Advertisement

Treatments in Respiratory Medicine

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 67–77 | Cite as

Guidelines for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Are They Reflected in Practice?
  • Scott A. Flanders
  • Ethan A. HalmEmail author
Current Opinion

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common, costly, and clinically serious. Several national and international practice guidelines have been developed to promote more appropriate, cost-effective care for patients with CAP. This article compares and contrasts eight international practice guidelines for the management of CAP, describes the extent to which recommendations are reflected in practice, and proposes explanations for non-adherence to guidelines.

We found consistency in recommendations across all the guidelines for the management of patients with CAP requiring intensive care. In this setting, all guidelines recommend chest radiography, sputum Gram stain and culture, blood cultures, testing for Legionella pneumophila, and timely administration of antibiotics active against both typical (i.e. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae) and atypical organisms (i.e. Legionella spp., Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydia pneumoniae). Recommendations for the management of the average inpatient with pneumonia were more variable, with the greatest differences between the North American and European guidelines. The North American guidelines (in contrast to European ones), recommended empiric treatment of typical and atypical organisms in all inpatients. There were also differences in policies regarding the necessity of chest radiography, sputum studies, and serologic testing. Some guidelines explicitly embrace the use of prediction rules to inform the decision to hospitalize, while others do not. Some of these admission decision algorithms focus on identifying low risk patients, while others are most concerned with high risk patients. There was also considerable variation in the specificity and operationalization of clinical criteria for switching from parenteral to oral antibiotics or judging appropriateness for discharge. Many recommendations for key management decisions tended to lack explicit, objective, and actionable criteria that could be easily implemented in real world practice.

Review of the pneumonia literature revealed that physician performance of guideline-recommended best practices is often suboptimal. Administration of timely antibiotics (≤8 hours of presentation) and use of first-line antibiotics occurred in 75–85% and 18–79% of cases, respectively. Collection of blood cultures within 24 hours of presentation and prior to administration of antibiotics was achieved in 69–83% and 63–82% of cases, respectively. Screening the eligibility of CAP patients for hospital-based pneumococcal and influenza vaccination occurred on average in 11 and 14% of hospitalizations, respectively, in the US.

Lack of awareness of guidelines, conflicting advice among them, and lack of specific, objective, actionable recommendations most likely contribute to nonadherence to CAP guidelines. Increased attention to these factors will be needed if professional society practice guidelines are to fulfill their promise as tools for improving the quality and outcomes of care for patients with pneumonia.

Keywords

Influenza Vaccination American Thoracic Society Pneumococcal Vaccination European Respiratory Society British Thoracic Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Erin Hartman for her assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

Dr Halm is supported in part by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Generalist Physician Faculty Scholars Program.

Dr Flanders has received research support from Roche Pharmaceuticals and has received an honorarium from Roche and Ortho-McNeil.

References

  1. 1.
    Lave JR, Fine MJ, Sankey SS, et al. Hospitalized pneumonia: outcomes, treatment patterns, and costs in urban and rural areas. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11(7): 415–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Niederman MS, McCombs JS, Unger AN, et al. The cost of treating community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Ther 1998; 20(4): 820–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mortality patterns: United States, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999; 48(30): 664–8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults. Thorax 2001; 56Suppl. 4: IV1–164Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Culp WJ. Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilised in Boston? Lancet 1987; I(8543): 1185–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McMahon Jr LF, Wolfe RA, Tedeschi PJ. Variation in hospital admissions among small areas: a comparison of Maine and Michigan. Med Care 1989; 27(6): 623–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cleary PD, Greenfield S, Mulley AG, et al. Variations in length of stay and outcomes for six medical and surgical conditions in Massachusetts and California. JAMA 1991; 266(1): 73–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fine MJ, Singer DE, Phelps AL, et al. Differences in length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective four-hospital study. Med Care 1993; 31(4): 371–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCormick D, Fine MJ, Coley CM, et al. Variation in length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: are shorter stays associated with worse medical outcomes?. Am J Med 1999; 107(1): 5–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fine MJ, Stone RA, Singer DE, et al. Processes and outcomes of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) cohort study. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(9): 970–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fine MJ, Pratt HM, Obrosky DS, et al. Relation between length of hospital stay and costs of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med 2000; 109(5): 378–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gleason PP, Meehan TP, Fine JM, et al. Associations between initial antimicrobial therapy and medical outcomes for hospitalized elderly patients with pneumonia. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(21): 2562–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halm EA, Fine MJ, Kapoor WN, et al. Instability on hospital discharge and the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with pneumonia. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162(11): 1278–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meehan TP, Fine MJ, Krumholz HM, et al. Quality of care, process, and outcomes in elderly patients with pneumonia. JAMA 1997; 278(23): 2080–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Field MJ, Lohr KN. Committee to advise the public health service on clinical practice guidelines, Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines: directions of a new program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ERS Task Force Report. Guidelines for management of adult community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections: European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1998; 11(4): 986–91Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, Mandell LA, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31(2): 347–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niederman MS, Mandell LA, Anzueto A, et al. Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: Diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163(7): 1730–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reddy JC, Katz PP, Goldman L, et al. A pneumonia practice guideline and a hospitalist-based reorganization lead to equivalent efficiency gains. Am J Manag Care 2001; 7(12): 1142–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dean NC, Silver MP, Bateman KA, et al. Decreased mortality after implementation of a treatment guideline for community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med 2001; 110(6): 451–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halm EA, Atlas SJ, Borowsky LH, et al. Change in physician knowledge and attitudes after implementation of a pneumonia practice guideline. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14(11): 688–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atlas SJ, Benzer TI, Borowsky LH, et al. Safely increasing the proportion of patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated as outpatients: an interventional trial. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(12): 1350–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marrie TJ, Lau CY, Wheeler SL, et al. A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: CAPITAL Study Investigators. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Intervention Trial Assessing Levofloxacin. JAMA 2000; 283(6): 749–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Woolf SH. Manual for clinical practice guideline development. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1991: 91–1007Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines?: the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peerreviewed medical literature. JAMA 1999; 281(20): 1900–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, et al. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000; 355(9198): 103–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Choudhry NK, Stelfox HT, Detsky AS. Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA 2002; 287(5): 612–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomson R, Lavender M, Madhok R. How to ensure that guidelines are effective. BMJ 1995; 311(6999): 237–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mandell LA, Marrie TJ, Grossman RF, et al. Canadian guidelines for the initial management of community-acquired pneumonia: an evidence-based update by the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society. The Canadian Community-Acquired Pneumonia Working Group. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31(2): 383–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heffelfinger JD, Dowell SF, Jorgensen JH, et al. Management of community-acquired pneumonia in the era of pneumococcal resistance: a report from the Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Therapeutic Working Group. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160(10): 1399–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bartlett JG, Breiman RF, Mandell LA, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management: the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26(4): 811–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Niederman MS, Bass Jr JB, Campbell GD, et al. Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy: American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 148(5): 1418–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Switzer GE, Halm E, Mittman BS, et al. Physician familiarity with and use of local and national medical practice guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 124Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jencks SF, Cuerdon T, Burwen DR, et al. Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: a profile at state and national levels. JAMA 2000; 284(13): 1670–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gleason PP, Kapoor WN, Stone RA, et al. Medical outcomes and antimicrobial costs with the use of the American Thoracic Society guidelines for outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA 1997; 278(1): 32–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Battleman DS, Callahan M, Thaler HT. Rapid antibiotic delivery and appropriate antibiotic selection reduce length of hospital stay of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: link between quality of care and resource utilization. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162(6): 682–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meehan TP, Weingarten SR, Holmboe ES, et al. A statewide initiative to improve the care of hospitalized pneumonia patients: the Connecticut Pneumonia Pathway Project. Am J Med 2001; 111(3): 203–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jencks SF, Huff ED, Cuerdon T. Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998–1999 to 2000–2001 [published erratum appears in JAMA 2002; 289 (20): 2649]. JAMA 2003; 289(3): 305–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dedier J, Singer DE, Chang Y, et al. Processes of care, illness severity, and outcomes in the management of community-acquired pneumonia at academic hospitals. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161(17): 2099–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Meyer RJ, Town GI, Harre E, et al. An audit of the assessment and management of adults admitted to Christchurch Hospital with community acquired pneumonia. N Z Med J 1997; 110(1052): 349–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Metersky ML, Fine JM, Tu GS, et al. Lack of effect of a pneumonia clinical pathway on hospital-based pneumococcal vaccination rates. Am J Med 2001; 110(2): 141–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Missed opportunities for pneumococcal and influenza vaccination of Medicare pneumonia inpatients: 12 western states, 1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46(39): 919–923Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines?: a framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282(15): 1458–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Halm EA, Atlas SJ, Borowsky LH, et al. Understanding physician adherence with a pneumonia practice guideline: effects of patient, system, and physician factors. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160(1): 98–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336(4): 243–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dudas V, Hopefl A, Jacobs R, et al. Antimicrobial selection for hospitalized patients with presumed community-acquired pneumonia: a survey of nonteaching US community hospitals. Ann Pharmacother 2000; 34(4): 446–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mundy LM, Oldach D, Auwaerter PG, et al. Implications for macrolide treatment in community-acquired pneumonia: Hopkins CAP Team. Chest 1998; 113(5): 1201–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Houck PM, MacLehose RF, Niederman MS, et al. Empiric antibiotic therapy and mortality among medicare pneumonia inpatients in 10 western states: 1993, 1995, and 1997. Chest 2001; 119(5): 1420–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Flanders S. Pneumococcal vaccination prior to hospital discharge. In: Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, et al., editors. A critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 43, AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058; July 2001 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/ptsafety/ [Accessed 2004 Feb 18]Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Moore RA, Wiffen PJ, Lipsky BA. Are the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines effective?: meta-analysis of the prospective trials. BMC Fam Pract 2000; 1(1): 1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Niederman MS. Guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia: current recommendations and antibiotic selection issues. Med Clin North Am 2001; 85(6): 1493–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Weingarten S. Translating practice guidelines into patient care: guidelines at the bedside. Chest 2000; 118(2 Suppl.): 4S–7SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rhew DC, Riedinger MS, Sandhu M, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of a pneumonia practice guideline. Chest 1998; 114(1): 115–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tunis SR, Hayward RS, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120(11): 956–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, et al. Practice guidelines: what are internists looking for?. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11(3): 176–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, et al. Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1997; 156(12): 1715–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, et al. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ 1998; 317(7162): 858–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Internal Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Health PolicyMount Sinai School of MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations