How Many Steps/Day Are Enough?
Pedometers are simple and inexpensive body-worn motion sensors that are readily being used by researchers and practitioners to assess and motivate physical activity behaviours. Pedometer-determined physical activity indices are needed to guide their efforts. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review the rationale and evidence for general pedometer-based indices for research and practice purposes. Specifically, we evaluate popular recommendations for steps/day and attempt to translate existing physical activity guidelines into steps/day equivalents. Also, we appraise the fragmented evidence currently available from associations derived from cross-sectional studies and a limited number of interventions that have documented improvements (primarily in body composition and/or blood pressure) with increased steps/day.
A value of 10 000 steps/day is gaining popularity with the media and in practice and can be traced to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan 30+ years ago. 10 000 steps/day appears to be a reasonable estimate of daily activity for apparently healthy adults and studies are emerging documenting the health benefits of attaining similar levels. Preliminary evidence suggests that a goal of 10 000 steps/day may not be sustainable for some groups, including older adults and those living with chronic diseases. Another concern about using 10 000 steps/day as a universal step goal is that it is probably too low for children, an important target population in the war against obesity.
Other approaches to pedometer-determined physical activity recommendations that are showing promise of health benefit and individual sustainability have been based on incremental improvements relative to baseline values. Based on currently available evidence, we propose the following preliminary indices be used to classify pedometer-determined physical activity in healthy adults: (i) <5000 steps/day may be used as a ‘sedentary lifestyle index’; (ii) 5000–7499 steps/day is typical of daily activity excluding sports/exercise and might be considered ‘low active’; (iii) 7500–9999 likely includes some volitional activities (and/or elevated occupational activity demands) and might be considered ‘somewhat active’; and (iv) ≥10 000 steps/day indicates the point that should be used to classify individuals as ‘active’. Individuals who take >12 500 steps/day are likely to be classified as ‘highly active’.
KeywordsPhysical Activity Physical Activity Behaviour Physical Activity Guideline Physical Activity Recommendation Step Index
Neither author receives support from any pedometer manufacturer or distributor. Dr Tudor-Locke is the author of a commercially-available self-help book (Manpo-kei: The Art and Science of Step Counting, Trafford Publishing, 2003).
- 2.US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Promotion, 1996Google Scholar
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity trends: United States, 1990–1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001; 50(09): 166–9Google Scholar
- 7.Freedson PS, Miller K. Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71(2): 21–9Google Scholar
- 8.Bassett Jr DR. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71(2): 30–6Google Scholar
- 9.Moreau KL, DeGarmo R, Langley J, et al. The effectiveness of the ACSM-CDC physical activity recommendation in lowering blood pressure in postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32(S1): 72Google Scholar
- 10.Tudor-Locke C, Myers AM, Rodger NW. Formative evaluation of The First Step Program: a practical intervention to increase daily physical activity. Can J Diabetes Care 2000; 24(4): 34–8Google Scholar
- 18.Bassett Jr DR, Strath SJ. Use of pedometers to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ, editor. Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc., 2002: 163–78Google Scholar
- 19.Tudor-Locke C. Taking steps toward increased physical activity: using pedometers to measure and motivate. Res Digest 2002; 3(7): 1–8Google Scholar
- 21.Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrates, fiber, fat, protein and amino acids (macronutrients). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2002 Sep 5Google Scholar
- 22.Krucoff C. Popular, low-cost pedometers: 10,000 steps to a better health. The Seattle Times 1999 Dec 5Google Scholar
- 23.Spilner M, Robertson S. Take 10,000 a day! Prevention 2000, 90Google Scholar
- 24.DeSa P. Easy steps to shape up and slim down. Prevention 2001; Jul: 150–7Google Scholar
- 25.Kosta E. Make every step count. Walking 2001; 16: 100–1Google Scholar
- 28.Hatano Y. Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise. ICHPER 1993; 29: 4–8Google Scholar
- 35.Swartz AM, Thompson DL. Increasing daily walking improves glucose tolerance in overweight women. Res Q Exerc Sport 2002; 73 Suppl.: A16Google Scholar
- 36.The 10 000 Steps Rockhampton Project [online]. Available from URL: http://10000steps.cqu.edu.au/ [Accessed 2003 Nov 5]
- 39.Tudor-Locke C. Manpo-kei: the art and science of step counting. Victoria (BC): Trafford Publishing Inc, 2003Google Scholar
- 40.America on the move [online]. Available from URL: http://www.coloradoonthemove.org [Accessed 2003 Nov 5]
- 46.US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General, 2001Google Scholar
- 48.Vincent SD, Pangrazi RP. An examination of the activity patterns of elementary school children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2002; 14(4): 432–41Google Scholar
- 50.President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. The President’s Challenge Physical Activity and Fitness Awards Program. Bloomington (IN): President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2001Google Scholar
- 51.Corbin CB, Le Masurier G, Franks BD. Making sense of multiple physical activity recommendations. Res Digest 2002; 3(19): 1–8Google Scholar