Sports Medicine

, Volume 37, Issue 4–5, pp 348–352

Low Energy Availability in the Marathon and Other Endurance Sports

Conference Paper

Abstract

Energy availability is the amount of dietary energy remaining after exercise training for all other metabolic processes. Excessively low energy availability impairs reproductive and skeletal health, although genetics and age may alter an individual’s initial conditions and sensitivity when low energy availability is imposed. Many marathon runners and other endurance athletes reduce energy availability either (i) intentionally to modify body size and composition for improving performance; (ii) compulsively in a psychopathological pattern of disordered eating; or (iii) inadvertently because there is no strong biological drive to match energy intake to activity-induced energy expenditure. Inadvertent low energy availability is more extreme when consuming a low fat, high carbohydrate diet. Low energy availability, reproductive disorders, low bone mineral density and stress fractures are more common in female than male athletes. Functional menstrual disorders caused by low energy availability should be diagnosed by excluding diseases that also disrupt menstrual cycles. To determine energy availability (in units of kilocalories or kilojoules per kilogram of fat-free mass), athletes can record their diets and use diet analysis software to calculate energy intake, measure energy expenditure during exercise using a heart monitor and measure fat-free mass using a bioelectrical impedance body composition scale. All are commercially available at consumer prices.

References

  1. 1.
    Redman LM, Loucks AB. Menstrual disorders in athletes. Sports Med 2005; 35 (9): 747–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kopp-Woorlroffe SA, Manure MM, Dueck CA, et al. Energy and nutrient status of amenoaheic athletes participating in a diet and exercise training intervention program. Int J Sport Nutr 1999; 9 (1): 70–88Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stubbs RJ, Hughes DA, Johnstone AM, et al. Rate and extent of compensatory changes in energy intake and expenditure in response to altered exercise and diet composition in humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004; 286 (2): R350–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke LM, Cox GR, Cummings NK, et al. Guidelines for daily carbohydrate intake: do athletes achieve them? Sports Med 2001; 31 (4): 267–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otis CL, Drinkwakr B, Johnson M, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand: the Female Athlete Triad. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29 (5): i–ixPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Truswell AS. Energy balance, food and exercise. World Rev Nutr Diet 2001; 90: 13–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horvath PJ, Eagen CK, Ryer-Calvin SD, et al. The effects of varying dietary fat on the nutrient intake in male and female runners. J Am Coll Nutr 2000; 19 (1): 4251Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horvath PJ, Eagen CK, Fisher NM, et al. The effects of varying dietary fat on performance and metabolism in trained male and female runners. J Am Coll Nutr 2000; 19 (1): 52–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Havemann L, West SJ, Goedecke JH, et al. Fat adaptation followed by carbohydrate loading compromises high-intensity sprint performance. J Appl Physiol 2006; 100 (1): 194–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wardle J, Haase AM, Stepme A. Body image andweight control in young adults: international comparisons in university students from 22 countries. Int J Obes (Lend) 2006; 30 (4): 644–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations