Advertisement

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 155–166 | Cite as

Modelling the Costs and Outcomes of Changing Rates of Screening for Alcohol Misuse by GPS in the Australian Context

  • Marian ShanahanEmail author
  • Anthony Shakeshaft
  • Richard P. Mattick
Original Research Article

Abstract

Aim: To assess the relative cost effectiveness of four strategies (academic detailing, computerised reminder systems, target payments and interactive continuing medical education) to increase the provision of screening and brief interventions by Australian GPs with the ultimate goal of decreasing risky alcohol consumption among their patients.

Methods: This project used a modelling approach to combine information on the effectiveness and costs of four separate strategies to change GP behaviours to estimate their relative cost effectiveness.

Results: The computerised reminder system and academic detailing appear most effective in achieving a decrease in the number of standard drinks consumed by risky drinkers.

Conclusion: Regardless of the assumptions made, the targeted payment strategy appeared to be the least cost-effective method to achieve a decrease in risky alcohol consumption while the other three strategies appear reasonably comparable.

Keywords

Continue Medical Education Standard Drink Reduce Alcohol Consumption Outreach Visit Risky Alcohol Consumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Alcohol Education Research Foundation (AERF) for funding this project and thank J. Fawcett and Associate Professor C. Doran for their contribution to the initial report; and Professor H. Britt and her team for providing data. The authors also thank Associate Professor K. Conigrave, Professor R. Sanson Fisher, Mr G. Powell Davies, and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Kreitman N. Alcohol consumption and the preventive paradox. Br J Addict 1986; 81: 353–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saunders J, Aasland O, Babor T, et al. Development of the alcohol use disorders test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption — II. Addiction 1993; 88: 791–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bien TH, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction 1993; 88: 315–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang G. Brief interventions for problem drinking and women. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 23: 1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    WHO Brief Intervention Study Group. A cross-national trial of brief interventions with trial drinkers. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 948–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wutzke SE, Shiell A, Gomel MK, et al. Cost effectiveness of brief interventions for reducing alcohol consumption. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 863–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Preventive and Community Medicine Committee of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. Aust Fam Physician 2002; 31: S1 27-8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aalto M, Pekuri P, Seppa K. Obstacles to carrying out brief intervention for heavy drinkers in primary health care: a focus group study. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003; 22: 169-73Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rush B, Powell L, Crowe T, et al. Early intervention for alcohol use: Family physicians’ motivations and perceived barriers. CMAJ 1995; 152: 863–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adams PJ, Powell A, McCormick R, et al. Incentives for general practitioners to provide brief interventions for alcohol problems. N Z Med J 1997; 110: 291–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McAvoy BR, Kaner EFS, Lock CA, et al. Our healthier nation: are general practitioners willing and able to deliver? A survey of attitudes to and involvement in health promotion and lifestyle counselling. Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 187–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durand MA. General practice involvement in the management of alcohol misuse: dynamics and resistances. Drug Alcohol Depend 1994; 35: 181–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babor T, Higgins-Biddle J. Alcohol screening and brief intervention: dissemination strategies for medical practice and public health. Addiction 2000; 95: 677–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roche A, Hotham E, Richmond R. The general practitioner’s role in AOD issues: overcoming individual, professional and systemic barriers. Drug Alcohol Rev 2002; 21: 223–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Botelho RJ, Richmond R. Secondary prevention of excessive alcohol use: assessing the prospects of implementation. Fam Pract 1996; 13: 182–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heather N. The public health and brief interventions for excessive alcohol consumption: the British experience. Addict Behav 1996; 21: 857–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deehan A, Marshall EJ, Strang J. Tackling alcohol misuse: opportunities and obstacles in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1779–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher RW, Campbell EM. Primary care practitioners and health promotion: a review of current practices. Health Promot J Austr 1996; 6: 22–31Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richmond R, Anderson P. Research in general practice for smokers and excessive drinkers in Australia and the UK. III: dissemination of interventions. Addiction 1994; 89: 49–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raupach J, Rogers WA, Magarey A, et al. Advancing health promotion in Australian general practice. Health Educ Behav 2001; 28: 352–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001; 39: 112–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hulscher MEJL, Wensing M, Grol R, et al. Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 737–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hulscher MEJL, Wensing M, van der Weijden T, et al. Interventions to implement prevention in primary care (Cochrane review). Available in The Cochrane Library [database on disk and CD ROM]. Updated quarterly. The Cochrane Collaboration; issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 1996Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wensing M, Grol R. Single and combined strategies for implementing changes in primary care: a literature review. Int J Qual Health Care 1994; 6: 115–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brown CA, Belfield CR, Field SJ. Cost-effectiveness of continuing professional development in health care: a critical review of the evidence. BMJ 2002; 324: 652–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mason J, Freemantle N, Nazareth I, et al. When is it cost-effective to change the behavior of health professionals? JAMA 2001; 286: 2988–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/aus/ah02/ah02-x01.pdf [Accessed 2005 Jun]
  28. 28.
    Britt H, Miller G, Knox S, et al. BEACH — Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health: a continuous national study of general practice activity [data collected and reported annually]. Canberra (ACT): University of Sydney and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2001–2004Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silagy C, Muir J, Coulter A, et al. Lifestyle advice in general practice: rates recalled by patients. BMJ 1992; 305: 871–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gomel MK, Wutzke SE, Hardcasle DM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to market and train primary health care physicians in brief intervention techniques for hazardous alcohol use. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 203–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ewing G, Selassie A, Lopez C, et al. Self-report of delivery of clinical preventative services by US physicians. Am J Prev Med 1999; 17: 62–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weller D, Litt C, Pols R, et al. Drug and alcohol related health problems in primary care: what do GPs think? Med J Aust 1992; 156: 43–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Heywood A, Ring I, Sanson-Fischer R, et al. Screening for cardiovascular disease and risk reduction counselling behaviors of general practitioners. Prev Med 1994; 23: 292–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fleming MF, Barry KL, Manwell LB, et al. Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers: a randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices. JAMA 1997; 227: 1039–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Richmond R, Heather N, Wodak A, et al. Controlled evaluation of a general practice-based brief intervention for excessive drinking. Addiction 1995; 90: 119–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wallace PG, Cutler S, Haines AP. Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner intervention in patients with excessive alcohol consumption. BMJ 1988; 297: 663–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ockene JK, Adams A, Hurley TG, et al. Brief physician and nurse practitioner delivered counseling for high-risk drinkers: does it work? Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 2198–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/aus/ah02/ah02-x01.pdf [Accessed 2004 May]
  39. 39.
    Lock CA, Kaner EFS, Heather N, et al. A randomized trial of three marketing strategies to disseminate a screening and brief alcohol intervention programme to general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 695–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McCormick R, Adams P, Powell A, et al. Encouraging general practitioners to take up screening and early intervention for problem use of alcohol: a marketing trial. Drug Alcohol Rev 1999; 18: 171–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hansen LJ, Olivarius N, Beich A, et al. Encouraging GPs to undertake screening and a brief intervention in order to reduce problem drinking: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 1999; 16: 551–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thomson O’Brien MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane review). Available in The Cochrane Library [database on disk and CD ROM]. Updated quarterly. The Cochrane Collaboration; issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 1997Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Medicare Australia. Health statistics, physician incentive program. Canberra (ACT): Australian Government, 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hic.gov.au/providers/health_statistics/statistical_reporting/pip.htm [Accessed 2004 May]Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cockburn J, Ruth D, Silagy C, et al. Randomised trial of three approaches for marketing smoking cessation programmes to Australian general practitioners. BMJ 1992; 304: 691–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lobo CM, Frijling BD, Hulscher ME, et al. Improving quality of organizing cardiovascular preventive care in general practice by outreach visitors: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2002; 35: 422–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bernal-Delgado E, Galeote-Mayor M, Pradas-Arnal F, et al. Evidence based educational outreach visits: effects on prescriptions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56: 653–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, et al. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education. JAMA 1995; 274: 700–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb CT, et al. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 301–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dexter PR, Wolinsky FD, Gramelspacher GP, et al. Effectiveness of computer-generated reminders for increasing discussions about advance directives and completion of advance directive forms: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 102–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bennett J, Glasziou P. Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 217–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Giuffrida A, Gosden T, Forland F, et al. Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane review). Available in The Cochrane Library [database on disk and CD ROM]. Updated quarterly. The Cochrane Collaboration; issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 1999Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kouides RW, Bennett NM, Lewis B, et al. Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. Am J Prev Med 1998; 14: 89–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ritchie LD, Bisset AF, Russell D, et al. Primary and preschool immunisation in Grampian: progress and the 1990 contract. BMJ 1992; 304: 816–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Australian Department of Health and Aging. Medicare benefits schedule. Canberra (ACT): Australian Department of Health and Aging, 2004Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Silagy C, May F. An overview of current practices of academic detailing in Australia and internationally. Adelaide (SA): Flinders University, 1997 DecGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wilson D, Siliska D, Singer J, et al. Family physicians and exercise counselling: can they be influenced to provide more? Can Fam Physician 1992; 38: 2003–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    HIC (Health Insurance Commission). Practice incentive program [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hic.gov.au/providers/incentives_allowances/pip.htm [Accessed 2004 May]
  58. 58.
    HIC (Health Insurance Commission). GP II statistics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hic.gov.au/providers/health_statistics/statistical_reporting/immunisation_coverage.htm [Accessed 2004 May]
  59. 59.
    Productivity Commission. General Practice Administration and Compliance Costs. Canberra (ACT): Commonwealth of Australia, 2003Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian alcohol guidelines: health risks and benefits. Canberra (ACT): National Health & Medical Research Council, 2001Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lewis C, Claney C, Leake B, et al. The counselling practices of internists. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 54–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Calnan M, Williams S. Coronary heart disease prevention: the role of the general practitioner. Fam Pract 1993; 10: 137–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Spandorfer J, Yedy I, Turner B. Primary care physicians’ views on screening and management of alcohol abuse: inconsistencies with national guidelines. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 899–902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shanahan M, Doran C, Gibson A, et al. Interventions for excessive alcohol use: costs and outcomes of pharmacotherapies and other treatments. Sydney (NSW): National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, 2005Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wensing M, van der Weijden T, Grol R. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective? Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 991–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Fleming M, Manwell L, Barry K, et al. Brief physician advice for alcohol problems in older adults: a randomized community-based trial. J Fam Pract 1999; 48: 378–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lock CA, Kaner EFS. Use of marketing to disseminate brief alcohol intervention to general practitioners: promoting health care interventions to health promoters. J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 6: 345–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Thomson O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman A, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane review). Available in The Cochrane Library [database on disk and CD ROM]. Updated quarterly. The Cochrane Collaboration; issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2001Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bauchner H, Simpson L, Chessare J. Changing physician behaviour. Arch Dis Child 2001; 84: 459–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. Primary care initiatives, enhanced primary care package. Canberra (ACT): Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, 1999Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing physicians’ practices. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1271–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Town R, Kane R, Johnson P, et al. Economic incentives and physicians’ delivery of preventive care. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28: 234–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Shand F, Gates J, Fawcett J, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of alcohol problems. Canberra (ACT): Australian Government Department of Health and Aging, 2003Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Evans R. Towards a healthier economics: reflections on Ken assetts problem. In: Barer M, Getzen T, Stoddart G, editors. Health, health care, and health economics. Perspectives on distribution. Toronto (ON): Wiley, 1998: 465–500Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gold MR, Seigel JE, Russell LB, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Goodman AC, Nishiura E, Humphreys RS. Cost and usage impacts of treatment initiation: a comparison of alcoholism and drug abuse treatments. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1997; 21: 931–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Beich A, Thorsen T, Rollnick S. Screening in brief intervention trials targeting excessive drinkers in general practice: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 327: 536–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Fawcett J, Shakeshaft A, Harris M, et al. Using AUDIT to classify patients into Australian alcohol guideline categories. Med J Aust 2004; 180: 598PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Shakeshaft A, Frankish C. Using patient-driven computers to provide cost-effective prevention in primary care: a conceptual framework. Health Promot Int 2003; 18: 67–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Yarnall KSH, Pollak Kl, Ostbye T, et al. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 635–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marian Shanahan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anthony Shakeshaft
    • 1
  • Richard P. Mattick
    • 1
  1. 1.National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC)University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations