Disease Management & Health Outcomes

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 449–454

Effectiveness of a Structured Intensive Weight Loss Program Using Health Educators

  • James E. Rohrer
  • Harvey D. Cassidy
  • Diane Dressel
  • Barbara Cramer
Original Research Article



Primary care providers may refer their patients to a variety of weight loss programs and diet plans. However, the relative effectiveness of the available options is not well understood. This retrospective study compared weight loss in an intensive structured (IS) program using health educators versus weight loss in the general population of primary care patients seeking to lose weight using less intensive (LI) methods.


The IS program in this study is operated by Luther Midelfort Weight Management Services in Eau Claire, WI, USA, which is a part of the Mayo Health System. All consecutive patients enrolled in the IS program who met inclusion criteria were included in the sample. The LI group was a convenience sample of patients drawn from other Mayo Clinic locations who were surveyed to determine what, if any, approach to weight loss they were using. Weight loss strategies reported by potential LI participants included LA Weight Loss, Nutri-System®, SlimFast, Weight Watchers®, ‘own approach’, and other. Those who were not using a weight loss approach were excluded. The selection criteria for the study were that patients had a body mass index (BMI) of 35–50 kg/m2 and were aged 17–65 years. Weights were measured in clinic. The baseline year was 2005 and the follow-up year was 2006.


A total of 126 patients met the selection criteria: 71 in the IS group and 55 in the LI group. Outcome weights were available for 103 patients: 58 and 45 in the IS and LI groups, respectively. The mean weight changes were −18.8 (±15.7) kg and 0.87 (±5.9) kg for the IS and LI groups, respectively (p < 0.001). These results were confirmed using ordinary least squares regression analysis.


IS weight loss programs staffed by health educators may be effective for selected patients. Despite its limitations, this small study encourages further investigations into the effectiveness of high-intensity weight loss programs in patient populations of different race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and genetic background, after appropriate adjustments to assure cultural sensitivity. Further refinement and testing of moderate intensity programs is also warranted.


  1. 1.
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and interventions to prevent obesity in adults, topic page. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services 2006: recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsobes.htm [Accessed 2008 Nov 18]
  2. 2.
    Tsai A, Wadden T. Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2005 Jan 4; 142(1): 56–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dansinger M, Gleason J, Griffith J, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA 2005 Jan 5; 293(1): 43–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tate D, Wing R, Winett R. Using internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA 2001 Mar 7; 285(9): 1172–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tate D, Jackvony E, Wing R. Effects of internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003 Apr 9; 289(14): 1833–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wadden T, Berkowitz R, Womble L, et al. Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity. N Engl J Med 2005 Nov 17; 353(20): 2111–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giel KE, Binkele M, Becker S, et al. Weight reduction and maintenance in a specialized outpatient health care center. Obesity Res Clin Pract 2008; 2: 143–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linde J, Erickson D, Jeffery R. The relationship between prevalence and duration of weight loss strategies and weight loss among overweight managed care organization members enrolled in a weight loss trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006; 3(1): 3 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ijbnpa.Org/content/3/1/3 [Accessed 2008 Nov 26]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeffery R. How can health behavior theory be made more useful for intervention research?. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2004: 1(1): 10 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ijbnpa.Org/content/1/1/10 [Accessed 2008 Nov 26]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sherwood N, Jeffery R, Pronk N, et al. Mail and phone interventions for weight loss in a managed-care setting: Weigh-To-Be 2-year outcomes. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006 Oct; 30(10): 1565–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeffery R, McGuire M, Brelje K, et al. Recruitment to mail and telephone interventions for obesity in a managed care environment: the Weigh-To-Be project. Am J Manag Care 2004 Jun; 10(6): 378–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jeffery R, Sherwood N, Brelje K, et al. Mail and phone interventions for weight loss in a managed-care setting: Weigh-To-Be one-year outcomes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003 Dec; 27(12): 1584–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wing R, Tate D, Gorin A, et al. A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. N Engl J Med 2006 Oct 12; 355(15): 1563–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Winett R, Tate D, Anderson E, et al. Long-term weight gain prevention: a theoretically based internet approach. Prev Med 2005 Aug; 41(2): 629–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Truby H, Baic S, de Looy A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of four commercial weight loss programmes in the UK: initial findings from the BBC ‘diet trials’. BMJ 2006 Jun 3; 332(7553): 1309–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gardner C, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study. A randomized trial. JAMA 2007 Mar 7; 297(9): 969–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anderson J, Grant L, Gotthelf L, et al. Weight loss and long-term follow-up of severely obese individuals treated with an intense behavioral program. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006 Jul 4; 31: 488–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson J, Conley S, Nicholas A. One hundred pound weight losses with an intensive behavioral program: changes in risk factors in 118 patients with long-term follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr 2007 Aug; 86(2): 301–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Noakes M, Foster P, Keogh J, et al. Meal replacements are as effective as structured weight-loss diets for treating obesity in adults with features of metabolic syndrome. J Nutr 2004 Aug; 134(8): 1894–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mercer SL, DeVinney BJ, Fine LJ, et al. Study designs for effectiveness and translation research: identifying trade-offs. Am J Preventive Med 2007; 33(2): 139–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Link BG, Phelan JC. Review: why are some people healthy and others not? The determinants of health of populations. Am J Public Health 1996; 86(4): 598–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James E. Rohrer
    • 1
  • Harvey D. Cassidy
    • 2
  • Diane Dressel
    • 3
  • Barbara Cramer
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Mayo Clinic — JacksonvilleJacksonvilleUSA
  3. 3.Mayo Health System Midelfort ClinicEau ClaireUSA

Personalised recommendations