Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a gastric stimulation procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity.
Methods: All implantable gastric stimulator systems were implanted in a laparoscopic procedure. We focused on the results of the LOSS (Laparoscopic Obesity Stimulation Survey) study, which was a multicenter European survey of 16 hospitals. To date, 91 patients have undergone implantable gastric stimulator implantation in the LOSS study.
Results: The patient population was comprised of 62 (68%) women and 29 (32%) men. The mean age was 41 years, mean weight was 116kg, and mean body mass index was 41 kg/m2. All surgical procedures were successfully completed. There were no deaths, and no severe peri- or postoperative complications. The mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 20% at 12 months after surgery and about 25% at 2 years after implantation. Baroscreen-selected patients achieved a 31.4% EWL, which was significantly different to the EWL of those patients who were not selected by this screening (15% EWL) [p < 0.01].
Conclusion: Gastric pacing is a promising, minimally invasive, safe, and effective surgical method that results in very little impairment of the patient. Patient selection for gastric stimulation therapy seems to be an important determinant of treatment outcome.
Cigaina V, Saggioro A, Rigo V, et al. Long-term effects of gastric pacing to reduce feed intake in swine. Obes Surg 1996; 6: 250–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cigaina V, Pinato GP, Rigo V, et al. Gastric peristalsis control by mono situ electrical stimulation: a preliminary study. Obes Surg 1996; 6: 247–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cigaina V. Long-term follow-up of gastric stimulation for obesity: the Mestre 8-year experience. Obes Surg 2004; 14 Suppl. 1: 14S–22SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Luca M, Segato G, Busetto L, et al. Progress in implantable gastric stimulation: summary of results of the European multi-center study. Obes Surg 2004; 14 Suppl. 1: S33–9Google Scholar
Miller K. Implantable electrical gastric stimulation to treat morbid obesity in the human: operative technique. Obes Surg 2002; 12 Suppl. 1: 17S–20SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callegari A, Michelini I, Sguazzin C, et al. Efficacy of the SF-36 questionnaire in identifying obese patients with psychological discomfort. Obes Surg 2005; 15(2): 254–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller K, Holler E, Hell E. Intragastric stimulation (IGS) for treatment of morbid obesity. Zentralbl Chir 2002; 127(12): 1049–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favretti F, De Luca M, Segato G, et al. Treatment of morbid obesity with the transcend implantable gastric stimulator (IGS): a prospective survey. Obes Surg 2004; 14(5): 666–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shikora SA. ‘What are the yanks doing?’ The US experience with implantable gastric stimulation (IGS) for the treatment of obesity: update on the ongoing clinical trials. Obes Surg 2004; 14 Suppl. 1: S40–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao S, Ke M, Wang Z, et al. Visceral sensitivity to gastric stimulation and its correlation with alterations in gastric emptying and accommodation in humans. Obes Surg 2005 Feb; 15(2): 247–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin C, Sun Y, Chen JD, et al. Gastric electrical stimulation modulates neuronal activity in nucleus tractus solitarii in rats. Auton Neurosci 2005 Apr 29; 119(1): 1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller K. Obesity: surgical options. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 18(6): 1147–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
Stevens J, Cai J, Pamuk ER, et al. The effect of age on the association between body-mass index and mortality. N Engl J Med 1998; 338(1): 1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald K, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 339–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantz H, Peltonen M, Gren L, et al. A dietary and behavioural programme for the treatment of obesity: a 4-year clinical trial and a long-term post-treatment follow-up. J Intern Med 2003; 254: 272–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, et al. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 933–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Health. Consensus statement: gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 956–61Google Scholar
Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 416–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hell E, Miller KA, Moorehead MK, et al. Evaluation of health status and quality of life after bariatric surgery: comparison of standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. Obes Surg 2000; 10: 214–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stunkard A, Wadden T. Psychological aspects of severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 55: 524–32Google Scholar
Klein S, Fontana L, Young VL, et al. Absence of an effect of liposuction on insulin action and risk factors for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2549–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagner M, Steffen R, Biertho L, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and duodenal switch for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 444–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothari SN, DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, et al. Lap-band failures: conversion to gastric bypass and their preliminary outcomes. Surgery 2002; 131(6): 625–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Meador JG, et al. High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2001; 233(6): 809–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manco M, Nanni G, Tondolo V, et al. Hypocalcemia complicating near-total thyroidectomy in patients with coexisting lipid malabsorption due to biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg 2004; 14(10): 1429–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar