Sports Medicine

, Volume 39, Issue 11, pp 889–901 | Cite as

Design of the iPlay Study

Systematic Development of a Physical Activity Injury Prevention Programme for Primary School Children
  • Dorine C. M. Collard
  • Mai J. M. ChinapawEmail author
  • Willem van Mechelen
Leading Article


Health benefits of physical activity in children are well known. However, a drawback is the risk of physical activity-related injuries. Children are at particular risk for these injuries, because of a high level of exposure. Because of the high prevalence of physical activity injuries and the negative short- and long-term consequences, prevention of these injuries in children is important. This article describes how we systematically developed a school-based physical activity injury prevention programme using the intervention mapping (IM) protocol.

IM describes a process for developing theory- and evidence-based health promotion programmes. The development can be described in six steps: (i) perform a needs assessment; (ii) identify programme and performance objectives; (iii) select methods and strategies; (iv) develop programme; (v) adopt and implement; and (vi) evaluate.

First, the results of the needs assessment showed the injury problem in children and the different risk factors for physical activity injuries. Based on the results of the needs assessment the main focus of the injury prevention programme was described. Second, the overall programme objective of the injury prevention programme was defined as reducing the incidence of lower extremity physical activity injuries. Third, theoretical methods and practical strategies were selected to accomplish a decrease in injury incidence. The theoretical methods used were active learning, providing cues and scenariobased risk information, and active processing of information. The practical strategy of the injury prevention programme was an 8-month course about injury prevention to be used in physical education classes in primary schools. Fourth, programme materials that were used in the injury prevention programme were developed, including newsletters for children and parents, posters, exercises to improve motor fitness, and an information website. Fifth, an implementation plan was designed in order to ensure that the prevention programme would be implemented, adopted and sustained over time. Finally, an evaluation plan was designed. The injury prevention programme is being evaluated in a cluster randomized controlled trial with more than 2200 children from 40 primary schools throughout the Netherlands.

The IM process is a useful process for developing an injury prevention programme. Based on the steps of the IM we developed an 8-month injury prevention programme to be used in physical education classes of primary schools.


Physical Education Injury Prevention Focus Group Interview Intervention Mapping Physical Education Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The iPlay study is supported by a grant from the Netherlands organization for health research and development (ZONMW), grant number 62200033. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.


  1. 1.
    Adirim TA, Cheng TL. Overview of injuries in the young athlete. Sports Med 2003; 33 (1): 75–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ekblom B, Astrand PO. Role of physical activity on health in children and adolescents. Act Paediatr 2000 Jul; 89 (7): 762–4Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hallal PC, Victora CG, Azevedo MR, et al. Adolescent physical activity and health: a systematic review. Sports Med 2006; 36 (12): 1019–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Best TM, van Mechelen W, Verhagen E. The pediatric athlete: are we doing the right thing? Clin J Sport Med 2006 Nov; 16 (6): 455–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emery CA. Risk factors for injury in child and adolescent sport: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Sport Med 2003 Jul; 13 (4): 256–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emery CA. Injury prevention and future research. Med Sport Sci 2005; 49: 170–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emery CA, Meeuwisse WH, McAllister JR. Survey of sport participation and sport injury in Calgary and area highschools. Clin J Sport Med 2006 Jan; 16 (1): 20–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Backx FJG. Sports injuries in youth; etiology and prevention (thesis). Janus Jongbloed Research Center on Sports andHealth, the Netherlands. Utrecht: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1991Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Kemper HC. Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries: a review ofconcepts. Sports Med 1992 Aug; 14 (2): 82–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, et al. Intervention mapping: designing theory and evidence-based healthpromotion programs. Columbus (OH): McGraw-HillHigher Education, 2001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RA, et al. Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. J Health Psychol 2004 Jan; 9 (1): 85–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G. Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory- and evidence-basedhealth education programs. Health Educ Behav 1998 Oct; 25 (5): 545–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marchi AG, Di Bello D, Messi G, et al. Permanent sequelae in sports injuries: a population based study. Arch Dis Child 1999 Oct; 81 (4): 324–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kujala UM, Kettunen J, Paananen H, et al. Knee osteoarthritis in former runners, soccer players, weight lifters,and shooters. Arthritis Rheum 1995 Apr; 38 (4): 539–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flynn JM, Lou JE, Ganley TJ. Prevention of sports injuries in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 2002 Dec; 14 (6): 719–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelm J, Ahlhelm F, Pape D, et al. School sports accidents: analysis of causes, modes, and frequencies. J Pediatr Orthop 2001 Mar; 21 (2): 165–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hildebrandt VH, Ooijendijk WTM, Hopman-Rock M. Trendrapport: bewegen en gezondheid 2004-2005. Leiden:TNO Kwaliteit van Leven, 2007Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    SCP. Rapportage Sport 2006. The Hague: 2006Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    SCP. Rapportage jeugd 2002. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag, 2003Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kahl H, Dortschy R, Ellsasser G. Injuries among children and adolescents (1-17 years) and implementation of safetymeasures: results of the nationwide German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 2007 May; 50 (5-6): 718–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schneiders W, Rollow A, Rammelt S, et al. Risk-inducing activities leading to injuries in a child and adolescent populationof Germany. J Trauma 2007 Apr; 62 (4): 996–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sundblad G, Saartok T, Engstrom LM, et al. Injuries during physical activity in school children. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2005 Oct; 15 (5): 313–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toet H, Schoots W, den Hertog PC, et al. Kosten van sportblessures in Nederland. Amsterdam: Consument enVeiligheid, 2005Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, et al. Planning health promotion programs, an intervention mapping approach. San Fransico (CA): Jossey-Bass, 2006Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Caine D, Caine C, Maffulli N. Incidence and distribution of pediatric sport-related injuries. Clin J Sport Med 2006 Nov; 16 (6): 500–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klassen TP, MacKay JM, Moher D, et al. Communitybased injury prevention interventions. Future Child 2000; 10 (1): 83–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Machenbach J, van der Maas PJ. Volksgezondheid en gezondheidszorg. Maarsen: Elsevier Gezondheidszorg, 1999Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. New York (NY): Wiley, 1975Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs (NY): PrenticeHall, 1986Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    de Vries H, Dijkstra M, Kuhlman P. Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictorof behavioural intentions. Health Educ Res 1988; 3: 273–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kok G, de Vries H, Mudde A, et al. Planned health education and role of self-efficacy: Dutch research. Health Educ Res 1991; 6: 231–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Verstappen FT, Twellaar M, Hartgens F, et al. Physical fitness and sports skills in relation to sports injuries: a fouryearprospective investigation of sports injuries amongphysical education students. Int J Sports Med 1998 Nov; 19 (8): 586–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Emery CA, Cassidy D, Klassen TP. The effectiveness of a proprioceptive balance-training program in healthyadolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 749–54Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Heidt Jr RS, Sweeterman LM, Carlonas RL, et al. Avoidance of soccer injuries with preseason conditioning. Am J Sports Med 2000 Sep; 28 (5): 659–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hewett TE, Lindenfeld TN, Riccobene JV, et al. The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injuryin female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1999 Nov; 27 (6): 699–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Junge A, Rosch D, Peterson L, et al. Prevention of soccer injuries: a prospective intervention study in youth amateurplayers. Am J Sports Med 2002 Sep; 30 (5): 652–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Olsen OE, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, et al. Exercises to prevent lower limb injuries in youth sports: clusterrandomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005 Feb 26; 330 (7489): 449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Verhagen E, van der BA, Twisk J, et al. The effect of a proprioceptive balance board training program for theprevention of ankle sprains: a prospective controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2004 Sep; 32 (6): 1385–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brug J, Schaalma H, Kok G, et al. Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering, een planmatige aanpak. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2001Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Otis J, Lesage D, Godin G, et al. Predicting and reinforcing children’s intentions to wear protective helmets while bicycling. Public Health Rep 1992 May; 107 (3): 283–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Berg P, Westerling R. Bicycle helmet use among schoolchildren: the influence of parental involvement and children’sattitudes. Inj Prev 2001 Sep; 7 (3): 218–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Finch CF. Teenagers’ attitudes towards bicycle helmets three years after the introduction of mandatory wearing. Inj Prev 1996 Jun; 2 (2): 126–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Miller PA, Binns HJ, Christoffel KK. Children’s bicycle helmet attitudes and use: association with parental rules. The Pediatric Practice Research Group. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996 Dec; 150 (12): 1259–64Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zahler L, Puhse U, Stussi C, et al. Active childhood-healthy life. Basle: Swiss Federal Office of Sports Magglinger(FOSPO); Institute for Exercise and Health Science, Universityof Basle, 2004Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    van Berkel M, Consten A, Danes H, et al. Basisdocument; bewegingsonderwijs. Zeist: Jan Luiting Fonds, 2004Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Leyten C, Kemper H, Verschuur R. de MOPER hitheidstest: handleiding en prestatieschalen 9 t/m 11 jarigen. Haarlem: De Vrieseborch, 1982Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Adam C, Klissouras V, Ravazzolo M, et al. Handbook for the EUROFIT test of Physical Fitness. Brussels: Council of Europe committee for the development of sport, 1998Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a processevaluation plan for assessing health promotion programimplementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract 2005 Apr; 6 (2): 134–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, et al. RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource toimprove translation of research into practice. Ann Behav Med 2004 Oct; 28 (2): 75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorine C. M. Collard
    • 1
  • Mai J. M. Chinapaw
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Willem van Mechelen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research and Department of Public and Occupational HealthVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.Research Centre Body@Work TNO VUmcthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations