American Journal of Clinical Dermatology

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 245–272 | Cite as

Psychopathology and Psychological Problems in Patients with Burn Scars

Epidemiology and Management
  • Nancy E. E. Van Loey
  • Maarten J. M. Van Son
Therapy In Practice

Abstract

Burn injury is often a devastating event with long-term physical and psychosocial effects. Burn scars after deep dermal injury are cosmetically disfiguring and force the scarred person to deal with an alteration in body appearance. In addition, the traumatic nature of the burn accident and the painful treatment may induce psychopathological responses.

Depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which are prevalent in 13–23% and 13–45% of cases, respectively, have been the most common areas of research in burn patients. Risk factors related to depression are pre-burn depression and female gender in combination with facial disfigurement. Risk factors related to PTSD are pre-burn depression, type and severity of baseline symptoms, anxiety related to pain, and visibility of burn injury. Neuropsychological problems are also described, mostly associated with electrical injuries. Social problems include difficulties in sexual life and social interactions. Quality of life initially seems to be lower in burn patients compared with the general population. Problems in the mental area are more troublesome than physical problems. Over a period of many years, quality of life was reported to be rather good. Mediating variables such as low social support, emotion and avoidant coping styles, and personality traits such as neuroticism and low extraversion, negatively affect adjustment after burn injury.

Few studies of psychological treatments in burn patients are available. From general trauma literature, it is concluded that cognitive (behavioral) and pharmacological (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) interventions have a positive effect on depression. With respect to PTSD, exposure therapy and eye movement reprocessing and desensitization are successful. Psychological debriefing aiming to prevent chronic post-trauma reactions has not, thus far, shown a positive effect in burn patients. Treatment of problems in the social area includes cognitive-behavioral therapy, social skills training, and community interventions. Sexual health promotion and counseling may decrease problems in sexual life.

In conclusion, psychopathology and psychological problems are identified in a significant minority of burn patients. Symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders (of which PTSD is one) should be the subject of screening in the post-burn phase and treated if indicated. A profile of the patient at risk, based on pre-injury factors such as pre-morbid psychiatric disorder and personality characteristics, peri-traumatic factors and post-burn factors, is presented. Finally, objective characteristics of disfigurement appear to play a minor role, although other factors, such as proneness to shame, body image problems, and lack of self-esteem, may be of significance.

References

  1. 1.
    Monafo WW. Then and now: 50 years of bum treatment. Burns 1992; 18 Suppl. 2: S7–S10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yarbrough III DR. Improving survival in the burned patient. J S C Med Assoc 1990; 86: 347–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Constable ID. The state of burn care: past, present and future. Burns 1994; 20: 316–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hurren JS. Rehabilitation of the burned patient: James Laing Memorial Essay for 1993. Burns 1995; 21: 116–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choiniere M, Melzack R, Rondeau J, et al. The pain of burns: characteristics and correlates. J Trauma 1989; 29: 1531–1539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ulmer JF. An exploratory study of pain, coping, and depressed mood following burn injury. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 13: 148–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taal LA, Faber A W. Burn injuries, pain and distress: exploring the role of stress symptomatology. Burns 1997; 23: 288–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byers JF, Bridges S, Kijek J, et al. Burn patients’ pain and anxiety experiences. J Burn Care Rehabil 2001; 22: 144–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menzies V. Depression and bum wounds. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2000; 14: 199–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernstein NR, Breslau AJ, Graham JA. Coping strategies for burn survivors and their families. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1988Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cash TF. The psychology ofphysical appearance: aesthetics, attributes and images. In: Cash TF, Prnzinsky T, editors. Body images: development, deviance and change. New York: The Guilford Press, 1990: 51–79Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacGregor FC. A response to ‘The Quasimodo complex’. J Clin Ethics 1990; 1: 224–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilboa D, Friedman M, Tsur H. The burn as a continuous traumatic stress: implications for emotional treatment during hospitalization. J Burn Care Rehabil 1994; 15: 86–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arturson G. Pathophysiology of the burn wound and pharmacological treatment: The Rudi Hermans Lecture, 1995. Burns 1996; 22: 255–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams WG, Philips L.G. Pathophysiology of the burn wound. In: Herndon DN, editor. Total burn care. London: WB Saunders, 1996: 63–80Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leung KS, Sher A, Clark JA, et al. Microcirculation in hypertrophic scars after burn injury. J Burn Care Rehabil 1989; 10: 436–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Helm PA. Burn rehabilitation: dimensions of the problem. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19: 551–559PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Staley MJ, Richard RL. Use of pressure to treat hypertrophic burn scars. Adv Wound Care 1997; 10: 44–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van den Kerckhove E, Stappaerts K, Boeckx W, et al. Silicones in the rehabilitation of burns: a review and overview. Burns 2001; 27: 205–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fleming MD, Hunt JL, Purdue GF, et al. Marjolin’s ulcer: a review and reevaluation of a difficult problem. J Burn Care Rehabil 1990; 11: 460–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blumenfield M, Schoeps M. Reintegrating the healed burned adult into society: psychological problems and solutions. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19: 599–605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ward HW, Moss RL, Darko DF, et al. Prevalence of postburn depression following burn injury. J Burn Care Rehabil 1987; 8: 294–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patterson DR, Everett JJ, Bombardier CH, et al. Psychological effects of severe burn injuries. Psychol Bull 1993; 113: 362–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Malt U. Psychosocial follow-up studies of burned adults: review of the literature. Burns 1980; 6: 190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adler A. Neuropsychiatric complications in victims of Boston’s Cocoanut Grove Disaster. J Am Med Assoc 1943; 123: 1098–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tedstone JE, Tarrier N. An investigation of the prevalence of psychological morbidity in burn-injured patients. Burns 1997; 23: 550–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ptacek IT, Patterson DR, Heimbach DM. Inpatient depression in persons with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 2002; 23: 1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Madianos MG, Papaghelis M, Ioannovich J, et al. Psychiatric disorders in burn patients: a follow-up study. Psych other Psychosom 2001; 70: 30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fauerbach JA, Lawrence J, Haythornthwaite J, et al. Preburn psychiatric history affects posttrauma morbidity. Psychosomatics 1997; 38: 374–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wiechman SA, Ptacek IT, Patterson DR, et al. Rates, trends, and severity of depression after burn injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil 2001; 22: 417–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fukunishi I. Relationship of cosmetic disfigurement to the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder in burn injury or digital amputation. Psychother Psychosom 1999; 68: 82–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maes M, Mylle J, Deltreire L, et al. Psychiatric morbidity and comorbidity following accidental man-made traumatic events: incidence and risk factors. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000; 250: 156–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Williams EE, Griffiths TA. Psychological consequences of burn injury. Burns 1991; 17: 478–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tedstone JE, Tarrier N, Faragher EB. An investigation of the factors associated with an increased risk of psychological morbidity in burn injured patients. Burns 1998; 24: 407–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ehde DM, Patterson DR, Wiechman SA, et al. Post-traumatic stress symptoms and distress 1 year after burn injury. J Burn Care Rehabil 2000; 21: 105–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van Loey NE, Maas C, Faber AW, et al. Predictors of chronic post-traumatic stress symptoms following burn injury: results of a longitudinal study. J Trauma Stress. In pressGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maes M, Deltreire L, Schotte C, et al. Epidemiologic and phenotrenological aspects of post-traumatic stress disorder: DSM-III-R diagnosis and diagnostic criteria not validated. Psychiatry Res 1998; 81: 179–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Taal LA, Faber AW. Posttraumatic stress and maladjusttrent among adult burn survivors 1–2 years postburn. Burns 1998; 24: 285–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fukunishi I, Sasaki K, Chishima Y, et al. Emotional disturbances in trauma patients during the rehabilitation phase: studies of posttraumatic stress disorder and alexithymia. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1996; 18: 121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lawrence JW, Fauerbach J, Munster A. Early avoidance of traumatic stimuli predicts chronicity of intrusive thoughts following burn injury. Behav Res Ther 1996; 34: 643–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Difede J, Barocas D. Acute intrusive and avoidant PTSD symptoms as predictors of chronic PTSD following burn injury. J Trauma Stress 1999; 12: 363–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Joseph S, Williams R, Yule W. Understanding post-traumatic stress disorder: a psychosocial perspective on PTSD and treattrent. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1997Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shalev AY, Freedman S, Peri T, et al. Prospective study of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression following trauma. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 630–637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bijl RV, van Zessen G, Ravelli A. [Psychiatric morbidity among adults in The Netherlands: the NEMESIS-Study: II. prevalence of psychiatric disorders. Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997; 141: 2453–2460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of trental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Baur KM, Hardy PE, Van Dorsten B. Posttraumatic stress disorder in burn populations: a critical review of the literature. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998; 19: 230–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Breslau N. The epidemiology of posttraumatic stress disorder: what is the extent of the problem? J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 17: 16–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    FellerI, Tholen D, Cornell RG. Irnprovetrents in burn care, 1965 to 1979. JAMA 1980; 244: 2074–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P. Risk factors for PTSD-related traumatic events: a prospective analysis. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152: 529–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shalev AY, Peri T, Canetti L, et al. Predictors of PTSD in injured trauma survivors: a prospective study. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153: 219–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Melzack R, Wall PD. The challenge of pain. New York: Basic Books, 1982Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Perry S, Heidrich G. Managetrent of pain during debride trent: a survey of US burn units. Pain 1982; 13: 267–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Taal LA, Faber A W. Post-traumatic stress, pain and anxiety in adult burn victims. Burns 1997; 23: 545–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yu BH, Dimsdale JE. Posttraumatic stress disorder in patients with burn injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil 1999; 20: 426–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Breslau N, Davis GC. Posttraumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults: risk factors for chronicity. Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149: 671–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Seedat S, Stein DJ. Trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder in wotren: a review. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2000; 15 Suppl. 3: S25–S33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brady KT, Killeen TK, Brewerton T, et al. Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 Suppl. 7: 22–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Duff K, McCaffrey RJ. Electrical injury and lightning injury: a review of their trechanisms and neuropsychological, psychiatric, and neurological sequelae. Neuropsychol Rev 2001; 11: 101–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pliskin NH, Meyer GJ, Dolske MC, et al. Neuropsychiatric aspects of electrical injury: a review of neuropsychological research. Ann NY Acad Sci 1994; 720: 219–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Janus TJ, Barrash J. Neurologic and neurobehavioral effects of electric and lightning injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996; 17: 409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pliskin NH, Fink J, Malina A, et al. The neuropsychological effects of electrical injury: new insights. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999; 888: 140–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Muehlberger T, Vogt PM, Munster AM. The long-term consequences oflightning injuries. Burns 2001; 27: 829–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Varney NR, Ju D, Smith Shepherd J, et al. Long-term neuropsychological sequelae of severe burns. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998; 13: 737–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    van Zomeren AH, ten Duis HJ, Minderhoud JM, et al. Lightning stroke and neuropsychological impairment: cases and questions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 64: 763–769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bogaerts F, Boeckx W. Burns and sexuality. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13: 39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Whitehead TL. Sexual health promotion of the patient with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1993; 14: 221–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    de Rios MD, Novac A, Achauer BH. Sexual dysfunction and the patient with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1997; 18: 37–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tudahl LA, Blades BC, Munster AM. Sexual satisfaction in burn patients. J Burn Care Rehabil 1987; 8: 292–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bianchi TL. Aspects of sexuality after burn injury: outcOtreS in tren. J Burn Care Rehabil 1997; 18: 183–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Balakrishnan C, Imel LL. Effect of penile burns on sexual function. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 508–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kimmo T, Jyrki V, Sirpa AS. Health status after recovery from burn injury. Burns 1998; 24: 293–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kildal M, Andersson G, Fugl-Meyer AR, et al. Developtrent of a brief version of the Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS-B). J Trauma 2001; 51: 740–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Solomon SE. On an island by myself: wotren of color with facial distinctions. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998; 19: 268–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Jonsson CE, Schuldt K, Linder J, et al. Rehabilitative, psychiatric, functional and aesthetic problems in patients treated for burn injuries: a preliminary follow-up study. Acta Chir Plast 1997; 39: 3–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ye EM. Psychological morbidity in patients with facial and neck burns. Burns 1998; 24: 646–648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Taal L, Faber AW. Posttraumatic stress and maladjusttrent among adult burn survivors 1 to 2 years postburn: Part II: the interview data. Burns 1998; 24: 399–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Goffman E. Stigma, notes on the managetrent of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs (NY): Prentice-Hall, 1963Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    MacGregor FC. Transformation and identity: the face and plastic surgery. New York: Quadrangle, 1974Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Partridge I. Changing faces: the challenge of facial disfigurement. London: Penguin Books, 1990Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    MacGregor FC. Facial disfigurement: problems and management of social interaction and implications for mental health. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1990; 14: 249–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Robinson E, Rumsey N, Partridge J. An evaluation of the impact of social interaction skills training for facially disfigured people. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49: 281–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Houston V, Bull R. Do people avoid sitting next to someone who is facially disfigured? Eur J Soc Psychol 1994; 24: 279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Partridge J. Changing faces: taking up Macgregor’s challenge. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998; 19: 174–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    MacGregor FC, Abel TM, Bryt A, et al. Facial deformities and plastic surgery: a psychosocial study. Springfield (IL): Charles C. Thomas, 1953Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Cahners SS. Young women with breast burns: a self-help ‘group by mail’. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13: 44–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Patterson DR, Ptacek IT, Cromes F, et al. The 2000 Clinical Research Award: describing and predicting distress and satisfaction with life for burn survivors. J Burn Care Rehabil 2000; 21: 490–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Doctor IN, Patterson DR, Mann R. The 1997 Clinical Research Award: health outcome for burn survivors. J Burn Care Rehabil 1997; 18: 490–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Salvador-Sanza JF, Sanchez-Paya J, Rodriguez-Marin J. Quality of life of the Spanish burn patient. Burns 1999; 25: 593–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Riis A, Andersen M, Pedersen ME, et al. Long-term psychosocial adjustment in patients with severe burn injuries: a follow-up study. Burns 1992; 18: 121–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Fauerbach JA, Lawrence JW, Munster AM, et al. Prolonged adjustment difficulties among those with acute posttrauma distress following burn injury. J Behav Med 1999; 22: 359–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Boeve SA, Aaron LA, Martin-Herz SP, et al. Sleep disturbance after burn injury. J Burn Care Rehabil 2002; 23: 32–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Lawrence JW, Fauerbach J, Eudell E, et al. The 1998 Clinical Research Award: sleep disturbance after burn injury: a frequent yet understudied complication. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998; 19: 480–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Fauerbach JA, Heinberg LJ, Lawrence JW, et al. Effect of early body image dissatisfaction on subsequent psychological and physical adjustment after disfiguring injury. Psychosom Med 2000; 62: 576–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Blalock SJ, Bunker BJ, De Vellis RF. Measuring health status among survivors of burn injury: revisions of the Burn Specific Health Scale. J Trauma 1994; 36: 508–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Pardo Mateu L, Chamorro Hernandez JJ. Emotional aspects in burn patients: usage of a health state classification system. Burns 1996; 22: 396–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Blalock SJ, Bunker BJ, De Vellis RF. Psychological distress among survivors of burn injury: the role of outcome expectations and perceptions of importance. J Burn Care Rehabil 1994; 15: 421–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Xiao J, Cai BR. Functional and occupational outcome in patients surviving massive burns. Burns 1995; 21: 415–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Fong J. A study of self-monitoring processes and coping behaviour in burns victims. Burns 1997; 23 Suppl. 1: S8–S11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gilboa D, Bisk L, Montag I, et al. Personality traits and psychosocial adjustment of patients with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1999; 20: 340–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Fauerbach JA, Lawrence JW, Schmidt Jr CW, et al. Personality predictors of injury-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 2000; 188: 510–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Willebrand M, Kildal M, Ekselius L, et al. Development of the coping with burns questionnaire. Pers Individ Diff 2001; 30: 1059–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Calvert CT. A model of coping and psychological adjustment to a severe burn injury [thesis/dissertation]. North Carolina State University, 1995Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Bryant RA. Predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder following burns injury. Burns 1996; 22: 89–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ptacek IT, Wiechman SA, Patterson DR, et al. Coping following burn injuries [abstract]. J Burn Care Rehabil 2001, 22 (2), S94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Perry S, Difede J, Musngi G, et al. Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder after burn injury. Am JPsychiatry 1992; 149: 931–935Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Wisely JA, Tarrier N. A survey of the need for psychological input in a follow-up service for adult burn-injured patients. Burns 2001; 27: 801–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Holaday M, Yarbrough A. Results of a hospital survey to determine the extent and type of psychologic services offered to patients with severe burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996; 17: 280–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Van Loey NE, Faber AW, Taal LA. A European hospital survey to determine the extent of psychological services offered to patients with severe burns. Burns 2001; 27: 23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Van Loey NE, Faber AW, Taal LA. Do burn patients need burn specific multidisciplinary outpatient aftercare: research results. Burns 2001; 27: 103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Patterson DR. Non-opioid-based approaches to burn pain. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16 (3 Pt 2): 372–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Patterson DR. Practical applications of psychological techniques in controlling burn pain. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13 (1): 13–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Patterson DR, Ptacek IT, Carrougher GJ, et al. Lorazepam as an adjunct to opioid analgesics in the treatment of burn pain. Pain 1997; 72 (3): 367–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Choiniere M, Grenier R, Paquette C. Patient-controlled analgesia: a double-blind study in burn patients. Anaesthesia 1992; 47 (6): 467–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Kiecolt-Glazer JK, Williams DA. Self-blame, compliance, and distress among burn patients. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 53: 187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Welch M. Clients’ experiences of depression during recovery from traumatic injury. Clin Nurse Spec 1995; 9: 92–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Hallon SD, Shelton RC. Treatment guidelines for major depression disorders. Behav Ther 2001; 32: 235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Kennedy SH, Lam RW, Cohen NL, et al. Clinical guidelines for the treatment of depressive disorders. IV. Medications and other biological treatments. Can J Psychiatry 2001; 46 Suppl. 1: 38S–58SGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Brunello N, Davidson JR, Deahl M, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder: diagnosis and epidemiology, comorbidity and social consequences, biology and treatment. Neuropsychobiology 2001; 43: 150–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Bisson IT, Jenkins PL, Alexander J, et al. Randomised controlled trial of psychological debriefing for victims of acute burn trauma. Br J Psychiatry 1997; 171: 78–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Deahl M. Psychological debriefing: controversy and challenge. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2000; 34: 929–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Lee C, Slade PLV. The influence of psychological debriefing on emotional adaptation in females following early miscarriage. Br J Med Psychol 1996; 69: 47–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    McFarlane AC. The longitudinal course of posttraumatic morbidity: the range of outcomes and their predictors. J Nerv Ment Dis 1988; 176: 30–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Robinson RC, Mitchell IT. Evaluation of psychological debriefings. J Trauma Stress 1993; 6: 367–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Foa EB. Psychosocial treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 Suppl. 5: 43–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Shapiro F. Eye movement desensitization: a new treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1989; 20: 211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Van Etten ML, Taylor S. Comparative efficacy of treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin Psychol Psych other 1998; 5: 126–144Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Shepherd J, Stein K, Milne R. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: a review of an emerging therapy. Psychol Med 2000; 30: 863–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Davidson PR, Parker KC. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69: 305–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    McCann DL. Post-traumatic stress disorder due to devastating burns overcome by a single session of eye movement desensitization. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1992; 23: 319–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Blaha J, Svobodova K, Kapounkova Z. Therapeutical aspects of using citalopram in burns. Acta Chir Plast 1999; 41: 25–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Davidson JR, Rothbaum BO, van der Kolk BA, et al. Multicenter, double-blind comparison of sertraline and placebo in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58: 485–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    van der Kolk BA, Dreyfuss D, Michaels M, et al. Fluoxetine in posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1994; 55: 517–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Pearlstein T. Antidepressant treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 Suppl. 7: 40–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Thompson A, Kent G. Adjusting to disfigurement: processes involved in dealing with being visibly different. Clin Psychol Rev 2001; 21: 663–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Partridge J. Then and now: reflections on burn care past, present and future: towards a new paradigm of language and care. Burns 1999; 25: 739–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Cash TF, Grant JR. The cognitive-behavioral treattrent of bcxly image disturbances. In: Van Hassalt C, Hersen M, editors. Sourcebook of psychological treatment manuals for adult disorders. New York: Plenum, 1995: 567–614Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Papadopoulos L, Bor R, Legg C. Coping with the disfiguring effects of vitiligo: a preliminary investigation into the effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Br J Med Psychol 1999; 72: 385–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Willis-Helmich JJ. Reclaiming bcxly image: the hidden burn. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13: 64–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Rumsey N, Bun R, Gahagan D. A preliminary study of the potential of social skins for improving the quality of social interaction for the faciany disfigured. Soc Behav 1986; 1: 143–145Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Rose M, Meyer W, Thomas C, et al. Effects of group dynamic in facilitating social skins learning amongst adolescent burn survivors [abstract]. J Burn Care Rehabil 2001; 22: S153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Blakeney P. School reintegration. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 180–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Bishop B, Gilinsky V. School reentry for the patient with burn injuries: video and/or on-site intervention. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 455–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Blakeney P, Moore P, Meyer III W, et al. Efficacy of school reentry programs. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 469–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Aieno D. Sexuality: counseling for the disabled by the disabled. In: Bernstein NR, Breslau AJ, Graham JA, editors. Coping strategies for burn survivors and their families. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1988: 67–70Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Davidson JRT, Hughes D, Blazer DG. Post-traumatic stress disorder in the community: an epidemiological study. Psychol Med 1991; 21: 713–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P, et al. Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991; 48: 216–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Orsillo SM, Heimberg RG, Juster HR, et al. Social phobia and PTSD in Vietnam veterans. J Trauma Stress 1996; 9: 235–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Davies F, Norman RM, Cortese L, et al. The relationship between types of anxiety and depression. J Nerv Ment Dis 1995; 183: 31–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Adshead G. Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177: 144–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Pruzinsky T, Rice LD, Hitrel HN, et al. Psychotretric assess trent of psychologic factors influencing adult burn rehabilitation. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13: 79–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy E. E. Van Loey
    • 1
  • Maarten J. M. Van Son
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ResearchDutch Burns FoundationBeverwijkThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Clinical PsychologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations