Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 38, Issue 11, pp 881–891 | Cite as

Strategies for Improving Performance in Long Duration Events

Olympic Distance Triathlon
  • Christophe Hausswirth
  • Jeanick Brisswalter
Leading Article

Abstract

This review focuses on strategic aspects that may affect performance in a long-duration Olympic event, the Olympic distance triathlon. Given the variety of races during the Olympic Games triathlon, strategic aspects include improving technological features as well as energetics factors affecting overall triathlon performance. During the last decade, many studies have attempted to identify factors reducing the metabolic load associated (or not) with the development of fatigue process by analysing the relationship between metabolic and biomechanical factors with exercise duration. To date, a consensus exists about the benefit of adopting a drafting position during the swimming or the cycling part of the triathlon. Other potential strategic factors, such as the production of power output or the selection of cadence during the cycling or the running leg, are likely to affect the overall triathlon performance. Within this approach, pacing strategies are observed by elite athletes who swim or cycle in a sheltered position, inducing several changes of pace, intensity or stochastic shifts in the amplitude of the physiological responses. The analysis of these parameters appears to arouse some experimental and practical interest from researchers and coachers, especially for long-distance Olympic events.

Keywords

Pace Strategy Neuromuscular Fatigue Metabolic Load Cycling Time Trial Constant Power Output 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review and the authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to its contents.

References

  1. 1.
    Capelli C, Schena F, Zamparo P, et al. Energetics of best performances in track cycling. Med Science Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 614–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    di Prampero PE. Factors limiting maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 90: 420–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones JH, Lindstedt SL. Limits to maximal performance. Annu Rev Physiol 1993; 55: 547–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    di Prampero PE. The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 55–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Formenti F, Minetti AE. Human locomotion on ice: the evolution of ice-skating energetics through history. J Exp Biol 2007; 210: 1825–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bentley DJ, Millet GP, Vleck VE, et al. Specific aspects of contemporary triathlon. Sports Med 2002; 32: 345–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hausswirth C, Lehenaff D. Physiological demands of running during long distance runs and triathlons. Sports Med 2001; 31: 679–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeukendrup AE, Jentjens RL, Moseley L. Nutritional considerations in triathlon. Sports Med 2005; 35: 163–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dallam GM, Jonas S, Miller TK. Medical considerations in triathlon competition: recommendations for triathlon organisers, competitors and coaches. Sports Med 2005; 35: 143–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atkinson G, Peacock O, St Clair Gibson A, et al. Distribution of power output during cycling: impact and mechanisms. Sports Med 2007; 37 (8): 647–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV. From catastrophe to complexity: a novel model of integrative central neural regulation of effort and fatigue during exercise in humans: summary and conclusions. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 120–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, Rauch LH, et al. The role of information processing between the brain andperipheral physiological systems in pacing and perceptionof effort. Sports Med 2006; 36: 705–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abbiss CR, Quod MJ, Martin DT, et al. Dynamic pacing strategies during the cycle phase of an Ironman triathlon. Med Science Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 726–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atkinson G, Peacock O, Law M. Acceptability of power variation during a simulated hilly time trial. Int J SportsMed 2007; 28: 157–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bernard T, Vercruyssen F, Mazure C, et al. Constant versus variable-intensity during cycling: effects on subsequentrunning performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 99: 103–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lepers R, Theurel J, Hausswirth C, et al. Neuromuscular fatigue following constant versus variable-intensity endurance cycling in triathletes. J Sci Med Sport 2007; 9: 125–36Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vogt S, Heinrich L, Schumacher YO, et al. Power output during stage racing in professional road cycling. MedScience Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 147–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chatard JC, Chollet D, Millet GP. Performance and drag during drafting swimming in highly trained triathletes. Med Science Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 1276–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bassett DR, Flohr J, Duey WJ, et al. Metabolic responses to drafting during front crawl swimming. Med Science Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 744–7Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chatard JC, Wilson B. Drafting distance in swimming. Med Science Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1176–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chollet D, Hue O, Auclair F, et al. The effects of drafting on stroking variations during swimming in elite maletriathletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000;82: 413–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Millet GP, Chollet D, Chatard JC. Effects of drafting behind a two- or a six-beat kick swimmer in elite female triathletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 82: 465–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Delextrat A, Tricot V, Bernard T, et al. Drafting during swimming improves efficiency during subsequent cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1612–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mollendorf JC, Termin II AC, Oppenheim E, et al. Effect of swim suit design on passive drag. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1029–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kreider RB, Cundiff DJ, Hammet JB, et al. Effects of cycling on running performance in triathletes. Ann Sports Med 1988; 3: 220–5Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laursen PB, Rhodes EC, Langill RH. The effects of 3000-m swimming on subsequent 3-h cycling performance: implications for ultra endurance triathletes. Eur J ApplPhysiol 2000; 83: 28–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vleck V, Bürgi A, Bentley DJ. The consequences of swim, cycle, and run performance on overall result in eliteOlympic distance triathlon. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 43–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bentley DJ, Libicz S, Jougla A, et al. The effects of exercise intensity or drafting during swimming on subsequentcycling performance in triathletes. J Sci Med Sport 2007;10: 234–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    di Prampero PE. Cycling on earth, in space, on the moon. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 82: 345–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Olds T. Modelling human locomotion: applications to cycling. Sports Med 2001; 31: 497–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jeukendrup AE, Craig NP, Hawley JA. The bioenergetics of world class cycling. J Sci Med Sport 2000; 3: 414–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCole SD, Claney K, Conte JC, et al. Energy expenditure during bicycling. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68: 748–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Edwards AG, Byrnes WC. Aerodynamics characteristics as determinants of the drafting effect in cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 170–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hausswirth C, Lehenaff D, Dreano P, et al. Effects of cycling alone or in a sheltered position on subsequentrunning performance during a triathlon. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 599–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hausswirth C, Vallier JM, Lehénaff D, et al. Effect of two drafting modalities in cycling on running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 385–90Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sargent RM. The relation between oxygen requirement and speed in running. Proc R Soc 1926; 100: 10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pugh LG. The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of workagainst horizontal or vertical forces. J Physiol 1971; 213: 255–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pugh LG. Oxygen intake in track and treadmill running with observations on the effect of air resistance. J Physiol 1970; 207: 823–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bernard T, Vercruyssen F, Grego F, et al. Effect of cycling cadence on subsequent 3-km running performance inwell-trained triathletes. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 154–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gottshall JS, Palmer BM. The acute effects of prior cycling cadence on running performance and kinematics. Med Science Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 1518–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vercruyssen F, Brisswalter J, Hausswirth C. Influence of cycling cadence on subsequent running performance intriathletes. Med Science Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 530–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takaishi T, Ishida K, Katayama K, et al. Effect of cycling experience and pedal cadence on the near-infrared spectroscopyparameters. Med Science Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 2062–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Takaishi T, Yasuda Y, Ono T, et al. Optimal pedaling rate estimated from neuromuscular fatigue for cyclists. MedScience Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 1492–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lucia A, Hoyos J, Chicharro JL. Preferred pedalling cadence in professional cycling. Med Science Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1361–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Marsh AP, Martin PE. Effect of cycling experience, aerobic power, and power output on preferred and most economicalcycling cadences. Med Science Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 1225–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Widrick JJ, Freedson PS, Hamill J. Effect of internal work on the calculation of optimal pedaling rates. Med Science Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 376–82Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bieuzen F, Lepers R, Vercruyssen F, et al. Muscle activation during cycling at different cadences: Effect of maximalstrength capacity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2006; 20: 112–23Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gotshall RW, Bauer TA, Fahmer SL. Cycling cadence alters exercise hemodynamics. Int J Sports Med 1996; 17: 17–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brisswalter J, Hausswirth C, Smith D, et al. Energetically optimal cadence versus freely-chosen cadence during cycling:effect of exercise duration. Int J Sports Med 2000; 20: 1–5Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lepers R, Hausswirth C, Maffiuletti NA, et al. Evidence of neuromuscular fatigue after prolonged cycling exercise. Med Science Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1880–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vercruyssen F, Hausswirth C, Smith D, et al. Effect of exercise duration on optimal pedaling rate choice intriathletes. Can J Appl Physiol 2001; 26: 44–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Neptune RR, Herzog W. The association between negative muscle work and pedaling rate. J Biomech 1999; 32: 1021–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kohrt WM, Morgan DW, Bates B, et al. Physiological responses of triathletes to maximal swimming, cycling andrunning. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19: 51–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chatard JC, Senegas X, Selles M, et al. wetsuit effect: a comparison between competitive swimmers and triathletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 580–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chatard JC, Millet GP. Effects of wetsuit use in swimming events. Sports Med 1996; 22: 70–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Toussaint HM. Differences in propelling efficiency between competitive and triathlon swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 409–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Williams KR. Conquering rubbery legs off the bike (part one). Triathlon Multi sport 2000; 3: 16–7Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Palmer GS, Noakes T, Hawley JA. Effects of steady-state versus stochastic exercise on subsequent cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 684–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Palmer GS, Borghouts LB, Noakes T, et al. Metabolic and performance responses to constant-load vs. variable-intensityexercise in trained cyclists. J Appl Physiol 1999;87: 1186–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Atkinson G, Brunskill A. Pacing strategies during a cycling time trial with simulated headwinds and tailwinds. Ergonomics 2000; 43: 1449–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Swain DP. A model for optimizing cycling performance by varying power on hills and in wind. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 1104–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hausswirth C, Bernard T, Vallier JM, et al. Effect of different running strategies on running performance inOlympic distance triathlon. Proceedings of the 7th annual congress of the ECSS; 2002 Jul 24-28; Athens: 183Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Heiden T, Burnett A. The effect of cycling on muscle activation in the running leg of an Olympic distance triathlon. Sports Biomech 2003; 2: 35–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut National du Sport et de L’Education Physique (INSEP)Research Mission, Laboratory of Biomechanics and PhysiologyFrance
  2. 2.Sport Ergonomics and Performance Laboratory, EA 3162University of Toulon-VarFrance

Personalised recommendations