Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 147–166 | Cite as

Factors Modulating Post-Activation Potentiation and its Effect on Performance of Subsequent Explosive Activities

  • Neale Anthony Tillin
  • David Bishop
Review Article

Abstract

Post-activation potentiation (PAP) is induced by a voluntary conditioning contraction (CC), performed typically at a maximal or near-maximal intensity, and has consistently been shown to increase both peak force and rate of force development during subsequent twitch contractions. The proposed mechanisms underlying PAP are associated with phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chains, increased recruitment of higher order motor units, and a possible change in pennation angle. If PAP could be induced by a CC in humans, and utilized during a subsequent explosive activity (e.g. jump or sprint), it could potentially enhance mechanical power and thus performance and/or the training stimulus of that activity. However, the CC might also induce fatigue, and it is the balance between PAP and fatigue that will determine the net effect on performance of a subsequent explosive activity. The PAP-fatigue relationship is affected by several variables including CC volume and intensity, recovery period following the CC, type of CC, type of subsequent activity, and subject characteristics. These variables have not been standardized across past research, and as a result, evidence of the effects of CC on performance of subsequent explosive activities is equivocal. In order to better inform and direct future research on this topic, this article will highlight and discuss the key variables that may be responsible for the contrasting results observed in the current literature. Future research should aim to better understand the effect of different conditions on the interaction between PAP and fatigue, with an aim of establishing the specific application (if any) of PAP to sport.

Keywords

Isometric Contraction Regulatory Light Chain Pennation Angle Fatigue Protocol Dynamic Contraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this review and the authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of the review.

References

  1. 1.
    Hodgson M, Docherty D, Robbins D. Post-activation potentiation: underlying physiology and implications for motor performance. Sports Med 2005; 35 (7): 585–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robbins DW. Postactivation potentiation and its practical applicability: a brief review. J Strength Cond Res 2005 May; 19 (2): 453–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sale DG. Postactivation potentiation: role in human performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002 Jul; 30 (3): 138–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sale DG. Postactivation potentiation: role in performance. Br J Sports Med 2004 Aug; 38 (4): 386–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manning DR, Stull JT. Myosin light chain phosphorylation-dephosphorylation in mammalian skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 1982 Mar; 242 (3): C234–41Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vandervoort AA, Quinlan J, McComas AJ. Twitch potentiation after voluntary contraction. Exp Neurol 1983 Jul; 81 (1): 141–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moore RL, Stull JT. Myosin light chain phosphorylation in fast and slow skeletal muscles in situ. Am J Physiol 1984 Nov; 247 (5 Pt 1): C462–71Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stuart DS, Lingley MD, Grange RW, et al. Myosin light chain phosphorylation and contractile performance of human skeletal muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1988 Jan; 66 (1): 49–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vandenboom R, Grange RW, Houston ME. Threshold for force potentiation associated with skeletal myosin phosphorylation. Am J Physiol 1993 Dec; 265 (6 Pt 1): C1456–62Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gullich A, Schmidtbleicher D. MVC-induced short-term potentiation of explosive force. New Studies in Athletics 1996; 11 (4): 67–81Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gossen ER, Sale DG. Effect of postactivation potentiation on dynamic knee extension performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000 Dec; 83 (6): 524–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamada T, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, et al. Postactivation potentiation, fiber type, and twitch contraction time in human knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol 2000 Jun; 88(6): 2131–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szczesna D, Zhao J, Jones M, et al. Phosphorylation of the regulatory light chains of myosin affects Ca2+ sensitivity of skeletal muscle contraction. J Appl Physiol 2002 Apr; 92(4): 1661–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamada T, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, et al. Interaction of fibre type, potentiation and fatigue in human knee extensor muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 2003; 178 (2): 165–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Kasimatis P, et al. Effect of a submaximal half-squats warm-up program on vertical jumping ability. J Strength Cond Res 2003 May; 17 (2): 342–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grange RW, Cory CR, Vandenboom R, et al. Myosin phosphorylation augments force-displacement and force-velocity relationships of mouse fast muscle. Am J Physiol 1995 Sep; 269 (3 Pt 1): C713–24Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grange RW, Vandenboom R, Xeni J, et al. Potentiation of in vitro concentric work in mouse fast muscle. J Appl Physiol 1998 Jan; 84 (1): 236–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Docherty D, Hodgson M. The application of postactivation potentiation to elite sport. Int J Sports Physiol Perf 2007; 2(4): 439–44Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baudry S, Duchateau J. Postactivation potentiation in a human muscle: effect on the rate of torque development of tetanic and voluntary isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 2007 Apr; 102 (4): 1394–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chiu LZ, Fry AC, Weiss LW, et al. Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 2003 Nov; 17 (4): 671–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Szczesna D. Regulatory light chains of striated muscle myosin. Structure, function and malfunction. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord 2003 Jun; 3 (2): 187–97Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbate F, Sargeant AJ, Verdijk PW, et al. Effects of high-frequency initial pulses and posttetanic potentiation onpower output of skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 2000 Jan; 88 (1): 35–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baudry S, Klass M, Duchateau J. Postactivation potentiation of short tetanic contractions is differently influencedby stimulation frequency in young and elderly adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 103 (4): 449–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith JC, Fry AC. Effects of a ten-second maximum voluntary contraction on regulatory myosin light-chain phosphorylation and dynamic performance measures. J Strength Cond Res 2007 Feb; 21 (1): 73–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gossard JP, Floeter MK, Kawai Y, et al. Fluctuations of excitability in the monosynaptic reflex pathway to lumbar motoneurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol 1994 Sep; 72 (3): 1227–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luscher HR, Ruenzel P, Henneman E. Composite EPSPs in motoneurons of different sizes before and during PTP:implications for transmission failure and its relief in Ia projections. J Neurophysiol 1983 Jan; 49 (1): 269–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirst GDS, Redman SJ, Wong K. Post-tetanic potentiation and facilitation of synaptic potentials evoked in cat spinal motoneurons. J Physiol 1981; 321: 97–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Enoka R. Neuromechanics of human movement. 3rd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2002Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trimble MH, Harp SS. Postexercise potentiation of the H-reflex in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998 Jun; 30 (6): 933–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maffiuletti NA, Martin A, Babault N, et al. Electrical and mechanical H(max)-to-M(max) ratio in power- andendurance-trained athletes. J Appl Physiol 2001 Jan; 90 (1): 3–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Folland JP, Wakamatsu T, Finland MS. The influence of maximal isometric activity on twitch and H-reflex potentiation, and quadriceps femoris performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 104 (4): 739–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Folland JP, Williams AG. Methodological issues with the interpolated twitch technique. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2007 Jun; 17 (3): 317–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shield A, Zhou S. Assessing voluntary muscle activation with the twitch interpolation technique. Sports Med 2004; 34 (4): 253–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Behm DG, Button DC, Barbour G, et al. Conflicting effectsof fatigue and potentiation on voluntary force. J Strength Cond Res 2004 May; 18 (2): 365–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Folland JP, Williams AG. The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med 2007; 37 (2): 145–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fukunaga T, Ichinose Y, Ito M, et al. Determination of fascicle length and pennation in a contracting human muscle in vivo. J Appl Physiol 1997 Jan; 82 (1): 354–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mahlfeld K, Franke J, Awiszus F. Postcontraction changes of muscle architecture in human quadriceps muscle. Muscle Nerve 2004 Apr; 29 (4): 597–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Kawakami Y, et al. Effects of repeated muscle contractions on the tendon structures in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001 Jan-Feb; 84 (1-2): 162–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Adams K, O’Shea JP, O’Shea KL, et al. The effect of six weeks of squat, plyometric and squat-plyometric training on power production. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1992; 6 (1): 36–41Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Newton RU, Kraemer WJ. Developing explosive muscular power: implications for a mixed methods training strategy. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 1994; 16 (5): 20–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baker D, Nance S. The relation between strength and power in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13 (3): 224–9Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Potteiger JA, Lockwood RH, Haub MD, et al. Muscle power and fibre characteristics following 8 weeks of plyometric training. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13 (3): 275–9Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, McCoy L, et al. Power and maximum strength relationships during performance of dynamic and static weighted jumps. J Strength Cond Res 2003 Feb; 17 (1): 140–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stone MH. Literature review: explosive exercises and training. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 1993; 15 (3): 6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rahimi R. The acute effect of heavy versus light-load squats on sprint performance. Phy Educ Sport 2007; 5 (2): 163–9Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Saez Saez de Villarreal E, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ, Izquierdo M. Optimal warm-up stimuli of muscle activation to enhance short and long-term acute jumping performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007 Jul; 100 (4): 393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Batista MA, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H, et al. Intermittent exercise as a conditioning activity to induce postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 2007 Aug; 21 (3): 837–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chatzopoulos DE, Michailidis CJ, Giannakos AK, et al. Postactivation potentiation effects after heavy resistance exercise on running speed. J Strength Cond Res 2007 Nov; 21 (4): 1278–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ebben WP, Jenson RL, Blackard DO. Electromyographic and kinetic analysis of complex training variables. J Strength Cond Res 2000; 14 (4): 451–6Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    French DN, Kraemer WJ, Cooke CB. Changes in dynamic exercise performance following a sequence of pre-conditioning isometric muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res 2003 Nov; 17 (4): 678–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gilbert G, Lees A, Graham-Smith P. Temporal profile of post-tetanic potentiation of muscle force characteristics after repeated maximal exercise. J Sports Sci 2001; 19: 6Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hanson ED, Leigh S, Mynark RG. Acute effects of heavyand light-load squat exercise on the kinetic measures of vertical jumping. J Strength Cond Res 2007 Nov; 21 (4): 1012–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jensen RL, Ebben WP. Kinetic analysis of complex training rest interval effect on vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 2003 May; 17 (2): 345–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kilduff LP, Bevan HR, Kingsley MI, et al. Postactivation potentiation in professional rugby players: optimal recovery. J Strength Cond Res 2007 Nov; 21 (4): 1134–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mangus BC, Takahashi M, Mercer JA, et al. Investigation of vertical jump performance after completing heavy squat exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2006 Aug; 20 (3): 597–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rixon KP, Lamont HS, Bemben MG. Influence of type of muscle contraction, gender, and lifting experience on postactivation potentiation performance. J Strength Cond Res 2007 May; 21 (2): 500–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Robbins DW, Docherty D. Effect of loading on enhancement of power performance over three consecutive trials. J Strength Cond Res 2005 Nov; 19 (4): 898–902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Young WB, Jenner A, Griffiths K. Acute enhancement of power performance from heavy load squats. J Strength Cond Res 1998; 12 (2): 82–4Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Baudry S, Duchateau J. Postactivation potentiation in human muscle is not related to the type of maximal conditioning contraction. Muscle Nerve 2004 Sep; 30 (3): 328–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Babault N, Desbrosses K, Fabre MS, et al. Neuromuscular fatigue development during maximal concentric and isometric knee extensions. J Appl Physiol 2006 Mar; 100 (3): 780–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kay D, St Clair Gibson A, Mitchell MJ, et al. Different neuromuscular recruitment patterns during eccentric,concentric and isometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000 Dec; 10 (6): 425–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gandevia SC. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 2001 Oct; 81 (4): 1725–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Taylor JL, Butler JE, Gandevia SC. Changes in muscle afferents, motoneurons and motor drive during muscle fatigue.Eur J Appl Physiol 2000 Oct; 83 (2-3): 106–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Linnamo V, Hakkinen K, Komi PV. Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery in maximal compared to explosive strength loading. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1998; 77 (1-2): 176–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Karelis AD, Marcil M, Peronnet F, et al. Effect of lactate infusion on M-wave characteristics and force in the rat plantaris muscle during repeated stimulation in situ. J Appl Physiol 2004 Jun; 96 (6): 2133–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Isometric or dynamic training: differential effects on mechanical properties of a human muscle. J Appl Physiol 1984 Feb; 56 (2): 296–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Thorstensson A, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Force-velocity relations and fibre composition in human knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol 1976; 40 (1): 12–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J. Relationships between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area in malesprinters and endurance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1983; 50 (3): 309–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Aagaard P, Andersen JL. Correlation between contractile strength and myosin heavy chain isoform composition in human skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998 Aug; 30(8): 1217–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Enoka RM, Stuart DG. Neurobiology of muscle fatigue. J Appl Physiol 1992 May; 72 (5): 1631–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Gaitanos GC, Williams C, Boobis LH, et al. Human muscle metabolism during intermittent maximal exercise. J Appl Physiol 1993 Aug; 75 (2): 712–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Katz A, Sahlin K, Henriksson J. Muscle ATP turnover rate during isometric contraction in humans. J Appl Physiol 1986 Jun; 60 (6): 1839–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Greenhaff PL, Nevill ME, Soderlund K, et al. The metabolic responses of human type I and II muscle fibres during maximal treadmill sprinting. J Physiol 1994 Jul 1; 478 (Pt 1): 149–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Fabiato A, Fabiato F. Effects of pH on the myofilaments and the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skinned cells from cardiace and skeletal muscles. J Physiol 1978 March 1; 276 (1): 233–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Chasiotis D, Hultman E, Sahlin K. Acidotic depression of cyclic AMP accumulation and phosphorylase b to a transformation in skeletal muscle of man. J Physiol 1983 Feb 1; 335 (1): 197–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Schneiker K, Billaut F, Bishop D. The effects of preloading using heavy resistance exercise on acute power output during lower-body complex training [abstract]. Book of Abstracts of the 11th Annual Congress, European Collegeof Sports Science, 2006 Jul 5-8, Lausanne, 89Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Haff GG, Stone M, O’ Bryant HS, et al. Force-time dependent characteristics of dynamic and isometric muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res 1997; 11 (4): 269–72Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Blazevich AJ, Gill N, Newton RU. Reliability and validity of two isometric squat tests. J Strength Cond Res 2002 May; 16 (2): 298–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 1965 May; 28: 560–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    ter Haar Romeny BM, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CC. Changes in recruitment order of motor units in the human biceps muscle. Exp Neurol 1982 Nov; 78 (2): 360–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    McComas AJ. Skeletal muscle: form and function. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1996Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon B. Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynamic and isometric measures ofstrength and speed-strength. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1994; 68 (4): 350–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wilson GJ, Elliot BC, Wood GA. The effect on performance of imposing a delay during a stretch-shorten cycle movement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23 (3): 364–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Walshe AD, Wilson GJ, Ettema GJ. Stretch-shorten cycle compared with isometric preload: contributions to enhanced muscular performance. J Appl Physiol 1998 Jan; 84(1): 97–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Newton RU, Murphy AJ, Humphries BJ, et al. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kineticsand muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1997; 75 (4): 333–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Babault N, Maffiuletti N, Pousson M. Postactivation potentiation in human knee extensors during dynamic passive movements. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40 (4): 735–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Movement and Exercise Sciencethe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Sport and Exercise ScienceLoughborough UniversityLoughborough, LeicestershireUK
  3. 3.Facoltà di Scienze MotorieUniversità degli Studi di VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations