Sports Medicine

, Volume 38, Issue 12, pp 975–986 | Cite as

Catastrophic Injury in Rugby Union

Is the Level of Risk Acceptable?
Current Opinion


Rugby union is a full contact sport with a relatively high overall risk of injury and a small specific risk of fatal and catastrophic spinal injury. Although catastrophic injuries in rugby union cause public concern and generate strong emotive reactions, the magnitude of society’s concern about this type of injury is often dominated by people’s perceptions rather than by actual levels of risk. This article assesses published values for the risk of catastrophic injuries in rugby union, evaluates these against the risk standards of the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and compares the values with the risks associated with other common sport and non-sport activities.

The assessment showed that the risks of sustaining a catastrophic injury in rugby union in England (0.8/100 000 per year), Ireland (0.9/100 000 per year) and Argentina (1.9/100 000 per year) were within the HSE’s ‘acceptable’ region of risk (0.1–2/100 000 per year), whilst the risks in New Zealand (4.2/100 000 per year), Australia (4.4/100 000 per year) and Fiji (13/100 000 per year) were within the ‘tolerable’ region of risk (2–100/100 000 per year). The risk of sustaining a catastrophic injury in rugby union was generally lower than or comparable with the levels reported for a wide range of other collision sports, such as ice hockey (4/100 000 per year), rugby league (2/100 000 per year) and American Football (2/100 000 per year). In addition, the risk of catastrophic injury in rugby union was comparable with that experienced by most people in work-based situations and lower than that experienced by motorcyclists, pedestrians and car occupants.

Whilst ranking risks provides an effective way of assessing their acceptability, it is recognized that representing risks by a single risk value can be misleading, as account must also be taken of the public’s perception of the risks and the inherent differences in the types of risk being considered. However, an acceptable level of risk is often regarded as one that is no greater than the levels of risk that an individual encounters in everyday life. In this respect, the assessment indicated that the risk of sustaining a catastrophic injury in rugby union could be regarded as acceptable and that the laws of the game therefore adequately manage the risk.



The preparation of this assessment was partly funded by the Rugby Football Union (England) and the International Rugby Board (Ireland); the content of the assessment including the opinions and conclusions expressed are, however, those of the author alone and they do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of either the Rugby Football Union or the International Rugby Board. The author has no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the contents of this article.


  1. 1.
    International Rugby Board. Laws of the game [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  2. 2.
    Brooks JHM, Fuller CW, Kemp SPT, et al. Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: part 1 — matchinjuries. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 757–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silver JR. Spinal injuries in sports in the UK. Br J Sports Med 1993; 27: 115–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gabbe BJ, Finch CF, Cameron PA, et al. Incidence of serious injury and death during sport and recreation activitiesin Victoria, Australia. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 573–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turk EE. Natural and traumatic sports-related fatalities: a 10 year retrospective study. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 604–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fuller CW, Brooks JHM, Kemp SPT. Spinal injuries in professional rugby union: a prospective cohort study. ClinJ Sport Med 2007; 17: 10–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quarrie KL, Cantu RC, Chalmers DJ. Rugby union injuries to the cervical spine and spinal cord. Sports Med 2002; 32: 633–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuller CW. Managing the risk of injury in sport. Clin J Sport Med 2007; 17: 182–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slovic P.Perceptions of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: Krimsky S, Golding D, editors. Social theoriesof risk. London: Praeger, 1992: 117–52Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Royal Society. Risk: analysis, perception and management. London: The Royal Society, 1992Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, et al. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technologicalrisks and benefits. Policy Sci 1978; 9: 127–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Law R. Analysis of relative risks and levels of risk in Canada [online]. Available from URL:[Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  13. 13.
    Interdepartmental Liaison Group on Risk Assessment. Use of risk assessment within government departments. Sudbury: HSE Books, 1996Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Health and Safety Executive. The tolerability of risks from nuclear power stations. Sudbury: HSE Books, 1988Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Health and Safety Executive. Generic terms and concepts in the assessment and regulation of industrial risks. Sudbury: HSE Books, 1995Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fuller CW, Myerscough FE. Stakeholder perceptions of risk in motor sport. J Safety Res 2001; 32: 345–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rotem TR, Lawson JS, Wilson SF, et al. Severe cervical spinal cord injuries related to rugby union and leaguefootball in New South Wales, 1984-1996. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 379–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shelly MJ, Butler JS, Timlin M, et al. Spinal injuries in Irish rugby: a ten-year review. J Bone Joint Surg 2006; 88B: 771–5Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spinecare Foundation. Spinal cord injuries in Australian footballers. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 493–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research (NCCSIR). Glossary of injury terms (1999) [online]. Available from URL:[Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  21. 21.
    Thurman DJ, Sniezek JE, Johnson D, et al. Guidelines for surveillance of central nervous system injury. Atlanta(GA): US Department of Health and Human Services,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1995Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fuller CW, Molloy MG, Bagate C, et al. Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures for studiesof injuries in rugby union. Br J Sports Med 2007; 41: 328–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury (NCCSI). Annual survey of catastrophic football injuries 1977-2005[online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  24. 24.
    Health and Safety Executive. Health and safety statistics 2006/07. Sudbury: HSE Books, 2007Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consensus of fatal occupational injuries, 2006 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  26. 26.
    Apparelyzed. Traumatic spinal cord injury: facts & figures [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  27. 27.
    National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. 2006 Annual statistical report for the model spinal cord injury caresystems. Birmingham (AL); University of Alabama, 2006[online]. Available from URL:[Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  28. 28.
    Rugby Football Union. Governance Committee: players’ safety. Twickenham: Rugby Football Union, 2002Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silver JR. Injuries of the spine sustained during rugby. Br J Sports Med 1992; 26: 253–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Haylen PT. Spinal injuries in rugby union, 1970-2003: lessons and responsibilities. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 48–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Silver JR, Gill S. Injuries of the spine sustained during rugby. Sports Med 1988; 5: 328–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Secin FP, Poggi EJT, Luzuriaga F, et al. Disabling injuries of the cervical spine in Argentine rugby over the last 20years. Br J Sports Med 1999; 33: 33–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Carmody DJ, Taylor TKF, Parker DA, et al. Spinal cord injuries in Australian footballers 1997-2002. Med J Aust 2005; 182: 561–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maharaj JC, Cameron ID. Increase in spinal injury among rugby union players in Fiji. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Quarrie KL, Gianotti SM, Hopkins WG, et al. Effect of nationwide injury prevention programme on serious spinal injuries in New Zealand rugby union: ecological study[online]. BMJ 2007; 334: 1150–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wetzler MJ, Akpata T, Laughlin W, et al. Occurrence of cervical spine injuries during the rugby scrum. Am J SportsMed 1992; 26: 253–8Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Scher AT. Catastrophic rugby injuries of the spinal cord: changing patterns of injury. Br J Sports Med 1991; 25: 57–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cantu RC, Mueller FO. Fatalities and catastrophic injuries in high school and college sports, 1982-1997. PhysSportsmed 1999 Aug; 27 (8): 35–48Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boden BP, Tacchetti RL, Cantu C, et al. Catastrophic head injuries in high school and college football players. Am JSports Med 2007; 35: 1075–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boden BP, Lin W, Young M, et al. Catastrophic injuries in wrestling. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30: 791–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Boden BP, Tacchetti R, Mueller FO. Catastrophic injuries in high school and college baseball players. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 1189–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boden BP, Tacchetti RL, Cantu C, et al. Catastrophic cervical spine injuries in high school and college footballplayers. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 1223–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Boden BP, Tacchetti R, Mueller FO. Catastrophic cheerleading injuries. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 881–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    McCrory P, Turner M, LeMasson B, et al. An analysis of injuries resulting from professional horse racing in Franceduring 1991-2001: a comparison with injuries resultingfrom professional horse racing in Great Britain during1992-2001. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40: 614–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    National Occupational Health and Safety Commission. Fatal occupational injuries: how does Australia compareinternationally? Canberra (ACT): National OccupationalHealth and Safety Commission, 2004Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    National Statistics. Transport statistics bulletin. Road casualties in Great Britain: main results 2005. London: National Statistics, 2006Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Department for Transport. Tomorrow’s roads: safer for everyone. London: Department of Transport, 2004Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Health and Safety Executive. Reducing risks, protecting people. Sudbury: HSE Books, 2001Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Henley G, Kreisfeld R, Harrison J. Injury deaths, Australia 2003-04. Canberra (ACT): National Occupational Health and Safety Commission, 2007Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, et al. Alarming rise in the number and incidence of fall-induced cervical spine injuriesamong older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007; 62: 180–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Brooks JHM, Fuller CW. The influence of research design on the results and conclusions obtained from epidemiologicalstudies: illustrative examples. SportsMed 2006; 36 (6): 459–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Junge A, Dvorak J. Influence of definition and data collection on the incidence of injuries in football. Am J SportsMed 2000; 28: 40–6Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Adams J. Risk. London: UCL Press, 1995Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wilde GJS. The concept of target risk and its implications for accident prevention strategies. In: Feyer AM, Williamson A, editors. Occupational injury: risk, preventionand intervention. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd, 1998: 82–105Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Trimpop R, Zimolong B. Risk acceptance. In: Stellman JM, editor. Encyclopedia of occupational health and safety[online]. 4th ed. Available from URL: [Accessed 2007May 20]
  56. 56.
    James M. Liability for professional athletes’ injuries: a comparative analysis of where the risk lies. Web journal of currentlegal issues 2006; 1 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  57. 57.
    Interdepartmental Liaison Group on Risk Assessment. Risk assessment and risk management. Improving policy andpractice within government departments. Sudbury: HSEBooks, 1998Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bourke JB. Rugby union should ban contested scrums. BMJ 2006; 332: 1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    BMJ. Rapid responses to James B Bourke: rugby union should ban contested scrums [online]. Availablefrom URL:[Accessed 2007 Dec 12]
  60. 60.
    International Rugby Board. IRB Rugbyready (DVD). Dublin: International Rugby Board, 2007Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rugby Football Union. Tackling safety: peak performance and injury prevention (DVD). Twickenham: Rugby FootballUnion, 2004Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    New Zealand Rugby Union [online]. Available from URL: RugbySmart.[Accessed 2008 Oct 30]
  63. 63.
    KwaZulu-Natal Rugby Union. Avoiding neck injuries (DVD). Durban: KwaZulu-Natal Rugby Union, 2007Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics and pathology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001; 26 (24 Suppl.): 2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jones L, Bagnall A. Spinal injuries centres (SICs) for acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004 Oct 18; (4): CD004442PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sports MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations