Advertisement

CNS Drugs

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 65–83 | Cite as

Reboxetine

A Review of its Use in Depression
  • Kristin J. HolmEmail author
  • Caroline M. Spencer
Adis Drug Evaluation

Summary

Abstract

Reboxetine is a selective noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitor, the first drug of a new antidepressant class.

Most clinical studies of reboxetine were of 4 to 8 weeks’ duration and are published in summary papers; only a few trials have been published in full. This prevents accurate determination of the efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine because data are limited for some studies. Nevertheless, reboxetine (usually 4 to 10 mg/day) generally has significantly greater efficacy than placebo, similar efficacy to the selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine and appears at least as effective as the tricyclic antidepressants desipramine and imipramine. Some evidence suggests that, compared with fluoxetine, reboxetine may be more effective in severely depressed patients and at improving social behaviour. This requires confirmation, as do limited long term data suggesting that reboxetine may prevent relapse in patients who respond to short term therapy.

Reboxetine recipients generally have a lower incidence of dry mouth and blurred vision than desipramine recipients and are less likely to experience dry mouth, somnolence, hypotension-related symptoms and tremor than patients treated with imipramine, according to short term tolerability data. Compared with fluoxetine, reboxetine causes fewer events typical of SSRIs (nausea and related symptoms and diarrhoea) and less somnolence but is associated with more anticholinergictype events, paraesthesia, flushing and hypotension. Constipation, urinary hesitancy or retention, hypertension and rash are reported more frequently with long term reboxetine therapy than with placebo. Urinary retention or hesitancy in males is the only event that is more common with long term than with short term reboxetine therapy in placebo-controlled trials.

Conclusions: In summary, reboxetine is the first of a new class of antidepressants, the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. As reported predominantly in summary papers, reboxetine appears to be at least as effective as the tricyclic antidepressants desipramine and imipramine and similar in efficacy to the SSRI fluoxetine after short term therapy. Reboxetine may also improve social functioning, an important corollary of depression. However, clarification of this point, and of its comparative efficacy and tolerability and ability to prevent relapse is required in fully reported and well designed trials before its role can be established definitively. Nevertheless, with its selective mechanism of action and acceptable tolerability profile, reboxetine can be considered a promising new agent for the treatment of depression.

Pharmacodynamic Properties

Reboxetine is a selective inhibitor of noradrenaline reuptake. It inhibits noradrenaline reuptake in vitro to a similar extent to the tricyclic antidepressant desmethylimipramine. Reboxetine does not affect dopamine or serotonin reuptake and it has low in vivo and in vitro affinity for adrenergic, muscarinic, cholinergic, histaminergic, dopaminergic and serotonergic receptors. However, reboxetine has been associated with anticholinergic-type adverse events in clinical trials.

Studies in animal models have demonstrated the antidepressant activity of reboxetine.

In healthy volunteers, psychomotor performance and cognitive function were not affected by single doses of reboxetine 0.5 to 4mg with or without alcohol (the recommended dosage of reboxetine is 4mg twice daily). In addition, EEG recordings and volunteers’ subjective ratings indicated that reboxetine ≤4mg, alone or with alcohol, did not cause significant sedation. This contrasted with the CNS impairment seen with amitriptyline 25mg alone or plus alcohol.

Pharmacokinetic Properties

Maximum plasma concentrations of reboxetine are reached about 2.5 hours after an oral dose in healthy volunteers. Reboxetine has linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied (single oral doses of 2 to 5mg) and steady-state plasma concentrations are reached within about 5 days of starting therapy. Reboxetine is ≈98% bound to plasma proteins, predominantly α1-acid glycoprotein, but its potential for interaction with other highly bound drugs has not been determined.

Reboxetine is metabolised via oxidation of the morpholine ring, O-dealkylation of the ethoxyphenoxy ring and hydroxylation. Preliminary evidence suggests that it is unlikely that the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 isoenzyme is involved in the metabolism of reboxetine, and reboxetine appears to inhibit CYP2D6 only at high concentrations. In contrast, reboxetine appears to be metabolised by the CYP3A4 isoenzyme, and compounds that decrease the activity of this isoenzyme are likely to increase plasma concentrations of reboxetine. It is unclear whether reboxetine inhibits CYP3A4. A study in healthy volunteers suggests that coadministration of reboxetine and lorazepam does not cause clinically significant changes to the pharmacokinetics of either drug.

Reboxetine has a relatively short elimination half-life (t1/2) of 12.5 hours in healthy volunteers and is therefore given twice daily. Only 9% of the administered dose is excreted unchanged in the urine.

Elderly individuals (mean age 81 years) appear to have higher plasma concentrations, a longer t1/2, and reduced renal clearance of reboxetine than younger individuals (age 21 to 39 years); similar effects were observed in individuals with renal impairment. Patients with alcoholic liver disease had approximately 2-fold increases in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and t1/2, compared with healthy volunteers after the same dose of reboxetine, although pharmacokinetic parameters were not affected by the severity of liver disease.

Therapeutic Efficacy

To date, most studies assessing the efficacy of reboxetine in patients with depression have been published only in summary papers lacking peer review and full details of methodology and results.

In short term (4- to 8-week) placebo-controlled clinical trials, the proportion of reboxetine recipients whose Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score was reduced by ≥50% ranged from 56 to 74%, a significantly superior response to that with placebo in most studies.

Reboxetine was at least as effective as the tricyclic antidepressants desipramine and imipramine in a total of 4 double-blind randomised studies that each included at least 200 outpatients or hospitalised patients; 1 trial included elderly patients only.

Reboxetine had equivalent antidepressant efficacy to the SSRI fluoxetine in 2 well designed clinical trials, one of which was placebo-controlled. However, reboxetine was significantly more effective than fluoxetine in a pooled subgroup analysis of severely depressed patients from the 2 comparisons. Reboxetine improved social motivation and behaviour, assessed using the newly-developed Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale, to a greater extent than fluoxetine in the placebo-controlled study, but not in the other comparison between reboxetine and fluoxetine that did not include a placebo group.

Preliminary results from a placebo-controlled trial and 2 noncomparative studies (all patients had responded to short term reboxetine therapy) also suggest that reboxetine may be effective for the prevention of relapse. Remission rates were similar for reboxetine and both imipramine and fluoxetine in the only trials with active comparators to report this parameter.

Reboxetine is likely to have a similar onset of action to other antidepressants (2 to 3 weeks) on the basis of available data.

Tolerability

Most tolerability data for reboxetine are provided by a summary paper of both published and previously unpublished trials.

Pooled data from placebo-controlled studies in a total of 746 patients showed that anticholinergic-type events (dry mouth, constipation and urinary hesitancy or retention), increased sweating, insomnia, impotence in male patients, tachycardia and vertigo occurred significantly more frequently with reboxetine than with placebo. Reboxetine does not appear to cause ECG abnormalities in the short term, apart from tachycardia in some adult and elderly patients and occasional atrial and ectopic beats in the elderly. However, in the long term, tachycardia and hypertension appear to be more frequent with reboxetine than with placebo; the cardiovascular effects of reboxetine have not been specifically assessed.

The overall incidence of adverse events with short term reboxetine is similar to that with desipramine, imipramine and fluoxetine. However, dry mouth, tremor, somnolence and hypotension are more common with imipramine than with reboxetine, and blurred vision and dry mouth are experienced more frequently with desipramine than with reboxetine. SSRI-related events (nausea and diarrhoea) and somnolence are more common with fluoxetine than with reboxetine, whereas anticholinergic-type events (constipation, dry mouth, urinary retention or hesitancy), paraesthesia, flushing and hypotension are more frequently reported with reboxetine than with fluoxetine.

Constipation, urinary hesitancy or retention, hypertension and rash are more common with long term reboxetine therapy than with placebo. Urinary retention or hesitancy in males was the only event that had a greater incidence with long term than with short term reboxetine therapy in placebo-controlled trials.

Data from 2 studies (interim results only were available for 1 trial) suggest that the tolerability profile of reboxetine in the elderly is similar to that in younger patients.

In a clinical trial, nausea, fatigue and headache were experienced by patients taking reboxetine at dosages higher than those recommended (up to a dosage of 20 mg/day). There are no published reports of patients taking very large doses of reboxetine. Reboxetine has not been associated with clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters.

Dosage and Administration

The recommended initial oral dosage of reboxetine is 4mg twice daily in adults and 2mg twice daily in the elderly. The dosage can be increased to 10 mg/day in adults and 6 mg/day in the elderly if the response to therapy is incomplete after 3 to 4 weeks. Dosage adjustments are recommended for patients with severe renal impairment and those with hepatic insufficiency.

Keywords

Adis International Limited Fluoxetine Imipramine Desipramine Clinical Global Impression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Riva M, Branello N, Rovescalli AC, et al. Effect of reboxetine, a new antidepressant drug, on the central noradrenergic system: behavioural and biochemical studies. J Drug Dev 1989; 1(4): 243–53Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dostert P, Benedetti MS, Poggesi I. Review of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor [discussion S71-3]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1997 Apr; 7 Suppl. 1: S23–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Szabadi E, Bradshaw CM, Boston PF, et al. The human pharmacology of reboxetine. Hum Psychopharm 1998 Feb; 13 Suppl. 1: S3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Theofilopoulos N, McDade G, Szabadi E, et al. Effects of reboxetine and desipramine on the kinetics of the pupillary light reflex. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995 Mar; 39: 251–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wong EHF, Graveel CR, Kagey ML, et al. Pharmacological selectivity of reboxetine: a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor [abstract]. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998 Sep; 248 Suppl. 2: S97Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwaninger M, Weisbrod M, Knepel W. Progress in defining the mechanism of action of antidepressants: across receptors and into gene transcription. CNS Drugs 1997 Sep; 8: 237–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leonard BE. Mechanisms of action of antidepressants. CNS Drugs 1995; 4 Suppl. 1: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leonard BE. Noradrenaline in basic models of depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1997 Apr; 7 Suppl. 1: S11–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dostert P, Castelli MG, Cicioni P, et al. Reboxetine prevents the tranylcypromine-induced increase in tyramine levels in rat heart. J Neural Transm 1994 Suppl. 41: 149–53Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kerr JS, Powell J, Hindmarch I. The effects of reboxetine and amitriptyline, with and without alcohol on cognitive function and psychomotor performance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996 Aug; 42: 239–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrmann WM, Fuder H. Reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, is non-sedative and does not impair psychomotor performance in healthy subjects. Hum Psychopharm 1998 Aug; 13: 425–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edwards DMF, Pellizzoni C, Breuel HP, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers. Single oral doses, linearity and plasma protein binding. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1995 Aug; 16: 443–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jannuzzo MG, Strolin Benedetti M, Duchene P. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in the elderly [abstract]. 2nd Int Symp Meas Kinet In Vivo Drug Eff 1994: 94-6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fiorentini F, Poggesi I, Jannuzzo MG, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine, a new selective noradrenaline uptake inhibitor, in patients with various degrees of hepatic and renal insufficiency [abstract]. Pharmacol Res 1997; 35(3): 239Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strolin Benedetti M, Pellizzoni C, Poggesi I, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine enantiomers in healthy volunteers [abstract]. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1994; 72 Suppl. 1: 441Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fleishaker JC, Mucci M, Pellizzoni C, et al. Absolute bioavailability of reboxetine enantiomers and effect of gender on pharmacokinetics. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1999; 20: 53-7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pellizzoni C, Strolin BM, Poggesi I, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers: relative bioavailability and food effect [abstract]. Pharmacol Res 1995; 31 Suppl.: 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pellizzoni C, Poggesi I, Jorgensen NP, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers. Single against repeated oral doses and lack of enzymatic alterations. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1996 Oct; 17: 623–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cocchiara G, Battaglia R, Pevarello P, et al. Comparison of the disposition and of the metabolic pattern of reboxetine, a new antidepressant, in the rat, dog, monkey and man. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 1991; 16(3): 231–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pharmacia & Upjohn. Core data sheet: reboxetine. (Data on file)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rocchetti M, Pellizzoni C, Poggesi I, et al. Genetic polymorphism and reboxetine metabolism [abstract]. Therapie 1995; 50 Suppl.: 80Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jannuzzo MG, Ryde M, Karlmark B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers of different ages [abstract; special issue]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1995 Sep; 5: 300Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jannuzzo MG, Bosc M, Renoux A, et al. Effect of reboxetine on the pharmacokinetics of lorazepam in healthy volunteers [abstract; special issue]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1995 Sep; 5: 300–1Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fiorentini F, Poggesi I, Jannuzzo MG, et al. Effect of lorazepam on the pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers [abstract; special issue]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1995 Sep; 5:00Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pharmacia & Upjohn. Edronax™. In: ABPI Compendium of Data Sheets and Summaries of Product Characteristics 1998–99. London: Datapharm Publications Limited, 1998: 997–8Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Montgomery SA. Reboxetine: additional benefits to the depressed patient. J Psychopharmacol 1997; 11(4 Suppl.): 9–15Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burrows GD, Maguire KP, Norman TR. Antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine: a review. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl. 14: 4–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Massana J. Reboxetine versus fluoxetine: an overview of efficacy and tolerability. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl. 14: 8–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ban TA, Gaszner P, Aguglia E, et al. Clinical efficacy of reboxetine: a comparative study with desipramine, with methodological considerations. Hum Psychopharm 1998 Feb; 13 Suppl. 1:S29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berzewski H, Van-Moffaert M, Gagiano CA. Efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine compared with imipramine in a double-blind study in patients suffering from major depressive offsodes [discussion S71-3]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1997 Apr; 7 Suppl. 1: S37–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Massana J, Möller H-J, Burrows GD, et al. Reboxetine: a double-blind comparison with fluoxetine in major depressive disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1999; 14(2): 73–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dubini A, Bosc M, Polin V. Do noradrenaline and serotonin differentially affect social motivation and behaviour? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1997 Apr; 7 Suppl. 1: S49–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bosc M, Dubini A, Polin V. Development and validation of a social functioning scale, the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale [discussion S71-3]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1997 Apr; 7 Suppl. 1: S57–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Versiani M. Reboxetine is effective in preventing relapse and recurrence in major depressive disorder [poster]. 152nd Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 1999 May 15–20; Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mucci M. Reboxetine: a review of antidepressant tolerability. J Psychopharmacol 1997; 11(4 Suppl.): 33–7Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sambunaris A, Keppel HJ, Pinder R, et al. Development of new antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry 1997; 58 Suppl. 6: 40–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hirschfeld RMA, Keller MB, Panico S, et al. The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression. JAMA 1997 Jan 22-29; 277: 333–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Henry JA, Rivas CA. Constraints on antidepressant prescribing and principles of cost-effective antidepressant use. Part 1: depression and its treatment. Pharmacoeconomics 1997 May; 11:419–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Charney DS. Monoamine dysfunction and the pathophysiology and treatment of depression. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl. 14: 11–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    DeVane CL. Differential pharmacology of newer antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl. 20: 85–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Leonard BE. The role of noradrenaline in depression: A review. J Psychopharmacol 1997; 11(4 Suppl.): S39–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schatzberg AF. Noradrenergic versus serotonergic antidepressants: predictors of treatment response. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl. 14: 15–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Weissman MM. Beyond symptoms: Social functioning and the new antidepressants. J Psychopharmacol 1997; 11(4 Suppl.): S5–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Norman TR, Leonard BE. Fast-acting antidepressants: can the need be met? CNS Drugs 1994 Aug; 2: 120–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Caccia S. Metabolism of the newer antidepressants: an overview of the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic implications. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998 Apr; 34: 281–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adis International LimitedMairangi Bay, Auckland 10New Zealand

Personalised recommendations