Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of pholcodine with that of dextromethorphan, one of the most used cough sedative products, in patients with acute, non-productive cough.
Methods: 129 adults with a diagnosis of acute, frequent, non-productive cough participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Medications were in a syrup formulation and were taken orally three times daily for 3 days. The efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline in the daytime and night-time cough frequency on 5-point scales at day 3, and cough intensity.
Results: A reduction of 1.4 and 1.3 points in the mean daytime cough frequency at day 3 was seen in the pholcodine and dextromethorphan groups, respectively, in the per-protocol population. The reduction in mean night-time cough was 1.3 for both groups. Cough intensity reduction was 0.7 for pholcodine and 0.8 for dextromethorphan.
Conclusions: These findings indicate that the efficacy of a 3-day course of pholcodine is similar to that of dextromethorphan in the treatment of adult patients with acute, non-productive cough. Both medications were well tolerated.
Chang AB, Newman RG, Carlin JB, et al. Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent-completed vs child-completed diary cards vs an objective method. Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 462–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catena E, Daffonchio L. Efficacy of levodropropizine in adult patients with non productive cough: comparison with dextrometorphan. Pulm Pharmacol Therap 1997; 10: 89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung KF. Measurement and assessment of cough. In: Chung KF, Widdicombe J, Boushey H, et al. editors. Cough: causes, mechanisms and therapy. 1st ed. Malden (MA): Blackwell, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrier P, Giudicelli R, Thuillier K, et al. Etude chimique, pharmacologique et clinique d’un nouveau sedative de la toux: la morpholyethylmorphine (M.E.M.). Ann Pharm Fr 1950; 8: 261–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
Heffron CE. Preliminary evaluation of pholcodine, a new antitussive agent. J New Drugs 1961; 1 (Sep–Oct): 217–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mullinos MG, Nair KG, Epstein IG. Clinical investigation of antitussive properties of pholcodine. NY State J Med 1962; 15: 2373–7Google Scholar
Edwards GF, Lewis HE, Stafford D. The effect of pholcodine with and without an antihistamine on cough and expectoration. Br J Dis Chest 1977; 71: 245–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffé G, Grimshaw JJ. Randomized single-blind trial in general practice comparing the efficacy and palatability of two cough linctus preparations, “Pholcolix” and “Actifed” compound, in children with acute cough. Curr Med Res Opin 1983; 8: 594–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell ES, Armitage P. Clinical comparison of diamorphine and pholcodine as cough suppressant. Lancet 1957 April 27; 272(6974): 860–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly DF. Comparative clinical test of pholcodine with codeine as control. Northwest Med 1963; 62: 871–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bolser DC. Cough suppressant and pharmacologic protussive therapy: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006; 129: 238–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthys H, Bleicher B, Bleicher U. Dextromethorphan and codeine: objective assessment of antitussive activity in patients with chronic cough. J Int Med Res 1983; 11(2): 92–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
Aylward M, Maddock J, Davies DE, et al. Dextromethorphan and codeine: comparison of plasma kinetics and antitussive effects. Eur J Resp Dis 1984 May; 65(4): 283–91Google Scholar
Lee PCL, Jawad MSM, Eccles R. Antitussive efficacy of dextromethorphan in cough associated with acute upper respiratory tract infection. J Pharm Pharmacol 2000; 52: 1137–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavesi L, Subburaji S, Porter-Shaw K. Application and validation of a computerized cough acquisition system for objective monitoring of acute cough: a meta-analysis. Chest 2001; 120: 1121–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee PCL, Jawad MSM, Hull JD, et al. The antitussive effect of placebo treatment on cough associated with acute upper respiratory infection. Psychosom Med 2005; 67: 314–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles R. Mechanisms of the placebo effect of sweet cough syrups. Resp Physiol Neurobiol 2006; 152: 340–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on drugs: use of codeine- and dextromethorphan-containing cough remedies in children. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 918–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder K, Fahey T. Over-the-counter medications for acute cough in children and adults in ambulatory settings. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004; Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001831.pub 2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001831.pub2Google Scholar