Background: Concierge medical practice is a relatively new and somewhat controversial development in primary-care practice. These practices promise patients more personalized care and dedicated service, in exchange for an annual membership fee paid by patients. The experiences of patients using these practices remain largely undocumented.
Objective: To assess the experiences of patients in a concierge medicine practice compared with those in a general medicine practice.
Methods: Stratified random samples of patients empanelled to each of the four doctors who practice at both a general medicine and a concierge medicine practice separately situated at an academic medical center were drawn. Patients were eligible for the study if they had a visit with the physician between January and May 2006. The study questionnaire (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Survey, supplemented with items from the Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey) was administered by mail to 100 general medicine patients per physician (n = 400) and all eligible concierge medicine patients (n = 201). Patients who completed the survey and affirmed the study physician as their primary-care physician formed the analytic sample (n = 344) that was used to compare the experiences of concierge medicine and general medicine patients. Models controlled for respondent characteristics and accounted for patient clustering within physicians using physician fixed effects.
Results: Patients’ experiences with organizational features of care, comprising care co-ordination (p < 0.01), access to care (p < 0.001) and interactions with office staff (p < 0.001), favored concierge medicine over general medicine practice. The quality of physician-patient interactions did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, the patients of the concierge medicine practice were more likely to report that their physician spends sufficient time in clinical encounters than patients of the general medicine practice (p < 0.003).
Conclusion: The results suggest patients of the concierge medicine practice experienced and reported enhanced service, greater access to care, and better care co-ordination than those of the general medicine practice. This suggests that further study to understand the etiology of these differences may be beneficial in enhancing patients’ experience in traditional primary-care practices.
Stein M. Independent personal medical care. J Am Physicians Surgeons 2007; 12(1): 28–9Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office. Physician services: concierge care characteristics and considerations for Medicare [report to Congressional Committees; GAO-05-929]. Washington, DC: US GAO, 2005 Aug [online]. Available from URL: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05929.pdf [Accessed 2008 Feb 17]Google Scholar
Carter J. What makes a high-earning family physician? Fam Pract Manag 2005 Jul; 12(7): 16, 19-20PubMedGoogle Scholar
Brennan TA. Luxury primary care: market innovation or threat to access? N Engl J Med 2002 Apr 11; 346(15): 1165–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landon BE, Aseltine Jr R, Shaul JA, et al. Evolving dissatisfaction among primary care physicians. Am J Manag Care 2002 Oct; 8(10): 890–901PubMedGoogle Scholar
Landon BE, Reschovsky JD, Pham HH, et al. Leaving medicine: the consequences of physician dissatisfaction. Med Care 2006 Mar; 44(3): 234–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery JE, Irish JT, Wilson IB, et al. Primary care experiences of medicare beneficiaries, 1998 to 2000. J Gen Intern Med 2004 Oct; 19(10): 991–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy J, Chang H, Montgomery JE, et al. The quality of physician-patient relationships: patients’ experiences 1996–1999. J Fam Pract 2001 Feb; 50(2): 123–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
Murray A, Montgomery JE, Chang H, et al. Doctor discontent: a comparison of physician satisfaction in different delivery system settings, 1986 and 1997. J Gen Intern Med 2001 Jul; 16(7): 452–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safran DG, Karp M, Coltin K, et al. Measuring patients’ experiences with individual primary care physicians: results of a statewide demonstration project. J Gen Intern Med 2006 Jan; 21(1): 13–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez HP, von GT, Chang H, et al. Patient samples for measuring primary care physician performance: who should be included? Med Care 2007 Oct; 45(10): 989–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stata Statistical Software. Release 10 [computer program]. College Station (TX): StataCorp LP, 2007Google Scholar
Damberg CL, Raube K, Williams T, et al. Paying for performance: implementing a statewide project in California. Qual Manag Health Care 2005 Apr; 14(2): 66–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez HP, Anastario MP, Frankel RM, et al. Can teaching agenda-setting skills to physicians improve clinical interaction quality? A controlled intervention. BMC Med Educ 2008; 8: 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tai-Seale M, McGuire T, Colenda C, et al. Two-minute mental health care for elderly patients: inside primary care visits. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007 Dec; 55(12): 1903–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res 2007 Oct; 42(5): 1871–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, et al. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health 2003 Apr; 93(4): 635–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, et al. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med 2005 May; 3(3): 209–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez HP, Rogers WH, Marshall RE, et al. The effects of primary care physician visit continuity on patients’ experiences with care. J Gen Intern Med 2007 Jun; 22(6): 787–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez HP, Rogers WH, Marshall RE, et al. Multidisciplinary primary care teams: effects on the quality of clinician-patient interactions and organizational features of care. Med Care 2007 Jan; 45(1): 19–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander GC, Kurlander J, Wynia MK. Physicians in retainer (“concierge”) practice: a national survey of physician, patient, and practice characteristics. J Gen Intern Med 2005 Dec; 20(12): 1079–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney J, Hausknecht D, Soutar G. Cognitive dissonance after purchase: a multidimensional scale. Psychol Marketing 2000 May; 17(5): 369–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goroll AH, Berenson RA, Schoenbaum SC, et al. Fundamental reform of payment for adult primary care: comprehensive payment for comprehensive care. J Gen Intern Med 2007 Mar; 22(3): 410–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995 May 1; 152(9): 1423–33PubMedGoogle Scholar