Advertisement

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 253–263 | Cite as

Hyperoxemic Perfusion for Treatment of Reperfusion Microvascular Ischemia in Patients with Myocardial Infarction

  • Antonio L. BartorelliEmail author
Leading Article

Abstract

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) primary angioplasty and stent placement is a more effective and better tolerated treatment than thrombolysis, and therefore, when logistics allow, this treatment is preferred and routinely used. However, successful reopening of an occluded coronary artery does not necessarily lead to recovery of left ventricular (LV) function. Post-AMI reduction in contractile function and ventricular remodeling may result in heart failure.There is evidence that reduced contractile function in the infarct zone is related to poor microvascular perfusion even after normalization of large-vessel flow by angiographic criteria following coronary recanalization. Failure to re-establish adequate tissue perfusion may be because of reperfusion injury, ischemia-induced microvascular damage, and plugging of the microcirculation by thrombus and plaque during mechanical recanalization. Experimental data support the hypothesis that reperfusion microvascular ischemia contributes to myocardial tissue injury over a prolonged time period.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) attenuates microvascular dysfunction and reperfusion microvascular ischemia, as demonstrated in both experimental models and patients with AMI. However, treating patients in an HBO chamber or with a conventional oxygenator is impractical and difficult.

Aqueous oxygen (AO) is a newly developed solution containing extremely high oxygen concentrations (1–3ml O2/mL saline). The AO system mixes AO solution with a patient’s blood from an arterial puncture and delivers the hyperoxemic blood to targeted ischemic myocardium via an infusion catheter for regional correction of hypoxemia and production of hyperoxemia. The system precisely controls the level of pO2 without clinically significant microbubble formation.

Hyperoxemic coronary infusion of AO in experimental models of AMI improved LV function and reduced infarct size compared with normoxemic controls, very likely as a result of microvascular blood flow improvement. The first clinical experiences with intracoronary infusion of AO solution demonstrated the therapy to be a safe and well tolerated in the setting of AMI after successful primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Its use was associated with significant progressive improvement in LV function as measured by ejection fraction and wall motion score index. Interestingly, such improvement was primarily due to functional recovery of infarct zone contractility. A larger randomized trial is currently underway to define the role of hyperoxemic coronary infusion in patients with AMI.

Keywords

Acute Myocardial Infarction Left Ventricular Function Wall Motion Score Index Piston Chamber Left Anterior Descend Coronary Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I give special thanks to the dedicated scientists and engineers at TherOx, Inc., Irvine, California, US, who developed the Aqueous Oxygen™ System. I am indebted particularly to Paul J. Zalesky, Ph.D. and Linda D’Abate for their invaluable collaboration. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA 1997; 278: 2093–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antoniucci D, Santoro GM, Bolognese L, et al. A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 1234–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suryapranata H, van’t Hof A, Hoorntje J, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 2502–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Fernandez M, et al. In-hospital and late results of coronary stenting versus conventional balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction (GRAMI trial). Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 1286–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    PASTA trial investigators. Primary stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: final results of the primary angioplasty versus stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction (PASTA) trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 48: 262–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maillard L, Hamon M, Khalife K, et al. A comparison of systematic stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. STENTIM-2 Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1729–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoming A, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, et al. Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 385–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kloner RA, Ganote CD, Jennings RB. The “no-reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J Clin Invest 1974; 54: 1496–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeremy RW, Links JM, Becker LC. Progressive failure of coronary flow during reperfusion of myocardial infarction: documentation of the no-reflow phenomenon with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 695–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ven de Werf F. Discrepancies between the effect of coronary reperfusion on survival and left ventricular function. Lancet 1989; I: 1367–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asanuma T, Tanabe K, Ochiai K, et al. Relationship between progressive microvascular damage and intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with reperfused anterior myocardial infarction: myocardial contrast echocardiographic study. Circulation 1997; 96: 448–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bremerich J, Wendland MF, Arheden H, et al. Microvascular injury in reperfused infarcted myocardium: noninvasive assessment with contrast-enhanced echoplanar magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 787–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rochitte CD, Lima JA, Bluemke DA, et al. Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 98: 1006–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minyailenko TD, Pozharov VP, Seredenko MM. Severe hypoxia activates lipid peroxidation in the rat brain. Chem Phys Lipids 1990; 55: 25–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Golino P, Ashton JH, McNatt J, et al. Simultaneous administration of thromboxane A2- and serotonin S2-receptor antagonists markedly enhances thrombolysis and prevents or delays reocclusion after tissue-type plasminogen activator in a canine model of coronary thrombosis. Circulation 1989; 79: 911–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mazzoni MC, Borgstrom P, Warnke KC, et al. Mechanisms and implications of capillary endothelial swelling and luminal narrowing in low-flow ischemias. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 1995; 15: 265–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ritter LS, McDonagh PF. Low-flow reperfusion after myocardial ischemia enhances leukocyte accumulation in coronary microcirculation. Am J Physiol 1997; 273: H1154–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation 2000; 101: 570–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Konamura K, Kitazume M, Nishida K, et al. Progressive decrease in coronary vein flow during reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: clinical documentation of the no-reflow phenomenon after successful thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 370–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, et al. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis: a predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992; 85: 1699–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ince C, Vink H, Wieringa PA, et al. Heterogeneous NADH fluorescence during post-anoxic reactive hyperemia in saline perfusion rat heart. Adv Exp Med Biol 1990; 277: 477–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weinstein H, Reinhardt CP, Leppo JA. Direct detection of regional myocardial ischemia with technetium-99m nitroimidazole in rabbits. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 598–607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spears JR, Henney C, Prcevski P, et al. Reperfusion microvascular ischemia: attenuation with aqueous oxygen in experimental models of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000; 102 Suppl. II: II–646Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pinsky DJ, Yan SF, Lawson C, et al. Hypoxia and modification of the endothelium: implications for regulation of vascular homeostatic properties. Semin Cell Biol 1995; 6: 283–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ogawa S, Gerlach H, Esposito C, et al. Hypoxia modulates the barrier and coagulant function of cultured bovine endothelium: increased monolayer permeability and induction of procoagulant properties. J Clin Invest 1990; 85: 1090–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dauber IM, Van Benthuysen KM, McMurtry IF, et al. Functional coronary microvascular injury evident as increased permeability due to brief ischemia and reperfusion. Circ Res 1990; 66: 986–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ito H, Iwakura K, Oh H, et al. Temporal changes in myocardial perfusion patterns in patients with reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction: their relation to myocardial viability. Circulation 1995; 91: 656–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 765–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs. Circulation 2000; 101: 125–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura, et al. Clinical implications of the “no-reflow” phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93: 223–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987; 76: 44–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Effect of intravenous streptokinase on left ventricular function and early survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 850–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1615–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Wall TC, et al. Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty and acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1312–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith G, Lawson DD. Experimental coronary arterial occlusion: effects of the administration of oxygen under pressure. Scott Med J 1958; 3: 346–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith G, Lawson DD. The protective effect of inhalation of oxygen at two atmospheres absolute pressure in acute coronary occlusion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962; 114: 320–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peter RH, Rau RW, Whalen RE, et al. Effects of hyperbaric oxygenation on coronary artery occlusion in pigs. Circ Res 1966; 18: 89–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chardack WM, Gage AA, Federico AJ, et al. Reduction by hyperbaric oxygenation of the mortality from ventricular fibrillation following coronary artery ligation. Circ Res 1964; 15: 497–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Meijne NG, Bulterijs A, Eloff SJP, et al. An experimental investigation into the influence of administration of oxygen under increased atmospheric pressure upon coronary infarction. J Cardiovasc Surg 1963; 4: 521–35Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Trapp WG, Creighton R. Experimental studies of increased atmospheric pressure on myocardial infarction after coronary ligation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1964; 47: 687–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Robertson HF. The effect of hyperbaric oxygenation on myocardial infarction in dogs. Can J Surg 1966; 9: 81–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cameron AJV, Hutton DA, Kenmure ACF, et al. Haemodynamic and metabolic effects of hyperbaric oxygen in myocardial infarction. Lancet 1966; II: 833–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sterling DL, Thornton JD, Swafford A, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen limits infarct size in ischemic rabbit myocardium in vivo. Circulation 1993; 88: 1931–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cason BA, Hickey RF, Shubayev I. Therapeutic hyperoxia diminishes myocardial stunning. J Card Surg 1994; 9: 459–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thomas MP, Brown LA, Sponseller DR, et al. Myocardial infarct size reduction by the synergistic effect of hyperbaric oxygen and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Am Heart J 1990; 120: 791–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thurston JGB, Greenwood TW, Bending MR, et al. A controlled investigation into the effects of hyperbaric oxygen on mortality following acute myocardial infarction. Q J Med 1973; 42: 751–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shandling AH, Ellestad MH, Hart GB, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction: the “HOT MI” pilot study. Am Heart J 1997; 134: 544–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sirsjo A, Lehr H-A, Nolte D, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment enhances the recovery of blood flow and functional capillary density in postischemic striated muscle. Circ Shock 1993; 40: 9–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zamboni WA, Roth AC, Russell RC, et al. Morphological analysis of the microcirculation during reperfusion of ischemic skeletal muscle and the effect of hyperbaric oxygen. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91:1110–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chen G, Banick PD, Thorn SR. Functional inhibition of rat polymorphonuclear leukocyte β2 integrins by hyperbaric oxygen is associated with impaired cGMP synthesis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 276: 929–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hills BA. A role for oxygen-induced osmosis in hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Med Hypotheses 1999; 52: 259–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Thom SR, Elbukin ME. Oxygen dependent antagonism of lipid peroxidation. Free Radic Biol Med 1991; 10: 413–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mink RB, Dukta AJ. Hyperbaric oxygen after global cerebral ischemia in rabbits does not promote brain lipid peroxidation. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 1398–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dean RB. The formation of bubbles. J Appl Physiol 1944; 15: 446–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hemmingsen EA. Cavitation in gas-supersaturated solutions. J Appl Physiol 1975; 46: 213–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Spears JR. Advances in the management of respiratory failure. Aqueous preparations of oxygen. ASAIO J 1996; 42: 196–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brereton GJ, Crilly RJ, Spears JR. Nucleation in small capillary tubes. Chem Phys 1998; 230: 253–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Spears JR. Method and apparatus for delivering oxygen into blood. US Patent 5, 407, 426. 1995Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Spears JR, Wang B, Wu X, et al. Aqueous oxygen: a highly O2-supersaturated infusate for regional correction of hypoxemia and production of hyperoxemia. Circulation 1997; 96: 4385–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Battino R, editor. Oxygen Data Series, Vol 7: Oxygen and zone. New York (NY): Pergamon Press, 1981: 372–6Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Spears JR, Henney C, Prcevski P, et al. Aqueous oxygen hyperbaric reperfusion in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol 2002; 14: 160–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Spears JR, Prcevski P, Jiang AJ, et al. Hyperoxemia reperfusion with aqueous oxygen improves left ventricular function and microvascular flow in the postischemic canine myocardium [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 449ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kantor B, McKenna CJ, Camrud AR, et al. Coronary reperfusion with Aqueous oxygen improves left ventricular ejection fraction and may reduce mortality in an ischemic porcine model [abstract]. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 86SGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Spears JR, Henney C, Prcevski P, et al. Reperfusion microvascular ischemia attenuated with aqueous oxygen infusion in a porcine coronary occlusion model [abstract]. Circulation 1999; 100: I–512Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Dixon SR, Bartorelli AL, Marcovitz PA, et al. Initial experience with hyperoxemic reperfusion after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results of a pilot study utilizing intracoronary aqueous oxygen therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 387–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Trabattoni D, Montorsi P, Fabbiocchi F, et al. Left ventricular function recovery after LAD hyperoxemic blood infusion in ST-elevation anterior AMI treated with primary PCI. Am J Cardiol 2002; 24: TCT–44Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Weaver WD. Time to thrombolytic therapy: factors affecting delay and their influence on outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25 Suppl. 7: 3S–9SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Kissling G, et al. Importance of infarct-related artery patency for recovery of left ventricular function and late survival after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28: 319–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Harrison JK, Califf RM, Woodlief LH, et al. Systolic left ventricular function after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: an analysis of determinants of improvement. Circulation 1993; 87: 1531–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1615–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Stone GW, Marsalese D, Brodie BR, et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1459–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ottervanger JP, van’t Hof AW, Reiffers S, et al. Long-term recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 785–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sheiban I, Fragasso G, Rosano GMC, et al. Time course and determinants of left ventricular function recovery after primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 464–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Broderick TM, Bourdillon PDV, Ryan T, et al. Comparison of regional and global left ventricular function by serial echocardiograms after reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2: 315–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Smart SC, Sawada S, Ryan T, et al. Low-dose dobutamine echocardiography detects reversible dysfunction after thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1993; 88: 405–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro Cardiologico “Monzino” IRCCS, Institute of CardiologyUniversity of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations