Sports Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 10, pp 663–679 | Cite as

The Role of Resistance Exercise Intensity on Muscle Fibre Adaptations

  • Andrew C. FryEmail author
Review Article


Although many training variables contribute to the performance, cellular and molecular adaptations to resistance exercise, relative intensity (% 1 repetition maximum [%1RM]) appears to be an important factor. This review summarises and analyses data from numerous resistance exercise training studies that have monitored percentage fibre type, fibre type cross-sectional areas, percentage cross-sectional areas, and myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform expression. In general, relative intensity appears to account for 18–35% of the variance for the hypertrophy response to resistance exercise. On the other hand, fibre type and MHC transitions were not related to the relative intensity used for training. When competitive lifters were compared, those typically utilising the heaviest loads (≥90% 1RM), that is weightlifters and powerlifters, exhibited a preferential hypertrophy of type II fibres when compared with body builders who appear to equally hypertrophy both type I and type II fibres. These data suggest that maximal hypertrophy occurs with loads from 80–95% 1RM.


Resistance Exercise Fibre Type Myosin Heavy Chain Resistance Exercise Training Body Builder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The preparation of this paper was supported, in part, by funding from the National Strength and Conditioning Association, USA-Weightlifting and the University of Memphis Research Grant programme. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.


  1. 1.
    Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Resistance training: physiological responses and adaptations (part 3). Phys Sportsmed 1988; 16(5): 63–73Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kraemer WJ, Deschenes MR, Fleck SJ. Physiological adaptations to resistance exercise: implications for athletic conditioning. Sports Med 1988; 6: 246–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carson JA. The regulation of gene expression in hypertrophying skeletal muscle. In: Holloszy JO, editor. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Vol. 25. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 1997: 301–20Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomason DB. Translational control of gene expression in muscle. In: Holloszy JO, editor. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Vol. 26. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 1998: 165–90Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kraemer WJ. Hormonal mechanisms related to the expression of muscular strength and power. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. London: Blackwell Scientific, 1992: 64–76Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sale DG. Neural adaptation to strength training. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. London: Blackwell Scientific, 1992: 249–65Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Staron RS. Human skeletal muscle fiber types: delineation development, and distribution. Can J Appl Physiol 1997; 22(4): 307–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lowe DA, Alway SE. Animal models for inducing muscle hypertrophy: are they relevant for clinical applications in humans? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002; 32(2): 36–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tihanyi J. Development of explosive strength according to muscle fibre types. Mod Athl Coach 1999; 37(1): 12–5Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Designing resistance exercise programs. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1997Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fry AC. Overload and regeneration during resistance exercise. In: Lehmann M, Foster C, Gastmann U, et al., editors. Overload, performance, incompetence, and regeneration in sport. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1999: 149–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. The ultimate training system: periodization breakthrough! New York: Advanced Research Press, 1996Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stone MH, O’Bryant H. Weight training: a scientific approach. Minneapolis (MN): Bellwether, 1987Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karvonen MJ, Kentala E, Mustala O. The effects of training on heart rate: a longitudinal study. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn 1957; 35: 307–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Camp SP. Pharmacologic factors in exercise and exercise testing In: Durstine JL, King AC, Painter PL, et al., editors. ACSM’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia (PA): Lea & Febiger, 1993: 197–215Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Noble BJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1996Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campos GER, Luecke TJ, Wendeln HK, et al. Muscular adaptations in responses to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 88: 50–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kraemer WJ, Koziris LP. Olympic weightlifting and power lifting. In: Lamb DR, Knuttgen HG, Murray R, editors. Perspectives in exercise science and sports medicine. Vol. 7. Physiology and nutrition for competitive sport. Carmel (IN): Cooper: 1994: 1–54Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adams GR. The role of insulin-like growth factor-I in the regulation of skeletal muscle adaptation to increased loading. In: Komi PV, editor. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Vol. 26. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 1998: 31–60Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fry AC. Resistance exercise overtraining: neuroendocrine responses. Sports Med 1997; 23(2): 106–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fry AC, Staron RS, Hagerman FC, et al. Endocrine responses to three different resistance exercise regimens [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31(5): S269Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kraemer WJ, Marchitelli L, McCurry D, et al. Hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69: 1142–50Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Staron RS, Karapondo DL, Kraemer WJ, et al. Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and women. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76(3): 1247–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harber MP, Fry AC, Rubin MR, et al. Skeletal muscle and hormonal adaptations to circuit weight training in untrained men. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2004; 14(3): 176–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Green H, Goreham G, Ouyang J, et al. Regulation of fiber size, oxidative potential, and capillarization in human muscle by resistance exercise. Am J Physiol 1998; 276(45): R591–6Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hather BM, Tesch PA, Buchanan P, et al. Influence of eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training. Acta Physiol Scand 1991; 143: 177–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roman WJ, Fleckenstein J, Stray-Gundersen J, et al. Adaptations in the elbow flexors of elderly males after heavy-resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74(2): 750–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Staron RS, Leonardi MJ, Karapondo DL, et al. Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resistance-trained women after detraining and retraining. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70(2): 631–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Staron RS, Malicky ES, Leonardi MJ, et al. Muscle hypertrophy and fast fiber type conversions in heavy resistance-trained women. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990; 60: 71–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bell GJ, Wenger HA. Physiological adaptations to velocity-controlled resistance training. Sports Med 1992; 13(4): 234–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Charette SL, McEvoy L, Pyka G, et al. Muscle hypertrophy response to resistance training in older women. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70(5): 1912–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hikida RS, Staron RS, Hagerman FC, et al. Effects of high-intensity resistance training on untrained older men: II. Muscle fiber characteristics in nucleo-cytoplasmic relationships. J Gerontol 2000; 55A(7): B347–54Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bottinnelli R, Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Force-velocity relations and myosin heavy chain isoform composition of skinned fibers from rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol 1991; 437: 655–72Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bottinnelli R, Betto R, Schiaffino S, et al. Unloaded shortening velocity and myosin heavy chain and alkali light chain isoform composition in rat skeletal muscle fibers. J Physiol 1994; 478: 341–9Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Trappe S, Costill D, Thomas R. Effect of swim taper on whole muscle and single muscle fiber contractile properties. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 32(12): 48–56Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Costill DL, Coyle EF, Fink WF, et al. Adaptations in skeletal muscle following strength training. J Appl Physiol 1979; 46(1): 96–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Kyröläinen H, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations and serum hormones in females during prolonged power training. Int J Sports Med 1990; 11: 91–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    MacDougall JD, Sale DG, Moroz JR, et al. Mitochondrial volume density in human skeletal muscle following heavy resistance training. Med Sci Sports 1979; 11(2): 164–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thorstensson A, Hulten B, von Döbeln W, et al. Effect of strength training on enzyme activities and fibre characteristics in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1976; 96: 392–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brown AB, McCartney N, Sale DG. Positive adaptations to weight-lifting training in the elderly. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69(5): 1725–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jansson E, Esbjörnsson M, Holm I, et al. Increase in the proportion of fast-twitch muscle fibers by sprint training in males. Acta Physiol Scand 1990; 140: 359–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Allemeier CA, Fry AC, Johnson P, et al. Effects of sprint cycle training on human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77(5): 2385–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Prince FP, Hikida RS, Hagerman FC. Human muscle fiber types in powerlifters, distance runners and untrained subjects. Pflugers Arch 1976; 363: 19–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fry AC, Allemeier CA, Staron RS. Correlation between myosin heavy chain content and percent fiber type area in human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 68: 246–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Narici MV, Hoppeler H, Kayser B, et al. Human quadriceps cross-sectional area, torque and neural activation during 6 months strength training. Acta Physiol Scand 1996; 157: 175–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ratzin Jackson CG, Dickinson AL, Ringel SP. Skeletal muscle fiber area alterations in two opposing modes of resistance-exercise training in the same individual. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990; 61: 37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, Chesley A, et al. Changes in muscle protein synthesis following heavy resistance exercise in humans: a pilot study. Acta Physiol Scand 1992; 146: 403–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kraemer WJ, Patton JF, Gordon SE, et al. Compatibility of high intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol 1995; 78: 976–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chiu LZ, Fry AC, Weiss LW, et al. Relative contribution of force and velocity to peak power across a load spectrum: a preliminary study [abstract]. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15(3): 391Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schilling BK, Fry AC, Chiu LZF, et al. Myosin heavy chain expression and rate of force development in weight trained males and females [abstract]. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15(3): 398Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Adams GR, Hather BM, Baldwin KM, et al. Skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain composition and resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1993; 4(2): 911–5Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Faigenbaum A. Age- and sex-related differences and their implications for resistance exercise. In: Baechle TR, Earle RW, editors. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2000: 169–86Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Alway SE, Grumbt WH, Gonyea WJ, et al. Contrasts on muscle and myofibers of elite male and female bodybuilders. J Appl Physiol 1989; 67(1): 24–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    MacDougall JD, Sale DG, Elder GCB, et al. Muscle ultrastructural characteristics of elite powerlifters and bodybuilders. Eur J Appl Physiol 1982; 48: 117–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Staron RS. The classification of human skeletal muscle fiber types. J Strength Cond Res 1997; 11(2): 67Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hoeger WWK, Barette SL, Hale DF, et al. Relationship between repetitions and selected percentages of one repetition maximum. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1987; 1(1): 11–3Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lander J. Maximum based on reps. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 1984; 6(6): 60–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zatsiorsky VM. Science and practice of strength training. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1995Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A. Acute hormonal responses to two different fatiguing heavy-resistance protocols in male athletes. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 882–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schilling BK, Fry AC, Ferkin MH, et al. Hormonal responses to free-weight and machine exercise [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33 (5 Suppl. 1): S270Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tesch PA. Training for bodybuilding. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. London: Blackwell Scientific, 1992: 370–80Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mikesky AE, Matthews W, Giddings CJ, et al. Muscle enlargement and exercise performance in the cat. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1989; 3(4): 85–92Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Garhammer J, Takano B. Training for weightlifting. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. London: Blackwell Scientific, 1992: 357–69Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fry AC, Ryan AJ, Schwab RJ, et al. Anthropometric characteristics as discriminators of body building success. J Sports Sci 1991; 9: 23–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bell DG, Jacobs I. Velocity specificity of training in bodybuilders. Can J Sport Sci 1992; 17(1): 28–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Fry AC, Harber MP, Vaczi M, et al. Muscle fiber characteristics of competitive power lifters. J Strength Cond Res 2003 May; 17(2): 402–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fry AC, Schilling BK, Staron RS, et al. Muscle fiber characteristics and performance correlates of male Olympic-style weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17(4): 746–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tesch PA, Larsson L. Muscle hypertrophy in body builders. Eur J Appl Physiol 1982; 49: 301–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tesch PA, Thorsson A, Kaiser P. Muscle capillary supply and fiber type characteristics in weight and power lifters. J Appl Physiol 1984; 56: 35–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rubin MR, Harber MP, Fry AC, et al. Endocrine responses to 10 weeks of circuit weight training [abstract]. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13(4): 432Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Performance LaboratoriesThe University of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations