Sports Medicine

, Volume 38, Issue 9, pp 759–779 | Cite as

Effectiveness of Foot Orthoses for Treatment and Prevention of Lower Limb Injuries

A Review
  • Patria Hume
  • Will Hopkins
  • Keith Rome
  • Peter Maulder
  • Greg Coyle
  • Benno Nigg
Review Article


Healthcare professionals prescribe foot orthoses (FOs) for treatment and prevention of lower limb injuries, but previous reviews of the effectiveness of FOs have been inconclusive. We have therefore performed a review emphasizing the magnitude of treatment effects to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of FOs in the treatment and prevention of lower limb injuries.

Qualifying studies were mainly controlled trials, but some uncontrolled clinical trials of patients with chronic injuries were analysed separately. Injuries included plantar fasciitis, tibial stress fractures and patellofemoral pain syndrome; these were included because of the large treatment costs for these frequent injuries in New Zealand. Outcomes were pain, comfort, function and injury status. Continuous measures were expressed as standardized differences using baseline between-subject standard deviations, and magnitudes were inferred from the intersection of 90% confidence intervals with thresholds of a modified Cohen scale. Effects based on frequencies were expressed as hazard ratios and their magnitudes were inferred from intersection of confidence intervals with a novel scale of thresholds.

The effects of FOs for treatment of pain or injury prevention were mostly trivial. FOs were not effective in treating or preventing patellofemoral pain syndrome. Some studies showed moderate effects for treatment of plantar fasciitis. Only a few studies showed moderate or large beneficial effects of FOs in preventing injuries.

Customized semi-rigid FOs have moderate to large beneficial effects in treating and preventing plantar fasciitis and posterior tibial stress fractures, and small to moderate effects in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Given the limited randomized controlled trials or clinical controlled trials available for the injuries of interest, it may be that more or less benefit can be derived from the use of FOs, but many studies did not provide enough information for the standardized effect sizes to be calculated. Further research with randomized controlled trials is needed to establish the clinical utility of a variety of FOs for the treatment and prevention of various lower limb injuries.


Ankle Sprain Plantar Fasciitis Heel Pain Lower Limb Injury Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Funding was received from the New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation for the preparation of this review and the authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to its contents.


  1. 1.
    Donatelli R. Abnormal biomechanics of the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987; 9 (1): 11–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crawford F, Thomson C. Interventions for treating plantar heel pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (3): CD000416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins N, Bisset L, McPoil TG, et al. Foot orthoses in lower limb overuse conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28 (3): 396–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Landorf KB, Keenan A-M. Do foot orthoses prevent injury?Boston (MA): Blackwell Publishing,]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Irving DB, Cook JL, Menz HB. Factors associated with chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9 (1-2): 11–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riddle DL, Pulisic M, Pidcoe P, et al. Risk factors for plantar fasciitis: a matched case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg 2003; 85A (5): 872–7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rome K, Handoll HH, Ashford R. Interventions for preventing and treating stress fractures and stress reactions of bone of the lower limbs in young adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (2): CD000450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekenman I, Milgrom C, Finestone A, et al. The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (6): 866–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finestone A, Giladi M, Elad H, et al. Prevention of stress fractures using custom biomechanical shoe orthoses. Clin Orthop 1999; 360: 182–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milgrom C, Giladi M, Kashtan H, et al. A prospective study of the effect of a shock-absorbing device on the incidence of stress fractures in military recruits. Foot Ankle 1985; 6 (2): 101–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Finestone A, Novack V, Farfel A, et al. A prospective study of the effect of foot orthoses composition and fabrication on comfort and the incidence of overuse injuries. Foot Ankle Int 2004 Jul; 25 (7): 462–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. Rigid versus soft foot orthoses: a single subject design. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1991 Dec; 81 (12): 638–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duddy RK, Duggan RJ, Visser HJ, et al. Diagnosis, treatment,and rehabilitation of injuries to the lower leg and foot. Clin Sports Med 1989 Oct; 8 (4): 861–76Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Witvrouw E, Werner S, Mikkelsen C, et al. Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain syndrome: guidelines for nonoperative treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13 (2): 122–30Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eng JJ, Pierrynowski MR. Evaluation of soft foot orthotics the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther 1993 Feb; 73 (2): 62–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bizzini M, Childs JD, Piva SR, et al. Systematic review of the quality of randomized controlled trials for patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003 Jan; 33 (1): 4–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fulkerson JP. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (3): 447–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sutlive TG, Mitchell SD, Maxfield SN, et al. Identification of individuals with patellofemoral pain whose symptoms improved after a combined program of foot orthosis use and modified activity: a preliminary investigation. Phys Ther 2004; 84 (1): 49–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D’Hondt NE Struijs PA, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Orthotic devices for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (2): CD002267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eng JJ, Pierrynowski MR. The effect of soft foot orthotics on three-dimensional lower-limb kinematics during walking and running. Phys Ther 1994 Sep; 74 (9): 836–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heiderscheit B, Hamill J, Tiberio D. A biomechanical perspective: do foot orthoses work? Br J Sports Med 2001; 35 (1): 4–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nigg BM, Nurse MA, Stefanyshyn DJ. Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999 Jul; 31 (7 Suppl.): 421–8Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krivickas LS. Anatomical factors associated with overuse sports injuries. Sports Med 1997 Aug; 24 (2): 132–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nigg BM, Stergiou P, Cole G, et al. Effect of shoe inserts on kinematics, center of pressure, and leg joint moments during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 Feb; 35 (2): 314–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ball KA, Afheldt MJ. Evolution of foot orthotics: part 1. Coherent theory or coherent practice? J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002 Feb; 25 (2): 116–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 4.2.5. Updated May 2005Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McLauchlan GJ, Handoll HH. Interventions for treating acute and chronic tendonitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (2): CD000232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ferrari J, Higgins JPT, Prior TD. Interventions for treating hallux valgus (abductovalgus) and bunions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD000964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Handoll HH, Rowe BH, Quinn KM, de Bie R. Interventions for preventing ankle ligament injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (3): CD000018PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yeung EW, Yeung SS. Interventions for preventing lower limb soft-tissue injuries in runners. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (3): CD001256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kirby K. Foot and lower extremity biomechanics II: precision intricast newsletters 1997—2003. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003; 93: 503Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rome K, Brown CL. Randomized clinical trial into the impact of rigid foot orthoses on balance parameters in excessively pronated feet. Clin Rehabil 2004 Sep; 18 (6): 624–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wu KK. Foot orthoses: principles and clinical applications. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 19Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hawke F, Burns J, Radford JA, et al. Custom-made foot or thoses for the treatment of foot pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3): CD006801PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH. Normal and abnormal functions of the foot. Los Angeles (CA): Clinical Biomechanics Corp.,1977Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    McPoil TG, Cornwall MW. Relationship between three static angles of the rearfoot and the pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 23 (6): 370–5Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB. Effect of patient position on the consistency of placing the rearfoot at subtalar neutral. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1997; 87: 399–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McKenzie DC, Clement DB, Taunton JE. Running shoes, orthotics and injuries. Sports Med 1985 Sep-Oct; 2 (5): 334–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smith LS, Clarke TE, Hamill CL, et al. The effects of soft and semirigid orthoses upon rear foot movement in running. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1986; 76: 227–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pagliano J. Management of the pronated and supinated foot. Med Sport Sci 1987; 23: 55–160Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Malas B. Implementing outcome measurement in O & P education. J Prosthet Orthot 2002; 14 (2): 78–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hopkins WG. A new view of statistics [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2008 Jul 10]
  44. 44.
    Sterne JAC, Smith GD. Sifting the evidence: what’s wrong with significance tests. BMJ 2001; 322: 226–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Sport Sci 2005; 9: 6–13Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Winemiller MH, Billow RG, Laskowski ER, et al. Effect of magnetic vs sham-magnetic insoles on nonspecific foot pain in the workplace: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc 2005 Sep; 80 (9): 1138–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schwellnus MP, Jordaan G, Noakes TD. Prevention of common overuse injuries by the use of shock absorbing insoles. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18 (6): 636–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Andrish JT, Bergfeld JA, Walheim J. A prospective study on the management of shin splints. J Bone Joint Surg 1974; 56-A (8): 1697–700Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fauno P, Kalund S, Andreasen I, et al. Soreness in lower extremities and back is reduced by use of shock absorbing heel inserts. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14: 288–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gardner LI, Dziados JE, Jones BH, et al. Prevention of lower extremity stress fractures: a controlled trial of a shock absorbent insole. Am J Public Health 1988 Dec; 78 (12): 1563–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Simkin A, Leichter I, Giladi M, et al. Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot Ankle 1989 Aug; 10 (1): 25–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Esterman A, Pilotto L. Foot shape and its effect on functioning in Royal Australian Air Force recruits. Part 2: pilot, randomized, controlled trial of orthotics in recruits with flat feet. Mil Med 2005; 170 (7): 629–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gross MT, Byers JM, Krafft JL, et al. The impact of custom semirigid foot orthotics on pain and disability for individuals with plantar fasciitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002 Apr; 32 (4): 149–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Landorf KB, Keenan AM, Herbert RD. Effectiveness of foot orthoses to treat plantar fasciitis: a randomized trial. Arch Int Med 2006 Jun 26; 166 (12): 1305–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pfeffer G, Bacchetti P, Deland J, et al. Comparison of custom and prefabricated orthoses in the initial treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 1999 Apr; 20 (4): 214–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lynch D, Goforth W, Martin J, et al. Conservative treatment of plantar fasciitis: a prospective study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1998; 88 (8): 375–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Martin JE, Hosch JC, Goforth WP, et al. Mechanical treatment of plantar fasciitis: a prospective study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001; 91 (2): 55–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Johnston LB, Gross MT. Effects of foot orthoses on quality of life for individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34 (8): 440–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stell JF, Buckley JG. Controlling excessive pronation: a comparison of casted and non-casted orthoses. The Foot 1998 8 (4): 210–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Seligman DA, Dawson DR. Customized heel pads and soft orthotics to treat heel pain and plantar fasciitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 Oct; 84 (10): 1564–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Saxena A, Haddad J. The effect of foot orthoses on patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003; 93 (4): 264–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Larsen K, Weidich F, Leboeuf-Yde C. Can customized biomechanic shoe orthoses prevent problems in the back and lower extremities? A randomized, controlled intervention trial of 146 military conscripts. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25 (5): 326–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sherman RA, Karstetter KW, May H, et al. Prevention of lower limb pain in soldiers using shock-absorbing orthotic inserts. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1996; 86 (3): 117–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Withnall RD, Eastaugh J, Freemantle N. Do shock absorbing insoles reduce lower limb injury? A randomised trial in British military subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37 (5): 346Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P, Lun VMY, Meeuwisse WH, Nigg Bag 92006, Auckland, New Zealand. BM. Knee joint moments and patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners. Part 1: a case control study. Part 2: a prospective runners. Part 1: a case control study. Part 2: a prospective cohort study. 4th Symposium on Footwear Biomechanics 1999 Aug 5-7; Canmore (AB), 86-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patria Hume
    • 1
  • Will Hopkins
    • 1
  • Keith Rome
    • 2
  • Peter Maulder
    • 1
  • Greg Coyle
    • 3
  • Benno Nigg
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Sport and Recreation Research New Zealand, School of Sport and RecreationAuckland University of TechnologyNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of Podiatry, School of Rehabilitation and Occupation StudiesAuckland University of TechnologyNew Zealand
  3. 3.Tertiary Education CommissionNew Zealand
  4. 4.Human Performance LaboratoryUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations