Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Use of Collaboration to Improve Outcomes in Chronic Disease

An Overview

Abstract

Chronic disease and collaboration (people ‘working in partnership’) have become ‘buzz’ words for health service delivery at the beginning of the 21st century. However, those working in the health field may not be aware of the different approaches aimed at improving healthcare and the impact they have had, and will continue to have, on chronic diseases. Collaboration can be formulated in a number of different ways, and can operate at a number of different levels both within and between groups of individuals and organizations.

The aim of this article is to outline four approaches to collaboration — epidemiologically focused collaborations, research-based consortiums, organizational-change collaborations, and patient-focused disease management strategies — currently employed to address the growing problem of chronic disease. We highlight the types of collaborations that may be of value when considering useful approaches to identifying evidence-based practice and how these might be implemented to improve patient outcomes, and deal with some potential barriers to change.

We identified 67 suitable papers that were grouped into four broad categories. Because of the variety of collaborations addressed, we targeted our review to highlight key groups as illustrative examples for discussion.

We found that epidemiological collaborations can useful for collecting and analyzing large amounts of data to provide evidence and develop guidelines for ensuring the most effective treatment is provided to the patient. They are also an effective tool for identifying barriers to evidence based treatments, such as access pathways to care. Collaborative Research Consortiums can provide a method for health providers to research or source best evidence and develop strategies for implementing specific evidence-based treatments into practice across a range of services within a given region. They also appear to be effective in raising awareness of specific issues (such as depression) in healthcare that can impact on patient outcomes. Organizational-change consortiums appear to provide an important mechanism that addresses to a degree, the translation of evidence developed by other research methods into clinical practice in a targeted step-wise strategy. Patient-focused disease management programs that work in a person-centered method, have demonstrated some capacity to create sustainable change once interventionist treatments have been identified; however, long-term management is required to maintain or improve outcomes.

All of these methods have shown benefit, but are limited by their own particular focus. To really harness their strengths, requires organizations to understand the potential value of all these methods and to develop a whole-of-health approach to implementing evidence into clinical practice if long-term sustainability is to become an achievable goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Preparing a healthcare workforce for the 21st century: the challenge of chronic conditions. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005

  2. 2.

    Strong K, Mathers C, Epping-Jordan J, et al. Preventing chronic disease: a priority for global health. Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35(2): 492–4

  3. 3.

    Glassman AH. Depression and cardiovascular morbidity. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2007; 9(1): 9–17

  4. 4.

    Jiang W, Krishnan RR, O’Connor CM. Depression and heart disease: evidence of a link, and its therapeutic implications. CNS Drugs 2002; 16: 111–27

  5. 5.

    Rumsfeld JS, Havranek E, Masoudi FA, et al. Depressive symptoms are the strongest predictors of short-term declines in health status in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1811–7

  6. 6.

    World Health Organization. WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health between WHO from the food, beverage, physical activity and insurance industries. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003

  7. 7.

    Wilson T, Buck D, Ham C. Rising to the challenge: will the NHS support people with long term conditions?. BMJ 2005; 330: 657–61

  8. 8.

    Cook ME, Cantor J. White paper on cardiovascular disease in New Jersey: review of current strategies and opportunities. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers Center for State Heath Policy, 2006 Oct [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cshp.rutgers.edu/Downloads/6760.pdf [Accessed 2008 Aug 15]

  9. 9.

    Lewis R, Dixon J. Rethinking management of chronic disease. BMJ 2004 Jan 24; 328(7433): 220–2

  10. 10.

    National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Outcomes research in cardiovascular disease [report of the NHLBI Working Group] 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/workshops/cvdoutcomes.htm [Accessed 2008 Sep 2]

  11. 11.

    Yach D, Lucio A, Barroso C. Can food and beverage companies help improve population health? Some insights from PepsiCo. Med J Australia 2007; 187(11–12): 656–7

  12. 12.

    Iowa Chronic Care Consortium. The comprehensive Wellness assessment project with Iowa Medicaid [online]. Available from URL: http://www.iowaccc.com/projects.cfm [Accessed 2007 Dec 10]

  13. 13.

    Parker III TF, Blantz R, Hostetter T, et al. The Chronic Kidney Disease Initiative. J Am Soc Nephrology 2004; 15: 708–16

  14. 14.

    Scott IA, Darwin IC, Harvey KH, et al. Multisite, quality-improvement collaboration to optimize cardiac care in Queensland public hospitals. Med J Aust 2004; 180(8): 392–7

  15. 15.

    Resnic FS, Foody J. Lessons learned from large clinical registries: special topics. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47(11 Suppl. D): 41–4

  16. 16.

    Georgakis A, Spertus J, Reid KJ, et al. The relationship between health insurance and long-term health status among acute myocardial infarction survivors: results from the PREMIER registry [abstract]. J Am Coll of Cardiology 2006; 47 Suppl. A: 256A

  17. 17.

    Aguiair CT, Ferreira JS. Compliance with contemporary guidelines for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: influence on outcome and interaction with risk stratification [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47 Suppl. A: 257A

  18. 18.

    Robinson K, Farmer T, Elliot S, et al. From heart health promotion to chronic disease prevention: contributions of the Canadian Heart Health Initiative [published errata appear in Prev Chron Dis 2007; 4 (3): A82 and Prev Chron Dis 2008; 5 (3): A105]. Prev Chron Dis 2007; 4 (2) [online]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2007/apr/06_0076.htm [Accessed 208 Aug 25]

  19. 19.

    Kilo CM. Improving care through collaboration. Pediatrics 1999; 103(1 Suppl. E): 384–03

  20. 20.

    Newton PJ, Davidson PM, Halcomb EJ, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the collaborative method: reflections from a single site. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 409–14

  21. 21.

    Kilo C. A framework for collaborative improvement: lessons from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s breakthrough series. Qual Manag Health Care 1998; 6: 1–13

  22. 22.

    Victorian Government Department of Human Services. Improving care: hospital admission risk program. Public report. Melbourne (VIC): Metropolitan Health and Aged Care Services Division, Victorian Government Department of Human Services, 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/harp-cdm/improvingcare.pdf [Accessed 2008 Aug 31]

  23. 23.

    Affiffi AA, Mroisky DE, Kominiski GF, et al. Impact of disease management on healthcare utilization: evidence from the ‘Florida: A Healthy State (FAHS)’ Medicaid Program. Prevent Med 2007; 44: 547–53

  24. 24.

    Berg GD, Wadhwa S. Health services outcomes for a diabetes disease management program for the elderly. Dis Manag 2007; 10: 226–34

  25. 25.

    Del Sindaco DA, Pulignano GB, Minardi G, et al. Two year outcome of a prospective, controlled study of a disease management programme for elderly patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007; 8(5): 324–9

  26. 26.

    Lytle BL, Frauio ES, Neelon BH, et al. What aspects of hospital culture influence quality? [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47 Suppl. A: 257A

  27. 27.

    Nallamothu BK, Bates ER, Polavarapu V, et al. Driving times and distances to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention in the US: implications for pre-hospital triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47 Suppl. A: 256A

  28. 28.

    Calvin JE, Roe M, Chen AY, et al. Insurance elevation and care of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145(10): 739–217

  29. 29.

    Pronovost P, Angus DC. Using large-scale databases to measure outcomes in critical care. Crit Care Clin 1999; 15(3): 615–31

  30. 30.

    Hoekstra JW, Pollack CV, Roe MT, et al. CRUSADE: a roadmap for change. 100 000 patients make a difference: interim analysis of the 100 000 patients enrollment milestone. A summary report by EMCREG-International 2005 Mar 2 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emcreg.org/pdf/monographs/crusade_web.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jun 14]

  31. 31.

    Dyke CK, Califf RM. National and regional registries: what good are they?. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1401–3

  32. 32.

    Boden WE, MacKay RG, Cabin HS, et al. The Connecticut Cardiovascular Consortium: a unique, state-wide research collaboration to advance clinical outcomes in patients with heart disease. Conn Med 2001; 65(10): 597–604

  33. 33.

    Bunker SJ, Colquhoun DM, Esler MD, et al. ‘Stress’ and coronary heart disease: psychosocial risk factors. National Heart Foundation of Australia position statement update. Med J Aust 2003; 178(6): 272 [online]. Available at: http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/178_06_170303/bunl0421_fm.html [Accessed 2007 May 11]

  34. 34.

    beyondblue: the national depression initiative [online]. Available from URL: http://www.beyondblue.org.au [Accessed 2008 Aug 15]

  35. 35.

    The National Heart Foundation of Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.heartfoundation.org.au/index.htm [Accessed 2008 Aug 15]

  36. 36.

    Jacobs AK, Antman EM, Faxon DP, et al. Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: executive summary. Circulation 2007; 116(2): 217–30

  37. 37.

    Jordan JE, Osborne RH. Chronic disease self-management education programs: challenges ahead. Med J Aust 2007; 186(2): 84–7

  38. 38.

    Burton HJ, Kline SA, Lindsay RM, et al. The relationship of depression to survival in chronic renal failure. Psychosom Med 1986; 48(3–4): 261–9

  39. 39.

    DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160(14): 2101–7

  40. 40.

    Odden MC, Whooley MA, Shlipak MG. Depression, stress, and quality of life in persons with chronic kidney disease: the Heart and Soul Study. Nephron Clin Pract 2006; 103(1): c1–7

  41. 41.

    Australian Government: Cancer Australia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/ [Accessed 2008 Aug 25]

  42. 42.

    UK Department of Health. R&D annual reports by NHS organisations in England for 2007: Birmingham and Solihull Research and Development Consortium [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nrr.nhs.uk/2007AnnualReports/Sectionl.asp?O=664 [Accessed 2008 Sep 3]

  43. 43.

    IOWA Chronic Care Consortium [online]. Available from URL: http://www.iowaccc.com/projects.cfm [Accessed 2007 Dec 10]

  44. 44.

    The Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cimit.org/ [Accessed 2008 Sep 2]

  45. 45.

    Cardiovascular Outcomes Inc. [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cvoutcomes.org/topics [Accessed 2007 Dec 12]

  46. 46.

    Heidenreich PA, Spertus JA, Jones PG, et al. Health status identifies heart failure outpatients at risk for hospitalization or death. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47(4): 752–6

  47. 47.

    Buse JB, Bigger JT, Byington RP, et al. The ACCORD Study Group. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial: design and methods. Am J Cardiology 2007; 99[12A]: 21i–33i

  48. 48.

    Martinuk A. Knowledge translation strategies using the ‘thinking about epilepsy’ program as a case study: Canadian Epilepsy Alliance [abstract]. World Psychiatric Association International Congress; 2007 Nov 28–Dec 2; Melbourne (VIC). Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2007; 41 Suppl. 2: A255

  49. 49.

    Lang ES, Wyer PC, Haynes PC. Knowledge translation: closing the evidence-to-practice gap. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49(3): 355–63

  50. 50.

    The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. IHI innovation series white paper. Boston (MA): Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2003

  51. 51.

    Cretin S, Shrotell SM, Keeler EB. An evaluation of collaborative interventions to improve chronic illness care: framework and study design. Eval Rev 2004; 28: 28–51

  52. 52.

    Newton PJ, Davidson PM, Halcomb EJ, et al. An introduction to the collaborative methodology and the potential to improve outcomes for people with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006; 21: 161–8

  53. 53.

    Kertai MD, Boersma E, Westerhout E, et al. A combination of statins and beta-blockers is independently associated with a reduction in the incidence of perioperative mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm survery. Eur J Vasc Surg 2004; 28(4): 343–52

  54. 54.

    Peter K, Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, et al. Perioperative beta-bocker therapy and mortality after major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 349–61

  55. 55.

    Brand C, Scott I, Greenberg P, et al. Chronic disease management: time for consultant physicians to take more leadership in system redesign. Int Med J 2007; 37(9): 653–9

  56. 56.

    Inglis SC, Pearson S, Treen S, et al. Extending the horizon in chronic heart failure: effects of multidisciplinary, home-based intervention relative to usual care. Circulation 2006; 114(23): 2466–73

  57. 57.

    Warsi A, Wang PS, LaValley MP, et al. Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164(15): 1641–9

  58. 58.

    Newman S, Steed L, Mulligan K. Self management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet 2004; 364(9444): 1523–37

  59. 59.

    Kennedy A, Gately C, Rogers A. EPP Evaluation Team. National evaluation of expert patient programme: assessing the process of embedding EPP in the NHS preliminary survey of PCT pilot sites. Manchester: NPCRDC, 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.npcrdc.ac.uk/publicationsArchive.cfm?ids=121,105&type=2 [Accessed 2008 Sep 1]

  60. 60.

    Zwar N, Harris M, Griffiths R. A systematic review of chronic disease management. Canberra (ACT): Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW, 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.anu.edu.au/aphcri/Domain/ChronicDiseaseMgmt/index.php [Accessed 2008 Sep 1]

  61. 61.

    Battersby MW. The SA Health Plus Team. Health reform through coordinated care: SA HealthPlus. BMJ 205; 330(7492): 662–5

  62. 62.

    Lydall-Smith S, Howard R, Staley C. Examining the impact of HARP-CDM interventions on hospital utilisation at St Vincent’s Hospital [internal report]. Melbourne (VIC): St Vincent’s 2007. (Data on file)

  63. 63.

    Lester H, Gask L. Delivering medical care for patients with serious mental illness or promoting a collaborative model of recovery?. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 188: 401–2

  64. 64.

    Castle DJ, Gilbert M. Collaborative therapy: framework for mental health. Br J Psychiatry; 2006; 189: 467–72

  65. 65.

    Gilbert M. Collaborative therapy program: a three year review [internal report]. Melbourne (VIC): Collaborative Therapy Unit, Mental Health Research Institute, 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.mhri.edu.au/ [Accessed 2008 Sep 3]

  66. 66.

    Astin F, Closs SJ. Chronic disease management and self-care support for people living with long-term conditions: is the nursing workforce prepared?. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16(7b): 105–6

  67. 67.

    Calman K. The profession of medicine. BMJ 1995; 310: 1140–3

  68. 68.

    Brooks P. The impact of chronic illness: partnerships with other healthcare professionals. Med J Aust 2003; 179(5): 260–2

  69. 69.

    Davis DA, Thompson MA, Oxman AD, et al. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995; 274: 700–5

  70. 70.

    Brooks PM. Organisation of healthcare: challenging the ‘ego systems’. Med J Aust 2000; 172: 445–7

  71. 71.

    Nguyen V, Ducharme A, White M, et al. Lack of long-term benefits of a 6 month heart failure disease management program. J Cardiac Failure 2007; 13: 287–93

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Correspondence to Monica Gilbert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, M., Staley, C., Lydall-Smith, S. et al. Use of Collaboration to Improve Outcomes in Chronic Disease. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 16, 381–390 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/0115677-200816060-00003

Download citation

Keywords

  • Disease Management
  • Disease Management Program
  • Chronic Disease Management
  • Collaborative Partnership
  • Chronic Disease Model