American Journal of Clinical Dermatology

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 185–191 | Cite as

Sunscreens

Safety, Efficacy and Appropriate Use
  • Fergal J. Moloney
  • Sinead Collins
  • Gillian M. Murphy
Review Article

Abstract

Promoting sunscreen use is an integral part of prevention programmes aimed at reducing ultraviolet (UV) radiation-induced skin damage and skin cancers. Protection against both UVB and UVA radiation is advocated. Most sunscreens combine chemical UV absorbing sunscreens and physical inorganic sunscreens, which reflect UV, to provide broad-spectrum protection. Newer triazole and camphor-derivative based sunscreens, also provide broad-spectrum protection and are more cosmetically acceptable than many traditional agents. Currently licensed sunscreen ingredients in common use rarely cause allergic or photoallergic reactions. Vitamin D levels are not significantly affected by regular use of a sunscreen. Sunscreen use reduces both the development of precancerous solar keratosis and the recurrence of squamous cell carcinomas. Sunscreen use early in life may be important in prevention of basal cell carcinomas. Increased melanoma risk is influenced by the behaviour patterns of regular sunscreen users, as opposed to any direct effect of sunscreens. Sun protection factor (SPF) is affected by application density, water resistance and other factors. An adequate SPF for an individual should be balanced to skin phenotype and exposure habits. The correct use of sunscreens should be combined with the avoidance of midday sun and the wearing of protective clothing and glasses, as part of an overall sun protection regimen.

Notes

Acknowledgments

There were no sources of funding or conflicts of interest in the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Schofield D. Who uses sunscreens? A comparison of the use of sunscreens with the use of prescribed pharmaceuticals. Canberra: NATSEM University of Canberra, 1996Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kondo S., Hamada A., Yagamuchi J., et al. Protective effect of dl-alfa-tocopherol on the cytotoxicity of ultraviolet B against human skin fibroblasts in vitro. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1990; 7: 173–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darr D. Combs S., Dunston S., et al. Topical vitamin C protects porcine skin from ultraviolet radiation-induced damage. Br J Dermat 1992; 127: 247–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klein K. Sunscreen products: formulation and regulatory considerations. In: Lowe N.J., Shaath N.A., Pathak M.A., editors. Sunscreens: development, evaluation and regulatory aspects. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997: 299Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Food and Drug Administration Sunscreen drug products for over-the counter human use; tentative final monograph. (Proposed Rule. 21 CFR Parts 352, 700 and 740, 58 [90], 28194-28302): 1993Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janousek A. Regulatory aspects of sunscreens in Europe. In: Lowe N.J., Shaath N.A., Pathak M.A., editors. Sunscreens: development, evaluation and regulatory aspects. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997: 218–22Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roelandts R. Shedding light on sunscreens. Clin Exp Dermatol 1998; 23: 147–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schauder S., Ippen H. Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 221–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derry J.E., McLean W.M., Freeman J.B. A study of the percutaneous absorption from topically applied zinc oxide ointment. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr 1983; 7: 131–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roelandts R., Sohrabuand N., Garmyn M. Evaluating the UVA protection of sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 56–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diffey B.L., Grice J. The influence of sunscreen type on photoprotection. Br J Dermatol 1997; 137: 103–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitchell K., Mitchnick M.A. Visibly transparent UV sunblock agents and methods of making same. 1996. US Patent No. 5, 587, 148Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitchnick M.A., Fairhurst D., Pinnell S.R. Microfine zinc oxide (z-cote) as a photostable UVA/UVB sunblock agent. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40: 85–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nixon R.L., Frowen K.E., Lewis A.E. Skin reactions to sunscreens. Australas J Dermatol 1997 Jun; 38 Suppl. 1: S83–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Funk J.O., Dromgoole S.H., Maibach H.I. Sunscreen intolerance: contact sensitization and irritancy of sunscreen agents. Dermatol Clin 1995; 13: 475–81Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szezurko C., Dompmartin A., Michel M., et al. Photocontact allergy to oxybenzone: ten years of experience. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1994; 10: 144–7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schauder S., Ippen H. Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 221–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marks R., Foley P.A., Jolley D., et al. The effect of regular sunscreen use on vitamin D levels in an Australian population: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 415–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farrerons J., Barnadas M., Rodriguez J., et al. Clinically prescribed sunscreen does not decrease serum vitamin D concentration sufficiently either to induce changes in parathyroid function of in metabolic markers. Br J Dermatol 1998 Sep; 139 (3): 422–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gallagher R.P., Hill G.B., Bajdik C.D., et al. Sunlight exposure, pigmentary factors, and risk of non-melanotic skin cancer, I: basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 157–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gallagher R.P., Hill G.B., Bajdik C.D., et al. Sunlight exposure, pigmentary factors, and risk of non-melanotic skin cancer, II: squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 164–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Autier P., Dor J.F., Grier S., et al. Sunscreen use and duration of sun exposure; a double-blind, randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999 Aug 4; 91 (15): 1304–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lavker R.M., Veres D.A., Irwin C.J., et al. Quantitative assessment of cumulative damage from repetitive exposures to suberythmogenic doses of UVA in human skin. Photochem Photobiol 1995; 62: 348–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bestak R., Barneston R.S.C., Nearn M.R., et al. Sunscreen protection of contact hypersensitivity responses from chronic solar-simulated ultraviolet irradiation correlates with the absorption spectrum of the sunscreen. J Invest Dermatol 1995; 105: 345–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberts L.K., Beasley D.G. Commercial sunscreen lotions prevent ultraviolet-radiation induced immunosuppression of contact hypersensitivity. J Invest Dermatol 1995; 105: 339–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Damian D.L., Halliday G.M., Barnetson R.S. Broad spectrum sunscreens provide greater protection against ultraviolet radiation induced suppression of contact hypersensitivity to a recall antigen in humans. J Invest Dermatol 1997 Aug; 109 (2): 146–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Whitmore S.E., Morrison W.L. Prevention of UVB-induced immunosuppression in humans by a high sun protection factor sunscreen. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 1128–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Damian D.L., Barnetson R.S., Halliday G.M. Measurement of in vivo sunscreen immune protection factors in humans. Photochem Photobiol 1999; 70 (6): 910–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wulf H.C., Poulsen T., Brodthagen H., et al. Sunscreens for delay of ultraviolet induction of skin tumours. J Am Acad Dermatol 1982; 7: 194–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kligman L.H., Akin F.J., Kligman A.M. Sunscreens prevent ultraviolet photocarcinogenesis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1980; 3: 30–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thompson S.C., Jolley D., Marks R. Reduction of solar keratosis by regular sunscreen use. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1147–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Naylor M.F., Boyd A., Smith D.W., et al. High sun protection factor sunscreens in the suppression of actinic neoplasia. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 1701–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Green A., Williams G., Neale R., et al. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in suppression of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Lancet 1999 Aug 28; 354: 723–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marks R. Photoprotection and prevention of melanoma. Eur J Dermatol 1999 Jul–Aug; 9 (5): 406–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rosenstein B.S., Phelps R.G., Weinstock M.A., et al. p53 mutations in basal cell carcinomas arising in routine users of sunscreens. Photochem Photobiol 1999 Nov; 70 (5): 798–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Staples M., Marks R., Giles G. Trends in the incidence of non-melanocytic skin cancer (NMSC) treated in Australia 1985–1995: are primary prevention programs starting to have an effect? Int J Cancer 1998 Oct; 78 (2): 144–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marks R. Epidemiology of melanoma. Clin Exp Dermatol 2000 Sep; 25: 459–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Langley R.G., Sober A.J. A clinical review of the etiology of cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Invest 1997; 15 (6): 561–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weinstock M.A. Do sunscreens increase or decrease melanoma risk; an epidemiologic evaluation. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc 1999 Sep; 4 (1): 97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Koh H.K., Low R.A. Sunscreens and melanoma: implications for preventions. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86 (2): 78–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Swerdlow A.J., Weinstock M.A. Do tanning lamps cause melanoma? An epidemiologic assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998 Jan; 38 (1): 89–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use. Federal Register, 43: 38206–38269: 1978 and 1994Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bech-Thomsen N., Wulf H.C. Sunbathers’ application of sunscreen is probably inadequate to obtain the sun protection factor assigned to the preparation. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1992; 9: 242–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sternberg C., Larko O. Sunscreen application and its importance for the sun protection factor. Arch Dermatol 1985; 121: 1400–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gottleib A., Bourget T.D., Lowe N.J. Sunscreens: effects of amounts of application of sun protection factors. In: Lowe N.J., Shaath N.A., Pathak M.A., editors. Sunscreens: development, evaluation and regulatory aspects. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997: 583–8Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaidbey K. The photoprotective potential of the new superpotent sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22 (3): 449–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Leroy D., Deschamps P. Influence of formulation on sunscreen water resistance. Photodermatology 1986; 3: 52–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stokes R.P., Diffey B.L. The water resistance of sunscreen and day care products. Br J Dermatol 1999 Feb; 140 (2): 259–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lavker R.M., Gerberick G.F., Veres K., et al. Cumulative effects from repeated exposures to suberythemal doses of UVB and UVA in human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 53–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gasparro F.P., Mitchnick M., Nash J.F. A review of sunscreen safety and efficacy. Photochem Photobiol 1998; 68 (3): 243–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rosenstein B.S., Weinstock M.A., Habib R. Transmittance spectra and theoretical sun protection factors for a series of sunscreen-containing sun care products. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1999; 15: 75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Diffey B.L., P.M. Farr. Sunscreen protection against UVB, UVA and blue light: an in vivo and in vitro comparison. Br J Dermatol 1991; 124: 258–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lowe N.J. Ultraviolet A claims and testing procedures for OTC sunscreens: a summary and review. In: Lowe N.J., Shaath N.A., Pathak M.A., editors. Sunscreens: development, evaluation and regulatory aspects. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997: 527–35Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gies H.P., Roy C.R., McLennan A. Textiles and sun protection. In: Volkmer B., Heller H., editors. Enviromnental UV-radiation, risk of skin cancer and primary prevention. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, 1996: 213–34Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cox N.H., Diffey B.L., Farr P.M. The relationship between chronological age and the erythemal response to ultraviolet B radiation. Br J Dermatol 1992; 126: 315–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Marks R. Skin cancer: childhood protection affords a lifetime protection. Aust Med J 1986; 147: 476Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gonzalez E., Gonzales S. Drug photosensitivity, idiopathic photodermatoses and sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35: 871–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fergal J. Moloney
    • 1
  • Sinead Collins
    • 1
  • Gillian M. Murphy
    • 1
  1. 1.Beaumont HospitalBeaumontIreland

Personalised recommendations