Disease Management & Health Outcomes

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 1–7

Drug-Eluting Stents in the Management of Coronary Artery Disease

Implications for Payors and Hospitals
Leading Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Of the >1 million patients who undergo coronary intervention in the US annually, 10–45% develop stent restenosis. Designed to inhibit tissue growth following coronary intervention, the drug-eluting stent (DES) is a breakthrough technology that has been shown to reduce restenosis by 80%, dramatically lowering the percentage of patients requiring repeat intervention. The health-economic implications of DES are complex and depend on the perspective from which they are viewed (i.e. hospital, payor, or physician). For hospitals, DES are a truly disruptive technology. Hospitals are caught between substantially higher costs (DES cost 3-fold more than bare-metal stents), inadequate reimbursement for those higher costs, and potentially declining revenue (fewer bypasses and repeat interventions for restenosis). In contrast, DES appear to be very cost effective for payors. Randomized studies have suggested that the higher initial costs of DES are nearly offset by reduced follow-up costs related to fewer repeat angioplasties and bypass surgeries. Furthermore, overall cost reductions to payors will occur as patients are converted from bypass surgery to multi-vessel coronary intervention with DES. Their high price continues to be a barrier to the use of DES, while the concerns about safety and stent thrombosis have substantially diminished. With greater competition, declining DES prices, and further studies demonstrating safety and efficacy in a wider range of real-world patients, DES will become the default platform for transcatheter coronary intervention in the near future.

References

  1. 1.
    Gruntzig A, Kumpe DA. Technique of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with the Gruntzig balloon catheter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979; 132(4): 547–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith SC Jr, Dove JT, Jacobs AK, et al., American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Committee to Revise the 1993 Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001 Jun 15; 37(8): 2215–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sousa JE, Serruys PW, Costa MA. New frontiers in cardiology: drug-eluting stents. Part I. Circulation 2003; 107(17): 2274–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sousa JE, Serruys PW, Costa MA. New frontiers in cardiology: drug-eluting stents. Part II. Circulation 2003; 107(18): 2383–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leon MB, Teirstein PS, Moses JW, et al. Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 250–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Topol EJ, Leya F, Pinkerton CA, et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease: the CAVEAT Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329(4): 221–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallo R, Padurean A, Jayaraman T, et al. Inhibition of intimal thickening after balloon angioplasty in porcine coronary arteries by targeting regulators of the cell cycle. Circulation 1999; 99: 2164–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho KKL, Senerchia C, Rodriguez O, et al. Predictors of angiographic restenosis after stenting: pooled analysis of 1197 patients with protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up from 5 randomized stent trials [abstract]. Circulation 1998; 98: Suppl. I: I–362Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marx SO, Marks AR. Bench to bedside: the development of rapamycin and its application to stent restenosis. Circulation 2001; 104: 852–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herdeg C, Oberhoff M, Baumbach A, et al. Local paclitaxel delivery for the prevention of restenosis: biological effects and efficacy in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1969–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sousa JE, Marco CA, Abizaid A, et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2001; 103(2): 192–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morice M-C, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1773–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1314–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grube E, Sonoda S, Ikeno F, et al. Six- and twelve-month results from first human experience using everolimus-eluting stents with bioabsorbable polymer. Circulation 2004; 109(18): 2168–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buellesfeld L, Grube E. ABT-578-eluting stents: the promising successor of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent concepts?. Herz 2004; 29(2): 167–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I: six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation 2003; 107: 38–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. TAXUS-IV investigators: a polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350(3): 221–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hermiller JB, Ellis SG, Cannon L, et al. TAXUS IV diabetic subset analysis: improvements in 12-month clinical and 9-month angiographic outcomes in diabetics on oral medications as well as insulin [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 47: 12AGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hermiller JB. Economics of DES: implications for real-world applications [online]. Available from URL: http://www.TCTMD.com [Accessed 2003 Aug 1]
  20. 20.
    Hodgson JM, Bottner RK, Klein LW, et al. Drug-eluting stent task force: final report and recommendations of the working committees on cost-effectiveness/economics, access to care, and medicolegal issues [review]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 62(1): 1–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weintraub WS, Ghazzal ZM, Douglas Jr JS, et al. Long-term clinical follow-up in patients with angiographic restudy after successful angioplasty. Circulation 1993; 87: 831–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ruygrok PN, Melkert R, Morel MA, et al. Does angiography six months after coronary intervention influence management and outcome? Benestent II investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34(5): 1507–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kereiakes DJ, Cox DA, Hermiller JB, et al. Usefulness of a cobalt chromium coronary stent alloy. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 463–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saia F, Lemos PA, Lee CH, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: a clinical and angiographic study. Circulation 2003; 108(16): 1927–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lemos PA, Saia F, Hofma SH, et al. Short- and long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(4): 704–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lemos PA, Arampatzis CA, Saia F, et al. Treatment of very small vessels with 2.25-mm diameter sirolimus-eluting stents (from the RESEARCH registry). Am J Cardiology 2004; 93(5): 633–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    FDA public health web notification [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/cypher2.html [Accessed 2003 Oct 29]
  28. 28.
    Lemos PA, Lee CH, Degertekin M, et al. Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 2093–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    FDA updates information for physicians on cordis cypher stent [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2003/ANS01267.html [Accessed 2003 Nov 25]Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Greenberg D, Bakhai A, Cohen DJ. Can we afford to eliminate restenosis? Can we afford not to?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(4): 513–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kong D, Eisenstein EL, Sketch MH JR, et al. Economic impact of drug-eluting stents on hospital systems: a disease-state model. Am Heart J 2004; 147(3): 449–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cohen DJ, Bakhai A, Shi C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of complex coronary stenoses: results from the Sirolimus-eluting balloon expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions (SIRIUS) trial. Circulation 2003; 110(5): 508–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lemos PA, Serruys PW, Sousa JE. Drug-eluting stents: cost versus clinical benefit. Circulation 2003; 107: 3003–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chandler B. The perfect storm [online]. Available from URL: http://www.tctmd.com/expert-presentations/multi-slide?product_id=4543 [Accessed 2003 Aug 1]
  35. 35.
    Morneault JA, Kereiakes DJ, Wright CB. Economic impact of drug-eluting stents in a multiple hospital healthcare system [abstract]. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90 Suppl. 6A: 4HGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ferreira AC, Arley PA, Salerno TA, et al. Clinical impact of drug-eluting stents in changing referral practices for coronary surgical revascularization in a tertiary care center. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 485–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St Vincent Hospital and the Heart Center for Indiana HospitalThe Care Group LLCIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations