Advertisement

Disease Management & Health Outcomes

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 185–190 | Cite as

Community Direct Access Service for Early Detection and Treatment of Clinical Deterioration

Effectiveness and Impact on the Workload Pattern of a Hospital-Based Heart Failure Unit
  • Carmel Conlon
  • Christina O’Loughlin
  • Mark Ledwidge
  • Kenneth McDonald
Original Research Article

Abstract

Introduction

The number of patients entering a heart failure program at the heart failure unit at St Vincent’s University Hospital (Dublin, Ireland) is increasing. However, the impact of a community direct access service on the workload pattern of a heart failure unit and its appropriateness remain poorly described. The workload of this hospital-based heart failure unit was analyzed over a 3-year period to assess changing workload patterns and to examine the appropriateness and outcome of patients’ direct access to the unit.

Methods

Clinical audits from the heart failure unit for the years 2002, 2003, and 2004 were reviewed, and the types of visits were classified and expressed as a percentage of total patient contact. A prospective, observational study was designed to examine the volume and nature of community direct access to the heart failure unit. Unscheduled contact was defined as a telephone call to the heart failure unit from a patient or carer seeking advice and/or reporting clinical deterioration. All unscheduled contact was triaged by a heart failure clinical nurse specialist, and advice was given on what to do, including immediate same-day referral to the heart failure clinic (termed an unscheduled visit).

Results

Twenty-eight percent of all unscheduled contacts resulted in an unscheduled visit to the unit. Eighty percent of unscheduled visits to the unit demonstrated evidence of clinical deterioration confirmed by physician examination. Eighty-nine percent of patients with clinical deterioration required an increase in oral medications, 10% required administration of an intravenous diuretic, and 1% required direct hospital admission. Unscheduled visits to the unit account for 20% of all clinical reviews annually. None of the unscheduled contacts that were resolved over the telephone (47%) or referred to the family physician or emergency department (25%) resulted in an admission with heart failure.

Conclusion

This study underlines the necessity for, and efficacy of, a community direct access service for heart failure patients in redirecting the course of clinical deterioration.

Keywords

Heart Failure Heart Failure Patient Family Physician Clinical Deterioration Disease Management Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ellrodt G, Cook DJ, Lee J, et al. Evidence-based disease management. JAMA 1997; 278: 1687–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Epstein WA, Sanchez M, Kechijian P. Conjunctivitis. Arch Dermatol 1985; 121: 838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patients must be actively involved for asthma disease management programmes to be effective. Drug Ther Perspect 1999; 13 (12): 5-7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Capomolla S, Febo O, Ceresa M, et al. Cost/utility ratio in chronic heart failure: comparison between heart failure management program delivered by dayhospital and usual care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1259–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stewart S, Marley J, Horowitz J. Effects of a multidisciplinary home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and survival among patients with chronic congestive heart failure: a randomised controlled study. Lancet 1999; 354: 1077–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fonarrow G, Stevenson L, Waiden J, et al. Impact of a comprehensive heart failure management program on hospital readmission and functional status of patients with advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 725–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rich M, Gray D, Beckham V, et al. Effect of a multidisciplinary intervention on medical compliance in medical patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Med 1996; 101: 270–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rich M, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, et al. A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1190–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phillips C, Singa R, Rubin H, et al. Complexity of program and clinical outcomes of heart failure disease management incorporating specialist nurse-led heart failure clinics: a meta-regression analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2005; 7: 333–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips C, Wright S, Kern D, et al. Comprehensive discharge planning plus postdischarge support for older patients with congestive heart failure: a metaanalysis. JAMA 2004; 291: 1358–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McAlistar F, Stewart S, Ferrua S, et al. Multidisciplinary strategies of management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 810–9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atienza F, Anguita M, Martinez-Alzamora N, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of a comprehensive hospital discharge and outpatient heart failure management program. Eur J Heart Fail 2004; 6: 643–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonseth J, Guallar-Castillon P, Banegas J, et al. The effectiveness of disease management programs in reducing hospital readmission in older patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1570–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lainscak M. Implementation of guidelines for management of heart failure in heart failure clinic: effects beyond pharmacological treatment. Int J Cardiol 2004; 97: 411–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McDonald K, Ledwidge M, Cahill J, et al. Heart failure management: multidisciplinary care has intrinsic benefit above the optimization of medical care. J Card Fail 2002; 8: 142–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McDonald K, Ledwidge M, Cahill J, et al. Elimination of early rehospitalization in a randomized, controlled trial of multidisciplinary care in a high-risk, elderly heart failure population: the potential contributions of specialist care, clinical stability and optimal angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor dose at discharge. 2001; 3: 209–15Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ledwidge M, Barry M, Cahill J, et al. Is multidisciplinary care of heart failure cost effective when combined with optimal medical care? Eur J Heart Fail 2003; 5: 381–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jain A, Mills P, Nunn L, et al. Success of a multidisciplinary heart failure clinic for the initiation and up-titration of key therapeutic agents. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005; 7: 405–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ledwidge M, Travers B, Ryder, et al. Specialist care of heart failure improves appropriate pharmacotherapy at the expense of greater polypharmacy and drug interactions. Eur J Heart Fail 2004; 6: 235–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsuyukl R, Fradette M, Johnson J, et al. A multicentre disease management program for hospitalized patients with heart failure. J Card Fail 2004; 10: 473–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DeWalt DA, Pignone M, Malone R, et al. Development and pilot testing of a disease management program for low literacy patients with heart failure. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 55: 78–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McDonald K, Ledwidge M. Heart failure management programs: can we afford to ignore the inpatient phase of care? J Card Fail 2003; 9: 258–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krumholz HM, Amatruda J, Smith GL, et al. Randomized trial of an education and support intervention to prevent readmission of patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 83–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Capomolla S, Pinna G, La Rovere MT, et al. Heart failure disease management program: a pilot study of home telemonitoring versus usual care. Eur J Heart Fail 2004; 6 Suppl.: 91–8Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Lusignan S, Wells S, Johnson P, et al. Compliance and effectiveness of 1 year’s home telemonitoring: the report of a pilot study of patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2001; 3: 723–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Blue L, Lang E, McMurray J, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a specialist nurse intervention in heart failure. BMJ 2001; 323: 715–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ledwidge M, Ryan E, O’Loughlin C, et al. Heart failure care in a hospital unit: a comparison of standard 3-month and extended 6-month programs. Eur J Heart Fail 2005; 7: 385–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmel Conlon
    • 1
  • Christina O’Loughlin
    • 1
  • Mark Ledwidge
    • 1
  • Kenneth McDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Heart Failure UnitSt Vincent’s University HospitalDublin, 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations