Sports Medicine

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 225–264 | Cite as

The Influence of Frequency, Intensity, Volume and Mode of Strength Training on Whole Muscle Cross-Sectional Area in Humans

  • Mathias Wernbom
  • Jesper Augustsson
  • Roland Thomeé
Review Article

Abstract

Strength training is an important component in sports training and rehabilitation. Quantification of the dose-response relationships between training variables and the outcome is fundamental for the proper prescription of resistance training. The purpose of this comprehensive review was to identify dose-response relationships for the development of muscle hypertrophy by calculating the magnitudes and rates of increases in muscle cross-sectional area induced by varying levels of frequency, intensity and volume, as well as by different modes of strength training.

Computer searches in the databases MEDLINE, SportDiscus® and CJNAHL® were performed as well as hand searches of relevant journals, books and reference lists. The analysis was limited to the quadriceps femoris and the elbow flexors, since these were the only muscle groups that allowed for evaluations of dose-response trends. The modes of strength training were classified as dynamic external resistance (including free weights and weight machines), accommodating resistance (e.g. isokinetic and semi-isokinetic devices) and isometric resistance. The subcategories related to the types of muscle actions used. The results demonstrate that given sufficient frequency, intensity and volume of work, all three types of muscle actions can induce significant hypertrophy at an impressive rate and that, at present, there is insufficient evidence for the superiority of any mode and/or type of muscle action over other modes and types of training. Tentative dose-response relationships for each variable are outlined, based on the available evidence, and interactions between variables are discussed. In addition, recommendations for training and suggestions for further research are given.

References

  1. 1.
    Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 67488Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Escamilla R, Wickham R. Exercise-based conditioning and rehabilitation. In: Kolt GS, Snyder-Mackler L, editors. Physical therapies in sports and exercise. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2003: 143–64Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraemer WJ, Adams K, Cafarelli E, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 364–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Burkett LN, et al. A meta-analysis to determine the dose response for strength development. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 456–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Burkett LN. Single versus multiple sets for strength: a meta-analysis to address the controversy. Res- Q Exerc Sport 2002; 73: 485–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Maximizing strength development in athletes: a metaanalysis to determine the dose-response relationship. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 377–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhea MR, Alderman BL. A meta-analysis of periordized versus nonperiordized strength and power training programs. Res Q Exerc Sport 2004; 75: 413–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolfe BL, LeMura LM, Cole PJ. Quantitative analysis of single- vs multiple-set programs in resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 3547Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atha J. Strengthening muscle. Exerc Sports Sci Rev 1981; 9: 1–73Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Behm DG. Neuromuscular implications and applications of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 1995; 9: 264–74Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Häkkinen K. Neuromuscular adaptation during strength training, aging, detraining, and immobilization. Crit Rev Phys Rehab Med 1994; 6: 161–98Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fry AC. The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations. Sports Med 2004; 34: 663–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi J, Takahashi H, Itai Y, et al. The difference between effects of ‘power-up type’ and ‘bulk up type’ strength training exercises: with special reference to muscle cross-sectional area, muscular strength, anaerobic power and anaerobic endurance. Jpn J Phys Fitness Sports Med 1998; 47 (1): 119–29Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masuda K, Choi JY, Shimojo H, et al. Maintenance of nryoglobin concentration in human skeletal muscle after heavy resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1999; 79: 347–52Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schnudtbleicher D, Buehrle M. Neuronal adaptation and increase of cross-sectional area studying different strength training methods. In: Jonsson GB, editor. Biomechanics X-B, volume 6-B. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1987: 615–20Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stone MH, O’Bryant HS. Weight training: a scientific approach. Minneapolis (MJ): Bellweather press, 1987Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poliquin C. Five steps to increasing the effectiveness of your strength training program. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 1988; 10: 34–9Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campos GE, Luecke TJ, Wendeln HK, et al. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. For J Appl Physiol 2002; 88: 50–60Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reeves ND, Maganaris CN, Narici MV. Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91: 116–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miyatani M, Kanehisa H, Kuno S, et al. Validity of ultrasonograph muscle thickness measurements for estimating muscle volume of knee extensors in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 86: 203–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beni M, Fukunaga T. A study on training effect on strength per unit cross-sectional area of muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Eur J Appl Physiol 1970; 28: 173–80Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knuttgen HG, Komi PV. Basic considerations for exercise. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell scientific publications, 2003: 3–7Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Designing resistance training programs. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1997Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grimby G. Clinical aspects of strength and power training. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: Blackwell scientific publications, 1992: 338–54Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Hagan FP, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, et al. Comparative effectiveness of accommodating and weight resistance training modes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1210–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon B. Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynastic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 68: 350–5Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tesch PA, Ekberg A, Lindquist DM, et al. Muscle hypertrophy following 5-week resistance training using a non-gravity-dependent exercise system. Acta Physiol Scand 2004; 180: 89–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Caruso JF, Hamill JL, Hernandez DA, et al. A comparison of isoload and isoinertial leg press training on bone and muscle outcomes. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 5928Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ. The assessment of human dynamic muscular function: a comparison of isoinertial and isokinetic tests. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1996; 36: 169–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoeger WWK, Hopkins DR, Barette SL, et al. Relationship between repetitions and selected percentages of one repetition maximum: a comparison between untrained and trained males and females. J Appl Sports Sci Res 1990; 4: 47–54Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hickson RC, Hidaka K, Foster C. Skeletal muscle fiber type, resistance training, and strength-related performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 593–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wathan D. Load assignment. In: Baechle T, editor. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1994: 435–9Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    LaSuer DA, McCormick JH, Mayhew JL, et al. The accuracy of prediction equations for estimating 1-RM performance in the bench press, squat, and deadlift. J Strength Cond Res 1997; 11: 211–3Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dudley GA, Harris RT, Duvoisin MR. Effect of voluntary vs artificial activation on the relationship of muscle torque to speed. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69: 2215–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Amiridis IG, Martin A, Morlon B, et al. Co-activation and tension-regulating phenomena during isokinetic knee extension in sedentary and highly skilled humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 1996; 73: 149–56Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    MacDougall JD. Adaptability of muscle to strength training: a cellular approach. In: Saltin B, editor. Biochemistry of Exercise VI. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1986: 501–13Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hortobagyi T, Katch FI. Eccentric and concentric torque-velocity relationships during arm flexion and extension: influence of strength level. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990; 60: 395401Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Paddon-Jones D, Leveritt M, Lonergan A, et al. Adaptation to chronic eccentric exercise in humans: the influence of contraction velocity. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001; 85: 466–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Atherton PJ, Babraj J, Smith K, et al. Selective activation of AMPK PGC-1alpha or PKB-TSC2-mTOR signaling can explain specific adaptive responses to endurance or resistance training-like electrical muscle stimulation. FASEB J 2005; 19: 786–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Deschenes MR, Kraemer WJ. Performance and physiologic adaptations to resistance training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81 (11 Suppl.): S3–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J. Muscle strength and cross-sectional area in man: a comparison of strength-trained and untrained subjects. Br J Sports Med 1984; 18: 149–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, et al. Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur J Appl Physiol 1989; 59: 310–9Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Narici MV, Hoppeler H, Kayser B, et al. Human quadriceps cross-sectional area, torque and neural activation during 6 months strength training. Acta Physiol Scand 1996; 157: 175–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, et al. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol 2001; 534: 613–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ahtiainen JT, Pakarinen A, Alen M, et al. Muscle hypertrophy, hormonal adaptations and strength development during strength training in strength trained and untrained men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 89: 555–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ahtiainen JT, Pakarinen A, Alen M, et al. Short vs long rest period between the sets in hypertrophic resistance training: influence on muscle strength, size, and hormonal adaptations in trained men. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 572–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    D’Antona G, Lanfranconi F, Pellegrino MA, et al. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres in male body builders. J Physiol 2006; 570: 611–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, et al. Hyperhophic response to unilateral concentric isokinetic resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73: 65–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tracy BL, Ivey FM, Hurlbut D, et al. Muscle quality: II. Effects of strength training in 65-to 75-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86: 195–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, et al. MRJ assessment of quadriceps muscle size before and after resistance training: determination of volume vs single-site CSA. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33 (5 Suppl.): S147Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tracy BL, Ivey FM, Metter EJ, et al. Muscle volume measurement: single vs multiple axial MRJ slices. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31 (5 Suppl.): 5384Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tracy BL, Ivey FM, Metter EJ, et al. A more efficient magnetic resonance imaging-based strategy for measuring quadriceps muscle volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 425–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    McCall GE, Byrnes WC, Dickinson A, et al. Muscle fiber hypertrophy, hyperplasia, and capillary density in college men after resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81: 2004–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Young A, Stokes M, Round JM, et al. The effect of high-resistance training on the strength and cross-sectional area of the human quadriceps. Eur J Clin Invest 1983; 13: 411–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jones DA, Rutherford OM. Human muscle strength handing: the effects of three different regimes and the nature of the resultant changes. J Physiol 1987; 391: 1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Häkkinen K, Kallinen M, Kenri PV, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations during short-term `normal’ and reduced training periods in strength athletes. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 31: 3542Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rutherford OM, Jones DA. Measurement of fibre pennation using ultrasound in the human quadriceps in vivo. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992; 65: 433–7Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sale DG, Martin JE, Moroz DE. Hypertrophy without increased isometric strength after weight training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992; 64: 51–5Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, Kallinen M. Neuromuscular adaptations and serum hormones in women during short-term intensive strength handing. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992; 64: 106–11Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ploutz LL, Tesch PA, Biro RL, et al. Effect of resistance handing on muscle use during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76: 1675–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Häkkinen K, Kallinen M. Distribution of strength handing volume into one or two daily sessions and neuromuscular adaptations in female athletes. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 34: 117–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Smith RC, Rutherford OM. The role of metabolites in strength handing: part I. A comparison of eccentric and concentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 71: 332–6Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Häkkinen K, Häkkinen A. Neuromuscular adaptations during intensive strength handing in middle-aged and elderly males and females. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 35: 13747Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Häkkinen K, Kallinen M, Linnamo V, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations during bilateral versus unilateral strength handing in middle-aged and elderly men and women. Acta Physiol Scand 1996; 158: 77–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hisaeda H, Miyagawa K, Kuno S, et al. Influence of two different males of resistance handing in female subjects. Ergonortucs 1996; 39: 842–52Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Welle S, Totterman S, Thornton C. Effect of age on muscle hypertrophy induced by resistance training. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1996; 51: 04270–5Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    McCarthy JP, Bammnn MM, Yelle JM, et al. Resistance exercise handing and the orthostatic response. Eur J Appl Physiol 1997; 76: 32–40Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Weir JP, et al. Effects of unilateral concentric-only dynastic constant external resistance handing on quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area. J Strength Cond Res 1998; 12: 185–91Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Weir JP, et al. Effects of unilateral eccentric-only dynastic constant external resistance handing on quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area. J Strength Cond Res 1998; 12: 192–8Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Häkkinen K, Newton RU, Gordon SE, et al. Changes in muscle morphology, electromyographic activity, and force production characteristics during progressive strength handing in young and older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998; 53: B415–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Häkkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, et al. Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84: 1341–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ivey FM, Roth SM, Ferrell RE, et al. Effects of age, gender, and myostatin genotype on the hypertrophic response to heavy resistance strength training. J Gerontol A Biel Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: 04641–8Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Izquierdo M, Häkkinen K, Ibanez I, et al. Effects of strength training on muscle power and serum hormones in middle-aged and older men. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 1497–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, Hannonen P, et al. Effects of strength handing on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, maximal electromyographic activity, and serum hormones in preme nopausal women with fibronryalgia. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 1287–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Takarada Y, Ishii N. Effects of low intensity resistance exercise with short inkrset rest period on muscular function in middle-aged women. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 123–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Takarada Y, Sato Y, Ishii N. Effects of resistance exercise combined with vascular occlusion on muscle function in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 86: 308–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    McCarthy JP, Pozniak MA, Agre JC. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 511–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Häkkinen K, Alen M, Kraemer W J, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength handing. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 89: 4252Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Vikne H, Refsnes PE, Medbø JI. Effect of training frequency of maximum eccentric strength handing on muscle force and cross-sectional area in strength trained athletes [abstract no. RR-PL-0517]. In: Book of abstracts, 14th International WCPT Congress; 2003 June 7–12; BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Friedmann B, Kidscherf R, Borisch S, et al. Effects of low-resistance/high-repetition strength handing in hypoxia on rrurscle structure and gene expression. Pflugers Arch 2003; 446: 742–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Friedmann B, Kinscherf R, Vorwald S, et al. Muscular adaptations to computer-guided strength training with eccentric overload. Acta Physiol Scand 2004; 182: 77–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Goto K, Nagasawa M, Yanagisawa O, et al. Muscular adaptations to combinations of high- and low-intensity resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 730–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Takarada Y, Tsurum T, Ishii N. Cooperative effects of exercise and occlusive stimuli on muscular function in low-intensity resistance exercise with moderate vascular occlusion. Jpn J Physiol 2004; 54: 585–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Abe T, Yasuda T, Midorikawa T, et al. Skeletal muscle size and circulating IGF-1 are increased after two weeks of twice daily Kaatsu resistance handing [online]. Int J Kaatsu Training Res 2005; 1: 7–14. Available from URL: http://kaatsu.jp/english/j01_1.html [Accessed 2005 April 25]Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Goto K, Ishii N, Mzuka T, et al. The impact of metabolic stress on hormonal responses and muscular adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 955–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Izquierdo M, Häkkinen K, Ibanez I, et al. Effects of combined resistance and cardiovascular handing on strength, power, muscle cross-sectional area, and endurance markers in middleaged men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 94: 70–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Norrbrand L, Pozzo M, Tesch P. Jämförelse av träingseffelder efter 5 veckors styrketräning med två olika belastningsstrategier (in Swedish) [abstract]. Svensk Idroftsmedicin 2005; 24 (4): 30–1Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Tanimoto M, Ishii N. Effects of low intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation on surscular function in young men. J Appl Physiol 2006; 100: 1150–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Coburn JW, Housh DJ, Housh TJ, et al. Effects of leucine and whey protein supplementation during 8 weep of unilateral resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 2849Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Kobe K, Komuro T, Ishiguro N, et al. Effects of low-load resistance training with vascular occlusion on the mechanical properties of muscle and tendon. J Appl Biomech. 2006; 22: 112–9Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Leger B, Cancan R, Praz M, et al. Akt signalling through GSK-3ta, mTOR and foxol is involved in human skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. J Physiol 2006; 576: 923–33Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Popov DV, Swirkun DV, Netreba AI, et al. Hormonal adaptation determines the increase in muscle mass and strength during low-intensity strength training without relaxation. Human Physiology 2006; 32 (5): 609–14Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Petersen SR, Bagnall KM, Wenger HA, et al. The influence of velocity-specific resistance training on the in vivo torque-velocity relationship and the cross-sectional area of quadriceps femoris. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1989; 11: 456–62Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Petersen S, Wessel I, Bagnall K, et al. Influence of concentric resistance training on concentric and eccentric strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 101–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Petersen SR, Bell GJ, Bagnall KM, et al. Influence ofconcentric resistance training on eccentric peak torque and muscle cross-sectional area. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991; 13: 132–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Bell GJ, Petersen SR, Wessel I, et al. Physiological adaptations to concurrent endurance training and low velocity resistance training. But J Sports Med 1991; 12: 384–90Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bell GJ, Petersen SR, Wessel I, et al. Adaptations to endurance training and low velocity resistance training performed in a sequence. Can J Sport Sci 1991; 16: 186–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Bell GJ, Petersen SR, MacLean I, et al. Effect of high velocity resistance training on peak torque, cross sectional area and nryofibrillar ATPase activity. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1992; 32: 10–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Ruther CL, Golden CL, Harris RT, et al. Hypertrophy, resistance training, and the nature of skeletal muscle activation. J Strength Cond Res 1995; 9: 155–9Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Higbie EJ, Cureton KJ, Warren GL, et al. Effects of concentric and eccentric training on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and neural activation. J Appl Physiol 1996, 81Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Weir JT, et al. Concentric isokinetic resistance training and quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area. Isokin Exerc Sci 1996; 6: 101–8Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Seger JY, Arvidsson B, Thorstensson A. Specific effects of eccentric and concentric training on muscle strength and morphology in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998; 79: 49–57Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Akima H, Takahashi H, Kuno SY, et al. Early phase adaptations of muscle use and strength to isokinetic training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 588–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Rafeei T. The effects of training at equal power levels using concentric and eccentric contractions on skeletal muscle fiber and whole muscle hypertrophy, muscle force and muscle activation in human subjects [dissertation]. Richmond (VA): Virginia Commonwealth University, 1999Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Seynnes OR, de Beer M, Narici MV. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training. J Appl Physiol. Epub 2006 Oct 19Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Garfinkel S, Cafarelli E. Relative changes in maximal force, EMG, and muscle cross-sectional area after isometric training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 1220–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Schott I, McCully K, Rutherford OM. The role of metabolites in strength training: II. Short versus long isometric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 71: 33741Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Kobe K, Kanehisa H, Fulmnaga T. Effects of different duration isometric contractions on tendon elasticity in human quadriceps muscles. J Physiol 2000; 536: 649–55Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Kobe K, Ohgo K, Takeishi R, et al. Effects of isometric training at different knee angles on the surscle-tendon complex in vivo. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006; 16: 159–67Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Kobe K, Yam H, Kanehisa H, et al. Effects of isometric squat training on the tendon stiffness and jump performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006; 96: 305–14Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Jacobs I, et al. Interaction between concurrent strength and endurance training. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68: 260–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Sale DG, Jacobs I, MacDougall JD, et al. Comparison of two regimens of concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 348–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kraemer WJ, Nindl BC, Ratamess NA, et al. Changes in muscle hypertrophy in women with periorlized resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 697–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Akima H, Kobe K, Kanehisa H, et al. Leg press resistance training during 20 days of 6 degrees head-down-tilt bed rest prevents muscle deconditioning. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 82: 30–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Akima H, Kobe K, Imai M, et al. Inactivity and muscle: effect of resistance training during bed rest on muscle size in the lower limb. Acta Physiol Scand 2001; 172: 269–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Schulze K, Gallagher P, Trappe S. Resistance training preserves skeletal muscle function during unloading in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 303–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Kobe K, Akima H, Ushiyama I, et al. Effects of resistance training during bed rest on the viscoelastic properties of tendon structures in the lower limb. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2004; 14: 296–302Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Tesch PA, Trieschmann JT, Ekberg A. Hypertrophy of chronically unloaded muscle subjected to resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 2004; 96: 1451–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Alkner BA, Tesch PA. Efficacy of a gravity-independent resistance exercise device as a countermeasure to muscle atrophy during 29-day bed rest. Acta Physiol Scand 2004; 181: 345–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Shackelford LC, LeBlanc AD, Driscoll TB. Resistance exercise as a countermeasure to disuse-induced bone loss. J Appl Physiol 2004; 97: 119–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Mulder ER, Stegeman OF, Gerrits KH, et al. Strength, size and activation of knee extensors followed during 8 weeks of horizontal bed rest and the influence of a countermeasure. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006; 97: 706–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Stevenson SW, Dudley GA. Dietary creatine supplementation and muscular adaptation to resistive overload. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1304–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Goodin I, Goode M, Ballay Y, et al. Electromyostimulation training effects on neural drive and muscle architecture. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 1291–9Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Fukunaga T, Sugiyama M. The effect of static and dynastic strength training on absolute muscle strength. Iap J Phys Educ 1978; 22: 343–9Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Sale D, MacDougall D, Alway S, et al. Effect of low vs high repetition weight training upon strength, muscle size and muscle fiber size [abstract]. Can J Spt Sci 1985; 10 (4): 27PGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Refsnes PE. En treningsnetude, hvor en aldivert musket strekkes forut for forkortning, ogdennetreningsnetudensinnvirkning på 1RM og vinkelhastighet ved leff belastning (in Norwegian) [dissertation]. Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway, 1986Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Dahl HA, Aaserud R, Iensen J. Muscle hypertrophy after light and heavy resistance training [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24 (5 Suppl.): S55Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Narici MV, Kayser B. Hyperhophic response of human skeletal muscle to strength training in hypoxia and normoxia. Eur JAppl Physiol 1995; 70: 213–9Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Moss BM, Refsnes PE, Abildgaard A, et al. Effects of maximal effort strength training with different loads on dynastic strength, cross-sectional area, load-power and load velocity relationships. Eur JAppl Physiol 1997; 75: 193–9Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Bemben DA, Fetters NL, Bemben MG, et al. Musculoskeletal responses to high-and low-intensity resistance training in early postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1949–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Takamda Y, Takazawa H, Sato Y, et al. Effects of resistance exercise combined with moderate vascular occlusion on muscular function in humans. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88: 2097–106Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Okada I, Fukashiro S. Effects of resistance training associated with stretch-shortening cycle exercise on force development and muscle volume in human elbow flexors. Adv Exerc Sports Physiol 2001; 7: 65–71Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Brandenburg JT, Docherty D. The effects of accentuated eccentric loading on strength, muscle hypertrophy and neural adaptations in trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 25–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Wirth K, Atzor KR, Schmidtbleicher D. Changes in muscle mass detected by MRJ, after an eight week hypertrophy training program. In: Koskolou M, editor. Proceedings of 7th annual Congress of the European College of Sports Sciences; 2002 Jul 24–27; Athens, 103Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Walker KS, Kambadur R, Shaman M, et al. Resistance training alters plasma myostatin but not IGF-1 in healthy men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 787–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Hubal MJ, Gordish-Dressman H, Thornpson PD, et al. Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 964–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Vikne H, Refsnes PE, Ekmark M, et al. Muscular performance after concentric and eccentric exercise in trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 1770–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Shepstone TN, Tang JE, Dallaire S, et al. Short-term high- vs low-velocity isokinetic lengthening training results in greater hypertrophy of the elbow flexors in young men. J Appl Physiol 2005; 98: 1768–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Davies J, Parker OF, Rutherford OM, et al. Changes in strength and cross-sectional area of the elbow flexors as a result of isometric strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1988; 57: 667–70Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Chesley A, MacDougall JD, Tamopolsky MA, et al. Changes in human muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73: 1383–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    MacDougall JD, Gibala MJ, Tamopolsky MA, et al. The fine course for elevated muscle protein synthesis following heavy resistance exercise. Can J Appl Physiol 1995; 20: 480–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Phillips SM, Tipton ED, Aarsland A, et al. Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 1997; 273: E99–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Miller BF, Olesen IL, Hansen M, et al. Coordinated collagen and muscle protein synthesis in human patella tendon and quadriceps muscle after exercise. J Physiol 2005; 567: 1021–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Garhammer I, Takano B. Training for weightlifting. In: Kenti PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: Blackwell scientific publications, 1992: 357–69Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Tesch PA. Strength training and muscle hypertrophy. In: Häkkinen K, editor. Conference book: international conference on weightlifting and strength training; Latin, Finland, 1998 November 10–12; Jyväskylä: Gumunerus printing, 1998: 17–22Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Oshowski K, Wilson GJ, Weatherby R, et al. The effect of weight training volume on hormonal output and muscular size and function. 1 Strength Cond Res 1997; 11: 148–54Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    McLester JR, Bishop P, Guilliams ME. Comparison of 1 day and 3 days per week of equal-volume resistance training in experienced subjects. J Strength Cond Res 2000; 14: 273–81Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Hawkins SA, Schroeder ET, Wiswell RA, et al. Eccentric muscle action increases site-specific, osteogenic response. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 1287–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Hortobagyi T, Hill JT, Houmard IA, et al. Adaptive responses to muscle lengthening and shortening in humans. J Appl Physiol 1996; 80: 765–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Hortobagyi T, Dempsey L, Fraser D, et al. Changes in muscle strength, muscle fibre size and myofibrillar gene expression after immobilization and retraining in humans. J Physiol 2000; 524: 293–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Farthing JT, Chilibeck PD. The effects of eccentric and concentric training at different velocities on muscle hypertrophy. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 89: 578–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Ewing JL, Wolfe DR, Rogers MA, et al. Effects of velocity of isokinetic training on strength, power, and quadriceps muscle fibre characteristics. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990; 61: 159–62Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Coyle EF, Feiring DC, Rotkis TC, et al. Specificity of power improvements through slow and fast isokinetic training. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51: 1437–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Trolle M, et al. Moment and power generation during maximal knee extensions performed at low and high speeds. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 69: 376–81Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Thomeé R, Renström P, Grimby G, et al. Slow orfast isokinetic training after knee ligament surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987; 8: 475–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Froböse I, Verdonck A, Duesberg F, et al. Effects of various load intensities in the framework of postoperative stationary endurance training on performance deficit of the quadriceps muscle of the thigh [in German]. Z Orthop Hire Grenzgeb 1993; 131: 164–7Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Greenhaff PL, Sorderlund K, Ren JM, et al. Energy metabolism in single human muscle fibres during intermittent contraction with occluded circulation. J Physiol 1993; 460: 443–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    McHugh MP, Tyler TF, Greenberg SC, et al. Differences in activation patterns between eccentric and concentric quadriceps contractions. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 83–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Starkey DB, Pollock ML, Ishida Y, et al. Effect of resistance training volume on strength and muscle thickness. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 1311–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Pollock ML, Abe T, DeHoyos DV, et al. Muscular hypertrophy responses to 6 months of high or low volume resistance training [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 (5 Suppl.): 5116Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    McBride JM, Blank JB, Triplett-McBride T. Effect ofresistance exercise volume and complexity on EMG, strength, and regional body composition. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 90: 626–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Ronnestad RB, Kadi F, Raastad T, et al. Dissimilar effects of 1 and 3 set strength training on strength and muscle mass gains in upper and lower body in untrained subjects. J Strength Cond Res. In pressGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Mayhew TP, Rothstein IM, Finucane SO, et al. Muscular adaptation to concentric and eccentric exercise at equal power levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 868–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Herzog W, Abrahamse SK, ter Kerns HE. Theoretical detemination of force-length relations of intact human skeletal nuns cles using the cross-bridge model. Pflugers Arch 1990; 416: 113–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Ichinose Y, Kawakami Y, Ito M, et al. Estimation of active force-length characteristics of human vastus laterafis muscle. Acta Anat (Basel) 1997; 159: 78–83Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Westing SH, Seger JY, Thorstensson A. Effects of electrical stimulation on eccentric and concentric torque-velocity relationships during knee extension in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1990; 140: 17–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Dugailly PM, Mouraux D, Llamas N, et al. EMGs and strength patterns of the quadriceps during isokinetic extension of the knee in different contraction male. Isokin Exerc Sci 2002; 10: 21–2Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    Holder-Powell HM, Rutherford OM. Reduction in range of movement can increase maximum voluntary eccentric forces for the human knee extensor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 1999; 80: 5024Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Colfiander E. Influence of concentric and eccentric muscle actions on acute strength patterns and adaptive responses to resistance training [dissertation]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, 1992Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    Ichinose Y, Kawakami Y, Ito M, et al. In vivo estimation of contraction velocity of human vastus lateralis muscle during `isokinetic’ action. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88: 851–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Rooney KI, Herbert RD, Balnave RJ. Fatigue contributes to the strength training stimulus. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 1160–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Drinkwater EJ, Lawton TW, Lindsell RP, et al. Training leading to repetition failure enhances bench press strength gains in elite junior athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 382–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Pincivero DM, Campy RM. The effects of rest interval length and training on quadriceps femoris muscle: part I. Knee extensor torque and muscle fatigue. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2004; 44: 111–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Tolland JT, Irish CS, Roberts JC, et al. Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains during resistance training. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 370–3Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    Tesch PA, Dudley GA, Duvoisin MR, et al. Force and EMG signal patterns during repeated bouts of concentric or eccentric muscle actions. Acta Physiol Scand 1990; 138: 263–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Grabiner MD, Owings TM. Effects of eccentrically and concentrically induced unilateral fatigue on the involved and uninvolved limbs. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1999; 9: 185–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Kay D, St Clair Gibson A, Mitchell MJ, et al. Different neuromuscular recruitment patterns during eccentric, concentric and isometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10: 425–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Dow DE, Cederna PS, Hassell CA, et al. Number of contractions to maintain mass and force of a denervated rat muscle. Muscle Nerve 2004; 30: 77–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Dow DE, Faulkner IA, Dennis RG. Distribution of rest periods between electrically generated contractions in denervated nuns cles of rats. Artif Organs 2005; 29: 4325Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Dow DE, Dennis RG, Faulkner IA. Electrical stimulation attenuates denervation and age-related atrophy in extensor digitorum longus muscles of old rats. J Gerontol A Biel Sci Med Sci 2005; 60: 416–24Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    Kawakami Y, Abe T, Kure SY, et al. Training-induced changes in muscle architecture and specific tension. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 72: 37–43Google Scholar
  182. 182.
    Amiridis IG, Cometti G, Morlon B, et al. Effects of the type of recovery training on the concentric strength of the knee extensors. J Sports Sci 1997; 15: 175–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    LaStayo PC, Pierotti DJ, Pifer J, et al. Eccentric ergometry: increases in locomotor muscle size and strength at low training intensities. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2000; 278: R1282–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    LaStayo PC, Ewy GA, Pierotti DD, et al. The positive effects of negative work: increased muscle strength and decreased fall riskin a frail elderly population. J Gerontol A Biel Sci Med Sci 2003; 58: 04419–24Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    Gerber JT, Marcus RL, Dibble LE, et al. Early application of negative work via eccentric ergometry following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006; 36: 298–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Fry AC. The role of training intensity in resistance exercise overhairring and overreaching. In: Kreider RB, Fry AC, O’Toole ML, editors. Overhairring in sport. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1998: 107–27Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: a review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 950–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Refutes PE. Testing and training for top Norwegian athletes. In: Muller E, Zallinger G, Ludescher F, editors. Science in elite sport. London: E & FN Sport, 1999: 97–114Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 975–91Google Scholar
  190. 190.
    Wallace MB, Mills BD, Browning CL. Effects of cross-training on markers of insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 1170–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Woods RH, Reyes R, Welsch MA, et al. Concurrent cardiovascular and resistance training in healthy older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1751–8Google Scholar
  192. 192.
    Kraemer WJ, Kenning M, Ratamess NA, et al. Resistance training combined with bench-step aerobics enhances women’s health profile. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 259–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Kawano H, Tanaka H, Miyachi M. Resistance training and arterial compliance: keeping the benefits while minimizing the stiffening. J Hypertens 2006; 24: 1753–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Leveritt M, Abernethy PI, Barry BE, et al. Concurrent strength and endurance training: a review. Sports Med 1999; 28: 413–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Deakin GB. Concurrent training in endurance athletes: theacute effects on muscle recovery capacity, physiological, hormonal and gene expression responses post-exercise (dissertation) [online]. Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University, 2004. Available from URL: http://thesis.scu.edu.au/ [Accessed 2006 Dec 3]Google Scholar
  196. 196.
    Staron RS, Karapondo DL, Kraemer WJ, et al. Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and women. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76: 1247–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Sale DG. Neural adaptations to strength training. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell scientific publications, 2003: 281–314Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    Phillips SM. Short-term training: when do repeated bouts of resistance exercise become handing? Can J Appl Physiol 2000; 25: 185–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Willoughby DS, Taylor L. Effects of sequential bouts of resistance exercise on androgen receptor expression. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1499–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Foley IM, Jayaraman RC, Prior BM, et al. MR measurements of muscle damage and adaptation after eccentric exercise. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 2311–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Willoughby DS, Taylor M, Taylor L. Glucocorticoid receptor and ubiquitin expression after repeated eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 2023–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Trappe TA, Raue U, Tesch PA. Human soleus muscle protein synthesis following resistance exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 2004; 182: 189–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Turner DL, Hoppeler H, Claassen H, et al. Effects of endurance training on oxidative capacity and structural composition of human arm and leg muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 1997; 161: 459–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Abe T, DeHoyos DV, Pollock ML, et al. Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 81: 174–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Rennie MJ, Wackerhage H, Spangenburg EE, et al. Control of the size of the human muscle mass. Anon Rev Physiol 2004; 66: 799–828Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Glass DJ. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy signaling pathways. But J Biochem Cell Biol 2005; 37: 1974–84Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    Nader GA. Molecular determinants of skeletal muscle mass: getting the ‘AKT’ together. But J Biochem Cell Biol 2005; 37: 1985–96Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    Bomberger TA, Esser KA. Mechanotransduction and the regulation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle. Proc Nutr Sac 2004; 63: 331–5Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    Hanneed M, Drell RW, Cobbold M, et al. Expression of IGF-I splice variants in young and old human skeletal muscle after high resistance exercise. J Physiol 2003; 547: 247–54Google Scholar
  210. 210.
    Bomberger TA, Chu WK, Mak YW, et al. The role of phospholipase D and phosphatidic acid in the mechanical activation of mTOR signaling in skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 4741–6Google Scholar
  211. 211.
    Boppart MD, Burkin DJ, Kaufman SJ. Alpha7beta1-integrin regulates naechanotransduction and prevents skeletal muscle injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2006; 290: 1660–5Google Scholar
  212. 212.
    Spangenburg EE, McBride TA. Inhibition of stretch-activated channels during eccentric muscle contraction attenuates p70S6K activation. J Appl Physiol 2006; 100: 129–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Lange S, Xiang F, Yakovenko A, et al. The kinase domain of thin controls muscle gene expression and protein turnover. Science 2005; 308 (5728): 1599–603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Goldberg AL, Ettinger ID, Goldspink DF, et al. Mechanism of work-induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports 1975; 7: 185–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    MacDougall I. Adaptability of muscle to strength training: a cellular approach. In: Salon B, editor. Biochemistry of exercise VI. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1986: 501–13Google Scholar
  216. 216.
    Martineau LC, Gardiner PF. Insight into skeletal muscle mechanotransduction: MAPK activation is quantitatively related to tension. J Appl Physiol 2001; 91: 693–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Martineau LC, Gardiner PA. Skeletal muscle is sensitive to the tension-time integral but not to the rate of change of tension, as assessed by mechanically induced signaling. J Biomech 2002; 35: 657–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Eliasson I, Elfegoun T, Nilsson I, et al. Maximal lengthening contractions increase p70S6 kinase phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle in the absence of nutritional supply. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006; 291: E1197–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Cuthbertson DJ, Babraj J, Smith K, et al. Anabolic signaling and protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle after dynastic shortening or lengthening exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006; 290: 731–8Google Scholar
  220. 220.
    Jones DA, Tolland JP. Strength training in young adults. In: Maffuli N, Chan KM, Macdonald R, et al., editors. Sports medicine for specific ages abilities. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2001: 57–64Google Scholar
  221. 221.
    Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Hormonal responses and adaptations to resistance exercise and training. Sports Med 2005; 35: 339–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Uehara K, Goto K, Kobayashi T, et al. Heat-stress enhances proliferative potential in rat soleus muscle. Jpn J Physiol 2004; 54: 263–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
    Goto K, Olmyama R, Sugiyama H, et al. Effects of heat stress and mechanical stretch on protein expression in cultured skeletal muscle cells. Pflugers Arch 2003; 447: 247–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    Goto K, Honda M, Kobayashi T, et al. Heat stress facilitates the recovery of atrophied soleus muscle in rat. Jpn J Physiol 2004; 54: 285–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Abe T, Kawamoto K, Yasuda T, et al. Eight days Kaatsu-resistance training improved sprint but not jump performance in collegiate male track and field athletes [online]. Int J Kaatsu Training Res 2005; 1: 19–23. Available from URL: http://kaatsu.jp/english/j01_1.html. [Accessed 2005 April 25]Google Scholar
  226. 226.
    Mazzetti SA, Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, et al. The influence of direct supervision of resistance training on strength performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1175–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    Mitsiopoulos N, Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, et al. Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography. J Appl Physiol 1998; 85: 115–22PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathias Wernbom
    • 1
  • Jesper Augustsson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roland Thomeé
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Lundberg Laboratory for Human Muscle Function and Movement Analysis, Department of OrthopaedicsSahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden
  2. 2.SportRehab Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine ClinicGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations