Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Device
- 397 Downloads
The use of sub-atmospheric pressure dressings, available commercially as the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device, has been shown to be an effective way to accelerate healing of various wounds. The optimal sub-atmospheric pressure for wound healing appears to be approximately 125mm Hg utilizing an alternating pressure cycle of 5 minutes of suction followed by 2 minutes off suction. Animal studies have demonstrated that this technique optimizes blood flow, decreases local tissue edema, and removes excessive fluid from the wound bed. These physiologic changes facilitate the removal of bacteria from the wound. Additionally, the cyclical application of sub-atmospheric pressure alters the cytoskeleton of the cells in the wound bed, triggering a cascade of intracellular signals that increases the rate of cell division and subsequent formation of granulation tissue. The combination of these mechanisms makes the VAC device an extremely versatile tool in the armamentarium of wound healing. This is evident in the VAC device’s wide range of clinical applications, including treatment of infected surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, pressure ulcers, wounds with exposed bone and hardware, diabetic foot ulcers, and venous stasis ulcers. VAC has also proven useful in reconstruction of wounds by allowing elective planning of the definitive reconstructive surgery without jeopardizing the wound or outcome. Furthermore, VAC has significantly increased the skin graft success rate when used as a bolster over the freshly skin-grafted wound. VAC is generally well tolerated and, with few contraindications or complications, is fast becoming a mainstay of current wound care.
The authors would like to acknowledge Daniel Lane as the medical photographer of this manuscript. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. Dr Attinger is on the Kinetic Concepts, Inc. speakers bureau.
- 21.Godina M. Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities. Clin Plast Surg. 1986; 13 (4): 619–20Google Scholar
- 22.Joseph E, Harried CA, Bergman S, et al. A prospective randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic nonhealing wounds. Wounds. 2000; 12 (3): 60–7Google Scholar
- 35.Attinger C, Hopf H, Marks MW, et al. New approaches to difficult wound healing challenges. Panel at the 73rd American Society for Plastic Surgery; 2004 Oct 9–13; Philadelphia (PA)Google Scholar
- 39.Howard M, Attinger CE, Cooper P. Soft tissue strategies around the Ilizarov [abstract]. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society 19th Annual Summer Meeting; 2003 Jun 27–29; Hilton Head (SC)Google Scholar