High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 185–198 | Cite as

Metabolic Syndrome

Diagnosis and Clinical Management, an Official Document of the Working Group of the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Prevention (SIPREC)
  • Giorgio Sesti
  • Massimo Volpe
  • Francesco Cosentino
  • Gaetano Crepaldi
  • Stefano Del Prato
  • Giuseppe Mancia
  • Enzo Manzato
  • Alessandro Menotti
  • Antonio Tiengo
  • Augusto Zaninelli
2006 Consensus Document

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a complex clinical condition, characterised by a constellation of different metabolic and cardiovascular traits, typically high blood pressure, abdominal obesity, lipid profile abnormalities, insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. More recently, other features have been proposed; in particular, chronic proinflammatory and prothrombotic states seem to further characterise MS. Because of its multifactorial pathogenesis, a singular definition of this clinical condition is still debated, and physicians tend to make individual choices, e.g. the threshold for treatment initiation is heterogeneous. The lack of specific international guidelines, consisting of a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm with an accurate cardiovascular risk stratification, makes the clinical management of patients with MS by primary physicians difficult and non-uniform. In particular, while there is convincing evidence that the progressive addition of components of MS increase cardiovascular risk, there are no consistent indications regarding treatment priorities and strategies.

The Italian Society for Cardiovascular Prevention (Società Italiana di Prevenzione Cardiovascolare) [SIPREC], in the form of a panel of expert scientists operating in different areas of medicine, has compiled this consensus document in order to create a balanced and qualified document on the diagnosis and clinical management of MS. This document is focused on global risk-based stratification, aimed at identifying ‘low-risk’ and ‘high-risk’ patients within those presenting with MS. This approach may be particularly effective in clinical practice in identifying patients with MS with different degrees of cardiovascular disease risk profile. This approach may also be helpful to develop therapeutic strategies based on the global cardiovascular risk profile.

References

  1. 1.
    Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications, part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus: provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 539–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143–421Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balkau B, Charles MA, Drivsholm T, et al. European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR). Frequency of the WHO metabolic syndrome in European cohorts, and an alternative definition of an insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes Metab 2002; 28: 364–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grundy SM, Hansen B, Smith Jr SC, et al. Clinical management of metabolic syndrome: report of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Diabetes Association conference on scientific issues related to management. Circulation 2004; 109: 551–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus Group. The metabolic syndrome: a new worldwide definition. Lancet 2005; 366: 1059–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grundy SM, Brewer Jr HB, Cleeman JI, et al. for the American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation 2004; 109: 433–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bo S, Gentile L, Ciccone G, et al. The metabolic syndrome and high C-reactive protein: prevalence and differences by sex in a southern European population-based cohort. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2005; 21: 515–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, et al. Metabolic syndrome: epidemiology and more extensive phenotypic description: cross-sectional data from the Bruneck Study. Int J Obesity 2003; 27: 1283–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magi L, Stramenga C, Morosini P, per conto del Gruppo di Studio SIMAP. Prevalenza della sindrome metabolica in una zona territoriale della Regione Marche. Rec Prog Med 2005; 96: 280–3Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miccoli R, Bianchi C, Odoguardi L, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among Italian adults according to the ATPIII definition. Nutr Metab Cardiov Dis 2005; 15: 250–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menotti A, Lanti M, Zanchetti A, et al. Impact of the GUBBIO population study on community control of blood pressure and hypertension: GUBBIO Study Research Group. J Hypertens 2001; 18: 843–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mancia G, Bombelli M, Corrao G, et al. Metabolic syndrome in the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study: dDaily life blood pressure, cardiac damage and prognosis. Hypertension. Epub 2006 Nov 27Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maggi S, Noale M, Gallina P, for the ILSA Working Group. Metabolic syndrome, diabetes and cardiovascular disease in an elderly Caucasian cohort.: the Italian Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006; 61(5): 505–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dekker JM, Girman C, Rhodes T, et al. Metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn Study. Circulation 2005; 112: 666–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA 2002; 288: 2709–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanson RL, Imperatore G, Bennet PH, et al. Components of the metabolic syndrome and incidence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 51: 3120–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cuspidi C, Meani S, Fusi V, et al. Metabolic syndrome and target organ damage in untreated essential hypertensives. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1991–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schillaci G, Pirro M, Vaudo G, et al. Prognostic value of the metabolic syndrome in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1817–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    European Society of Hypertension (ESH)/European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertension 2003; 21: 1011–53Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kannel WB. Risk stratification in hypertension: new insights from the Framingham Study. Am J Hypertens 2000; 13(1 Pt 2): 3S–10SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malik S, Wong ND, Franklin SS, et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in United States adults. Circulation 2004; 110: 1245–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Whitlock EP, Williams SB, Gold R, et al. Screening and interventions for childhood overweight: a summary of evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics 2005; 116: e125–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Speiser PW, Rudolf MCJ, Anhalt H, et al. on behalf of the Obesity Consensus Working Group. Consensus statement: childhood obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 1871–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Daniels SR, Arnett DK, Eckel RH, et al. Overweight in children and adolescents: pathophysiology, consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation 2005; 111: 1999–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    American Diabetes Association Task Force for Writing Nutrition Principles and Recommendations for the Management of Diabetes and Related Complications. American Diabetes Association position statement: evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications. J Am Diet Assoc 2002; 102: 109–18Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome. An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005; 112: 2735–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss. An update of the 1997 American Heart Association Scientific statement on obesity and heart disease from the Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation 2006; 113: 898–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2006. Diabetes Care 2006; 29 Suppl. 1: S4–42Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1291–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Davi G, Guagnano MT, Ciabattoni G, et al. Platelet activation in obese women: role of inflammation and oxidant stress. JAMA 2002; 288: 2008–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mancia G, and Members of the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialist’s Collaboration. Effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1410–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mancia G, Grassi G, Zanchetti A. New-onset diabetes and antihypertensive drugs. J Hypertens 2006; 24: 3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Zwieten PA, Mancia G. Background and treatment of metabolic syndrome: a therapeutic challenge. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006 Sep; 10(3): 206–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Committee. 2003 ESH-ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–53Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Patrono C, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Landolfi R, et al. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2373–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bhatt DL, Fox KA, Hacke W, et al. CHARISMA Investigators: clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med 2006 Apr 20; 354(16): 1706–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Sesti
    • 1
  • Massimo Volpe
    • 2
  • Francesco Cosentino
    • 2
  • Gaetano Crepaldi
    • 3
  • Stefano Del Prato
    • 4
  • Giuseppe Mancia
    • 5
  • Enzo Manzato
    • 6
  • Alessandro Menotti
    • 7
  • Antonio Tiengo
    • 8
  • Augusto Zaninelli
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicineUniversity Magna GraeciaCatanzaroItaly
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, II Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Sant’Andrea HospitalRome, 1035-39Italy
  3. 3.Clinic Section for the Study of Aging, National Research Centre (CNR)University of PaduaPaduaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  5. 5.Department of Clinical Medicine, Prevention and Medical BiotechnologiesUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo HospitalMonzaItaly
  6. 6.Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  7. 7.Association for Cardiac ResearchRomeItaly
  8. 8.Department of Medical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  9. 9.School of Medicine, Italian College of General Practitioners (SIMG) and University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations