Burning a hole in the budget
- 71 Downloads
Smoking is an expensive habit. Smoking households spend, on average, more than $US1000 annually on cigarettes. When a family member quits, in addition to the former smoker’s improved long-term health, families benefit because savings from reduced cigarette expenditures can be allocated to other goods. For households in which some members continue to smoke, smoking expenditures crowd-out other purchases, which may affect other household members, as well as the smoker. We empirically analyse how expenditures on tobacco crowd-out consumption of other goods, estimating the patterns of substitution and complementarity between tobacco products and other categories of household expenditure. We use the Consumer Expenditure Survey data for the years 1995–2001, which we complement with regional price data and state cigarette prices. We estimate a consumer demand system that includes several main expenditure categories (cigarettes, food, alcohol, housing, apparel, transportation, medical care) and controls for socioeconomic variables and other sources of observable heterogeneity. Descriptive data indicate that, comparing smokers to nonsmokers, smokers spend less on housing. Results from the demand system indicate that as the price of cigarettes rises, households increase the quantity of food purchased, and, in some samples, reduce the quantity of apparel and housing purchased.
KeywordsPrice Elasticity Demand System Budget Share Expenditure Category Cigarette Price
We would like to acknowledge financial support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (#039787) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA RO1-DA14471). We also thank Frank Chaloupka for providing ciga-rette price data and Meg Wise for programming assistance. ## The authors have provided no information on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.
- 1.Congressional Budget Office. Federal taxation of tobacco, alcoholic beverages, and motor fuels. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1990Google Scholar
- 5.Barrow L, McGranahan L. The earned income credit and durable goods purchases. Evanston (IL): The Joint Center for Poverty Research Conference on the Earned Income Tax Credit, 1999Google Scholar
- 7.Deaton AS, Muellbauer J. An almost ideal demand system. Am Econ Rev 1980; 70(3): 312–26Google Scholar
- 11.World Health Organization. Tobacco and poverty: a vicious circle. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004Google Scholar
- 12.Mackay J, Eriksen M. The tobacco atlas. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002: 22–3, 30-1Google Scholar
- 13.US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2002: interview survey and detailed expenditure files [computer file; ICPSR03949-v1]. Ann Arbor (MI): Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005 Mar 25Google Scholar
- 14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, prevalence data (1995–2002) [online]. Available from URL: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/ [Accessed 2005 Mar 31]
- 18.Ohsfeldt RL, Boyle RG, Capilouto EI. Tobacco taxes, smoking restrictions, and tobacco use. In: Chaloupka FJ, Grossman M, Bickel WK, et al., editors. The economic analysis of substance use and abuse: an integration of econometric and behavioral economic research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999Google Scholar