To Retain or Remove User Fees?
- 799 Downloads
Many low- and middle-income countries continue to search for better ways of financing their health systems. Common to many of these systems are problems of inadequate resource mobilisation, as well as inefficient and inequitable use of existing resources. The poor and other vulnerable groups who need healthcare the most are also the most affected by these shortcomings. In particular, these groups have a high reliance on user fees and other out-of-pocket expenditures on health which are both impoverishing and provide a financial barrier to care.
It is within this context, and in light of recent policy initiatives on user fee removal, that a debate on the role of user fees in health financing systems has recently returned. This paper provides some reflections on the recent user fees debate, drawing from the evidence presented and subsequent discussions at a recent UNICEF consultation on user fees in the health sector, and relates the debate to the wider issue of access to adequate healthcare. It is argued that, from the wealth of evidence on user fees and other health system reforms, a broad consensus is emerging. First, user fees are an important barrier to accessing health services, especially for poor people. They also negatively impact on adherence to long-term expensive treatments. However, this is offset to some extent by potentially positive impacts on quality. Secondly, user fees are not the only barrier that the poor face. As well as other cost barriers, a number of quality, information and cultural barriers must also be overcome before the poor can access adequate health services. Thirdly, initial evidence on fee abolition in Uganda suggests that this policy has improved access to outpatient services for the poor. For this to be sustainable and effective in reaching the poor, fee removal needs to be part of a broader package of reforms that includes increased budgets to offset lost fee revenue (as was the case in Uganda). Fourthly, implementation matters: if fees are to be abolished, this needs clear communication with a broad stakeholder buy-in, careful monitoring to ensure that official fees are not replaced by informal fees, and appropriate management of the alternative financing mechanisms that are replacing user fees. Fifthly, context is crucial. For instance, immediate fee removal in Cambodia would be inappropriate, given that fees replaced irregular and often high informal fees. In this context, equity funds and eventual expansion of health insurance are perhaps more viable policy options. Conversely, in countries where user fees have had significant adverse effects on access and generated only limited benefits, fee abolition is probably a more attractive policy option.
Removing user fees has the potential to improve access to health services, especially for the poor, but it is not appropriate in all contexts. Analysis should move on from broad evaluations of user fees towards exploring how best to dismantle the multiple barriers to access in specific contexts.
KeywordsEquity Fund Informal Payment Conditional Cash Transfer Catastrophic Health Expenditure Cost Barrier
This paper reflects its authors’ personal views and does not necessarily represent the view of their organisations or institutes.
No funding has been provided to the authors of this paper by UNICEF. The role of UNICEF was limited to convening the expert consultation on user fees in the health sector. The decision to co-author a paper summarising the discussions and conclusions of the expert consultation was a joint decision by all authors.
No conflict of interest is discernible for any of the authors of the paper.
All authors have made significant contributions to the paper.
We would also like to acknowledge the insightful comments from an anonymous reviewer.
- 2.Witter S. An unnecessary evil? User fees for healthcare in low-income countries. London: Save the Children Fund UK, 2005Google Scholar
- 4.Preker AS, Carrin G, editors. Health financing for poor people: resource mobilization and risk sharing. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005Google Scholar
- 9.Soucat A, Gandaho T, Levy-Bruhl D, et al. Health seeking behaviour and household health expenditures in Benin and Guinea: the equity implications of the Bamako Initiative. Int J Health Plann Manage 1997; 12 Suppl. 1: S137–63Google Scholar
- 14.Fafchamps M, Minten B. Public service provision, user fees, and political turmoil. Oxford: Oxford Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford, 2003Google Scholar
- 16.United Kingdom Department for International Development [online]. Available from URL: http://www.dfid.gov.uk/news/files/Speeches/wp2006-speeches/servicesl60206.asp [Accessed 2006 Feb 23]
- 17.G8 Gleneagles 2005. UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fco.gov.uk/Files/kfile/PostG8_Gleneagles_Africa,0.pdf [Accessed 2006 Feb 23]
- 19.Bate A, Witter S. Coping with community health financing: illness costs and their implications for poor households’ abilities to pay for health care and children’s access to health services. London: Save the Children UK, 2003Google Scholar
- 25.Russell S, Abdella K. Too poor to be sick: coping with the costs of illness in East Hararghe, Ethiopia. London: Save the Children UK, 2002Google Scholar
- 33.Uzochukwu B, Onwujekwe O, Eriksson B. Inequity in the Bamako Initiative programme: implications for the treatment of malaria in south-east Nigeria. Int J Health Plann Manage 2004; 19 Suppl. 1: S107–16Google Scholar
- 35.Abdu Z, Mohammed Z, Bashier I, et al. The impact of user fee exemption on service utilization and treatment seeking behaviour: the case of malaria in Sudan. Int J Health Plann Manage 2004; 19 Suppl. 1: S95–106Google Scholar
- 37.Laterveer L, Munga M, Schwerzel P. Equity implications of health sector user fees in Tanzania: do we retain the user fee or do we set the user free? Leusden, The Netherlands: ETC Crystal for REPOA, 2004Google Scholar
- 39.Blas E, Limbambala M. User-payment, decentralization and health service utilization in Zambia. Health Policy Plan 2001; 16 Suppl. 2: 19–28Google Scholar
- 40.Zigora T. An evaluation of the abolition of user fees at rural health centres and rural hospitals. Harare, Zimbabwe: Blair Laboratory for Ministry of Health, 1996Google Scholar
- 41.World Health Organization. World health report 2000: world health systems — improving performance. Geneva: WHO, 2000Google Scholar
- 42.World Health Organization. Resolution on sustainable health financing, universal coverage and social health insurance. Geneva: WHO, 2005Google Scholar
- 43.Carrin G, James C, Evans D. Achieving universal coverage: developing the health financing system. Technical Briefs for Policymakers number 1. Geneva: WHO, 2005Google Scholar
- 44.Xu K, Evans D, Carrin G, et al. Designing health financing systems to reduce catastrophic health expenditure. Technical Briefs for Policymakers number 2. Geneva: WHO, 2005Google Scholar
- 45.World Health Organization. The practice of user fees at the point of service delivery for HIV/AIDS treatment and care. WHO discussion paper. Geneva: WHO, 2005Google Scholar
- 46.World Bank. HNP sector strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1997Google Scholar
- 47.World Bank. Health financing revisted. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006Google Scholar
- 51.Kutzin J, Meimanaliev T, Ibraimava A, et al. Formalizing informal payments in Kyrgyz hospitals: evidence from phased implementation of financing reforms. Fourth International Conference of the International Health Economics Association; 2003 Jun 15–18; San Francisco (CA)Google Scholar
- 53.Gertler P, Van der Gaag J. The willingness to pay for medical care: evidence from two developing countries. Baltimore (MD): Published for the World Bank [by] Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990Google Scholar
- 55.Desclaux A, Ciss M, Taverne B, et al. Access to antiretroviral drugs and AIDS management in Senegal. AIDS 2003; 17 Suppl. 3: S95–101Google Scholar
- 57.The Antiretroviral Therapy in Lower Income Countries (ARTLINC) Collaboration and ART Cohort Collaboration (ARTCC) groups. Mortality of HIV-1-infected patients in the first year of antiretroviral therapy: comparison between low-income and high-income countries. Lancet 2006; 367: 817–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 58.Bitran R, Giedion U. Waivers and exemptions for health services in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003Google Scholar
- 60.Arhin-Tenkorang D. Mobilizing resources for health: the case for user fees revisited. Commission on Macroeconomics and Health working paper series no. WG3:6. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000Google Scholar
- 63.Pearson M. Issues paper: the case for abolition of user fees. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre, 2004Google Scholar
- 64.Singh A. Building on the user-fee experience: the African case. Discussion paper number 3. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003Google Scholar
- 65.World Health Organization. World health report 2005: make every mother and child count. Geneva: WHO, 2005Google Scholar
- 70.World Bank. Making services work for poor people. World development report. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2004Google Scholar
- 77.Tashobya CK, McPake B, Nabyonga J, et al. Health sector reforms and increasing access to health services by the poor: what role has the abolition of user fees played in Uganda? In: Tashobya CK, Ssengooba F, Olivera-Cruz V, editors. Health systems in Uganda: processes and outputs. London: Health Systems Development Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 2006: 45–60Google Scholar
- 78.World Bank. Madagascar health sector note. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005Google Scholar
- 80.Carrin G, James C, Adelhardt M, et al. Health financing reform in Kenya: assessing the social health insurance proposal. South Afr Med J. In pressGoogle Scholar
- 85.World Health Organization. Sustainable health financing, universal coverage and social health insurance. WHA58.33, WHO resolution. Geneva: WHO, 2005Google Scholar
- 86.Gwatkin D. For whom to buy? Are free government health services the best way to reach the poor? In: Preker A, Langenbrunner J, editors. Spending wisely: buying health services for the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005: 47–60Google Scholar
- 87.Atim C. Financial factors affecting the slow progress in reaching agreed targets on HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria in Africa. Contribution to background technical documents of African Heads of State Summit on HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria, Abudja, 2-4 May 2006. London: DFiD Health Resource Centre, 2006Google Scholar