Toxicological Reviews

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 15–35 | Cite as

Urine as a Biological Specimen for Forensic Analysis of Alcohol and Variability in the Urine-to-Blood Relationship

  • Alan W. JonesEmail author
Review Article


This article concerns the use of urine as a biological specimen for determination of alcohol in clinical and forensic toxicology and discusses factors that might influence variability in the urine/blood concentration ratio of alcohol. A large number of human drinking experiments were conducted to determine the time course of urine-alcohol concentrations (UAC) in relation to blood-alcohol concentrations (BAC). The UAC and BAC curves were shifted in time and the BAC curve always began to decrease before the UAC started to decline. During the early absorption phase the UAC/BAC ratio was less than unity, whereas in the late absorption/distribution period the ratio was between 1.0–1.2. On reaching the post-absorptive phase, the UAC always exceeded BAC and UAC/BAC ratios averaged 1.3–1.4, increasing appreciably as BAC decreased towards zero. Alcohol-induced diuresis was most pronounced during the rising portion of the BAC curve and near to the peak value. After about 2 hours post-drinking, the production rate of urine diminished to the pre-drinking rate of about 0.5–1 mL/min. Drinking water during the post-absorptive phase of the alcohol curve produced dilute urine, as reflected in lower creatinine content and osmolality, although the concentration of ethanol remained unchanged. After subjects drank a moderate dose of ethanol (0.54–0.85 g/kg) about 2% of the dose was recoverable in the urine after 7 hours. Ethyl glucuronide, a minor metabolite of ethanol, was measured in urine samples from drunk drivers. The UAC/BAC ratio of ethanol in drunk drivers did not depend on the creatinine content of the urine and therefore the relative dilution of the specimens. When alcohol-free urine was spiked with glucose and infected with the yeast species Candida albicans, ethanol was produced by fermentation after approximately 24 hours storage at room temperature. This post-sampling synthesis of ethanol was prevented by sodium fluoride (1% weight by volume) in the urine tubes or by keeping the specimens in the cold (4°C). The UAC and BAC were highly correlated (r > 0.95) in drunk drivers and in autopsy cases, although the residual standard deviations were appreciable. This speaks against attempting to estimate BAC indirectly from UAC in any individual case. The UAC/BAC ratio and the change in UAC between two successive voids can help to resolve whether a large amount of alcohol had recently been consumed. This information is useful to support or challenge allegations of drinking alcohol after driving, which has become known as the hip-flask defence.


Urine Specimen Sodium Fluoride Successive Void Drunk Driver Forensic Casework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.


  1. 1.
    White WI. A new look at the role of urinalysis in the history of diagnostic medicine. Clin Chem 1991; 37: 119–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Free AH, Free HM. Urinalysis, critical discipline of clinical medicine. CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1972; 3: 481–531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Voswinckel P. From uroscopy to urinalysis. Clin Chim Acta 2000; 297: 5–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kadehjian L. Urine alcohol testing is a valuable under used tool. Clin Forensic Toxicol News 2002; Jun: 1–5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu RH, Goldberger B, editors. Handbook of workplace drug testing. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Widmark EMP. Om alkoholens övergång i urinen samt om en enkel, kliniskt använbar metod för diagnosticering av alkoholförekomst i kroppen. Uppsala Läkarefören Förh 1914; 19: 241–72Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Widmark EMP. Principles and practical applications of medicolegal alcohol analysis. Foster City (CA): Biomedical Publications, 1981: 1–163Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Widmark EMP. Über die koncentration des genossenen Alkohol i blod och Härn under verschiedenen Umständen. Skand Arch Physiol 1915; 33: 85–96Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Widmark EMP. Zur Frage nach dem Übergang des Alkohols in den Harn durch Diffusion. Biochem Z 1930; 218: 445–52Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miles WH. The comparative concentrations of alcohol in human blood and urine at intervals after ingestion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1922; 20: 265–319Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saady JJ, Poklis A, Dalton HP. Production of urinary ethanol after sample collection. J Forensic Sci 1993; 38: 1467–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones AW. Measuring alcohol in blood and breath for forensic purposes: a historical review. Forensic Sci Rev 1996; 8: 13–44Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooper WE, Schwär TG, Smith LS. Urine alcohol. In: Alcohol, drugs and road safety. Cape Town: Juta & Co., 1979: 259–66Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ladd M, Gibson RB. The medicolegal aspects of the blood test to determine intoxication. Iowa Law Review 1939; 24: 1–77Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heise HA. Concentrations of alcohol in samples of blood and urine taken at the same time. J Forensic Sci 1967; 12: 454–61Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heise HA. Breath and urine alcohol, practical considerations of simultaneous determinations. Rocky Mt Med J 1969; 66: 37–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heise HA. Interpretation of tests for intoxication. J Forensic Sci 1956; 1: 38Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heise HA, Halporn B. Medicolegal aspects of drunkenness. Penn Med J 1932; 36: 190–5Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones AW, Andersson L. Variability of the blood/breath alcohol ratio in drinking drivers. J Forensic Sci 1996; 41: 916–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jones AW. Ethanol distribution ratios between urine and capillary blood in controlled experiments and in apprehended drinking drivers. J Forensic Sci 1992; 37: 21–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morgan WHD. Concentrations of alcohol in samples of blood and urine taken at the same time. J Forensic Sci Soc 1965; 5: 15–21Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Curry AS. Ethanol. In: Advances in forensic and clinical toxicology. Cleveland (OH): CRC Press, 1972: 17–28Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    British Medical Association. Report of a special committee on the drinking driver. London: British Medical Association, 1965Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walls HJ, Brownlie AR. Drink, drugs and driving. 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1985Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones AW, Logan BK. DUI defenses. In: Karch S, editor. Handbook of drug abuse. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 1998: 1006–45Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iffland R. Nachtrank und Hamprobe. Blutalkohol 1999; 36: 99–105Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iffland R, Jones AW. Evaluating alleged drinking after driving: the hip flask defence. Part 1. Double blood samples and urine-to-blood alcohol relationship. Med Sci Law 2002; 42: 207–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Biasotti AA, Valentine TE. Blood alcohol concentration determined from urine samples as a practical equivalent or alternative to blood and breath alcohol tests. J Forensic Sci 1985; 30: 194–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stevens PJ, Mason JK, Bowden CH. Comparative ethanol concentration in blood and urine during social drinking. Med Sci Law 1966; 6: 96–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weinig E, Zink P, Reinhardt G. Über die forensische Bedeutung der Alkoholkonzentration im Urin. Blutalkohol 1970; 7: 307–15Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Staak M, Springer E, Baum H. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über den Aussagewert des Harnalkohol-Blutalkoholquotienten unter experimentellen Bedingungen sowie im Probenmaterial. Blutalkohol 1974; 13: 100–10Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dunnett N, Kimber KJ. Urine-blood alcohol ratio. J Forensic Sci Soc 1968; 8: 15–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Payne JP, Foster DV, Hill DW, et al. Observations on interpretation of blood alcohol levels derived from analysis of urine. BMJ 1967; 3: 819–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dubowski, KM. Manual for analysis of ethanol in biological liquids. Department of Transportation report no. DOT-TSC NHTSA-76-4. Washington, DC: United States Government, 1977: 1–117Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Alexander WD, Wills PD, Eldred N, et al. Urinary ethanol levels and diabetes. Lancet 1981; I: 789Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ball W, Lichtenwalner M. Ethanol production in infected urine. N Engl J Med 1979; 301: 614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lough PS, Fehn R. Efficacy of 1% sodium fluoride as a preservative in urine samples containing glucose and Candida albicans. J Forensic Sci 1993; 38: 266–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sulkowski HA, Wu AHB, McCarter YS. In-vitro production of ethanol in urine by fermentation. J Forensic Sci 1995; 40: 990–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jones AW, Hylén L, Svensson E, et al. Storage of specimens at +4°C or addition of sodium fluoride (1%) prevents formation of ethanol in urine inoculated with Candida albicans. J Anal Toxicol 1999; 23: 333–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Winek CL, Murphy KL, Winek TA. The unreliability of using urine ethanol concentrations to predict a blood ethanol concentration. Forensic Sci Int 1984; 25: 277–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jones AW, Holmgren P. Urine/blood ratios of alcohol in deaths attributed to acute alcohol poisoning and chronic alcoholism. Forensic Sci Int 2003; 135: 206–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Alha AR, Tamminen V. Fatal cases with an elevated urine alcohol but without alcohol in the blood. J Forensic Med 1964; 11:3–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kuroda N, Williams K, Pounder DJ. Estimating blood alcohol from urinary alcohol at autopsy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1995; 16: 219–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Verstraete AG. Detection times of drugs of abuse in blood, urine, and oral fluid. Ther Drug Monit 2004; 26: 200–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kim DJ, Yoon SJ, Lee HP, et al. The effects of alcohol hangover on cognitive functions in healthy subjects. Int J Neurosci 2003; 113: 581–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bendtsen P, Hultberg J, Carlsson M, et al. Monitoring ethanol exposure in a clinical setting by analysis of blood, breath, saliva, and urine. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999; 23: 1446–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hayden PM, Layden MT, Hickey MD. The stability of alcohol content in samples of blood and urine. Irish J Med Sci 1977; 146: 48–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Neuteboom W, Zweipfenning PGM. The stability of the alcohol concentration in urine specimens. J Anal Toxicol 1989; 13: 141–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jortani SA, Poklis A. Evaluation of the Adx REA assay for determination of ethanol in serum and urine. J Anal Toxicol 1993; 17: 307–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jortani SA, Poklis A. Evaluation of the SYVA ETS Plus urine drug and serum ethanol analyzer. J Anal Toxicol 1993; 17: 31–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Buijten JC. An automated ultra-micro distillation technique for determination of ethanol in blood and urine. Blutalkohol 1975; 12: 393–8Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kristoffersen L, Smith-Kielland A. An automated alcohol dehydrogenase method for ethanol quantification in urine and whole blood. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29: 387–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kunsman GW, Manno JE, Cockerham KR, et al. A modification and validation of two urine ethanol procedures for use with the Monarch 2000 chemistry system. J Anal Toxicol 1991; 15: 130–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Seeley RR, Stephens TD, Tate P. Anatomy and physiology. 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2004Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ganong WJ. Review of medical physiology. 22nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2005Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Brenner BM, Rector FC, editors. The kidney. Vol. 1, 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders Co., 2003Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zink P, Reinhardt G. Zur Theorie der Äthanolausscheidung im menschlichen Urin. Blutalkohol 1971; 8: 1–15Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Weinig E, Zink P, Reinhardt G. Die Durchlässigkeit der menschlichen Harnblase für Äthylalkohol. Z Rechtsmedizin 1970; 67: 147–57Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Haggard HW, Greenberg LA, Carroll RP, et al. The use of the urine in the chemical test for intoxication. JAMA 1940; 115: 1680–3Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jones AW, Helander A. Time-course and reproducibility of urinary excretion profiles of ethanol, methanol and the ratio of serotonin metabolites after intravenous infusion of ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999; 23: 1921–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jones AW. Excretion of alcohol in urine and diuresis in healthy men in relation to their age, the dose administered and the time after drinking. Forensic Sci Int 1990; 45: 217–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bendtsen P, Jones AW. Impact of water-induced diuresis on urine-ethanol profiles, urine-creatinine, and urine-osmolality. J Anal Toxicol 1999; 23: 565–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bendtsen P, Jones AW, Helander A. Urinary excretion of methanol and 5-hydroxy-tryptophol as biochemical markers of recent drinking during the hangover state. Alcohol Alcohol 1998; 33: 431–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jones AW. Lack of association between urinary creatinine and ethanol concentrations and urine/blood ratios of ethanol in two successive voids from drinking drivers. J Anal Toxicol 1998; 22: 184–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jones AW. Reference limits for urine/blood ratios of ethanol in two successive voids from drinking drivers. J Anal Toxicol 2002; 26: 333–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jones AW. Time-adjusted urine/blood ratios of ethanol in drinking drivers. J Anal Toxicol 2003; 27: 167–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Jones AW. Alcohol; post-mortem. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, Knupfer GC, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. London: Academic Press Inc., 2000: 112–26Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bergström J, Helander A, Jones AW. Ethyl glucuronide concentrations in two successive voids from drinking drivers: relationship to creatinine content and blood and urine ethanol concentrations. Forensic Sci Int 2003; 133: 86–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jones AW, Schuberth J. Computer-aided headspace gas chromatography applied to blood-alcohol analysis: importance of on-line process control. J Forensic Sci 1989; 34: 1116–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Spierto FW, Hannon WH, Gunter FW, et al. Stability of urine creatinine. Clin Chim Acta 1997; 264: 227–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders Co., 1984Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Stephanson N, Dahl H, Helander A, et al. Direct quantification of ethyl glucuronide in clinical urine samples by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Ther Drug Monit 2002; 24: 645–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Lentner C. Geigy scientific tables, vol. 1: units of measurement, body fluids, composition of the body, nutrition. Basel: Ciba-Geigy Ltd, 1981Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bonnichsen R, Åberg CJ. Alcohol in blood and urine. Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege) 1969; 4: 65–8Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Jones AW, Lindberg L, Olsson SG. Magnitude and time-course of arterial-venous differences in blood-ethanol concentration in healthy men. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43: 1157–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Iffland R, West A, Bilzer N, et al. Zur Zuverlässigkeit der Blutalkoholbestimmung Das Verteilungsverhältnis des Wassers zwischen Serum und Vollblut. Rechtsmedizin 1999; 9: 123–30Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Holford NGH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ethanol. Clin Pharmacokinet 1987; 13: 273–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Norberg Å, Gabrielsson J, Jones AW, et al. Within- and between-subject variation of pharmacokinetic parameters of ethanol by analysis of breath, venous blood, and urine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49: 399–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Norberg Å, Jones AW, Hahn RG, et al. Role of variability in explaining ethanol pharmacokinetics: forensic and clinical applications. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003; 42: 1–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Dundee JW, Knox JWD, Isaac M. Blood, urine, and breath levels after rapid intravenous infusion of ethanol. BMJ 1970; 3: 552–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Eggleton MG. The diuretic action of alcohol in man. J Physiol 1942; 101: 172–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Blackmore DJ, Mason JK. Renal clearance of urea, creatinine and alcohol. Med Sci Law 1968; 8: 51–3Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Lundquist F. The urinary excretion of ethanol by man. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 1961; 18: 231–8Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Mander AJ, Young A, Merrick MV, et al. Fluid balance, vasopressin and withdrawal symptoms during detoxification from alcohol. Drug Alcohol Depend 1989; 24: 233–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wu AHH. Integrity of urine specimens for toxicological analysis: adulteration, mechanisms of action, and laboratory detection. Forensic Sci Rev 1998; 10: 47–65Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cody JT. Specimen adulteration in drug urinalysis. Forensic Sci Rev 1990; 2: 63–75Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Cook JD, Caplan YH, LoDico CP, et al. The characteristics of human urine for specimen validity determination in workplace drug testing: a review. J Anal Toxicol 2000; 24: 579–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Needlemann SB, Porvaznik M, Ander D. Creatinine analysis in single collection urine specimens. J Forensic Sci 1992; 37: 1125–33Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1990Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Flanagan RJ, Connally G, Evans JM. Analytical toxicology: guidelines for sample collection postmortem. Toxicol Rev 2005; 24: 63–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Forrest ARW. Obtaining samples at post-mortem examination for toxicological and biochemical analysis. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46: 292–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kalant H. Interpretation of post-mortem ethanol concentrations. Aerospace Med 1968; 39: 633–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Gormsen H. Yeasts and the production of alcohol post-mortem. J Forensic Med 1954; 1: 170–1Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gruszecki AC, Robinson A, Kloda S, et al. High urine ethanol and negative blood and vitreous ethanol in a diabetic women. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2005; 26: 96–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zumwait RE, Bost RO, Sunshine I. Evaluation of ethanol concentrations in decomposed bodies. J Forensic Sci 1982; 27: 549–54Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gilliland MG, Bost RO. Alcohol in decomposed bodies: postmortem synthesis and distribution. J Forensic Sci 1993; 38(6): 1266–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Lewis RJ, Johnson RD, Angier K, et al. Ethanol formation in unadulterated postmortem tissues. Forensic Sci Int 2004; 146: 17–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Heatley MK, Crane J. The relationship between blood and urine alcohol concentrations at autopsy. Med Sci Law 1989; 29: 209–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hishida S, Kinoshita M, Ijiri I, et al. Studies on the ratio between alcoholic concentrations in urine and blood. Jpn J Legal Med 1973; 27: 295–306Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Fine J. Glucose content of normal urine. BMJ 1965; 5444: 1209–14Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Ziavrou K, Boumba VA, Vougiouklakis TG. Insights into the origin of postmortem ethanol. Int J Toxicol 2005; 24: 69–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Flanagan RJ, Connally G. Interpretation of analytical toxicology results in life and at postmortem. Toxicol Rev 2005; 24: 51–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Leikin JH, Watson WA. Post-mortem toxicology: what the dead can and cannot tell us. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2003; 41: 47–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Ito A, Moriya F, Ishizu H. Estimating the time between drinking and death from tissue distribution patterns of ethanol. Acta Med Okayama 1998; 52: 1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Levine B, Smialek JE. Status of alcohol absorption in drinking drivers killed in traffic accidents. J Forensic Sci 2000; 45: 3–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Mittmeyer BJ, Blattert AK. UAK/BAK Quotient unter Berücksichtigung der Harnblasenfüllung. Beitr Gerichtl Med 1991; 49: 263–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Ameno K. Medico-legal studies on the ethanol concentrations in blood and urine of cadavers. Jpn J Legal Med 1981; 35: 83–102Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Prouty RW, Anderson WH. The forensic science implications of site and temporal influences on postmortem blood-drug concentrations. J Forensic Sci 1990; 35: 243–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Pelissier-Alicot AL, Gaulier JM, Champsaur P, et al. Mechanisms underlying postmortem redistribution of drugs: a review. J Anal Toxicol 2003; 27: 533–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Yarema MC, Becker CE. Key concepts in postmortem drug redistribution. Clin Toxicol 2005; 43: 235–41Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Alexander WD, Wills PD, Eldred N. Urinary ethanol and diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1988; 5: 463–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Chang J, Kollman SE. The effect of temperature on the formation of ethanol by Candida albicans in blood. J Forensic Sci 1989; 34: 105–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Amick GD, Habben KH. Inhibition of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in human blood by sodium fluoride. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42: 690–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Corry JEL. A review: possible sources of ethanol ante- and post-mortem; its relationship to the biochemistry and microbiology of decomposition. J Appl Bacteriol 1978; 44: 1–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Blackmore DJ. The bacterial production of ethyl alcohol. J Forensic Sci Soc 1968; 8: 73–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Bogusz M, Guminska M, Markiewicz J. Studies on the formation of ethanol and of pyruvate as its precursor from some di- and tri-carbonic compounds in putrefying blood in vitro. Forensic Sci 1972; 1: 229–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Wooten DC, Susa J, Baskin L. Conflicting whole blood and urine ethanol results. Lab Med 2002; 33: 227–8Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Jones AW, Eklund A, Helander A. Misleading results of ethanol analysis in urine specimens from rape-victims suffering from diabetes. J Clin Forensic Med 2000; 7: 144–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Mitchell S, Bradbeer C. Over the counter treatment for candidiasis. BMJ 1992; 304: 1648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Kamil IA, Smith JN, Williams RT. A new aspect of ethanol metabolism: isolation of ethyl glucuronide. Biochem J 1952; 51: 32–3Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Conti A, Bickel MH. History of drug metabolism: discoveries of the major pathways in the 19th century. Drug Metab Rev 1977; 6: 1–50Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Helander A, Beck O. Ethyl sulfate: a metabolite of ethanol in humans and a potential biomarker of acute alcohol intake. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29: 270–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Helander A, Beck O. Mass spectrometric identification of ethyl sulphate as an ethanol metabolite in humans. Clin Chem 2004; 50: 936–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Janda I, Alt A. Improvement of ethyl glucuronide determination in human urine and serum samples by solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr B 2001; 758: 229–34Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Schmitt G, Aderjan RE, Keller T, et al. Ethyl glucuronide: an unusual ethanol metabolite in humans: synthesis, analytical data, and determination in serum and urine. J Anal Toxicol 1995; 19: 91–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Seidl S, Wurst FM, Alt A. Ethyl glucuronide: a biological marker for recent alcohol consumption. Addict Biol 2001; 6: 205–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Schmitt G, Droenner P, Skopp G, et al. Ethyl glucuronide concentration in serum of human volunteers, teetotalers, and suspected drinking drivers. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42: 1099–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Droenner P, Schmitt G, Aderjan R, et al. A kinetic model describing the pharmacokinetics of ethyl glucuronide in humans. Forensic Sci Int 2002; 126: 24–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Wurst FM, Kempter C, Metzger J, et al. Ethyl glucuronide: a marker of recent alcohol consumption with clinical and forensic implications. Alcohol 2000; 20: 111–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Skipper GE, Weinmann W, Thierauf A, et al. Ethyl glucuronide: a biomarker to identify alcohol use by health professionals recovering from substance use disorders. Alcohol Alcohol 2004; 39: 445–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Helander A, Dahl H. Urinary tract infections: a risk factor for false negative urinary ethyl glucuronide but not ethyl sulfate in the detection of recent drinking. Clin Chem 2005; 51: 1728–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Lafolie P, Beck O, Blennow G, et al. Importance of creatinine analyses of urine when screening for abused drugs. Clin Chem 1991; 37: 1927–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Dahl H, Stephanson N, Beck O, et al. Comparison of urinary excretion characteristics of ethanol and ethyl glucuronide. J Anal Toxicol 2002; 26: 201–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Jones AW. Top-ten defense challenges among drinking drivers in Sweden. Med Sci Law 1991; 31: 229–38PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forensic Chemistry and GeneticsNational Board of Forensic Medicine, and University HospitalLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations