Vision-Specific Instruments for the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life and Visual Functioning
- 201 Downloads
Clinically objective measures such as visual acuity or visual field provide an assessment of a patient’s visual status. However such measures may not reflect the degree of visual impairment the patient experiences in his or her daily activities. Visual impairment has been shown to have negative effects on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and a significant impact on daily functioning, including social activities. As such, there is a growing recognition of the importance of patient-reported outcomes of visual functioning.
This review examines the development and psychometric properties of 22 vision-specific instruments assessing visual functioning and/or the impact of visual impairment on HR-QOL or daily activities. Issues relevant to assessing vision-specific subjective outcomes are reviewed, with specific application of the reviewed instruments.
Three instruments, the Activities of Daily Vision Scale, National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, and Visual Function Index have been well validated and widely used, but others also show promise. To fully capture the benefits of a new ophthalmology treatment (or new treatment for eye disease) a valid and reliable visual instrument, in which the psychometric performance has been demonstrated in the particular ocular condition being treated, should be utilised.
Funding provided by Lilly Research Centre. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.
- 2.Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chen SJ, et al. Population-based study on prevalence and risk factors of age-related cataracts in Peitou, Taiwan. Chin Med J 2000; 63: 641–8Google Scholar
- 3.National Eye Institute [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nei.nih.gov/eyedata/pdf/VPUS.pdf [Accessed 2002 May 2]
- 5.World Health Organization [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int [Accessed 2001 Jun 1]
- 13.Cullinan TR. The epidemiology of visual disability: studies of visually disabled people in the community. Research report 28. Canterbury, England: Health Services Research Unit, University of Kent, 1977Google Scholar
- 26.Weih LM, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. In pressGoogle Scholar
- 32.Mangione CM. NEI VFQ-25 scoring algorithum. Bethesda (MD): National Eye Institute, 1997Google Scholar
- 33.Mangione CM. NEI VFQ-25 scoring algorithm. Bethesda (MD): National Eye Institute, 2000Google Scholar
- 43.Turano KA, Geruschat DR, Massof RW. Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 865–77Google Scholar
- 44.van Dijk K, Lewallen S, Chirambo M, et al. Creation and testing of a practical visual function assesment for use in Africa: correlation with visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and near vision in Malawian adults. Ophthalmology 1999; 83: 792–5Google Scholar
- 45.Mills RP. Correlation of quality of life with clinical symptoms and signs at the time of glaucoma diagnosis. Tr Am Ophth Soc 1998; XCVI: 753–812Google Scholar
- 68.Hays R, Anderson R, Revicki DA. Assessing reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials. In: Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM, editors. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998Google Scholar
- 69.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988Google Scholar
- 71.Mangione CM, Lee PP, Hays RD. Measurement of visual functioning and health-related quality of life in eye disease and cataract surgery. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996: 1045–51Google Scholar