American Journal of Pharmacogenomics

, Volume 4, Issue 5, pp 293–298 | Cite as

Human Genetics and Responses to Influenza Vaccination

Clinical Implications
  • Robert Lambkin
  • Patricia Novelli
  • John Oxford
  • Colin Gelder
Genomics and Drug Response

Abstract

Influenza A and B viruses are negative-strand RNA viruses that cause regular outbreaks of respiratory disease and substantially impact on morbidity and mortality. Our primary defense against the influenza virus infection is provided by neutralizing antibodies that inhibit the function of the virus surface coat proteins hemagglutinin and neuraminidase. Production of these antibodies by B lymphocytes requires help from CD4+ T cells. The most commonly used vaccines against the influenza virus comprise purified preparations of hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, and are designed to induce a protective neutralizing antibody response. Because of regular antigenic change in these proteins (drift and shift mutation), the vaccines have to be administered on an annual basis. Current defense strategies center on prophylactic vaccination of those individuals who are considered to be most at risk from the serious complications of infection (principally individuals aged >65 years and those with chronic respiratory, cardiac, or metabolic disease).

The clinical effectiveness of influenza virus vaccination is dependent on several vaccine-related factors, including the quantity of hemagglutinin within the vaccine, the number of doses administered, and the route of immunization. In addition, the immunocompetence of the recipient, their previous exposure to influenza virus and influenza virus vaccines, and the closeness of the match between the vaccine and circulating influenza virus strains, all influence the serologic response to vaccination.

However, even when these vaccines are administered to young fit adults a proportion of individuals do not mount a significant serologic response to the vaccine. It is not clear whether these nonresponding individuals are genetically pre-programmed to be nonresponders or whether failure to respond to the vaccine is a random event. There is good evidence that nonresponsiveness to hepatitis B vaccine, another purified protein vaccine, is at least partially modulated by an individual’s human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles. Because CD4+ T cells, which control the neutralizing antibody response to influenza virus, recognize antigens in association with HLA class II molecules, we recently conducted a small study to investigate whether there was any association between HLA class II molecules and nonresponsiveness to influenza virus vaccination. This work revealed that the HLA-DRB1*0701 allele was over represented among persons who fail to mount a neutralizing antibody response. This preliminary finding is important because it potentially identifies a group who may not be protected by current vaccination strategies. Further investigation into the role of HLA polymorphisms and nonresponse to influenza virus vaccination, and vaccination against viruses in general, is clearly required.

References

  1. 1.
    Klein T, Kakahata N. Where do we come from: the molecular evidence for human descent. Berlin: Springer, 2002: 462Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oxford J. Influenza A pandemics in the 20th century with special reference to 1918: virology, pahtology and epidemiology. Rev Med Virol 2002; 10: 119–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reid A, Janczewski TA, Lourens RM, et al. 1918 influenza pandemic caused by highly conserved viruses with two receptor-binding variants. Emerg Infect Dis 2003 Oct; 9(10): 1249–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basier CF, Reid AH, Dybing JK, et al. Sequence of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus nonstructural gene (NS) segment and characterization of recombinant viruses bearing the 1918 NS genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98(5): 2746–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nicholson KG. Clinical features of influenza. Semin Respir Infect 1992; 7(1): 26–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sprenger MJ, Van Naelten MA, Mulder PG, et al. Influenza mortality and excess deaths in the elderly, 1967–82. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103(3): 633–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sprenger MJ, Mulder PG, Beyer WE, et al. Impact of influenza on mortality in relation to age and underlying disease, 1967–1989. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22(2): 334–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barker W, Mullooly JP. Pneumonia and influenza deaths during epidemics: implications for prevention. Arch Intern Med 1982; 142: 85–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irving WL, James DK, Stephenson T, et al. Influenza virus infection in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy: a clinical and seroepidemiological study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 107(10): 1282–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fedson DS. Prevention and control of influenza in institutional settings. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 1989; 24(9A): 87–96Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simonsen L, Clarke MJ, Stroup DF, et al. A method for timely assessment of influenza-associated mortality in the United States. Epidemiology 1997; 8(4): 390–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Potter JM, Oxford J. Determinants of immunity to influenza infection in man. Br Med Bull 1979; 35: 45–69Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anders EM, Peppard PM, Burns WH, et al. In vitro antibody response to influenza virus: I. T cell dependence of secondary response to hemagglutinin. J Immunol 1979; 123(3): 1356–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Callard RE, Smith CM. Histocompatibility requirements for T cell help in specific in vitro antibody responses to influenza virus by human blood lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 1981; 11(3): 206–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McMichael AJ, Askonas BA. Influenza virus-specific cytotoxic T cells in man: induction and properties of the cytotoxic cell. Eur J Immunol 1978; 8(10): 705–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McMichael AJ, Gotch FM, Noble GR, et al. Cytotoxic T-cell immunity to influenza. N Engl J Med 1983; 309(1): 13–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maide JA. Viral double-stranded RNA, cytokines and the flu. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2002; 20: 250–72Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kujime K, Hashimoto S, Gon Y, et al. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-jun-NH2-terminal kinase regulate RANTES production by influenza virus-infected human bronchial epithelial cells. J Immunol 2000; 164(6): 3222–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garcia-Sastre A. Inhibition of intereferon-mediated antiviral responses by influenza A viruses and other negative strand RNA viruses. Virology 2001; 279: 375–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ludwig S, Wang X, Ehrhardt C, et al. The influenza A virus NS1 protein inhibits activation of Jun N-terminal kinase and AP-1 transcription factors. J Virol 2002; 76(21): 11166–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang X, Li M, Zheng H, et al. Influenza A virus NS1 protein prevents activation of NF-kappaB and induction of alpha/beta interferon. J Virol 2000; 74(24): 11566–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Talon J, Horvath CM, Polley R, et al. Activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 is inhibited by the influenza A virus NS1 protein. J Virol 2000; 74(17): 7989–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chamik M. Interferon induction by influenza virus: significance of neuraminidase. Arch Immunol Ther Exp 1981; 29: 109–14Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schultz-Cherry S, Hinshaw V. Influenza virus neuraminidase activates latent transforming growth factor beta. J Virol 1996; 70: 8624–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rott O, Charreire J, Semichon M, et al. B cell superstimulatory influenza virus (H2-subtype) induces B cell proliferation by a PKC-activating, Ca (2+)-inde-pendent mechanism. J Immunol 1995; 154(5): 2092–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Flory E, Kunz M, Scrieller C, et al. Influenza virus-induced NF-κB-dependent gene expression is mediated by overexpression of viral proteins and involves oxidative radicals and activation of IκB kinase. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(12): 8307–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McMichael AJ, Gotch F, Cullen P, et al. The human cytotoxic T cell response to influenza A vaccination. Clin Exp Immunol 1981; 43(2): 276–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bridges CB, Fukuda K, Cox NJ, et al. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2001; 50(RR-4): 1–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nichol KL. Cost-benefit analysis of a strategy to vaccinate healthy working adults against influenza. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161(5): 749–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fleming DM, Watson JM, Nicholas S, et al. Study of the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in the elderly in the epidemic of 1989–90 using a general practice database. Epidemiol Infect 1995; 115(3): 581–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nichol KL, Baken L, Wuorenma J, et al. The health and economic benefits associated with pneumococcal vaccination of elderly persons with chronic lung disease. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(20): 2437–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nichol KL, Margolis KL, Wouremna J, et al. Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in the elderly. Gerontology 1996; 42(5): 274–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dowdle WR. Influenza pandemics: lessons for the future [letter]. Vaccine 2002; 20Suppl. 2: S15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mostow SR, Schoenbaum SC, Dowdle WR, et al. Studies on inactivated influenza vaccines: II. Effect of increasing dosage on antibody response and adverse reactions in man. Am J Epidemiol 1970; 92(4): 248–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Holland W, Isaacs A, Clarke S, et al. A serological trial of Asian influenza vaccine after the autumn epidemic. Lancet 1958; I(7025): 820–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stuart-Harris C, Schild GC, Oxford J. Influenza: the viruses and the disease. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1985: 118–38Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oxford J, Al-Jabri A, Lambkin R, et al. Non-responders to egg grown influenza vaccine seroconvert after booster immunization with MDCK cell grown vaccine. Vaccine 2003 Jun 20; 21(21–22): 2743–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fazekas de St Groth B, Webster RG. Disquisitions of original antigenic sin: I. Evidence in man. J Exp Med 1966; 124(3): 331–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fazekas de St Groth B, Webster RG. Disquisitions on original antigenic sin: II. Proof in lower creatures. J Exp Med 1966; 124(3): 347–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Webster RG. Original antigenic sin in ferrets: the response to sequential infections with influenza viruses. J Immunol 1966; 97(2): 177–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McElhaney JE, Meneilly GS, Lechelt KE, et al. Antibody response to whole-virus and split-virus influenza vaccines in successful ageing. Vaccine 1993; 11(10): 1055–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Powers DC, Belshe RB. Effect of age on cytotoxic T lymphocyte memory as well as serum and local antibody responses elicited by inactivated influenza virus vaccine. J Infect Dis 1993; 167(3): 584–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Murasko DM, Bernstein ED, Gardner EM, et al. Role of humoral and cell-mediated immunity in protection from influenza disease after immunization of healthy elderly. Exp Gerontol 2002; 37(2–3): 427–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Remarque EJ, Cools HJ, Boere TJ, et al. Functional disability and antibody response to influenza vaccine in elderly patients in a Dutch nursing home. BMJ 1996; 312(7037): 1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Remarque EJ, de Bruijn IA, Boersma WJ, et al. Altered antibody response to influenza H1N1 vaccine in healthy elderly people as determined by HI, ELISA, and neutralization assay. J Med Virol 1998; 55(1): 82–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hobson D, Curry RL, Beare AS, et al. The role of serum haemagglutinationinhibiting antibody in protection against challenge infection with influenza A2 and B viruses. J Hyg (Lond) 1972; 70(4): 767–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Krakauer T, Russo C. Serum cytokine levels and antibody response to influenza vaccine in the elderly. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2001; 23(1): 35–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mackenzie JS, Fimmel PJ. The effect of ABO blood groups on the incidence of epidemic influenza and on the response to live attenuated and detergent split influenza virus vaccines. J Hyg (Lond) 1978; 80(1): 21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pavlovic J, Zurcher T, Haller O, et al. Resistance to influenza virus and vesicular stomatitis virus conferred by expression of human MxA protein. J Virol 1990; 64(7): 3370–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Horisberger MA. Interferons, Mx genes, and resistance to influenza virus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152 (4 Pt 2): S67–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Alper CA, Kruskall MS, Marcus-Bagley D, et al. Genetic prediction of nonresponse to hepatitis B vaccine. N Engl J Med 1989; 321(11): 708–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McDermott AB, Zuckerman JN, Sabin CA, et al. Contribution of human leukocyte antigens to the antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination. Tissue Antigens 1997; 50(1): 8–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Desombere I, Willems A, Leroux-Roels G. Response to hepatitis B vaccine: multiple HLA genes are involved. Tissue Antigens 1998; 51(6): 593–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gelder CM, Lambkin R, Hart KW, et al. Associations between human leukocyte antigens and nonresponsiveness to influenza vaccine. J Infect Dis 2002; 185(1): 114–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gelder CM, Welsh KI, Faith A, et al. Human CD4+ T-cell repertoire of responses to influenza A virus hemagglutinin after recent natural infection. J Virol 1995; 69(12): 7497–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gelder CM, Lamb JR, Askonas BA. Human CD4+ T-cell recognition of influenza A virus hemagglutinin after subunit vaccination. J Virol 1996; 70(7): 4787–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gelder C, Davenport M, Barnardo M, et al. Six unrelated HLA-DR-matched adults recognize identical CD4+ T cell epitopes from influenza A haemagglutinin that are not simply peptides with high HLA-DR binding affinities. Int Immunol 1998; 10(2): 211–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Lambkin
    • 1
  • Patricia Novelli
    • 1
  • John Oxford
    • 1
  • Colin Gelder
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical Microbiology and Retroscreen VirologyQueen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry, St Bart’s and the LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.University of Wales College of MedicineHeath ParkWales

Personalised recommendations