A randomised trial of the cost effectiveness of buprenorphine as an alternative to methadone maintenance treatment for heroin dependence in a primary care setting
- 287 Downloads
Background and aim: Buprenorphine offers an alternative to methadone in the treatment of heroin dependence, and has the advantage of allowing alternate-day dosing. This study is the first to examine the cost effectiveness of buprenorphine as maintenance treatment for heroin dependence in a primary care setting using economic and clinical data collected within a randomised trial.
Study design and methods: The study was a randomised, open-label, 12-month trial of 139 heroin-dependent patients in a community setting receiving individualised treatment regimens of buprenorphine or methadone. Those who were currently on a methadone program (n = 57; continuing therapy subgroup) were analysed separately from new treatment recipients (n = 82; initial therapy subgroup). The study took a broad societal perspective and included health, crime and personal costs. Data on resource use and outcomes were a combination of clinical records and self report at interview. The main outcomes were incremental cost per additional day free of heroin use and per QALY. An analysis of uncertainty calculated the likelihood of net benefits for a range of acceptable money values of outcomes. All costs were in 1999 Australian dollars ($A).
Results: The estimated mean number of heroin-free days did not differ significantly between those randomised to methadone (225 [95% CI 91, 266]), or buprenorphine (222 [95% CI 194, 250]) over the year of the trial. Buprenorphine was associated with an average 0.03 greater QALYs over 52 weeks (not significant). The total cost was $A17 736 (95% CI −$A2981, $A38 364) with methadone and $A11 916 (95% CI $A7697, $A16 135) with buprenorphine; costs excluding crime were $A4513 (95% CI $A3495, $A5531) and $A5651 (95% CI $A4202, $A7100). With additional heroin-free days as the outcome, and crime costs included buprenorphine has a lower cost but less heroin-free days. If crime costs are excluded buprenorphine has a higher cost and worse outcome than methadone. With additional QALYs as the outcome, the cost effectiveness of buprenorphine is $A39 404 if crime is excluded, but buprenorphine is dominant if crime is included.
Conclusions: The trial found no significant differences in costs or outcomes between methadone and buprenorphine maintenance in this particular setting. Although some of the results suggest that methadone may have a cost advantage, it is difficult to infer from the trial data that offering buprenorphine as an alternative would have a significant effect on total costs or outcomes. The point estimates of costs and outcomes suggest that buprenorphine may have an advantage in those initiating therapy. The confidence intervals were wide, however, and the likelihood of net benefits from substituting one treatment for another was close to 50%.
KeywordsHeroin Buprenorphine Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio Methadone Maintenance Treatment Heroin Dependence
This research was supported by a grant from the Victorian Government, Community Support Fund. Buprenorphine was supplied free of charge to the study by Reckitt Benckiser. The third author has received an educational grant from Reckitt Benckiser.
- 1.Ward DC, Mattick RP, Hall W. Key issues in methadone maintenance treatment. Sydney: New South Wales University Press, 1992Google Scholar
- 11.Mattick RP, Kimber J, Breen C, et al. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database SystRev 2004; (3) article no.: CD002207.pub2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD002207.pub2.Google Scholar
- 16.Department of Health and Community Services. Victorian methadone program. Guidelines for providers. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Health and Community Services, 1995Google Scholar
- 19.Schedule of pharmaceutical benefits for approved pharmacists and medical practitioners, Australian Government, Department of Health and Aged Care. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1999 AugGoogle Scholar
- 20.Caswell A, editor. MIMS Australia. Sydney (NSW): MediMedia Australia Pty Ltd, A Vivendi Universal Publishing Company, 1999 JunGoogle Scholar
- 21.Medicare Benefits Schedule, Australian government, Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, ACT. 1999 Nov [online]. Available from URL: http://www7.health.gov.au/pubs/mbs/nov99s.htm [Accessed 2004 Dec 6]Google Scholar
- 22.Victorian Acute Health Cost Weights Study 1998–1999. Published by Acute Health Division, Victorian government Department of Human Services, 1999 Melbourne, Victoria, Aus tralia [online]. Previously available from URL: http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/ahs/pub.htm [Accessed 2000 Feb 15]Google Scholar
- 23.Australian Psychological Society’s recommended fee schedule [online]. Available from URL: http://www.psychsociety.com.au/member/fr_member.htm [Accessed 1999 Jun 71Google Scholar
- 24.Royal Auto, RACV members magazine. Victoria: Royal Automobile Club of Victoria, 2000 JunGoogle Scholar
- 25.VicTrip Information Centre [online]. Previously available from URL: http://www.victrip.com.au/fares zones [Accessed 1999 Jul 15]. Now available from URL: http://www.metlinkmelboume.com.au [Accessed 1999 Jul 15]Google Scholar
- 26.Allen Consulting Group Pty Ltd and Cox JB. Centre of Policy Studies Economic impact of city link: transurban project. Consultancy report to the Melbourne City Link Authority, 1996 AprGoogle Scholar
- 27.John Walker. Estimates of the costs of crime in Australia: trends and issues [paper no. 39]. Canberra (ACT): Australian Institute of Criminology, 1992 AugGoogle Scholar
- 28.John Walker. Estimates of the costs of crime in Australia in 1996: trends and issues [paper no. 72]. Canberra (ACT): Australian Institute of Criminology, 1997 AugGoogle Scholar
- 29.Potas I, Vining A, Wilson P. Young people and crime: costs and prevention. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, ACT, Australia; 1990 ISBN 0 642 15538 0 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/young-people [Accessed 2004 Dec 13]Google Scholar
- 30.Victorian Police Service Annual Crime Statistics Report, 1996/97. Melbourne (VIC): Victorian Police Service, 1997Google Scholar