Disease Management & Health Outcomes

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 101–108

Initiatives to Promote Effective Self-Care Skills in Children and Adolescents with Diabetes Mellitus

Leading Article

Abstract

Intensive management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is increasingly becoming the ‘ideal’ standard of care for pediatric patients at diabetes centers across the world. This ‘ideal’ standard is based on two landmark studies that documented that keeping blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible and achieving this as early as possible in the disease course helps to prevent or delay the devastating long-term complications of T1DM. Simultaneously, initiatives supplemental to the medical care of young patients with diabetes that are attempting to improve the self-care behavior and glycemic control of young patients with diabetes have been implemented. There is consensus among recent meta-analyses and critical reviews of these interventions that their overall impact on glycemic control is modest to moderate at best. Because of the need for healthcare cost containment and allocation of resources, we have attempted to identify the components of these different initiatives that have the potential to be practical, cost saving, and integrated into the routine clinical care of diabetes. Interventions based on coping-skills training, motivational interviewing, behavioral family systems therapy, and multisystemic therapy models require the expertise of a highly trained mental healthcare professional. Moreover, none of these interventions has yet been implemented or evaluated within the ongoing context of routine ambulatory diabetes care. Finally, each of these interventions requires additional time commitments from young patients with diabetes and their families.

The Care Ambassador intervention and programs based on the Family Teamwork intervention do not require highly trained, expensive staff for delivery and have been successfully integrated into routine pediatric diabetes-care settings. Moreover, the Care Ambassador model has also been shown to reduce expensive adverse outcomes across a broad spectrum of youth with diabetes. Finally, telehealth interventions for youth with diabetes may hold great potential as a lower-cost intervention to supplement routine diabetes care and to optimize glycemic control for pediatric patients; however, we await the rigorous evaluation of the application of telehealth interventions across a range of outpatient pediatric diabetes-care settings. Pediatric diabetes care requires an environment of supportive, collaborative communication grounded in realistic expectations for youths. Thus, ongoing evaluations of outcomes of these various interventions are needed within multiple healthcare settings.

References

  1. 1.
    American Diabetes Association. Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 186–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Criag ME, Hattersley A, Donaghue K. ISPAD Clinical practice consensus guidelines 2006–2007: definition, epidemiology and classification. Pediatr Diabetes 2006; 7: 343–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Research Group. Beneficial effect of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). J Pediatr 2001; 139: 804–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Research Group. Effect of intensive insulin treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 177–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanson CL, Henggeler SW, Burghen GA. Social competence and parental support as mediators of the link between stress and metabolic control in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987; 55: 529–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davidson M, Penney ED, Muller B, et al. Stressors and self-care challenges faced by adolescents living with type 1 diabetes. Appl Nurs Res 2004; 17: 72–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ginsburg KR, Howe CJ, Jawad AF, et al. Parents’ perceptions of factors that affect successful diabetes management for their children. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1095–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delamater AM, Albrecht DR, Postellon DC, et al. Racial differences in metabolic control of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1991; 14: 20–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris MA, Greco P, Wysocki T, et al. Adolescents with diabetes from single-parent, blended, and intact families: health-related and family functioning. Fam Syst Health 1999; 17: 181–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rewers A, Chase HP, Mackenzie T, et al. Predictors of acute complications in children with type 1 diabetes. JAMA 2002; 287: 2511–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Springer D, Dziura J, Tamborlane WV, et al. Optimal control of type 1 diabetes mellitus in youth receiving intensive treatment. J Pediatr 2006; 149: 227–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erikson EH. Childhood and society. New York: Norton, 1950Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erikson EH. Identity: youth and crisis. New York: Norton, 1968Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weisberg-Benchell J, Glasgow AM, Tynan WD, et al. Adolescent diabetes management and mismanagement. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wysocki T, Taylor A, Hough BS, et al. Deviation from developmentally appropriate self-care autonomy: association with diabetes outcomes. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 119–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anderson BJ, Brackett J, Ho J, et al. An office-based intervention to maintain parent-adolescent teamwork in diabetes management: impact on parent involvement, family conflict, and subsequent glycemic control. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 713–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miller-Johnson S, Emery RE, Marvin RS, et al. Parent-child relationships and the management of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62: 603–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hood KK, Huestis S, Maher A, et al. Depressive symptoms in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: association with diabetes-specific characteristics. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1389–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hauser, ST, Jacobson, AM, Lavori P, et al. Adherence among children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus over four-year longitudinal follow-up: II. Immediate and long-term linkages with the family milieu. J Pediatr Psychol 1990; 15: 527–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anderson BJ, Vangsness LV, Connell A, et al. Family conflict, adherence, and glycemic control in youth with short duration type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Med 2002; 19: 635–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson BJ. Family conflict and diabetes management in youth: clinical lessons from child development and diabetes research. Diabetes Spectr 2004; 17: 22–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohen DM, Lumley MA, Naar-King S, et al. Child behavior problems and family functioning as predictors of adherence and glycemic control in economically disadvantaged children with type 1 diabetes: a prospective study. J Pediatr Psychol 2004; 29: 171–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coyne JC, Anderson BJ. The “psychosomatic family” reconsidered: diabetes in context. J Marital Fam Ther 1988; 14: 113–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anderson BJ. Children with diabetes mellitus and family functioning: translating research into practice. J Pediatr Endocrin Metab 2001; 14: 645–52Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hampson SE, Skinner TC, Hart J, et al. Effects of educational and psychosocial interventions for adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5: 1–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hampson SE, Skinner TC, Hart J, et al. Behavioral interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes: how effective are they? Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 1416–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Northam EA, Todd S, Cameron FJ. Interventions to promote optimal health outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes: are they effective? Diabet Med 2005; 23: 113–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murphy HR, Rayman G, Skinner TC. Psychoeducational interventions for children and young people with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2006; 23: 935–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Winkley K, Landau S, Eisler I, et al. Psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 2006; 333: 65–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grey M, Boland E, Davidson M, et al. Short-term effects of coping skills training as adjunct to intensive therapy in adolescents. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 902–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grey M, Boland E, Davidson M, et al. Coping skills training for youth with diabetes mellitus has long-lasting effects on metabolic control and quality of life. J Pediatr 2000; 137: 107–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miller W, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behaviour. London: Guilford Press, 1991Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith DE, Heckemeyer CM, Kratt PP, et al. Motivational interviewing to improve adherence to a behavioural weight-control program for older obese women with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 52–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lask B. Motivating children and adolescents to improve adherence. J Pediatr 2003; 143: 430–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fiese BH, Wamboldt FS. Tales of pediatric asthma management: family-based strategies related to medical adherence and health care utilization. J Pediatr 2003; 143: 457–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Viner RM, Christie C, Taylor V, et al. Motivational/solution-focused intervention improves HbA1c in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 739–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Channon S, Smith VJ, Gregory JW. A pilot study of motivational interviewing in adolescents with diabetes. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88: 680–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Robin AL, Foster SL. Negotiating parent-adolescent conflict: a behavioral family systems approach. New York: Guilford Press, 1989Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wysocki T, Harris MA, Greco P, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of behavior therapy for families of adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Psychol 2000; 25: 23–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wysocki T, Greco P, Harris MA, et al. Behavior therapy for families of adolescents with diabetes: maintenance of treatment effects. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 441–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wysocki T, Harris MA, Buckloh LM, et al. Effects of behavioral family systems therapy for diabetes on adolescents’ family relationships, treatment adherence, and metabolic control. J Pediatr Psychol 2006; 31: 928–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Harris MA, Mertlich D. Piloting home-based behavioral family systems therapy for adolescent with poorly controlled diabetes. Child Health Care 2003; 32: 65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Harris MA, Harris BS, Mertlich D. Brief report: in-home family therapy for adolescents with poorly controlled diabetes: failure to maintain benefits at 6-month follow-up. J Pediatr Psychol 2005; 30: 683–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ellis DA, Frey M, Narr-King S, et al. Use of multisystemic therapy to improve regimen adherence among adolescents with type 1 diabetes in chronic poor metabolic control: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1604–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Henggeler SW, Schoenwalk DS, Borduin CM, et al. Multisystemic treatment of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press, 1998Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ellis DA, Frey M, Narr-King S, et al. The effects of multisystemic therapy on diabetes stress among adolescents with chronically poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: findings from a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 826–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ellis DA, Yopp J, Templin T, et al. Family mediators and moderators of treatment outcomes among youths with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32: 194–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Krolewski AS, Warram JH, Christlieb AR, et al. The changing natural history of nephropathy in type I diabetes. Am J Med 1985; 78: 785–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Birch-Johnsen K, Norgaard K, Hommel E. Is diabetic nephropathy susceptible to care? A cohort study of 641 patients with type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes. Diabetes Res 1986; 3: 397–400Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jacobson AM, Adler AG, Derby L, et al. Clinic attendance and glycemic control: study of contrasting groups of patients with IDDM. Diabetes Care 1991; 14: 599–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Graber AS, Davidson P, Brown AW, et al. Dropout and relapse during diabetes care. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 1477–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jacobson AM, Hauser ST, Willett J, et al. Consequences of irregular versus continuous medical follow-up in children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 1997; 131: 727–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Laffel L, Brackett J, Ho J, et al. Changing the process of diabetes care improves metabolic outcomes and reduces hospitalizations. Qual Manag Health Care 1998; 6: 53–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Svoren B, Butler D, Levine B, et al. Reducing acute adverse outcomes in youths with type 1 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 914–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Anderson BJ, Auslander WF, Jung KC, et al. Assessing family sharing of diabetes responsibilities. J Pediatr Psychol 1990; 15: 477–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Anderson BJ, Ho J, Brackett J, et al. Parental involvement in diabetes management tasks: Relationships to blood glucose monitoring adherence and metabolic control in young adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 1997; 130: 257–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Grey M, Cameron ME, Lipman TH, et al. Psychosocial status of children with diabetes in the first 2 years after diagnosis. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 1330–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Northam E, Anderson P, Adler R, et al. Psychosocial and family functioning in children with insulin-dependent diabetes at diagnosis and one year later. J Pediatr Psychol 1996; 21: 699–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kovacs M, Goldston D, Obrosky DS, et al. Prevalence and predictors of pervasive noncompliance with medical treatment among youths with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1992; 31: 1112–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hanson CL, Henggeler SW, Burghen GA. Model of associations between psychosocial variables and health-outcome measures of adolescents with IDDM. Diabetes Care 1987; 10: 752–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Laffel LM, Vangsness L, Connell A, et al. Impact of ambulatory, family-focused teamwork intervention on glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2003; 142: 409–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Butler BA, Volkening LK, Milaszewski K, et al. Family-focused teamwork intervention for youth with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) positively impacts A1c and quality of life (QoL): results of a 2-year randomized controlled trial [abstract]. Diabetes 2006, 55: A421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Murphy HR, Wadham C, Rayman G, et al. Integrating pediatric diabetes education into routine clinical care: the Families, Adolescents and Children’s Teamwork Study (FACTS). Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ahring KK, Ahring JP, Joyce C, et al. Telephone modem access improves diabetes control in those with insulin-requiring diabetes. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 971–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cottez ML, Grondin F, Gautier JF. Evaluation of phone calls as a link between diabetic patients and a diabetology department [abstract]. Diabetologia 1997; 40 Suppl. 1: A662Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kapellen TM, Dost A, Christiane L, et al. Patient acceptance and use of an emergency telephone hotline service in pediatric diabetes care [letter]. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chiari G, Ghidini B, Vanelli M. Effectiveness of a toll-free telephone hotline for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a 5-year study. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 2003; 74 Suppl. 1: 45–8Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Heidgerken AD, Adkins J, Storch EA, et al. Telehealth intervention for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2006; 148: 707–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara J. Anderson
    • 1
  • Britta Svoren
    • 2
  • Lori Laffel
    • 2
  1. 1.Baylor College of MedicineChildren’s Nutrition Research CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolJoslin Diabetes CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations