Background: Tapentadol is a novel, centrally acting analgesic with μ-opioid receptor agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor activity.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release (ER) compared with oxycodone controlled release (CR) for management of moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain.
Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multicentre, phase III study during which patients received tapentadol ER, oxycodone CR or placebo for a 3-week titration period followed by a 12-week maintenance period. The study was carried out at sites in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the US. A total of 1030 patients with chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain were randomized to receive tapentadol ER 100–250 mg twice daily, oxycodone HCl CR 20–50 mg twice daily or placebo. Primary endpoints (as determined prior to initiation of the study) were the changes from baseline in average daily pain intensity (rated by patients on an 11-point numerical rating scale) over the last week of maintenance and over the entire 12-week maintenance period; last observation carried forward was used to impute missing values after early treatment discontinuation.
Results: Efficacy and safety were evaluated for 1023 patients. Tapentadol ER significantly reduced average pain intensity from baseline to week 12 of the maintenance period versus placebo (least squares mean [LSM] difference [95% CI], −0.7 [−1.04, −0.33]), and throughout the maintenance period (−0.7 [−1.00, −0.33]). Oxycodone CR significantly reduced average pain intensity from baseline throughout the maintenance period versus placebo (LSM difference [95% CI], −0.3 [−0.67, −0.00]) but not at week 12 (−0.3 [−0.68, 0.02]). A significantly higher percentage of patients achieved ≥50% improvement in pain intensity in the tapentadol ER group (32.0% [110/344]) compared with the placebo group (24.3% [82/337]; p = 0.027), indicating a clinically significant improvement in pain intensity, while a significantly lower percentage of patients achieved ≥50% improvement in pain intensity in the oxycodone CR group (17.3% [59/342]; p = 0.023 vs placebo). In the placebo, tapentadol ER and oxycodone CR groups, respectively, 61.1% (206/337), 75.9% (261/344) and 87.4% (299/342) of patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); incidences of gastrointestinal-related TEAEs were 26.1% (88/337), 43.0% (148/344) and 67.3% (230/342).
Conclusion: Treatment with tapentadol ER 100–250 mg twice daily or oxycodone HCl CR 20–50 mg twice daily was effective for the management of moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis-related knee pain, with substantially lower incidences of gastrointestinal-related TEAEs associated with treatment with tapentadol ER than with oxycodone CR. [Trial registration number: NCT00421928 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier)]
Oxycodone Less Square Mean Maintenance Period Tapentadol Opioid Withdrawal
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This study was funded by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. M. Afilalo received funding for study support from Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. M. Etropolski, B. Kuperwasser, K. Kelly, A. Okamoto, I. Van Hove, C. Rauschkolb, and J. Haeussler are Johnson & Johnson employees and shareholders. A. Steup and B. Lange are employees of Grünenthal GmbH. Editorial support for the writing of this manuscript was provided by Cherie Koch, PhD, of MedErgy, and was funded by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Services, L.L.C., and Grünenthal GmbH. M. Afilalo, who is not employed by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Services, L.L.C., or Grünenthal GmbH, was not compensated for his contribution to the writing of this manuscript and has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study. Although writing assistance was provided, the authors retained full editorial control over the content of the manuscript.
Corti MC, Rigon C. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: prevalence, risk factors and functional impact. Aging Clin Exp Res 2003 Oct; 15(5): 359–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
Breedveld FC. Osteoarthritis: the impact of a serious disease. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004 Feb; 43Suppl. 1: i4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008 Feb; 16(2): 137–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz WA. Use of nonopioid analgesics and adjunctive agents in the management of pain in rheumatic diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002 Jan; 14(1): 63–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani M, Rochon PA, Juurlink DN, et al. Observational study of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in elderly patients given selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ 2002 Sep 21; 325(7365): 624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalso E, Edwards JE, Moore RA, et al. Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety. Pain 2004 Dec; 112(3): 372–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlan AD, Sandoval JA, Mailis-Gagnon A,et al. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and side effects. CMAJ 2006 May 23; 174(11): 1589–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivitz A, Ma C, Ahdieh H, et al. A 2-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase III trial comparing the efficacy of oxymorphone extended release and placebo in adults with pain associated with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Clin Ther 2006 Mar; 28(3): 352–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markenson JA, Croft J, Zhang PG, et al. Treatment of persistent pain associated with osteoarthritis with controlled-release oxycodone tablets in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain 2005 Nov; 21(6): 524–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portenoy RK. Opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant pain: a review of the critical issues. J Pain Symptom Manage 1996 Apr; 11(4): 203–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christo PJ. Opioid effectiveness and side effects in chronic pain. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003 Dec; 21(4): 699–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNicol E, Horowicz-Mehler N, Fisk RA, et al. Management of opioid side effects in cancer-related and chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review. J Pain 2003 Jun; 4(5): 231–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trescot AM, Glaser SE, Hansen H, et al. Effectiveness of opioids in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Pain Physician 2008 Mar; 11(2 Suppl.): S181–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pappagallo M. Incidence, prevalence, and management of opioid bowel dysfunction. Am J Surg 2001 Nov; 182(5A Suppl.): 11S–8SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzschentke TM, Christoph T, Kögel B, et al. (−)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-Dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride (tapentadol HCl): a novel μ-opioid receptor agonist/ norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with broad-spectrum analgesic properties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2007 Oct; 323(1): 265–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter GT, Sullivan MD. Antidepressants in pain management. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2002 Mar; 3(3): 454–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
Max MB, Lynch SA, Muir J, et al. Effects of desipramine, amitriptyline, and fluoxetine on pain in diabetic neuropathy. N Engl J Med 1992 May 7; 326(19): 1250–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossipov MH, Malseed RT, Goldstein FJ. Augmentation of central and peripheral morphine analgesia by desipramine. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1982 Oct; 259(2): 222–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tzschentke TM, De Vry J, Terlinden R, et al. Tapentadol HCl. Drugs Future 2006; 31(12): 1053–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 1986 Aug; 29(8): 1039–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988 Dec; 15(12): 1833–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
Farrar JT, Young Jr JP, LaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001 Nov; 94(2): 149–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware Jr JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993Google Scholar
Slappendel R, Simpson K, Dubois D, et al. Validation of the PAC-SYM questionnaire for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain 2006 Apr; 10(3): 209–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handelsman L, Cochrane KJ, Aronson MJ, et al. Two new rating scales for opiate withdrawal. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1987; 13(3): 293–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008 Feb; 9(2): 105–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzschentke TM, Jahnel U, Kogel B, et al. Tapentadol hydrochloride: a next-generation, centrally acting analgesic with two mechanisms of action in a single molecule. Drugs Today (Barc) 2009 Jul; 45(7): 483–96Google Scholar
Minami K, Uezono Y, Ueta Y. Pharmacological aspects of the effects of tramadol on G-protein coupled receptors. J Pharmacol Sci 2007 Mar; 103(3): 253–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennies HH, Friderichs E, Schneider J. Receptor binding, analgesic and antitussive potency of tramadol and other selected opioids. Arzneimittelforschung 1988 Jul; 38(7): 877–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
Barann M, Urban B, Stamer U, et al. Effects of tramadol and O-demethyl-tramadol on human 5-HT reuptake carriers and human 5-HT3A receptors: a possible mechanism for tramadol-induced early emesis. Eur J Pharmacol 2006 Feb 15; 531(1–3): 54–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buynak R, Shapiro D, Okamoto A, et al. Efficacy and safety of tapentadol ER for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase III study [abstract no. 301]. J Pain 2009 Apr; 10(4 Suppl. 1): S50Google Scholar
Wild JE, Grond S, Kuperwasser B, et al. Long-term safety and tolerability of tapentadol extended release for the management of chronic low back pain or osteoarthritis pain. Pain Pract. In pressGoogle Scholar
Babul N, Noveck R, Chipman H, et al. Efficacy and safety of extended-release, once-daily tramadol in chronic pain: a randomized 12-week clinical trial in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Pain Symptom Manage 2004 Jul; 28(1): 59–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual MLG, Fleming RRB, Gana TJ, et al. Open-label study of the safety and effectiveness of long-term therapy with extended-release tramadol in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23(10): 2531–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorsanger GJ, Xiang J, Gana TJ, et al. Extended-release tramadol (tramadol ER) in the treatment of chronic low back pain. J Opioid Manag 2008 Mar; 4(2): 87–97PubMedGoogle Scholar