Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 35, Issue 7, pp 585–595 | Cite as

Post-Activation Potentiation

Underlying Physiology and Implications for Motor Performance
  • Matt Hodgson
  • David Docherty
  • Dan Robbins
Review Article

Abstract

The response of muscle to volitional or electrically induced stimuli is affected by its contractile history. Fatigue is the most obvious effect of contractile history reflected by the inability of a muscle to generate an expected level of force. However, fatigue can coexist with post-activation potentiation (PAP), which serves to improve muscular performance, especially in endurance exercise and activities involving speed and power. The measured response of muscular performance following some form of contractile activity is the net balance between processes that cause fatigue and the simultaneous processes that result in potentiation. Optimal performance occurs when fatigue has subsided but the potentiated effect still exists. PAP has been demonstrated using electrically induced twitch contractions and attributed to phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chains, which makes actin and myosin more sensitive to Ca2+. The potentiated state has also been attributed to an increase in α-motoneuron excitability as reflected by changes in the H-reflex. However, the significance of PAP to functional performance has not been well established.

A number of recent studies have applied the principles of PAP to short-term motor performance as well as using it as a rationale for producing long-term neuromuscular changes through complex training. Complex training is a training strategy that involves the execution of a heavy resistance exercise (HRE) prior to performing an explosive movement with similar biomechanical characteristics, referred to as a complex pair. The complex pair is then repeated for a number of sets and postulated that over time will produce long-term changes in the ability of a muscle to generate power. The results of these studies are equivocal at this time and, in fact, no training studies have actually been undertaken. The discrepancies among the results of the various studies is due in part to differences in methodology and design, with particular reference to the mode and intensity of the HRE, the length of the rest interval within and between the complex pairs, the type of explosive activity, the training history of the participants, and the nature of the dependent variables. In addition, few of the applied studies have actually included measures of twitch response or H-reflex to determine if the muscles of interest are potentiated. There is clearly more research required in order to clarify the functional significance of PAP and, in particular, the efficacy of complex training in producing long-term neuromuscular adaptations.

Keywords

Maximal Voluntary Contraction Jump Height Myosin Regulatory Light Chain Drop Jump Complex Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

References

  1. 1.
    Rassier DE, MacIntosh BR. Coexistence of potentiation and fatigue in skeletal muscle. Braz J Med Biol Res 2000; 33 (5): 499–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sale DG. Postactivation potentiation: role in human performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002; 30 (3): 138–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vandenboom R, Grange RW, Houston ME. Threshold for force potentiation associated with skeletal myosin phosphorylation. Am J Physiol 1993; 265 (6 Pt 1): C1456–62Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Enoka RM, Hutton RS, Eldred E. Changes in excitability of tendon tap and Hoffmann reflexes following voluntary contractions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 48 (6): 664–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gollhofer A, Schopp A, Rapp W, et al. Changes in reflex excitability following isometric contraction in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1998; 77 (1–2): 89–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Güillich A, Schmidtbleicher D. MVC-induced short-term potentiation of explosive force. N Stud Athlet 1996; 11 (4): 67–81Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hultborn H, Illert M, Nielsen J, et al. On the mechanism of the post-activation depression of the H-reflex in human subjects. Exp Brain Res 1996; 108 (3): 450–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trimble MH, Harp SS. Postexercise potentiation of the H-reflex in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 (6): 933–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Boxtel A. Differential effects of low-frequency depression, vibration-induced inhibition, and posttetanic potentiation on H-reflexes and tendon jerks in the human soleus muscle. J Neurophysiol 1986; 55 (3): 551–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baker D. The effect of alternating heavy and light resistances on power output during upper-body complex power training. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17 (3): 493–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiu LZ, Fry AC, Weiss LW, et al. Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17 (4): 671–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duthie GM, Young WB, Aitken DA. The acute effects of heavy loads on jump squat performance: an evaluation of the complex and contrast methods of power development. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16 (4): 530–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    French DN, Kraemer WJ, Cooke CB. Changes in dynamic exercise performance following a sequence of preconditioning isometric muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17 (4): 678–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gossen ER, Sale DG. Effect of postactivation potentiation on dynamic knee extension performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 83 (6): 524–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Kasimatis P, et al. Effect of a submaximal half-squats warm-up program on vertical jumping ability. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17 (2): 342–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hrysomallis C, Kidgell D. Effect of heavy dynamic resistive exercise on acute upper-body power. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15 (4): 426–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jensen RL, Ebben WP. Kinetic analysis of complex training rest interval effect on vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17 (2): 345–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones P, Lees A. A biomechanical analysis of the acute effects of complex training using lower limb exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17 (4): 694–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scott S, Docherty D. Acute effects of heavy pre-loading on vertical and horizontal jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 2004 May; 18 (2): 201–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young WB, Jenner A, Griffiths K. Acute enhancement of power performance from heavy load squats. J Strength Cond Res 1998; 12 (2): 82–8Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Latash ML. Neurophysiological basis of movement. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1998Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hamada T, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, et al. Postactivation potentiation, fiber type, and twitch contraction time in human knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88 (6): 2131–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vandervoort AA, Quinlan J, McComas AJ. Twitch potentiation after voluntary contraction. Exp Neurol 1983; 81 (1): 141–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Leary DD, Hope K, Sale DG. Posttetanic potentiation of human dorsiflexors. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83 (6): 2131–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    MacIntosh BR, Willis JC. Force-frequency relationship and potentiation in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88 (6): 2088–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grange RW, Vandenboom R, Houston ME. Physiological significance of myosin phosphorylation in skeletal muscle. Can J Appl Physiol 1993; 18 (3): 229–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sweeney HL, Bowman BF, Stull JT. Myosin light chain phosphorylation in vertebrate striated muscle: regulation and function. Am J Physiol 1993; 264 (5 Pt 1): C1085–95Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abbate F, Sargeant AJ, Verdijk PW, et al. Effects of high-frequency initial pulses and posttetanic potentiation on power output of skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88 (1): 35–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vandervoort AA, McComas AJ. A comparison of the contractile properties of the human gastrocnemius and soleus muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1983; 51 (3): 435–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol 1998; 513 (Pt 1): 295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burke D, Gandevia SC, McKeon B. Monosynaptic and oligosynaptic contributions to human ankle jerk and H-reflex. J Neurophysiol 1984; 52 (3): 435–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zehr PE. Considerations for use of the Hoffmann reflex in exercise studies. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 86 (6): 455–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Crone C, Nielsen J. Methodological implications of the post activation depression of the soleus H-reflex in man. Exp Brain Res 1989; 78 (1): 28–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Corrie WS, Hardin WB. Post-tetanic potentiation of H reflex in man; quantitative study. Arch Neurol 1964; 11: 317–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kitago T, Mazzocchio R, Liuzzi G, et al. Modulation of H-reflex excitability by tetanic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2004 Apr; 115 (4): 858–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zucker RS, Regehr WG. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Physiol 2002; 64: 355–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hugon M. Methodology of the Hoffmann reflex in man. In: Desmedt JE, editor. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. Basel: Karger, 1973, 3277–93Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Misiaszek JE. The H-reflex as a tool in neurophysiology: its limitations and uses in understanding nervous system function. Muscle Nerve 2003; 28 (2): 144–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28 (3): 599–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tubman LA, MacIntosh BR, Maki WA. Myosin light chain phosphorylation and posttetanic potentiation in fatigued skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 1996; 431: 882–7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physical EducationUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations