Sports Medicine

, Volume 33, Issue 9, pp 683–698 | Cite as

Estimating Human Energy Expenditure

A Review of Techniques with Particular Reference to Doubly Labelled Water
  • Philip N. Ainslie
  • Thomas Reilly
  • Klass R. Westerterp
Review Article

Abstract

This review includes an historical overview of the techniques for measuring energy expenditure (EE). Following this overview, the ‘gold standard’ method of measuring EE, the doubly labelled water (DLW) method, is emphasised. Other methods, such as direct calorimetry, indirect calorimetry systems, heart rate and EE relationships, questionnaires and activity recall, motion sensors, combined heart rate and motion sensors for the estimation of EE are then highlighted in relation to their validation against the DLW method. The major advantages and disadvantages for each method are then considered. The preferred method to determine EE is likely to depend principally on factors such as the number of study participants to be monitored, the time period of measurements and the finances available. Small study participant numbers over a short period may be measured accurately by means of indirect calorimetric methods (stationary and portable systems). For periods over 3–4 days, EE should ideally be measured using the DLW method. However, the use of motion sensors is very promising in the measurement of EE, and has a number of advantages over the DLW method. Furthermore, if used correctly, both heart rate and questionnaire methods may provide valuable estimates of EE. Additional studies are needed to examine the possibility of improving the accuracy of measurement by combining two or more techniques. Such information, if confirmed by scientific rigour, may lead to an improvement in the estimation of EE and population-based physical activity levels. The accurate measurement of physical activity and EE is critical from both a research and health prospective. A consideration of the relevant techniques used for the estimation of EE may also help improve the quality of these frequently reported measurements.

References

  1. 1.
    Caspersen CJ. Physical activity epidemiology: concepts, methods, and applications to exercise science. In: Pandolf K, editor. Exercise and sport sciences review. Vol. 17. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins, 1989: 423–73Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elia M, Livesey G. Energy expenditure and fuel selections in biological systems: the theory and practice of calculations based on indirect calorimetry and tracer methods. In: Simopoulos AP, editor. Metabolic control of eating, energy expenditure and the bioenergetics of obesity: world review of nutrition and dietetics. Vol. 70. Basel: Karger, 1992: 68–131Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, et al. Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1996: 72–9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Macfarlane DJ. Automated metabolic gas analysis systems: a review. Sports Med 2001; 31: 841–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    West JB. High life: a history of high-altitude physiology and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Speakman JR. The history and theory of the doubly labeled water technique. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 68: 932S–8SGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Westerterp KR. Assessment of physical activity level in relation to obesity: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S522–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prentice AM, editor. International Dietary Energy Consultancy Group (IDECG): the doubly-labelled water method for measuring energy expenditure, technical recommendations for use in humans. Vienna: NAHRES-4, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 1990Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoeller DA, Delany JP. Human energy balance: what have be learned from the doubly labeled water method? Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 927S–79SGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jequier E. Direct and indirect calorimetry in man. In: Garrow JS, Halliday D, editors. Substrate and energy metabolism. London: Libbey, 1985: 82–91Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schoeller DA, van Santen E. Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by doubly labelled water method. J Appl Physiol 1982; 53: 955–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Speakman JR, Roberts SB. Recent advances in the doubly labeled water technique. Obes Res 1995; 3: 1S–74SGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Westerterp KR. Body composition, water turnover and energy turnover assessment with labelled water. Proc Nutr Soc 1999; 58: 945–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Black AE, Prentice AM, Coward WA. Use of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly-labeled water method of measuring energy expenditure. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1986; 40: 381–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frayn KN. Metabolic regulation: a human perspective. London: Portland Press Ltd, 1996Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schoeller DA, Hnilicka JM. Reliability of the doubly labeled water method for the measurement of total daily energy expenditure in free-living subjects. J Nutr 1996; 126: 348S–54SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zuntz N, Leowy A. Lehrbuch der physiologie bes menschem. Leipzig: Vogel, 1909Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kofranyi E, Michaelis HF. A portable apparatus to determine metabolism [in German]. Arbeitsphyiololgie 1940; 11: 148–50Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolff HS. The integrating pneumotacograph: a new instrument for the measurement of energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry. Q J Exerc Physiol 1958; 43: 270–83Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Humphrey SJE, Wolff HS. The oxylog [abstract]. J Appl Physiol 1977; 267: 120Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harrison MH, Brown GA, Belyasin AJ. The oxylog: an evaluation. Ergonomics 1982; 25: 809–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McNeill G, Cox MD, Rivers JPW. The oxylog oxygen consumption meter: a portable device for measurement of energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr 1987; 45: 1415–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schulz H, Helle S, Heck H. The validity of the telemetric system CORTEX X1 in the ventilatory and gas exchange measurement during exercise. Int J Sports Med 1997; 18: 454–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meyer T, Georg T, Becker C, et al. Reliability of gas exchange measurements from two different spiroergometry systems. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 593–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Christensen CC, Frey HM, Foenstelie E, et al. A critical evaluation of energy expenditure estimates based on individual O2 consumption, heart rate curves and average daily heart rates. Am J Clin Nutr 1983; 37: 469–72Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davidson L, McNeill G, Haggart P, et al. Free-living energy expenditure of adult men assessed by continuous heart rate monitoring and doubly labelled water. Br J Nutr 1997; 78: 696–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Livingstone MB. Heart-rate monitoring: the answer for assessing energy expenditure and physical activity in population studies? Br J Nutr 1997; 78: 869–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Melanson EL, Freedson PS. Physical activity assessment: a review of the methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1996; 36: 385–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spurr GB, Prentice AM, Murgatroyd PR, et al. Energy expenditure from minute-by-minute heart-rate recording: comparison with indirect calorimetry. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 48: 522–59Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Secher NH, Ruberg-Larsen N, Binkhorst RA, et al. Maximal oxygen uptake during arm cranking and combined arm plus leg exercise. J Appl Physiol 1974; 36: 515–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rowlands AV, Eston RG, Ingledew DK. Measurements of physical activity in children with particular reference to the use of heart rate and pedometry. Sports Med 1997; 24: 258–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Livingstone MB, Coward WA, Prentice AM, et al. Daily energy expenditure in free-living children: comparison of heart-rate monitoring with the doubly labeled water method. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 56: 343–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bratteby LE, Sandhagen B, Fan H, et al. A 7-day activity diary for the assessment of daily energy expenditure validated by the doubly labelled water methods in adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51: 585–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schulz S, Westerterp KR, Bruck K. Comparison of energy expenditure by the doubly labeled water technique with energy intake, heart rate and activity recording in man. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 49: 1146–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Racette SB, Schoeller DA, Kushner RF. Comparison of heart rate and physical activity recall with doubly labeled water in obese women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 126–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bonnefoy M, Normand S, Pachiaudi C, et al. Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labeled water study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 28–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schuit AJ, Schouten EG, Westerterp KR, et al. Validity of the physical activity scale (PASE) for the elderly according to energy expenditure assessed by the doubly labeled water method. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 541–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Philippaerts RM, Westerterp KR, Lefevre J. Doubly labeled water validation of three physical activity questionnaires. Int J Sports Med 1999; 20: 284–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dipietro L, Caspersen CJ, Ostfeld AM, et al. A survery for assessing physical activity among older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 628–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bouchard CA, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, et al. A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr 1983; 37: 461–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leaon AS, et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 71–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32(9): S498–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reilly T, Thomas V. Estimated daily energy expenditures of professional association footballers. Ergonomics 1979; 22: 541–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ebine N, Rafamantanantsoa HH, Nayuki Y, et al. Measurement of total energy expenditure by the doubly labelled water method in professional soccer players. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 391–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Washburn RA, Cook TC, LaPorte RE. The objective assessment of physical activity in an occupationally active group. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1989; 29: 279–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Baecke JA, Burema HJ, Frijters JER. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 36: 936–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reiff GG, Montoye HJ, Remmington RD, et al. Assessment of physical activity by questionnaire and interview. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1967; 7: 135–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Taylor HL, Jacobs DR, Schucker B, et al. A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities. J Chronic Dis 1978; 31: 741–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Richardson MT, Leon AS, Jacobs DR, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity questionnaire. J Clin Epidemol 1994; 47: 271–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Conway JM, Irwin ML, Ainsworth BE. Estimating energy expenditure from the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity and Tecumseh Occupational Activity questionnaires: a doubly labeled water validation. J Clin Epidemol 2002; 55: 392–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Conway JM, Seale JL, Jacobs Jr DR, et al. Comparison of energy expenditure estimates from doubly labeled water, a physical activity questionnaire, and physical activity records. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 75: 519–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Starling RD, Matthews DE, Ades PA, et al. Assessment of physical activity in older individuals: a doubly labeled study. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86: 2090–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Leenders NY, Sherman WM, Nagaraja NH, et al. Evaluation of methods to assess physical activity in free living condition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1233–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Seale JL, Klein G, Friedmann J, et al. Energy requirements measurement by doubly labeled water, activity recall, and diet records in the rural elderly. Nutrition 2002; 18: 568–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Goran MI, Poehlman ET. Total energy expenditure and energy requirements in healthy elderly persons. Metabolism 1992; 7: 744–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical comparison. Lancet 1986; I: 307–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Typical error versus limits of agreement. Sports Med 2000; 30: 375–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Basset DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, et al. Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S471–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Freedson PS, Miller J. Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71(2): 21–9Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kemper HCG, Verschuur R. Validity and reliability of pedometers in habitual physical activity research. Eur J Appl Physiol 1977; 37: 71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schutz Y, Froideraux F, Jequier E. Estimation of 25h energy expenditure by a portable accelerometer [abstract]. Proc Nutr Soc 1988; 47A: 23Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pambianco G, Wing RR, Robertson R. Accuracy and reliability of the caltrac accelerometer for estimated energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 858–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Haymes EM, Byrnes WC. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 1365–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Washburn RA, LaPorte RE. Assessment of walking behaviour: effect of speed and monitor position on two objective physical activity monitors. Res Q Exerc Sport 1988; 59: 83–5Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 777–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, et al. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S489–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Campbell KL, Crocker PR, Mckenzie DC. Field evaluation of energy expenditure in women using Tritrac accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 1667–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rodriguez G, Beghin L, Michaud L, et al. Comparison of the TriTrac-R3D accelerometer and a self-report activity diary with heart-rate monitoring for the assessment of energy expenditure in children. Br J Nutr 2002; 87: 623–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pannemans DL, Bouten CV, Westerterp KR. 24h energy expenditure during a standardised activity protocol in young and elderly men. Eur J Clin Nutr 1995; 49: 49–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bouten CV, Verboeket-Van De Venne P, Westerterp KR, et al. Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81: 1019–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Levine JA, Baukol PA, Westerterp KR. Validation of the Tracmor triaxial accelerometer system for walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1593–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Basset Jr DR. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71(2): S30–6Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Atwater WO, Benedict FG. Experiments of the metabolism of matter and energy in the human body. US Dept Agr Off Exp Sta Bull 1903; 136: 1–357Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Atwater WO, Rosa EB. Descriptions of new respiration calorimeter and experiments on the conservation in the human body. US Dept Agr Off Exp Sta Bull 1899; 63Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ferrannini E. The theoretical bases of indirect calorimetry: a review. Metabolism 1988; 37: 287–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Webb P. Human calorimeters. New York: Praeger, 1980Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Carter J, Jeukendrup AE. Validity and reliability of three commercially available breath-by-breath respiratory systems. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 86: 435–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    McLaughlin JE, King GA, Howley ET, et al. Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 280–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bratteby LE, Sandhagen B, Fan H, et al. Total energy expenditure and physical activity as assessed by the doubly labeled water method in Swedish adolescents in whom energy intake was underestimated by 7-d diet records. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67: 905–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    American College of Sports Medicine. A collection of physical activity questionnaires for health-related research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29 Suppl.: 5–9Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Jacobs Jr DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, et al. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 81–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bouten CV, Koekkoek KT, Verduin M, et al. A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 136–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Washburn R, Chin MK, Montoye HJ. Accuracy of pedometer in walking and running. Res Q Exerc Sport 1980; 31: 693–702Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jettee AM, et al. The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 163–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Basset DR, Ainsworth BE, Leggett SR, et al. Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 1071–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bouten CV, Westerterp KR, Verduin M, et al. Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 1516–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rennie K, Rowsell T, Jebb SA, et al. A combined heart rate and movement sensor: proof of concept and preliminary testing study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 409–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sallis JF, Buono MJ, Roby JJ, et al. The Caltrac accelerometer as a physical activity monitor for school age children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 698–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Maliszewski AF, Freedson PS, Ebbeling CJ, et al. Validity of the Caltrac accelerometer in estimating energy expenditure and activity in children and adults. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1991; 3: 141–51Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Eston RE, Rowlands AV, Ingledew DK. Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for predicting energy cost of children’s activities. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84: 362–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Trost G, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, et al. Validity of the Computer Science and Applications (CSA) monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 629–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hendelman D, Miller KM, Baggett C, et al. Validity of accelerometry in assessing moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S442–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Fogelholm M, Hiilloskorpi H, Laukkanen R, et al. Assessment of energy expenditure in overweight women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 1191–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ekelund U, Sjostrom M, Yngve A, et al. Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 275–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Swan PD, Byrnes WC, Haymes EM. Energy expenditure estimates for the Caltrac accelerometer for running, race walking, and stepping. Br J Sports Med 1997; 31: 235–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Westerterp KR, Bouten CV. Physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water method. Z Ernahrungswiss 1997; 36: 263–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Terrier P, Aminian K, Schutz Y. Can accelerometry accurately predict the energy cost of uphill/downhill walking? Ergonomics 2001; 44: 48–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Meijer GA, Westerterp KR, Verhoeven MH, et al. Methods to assess physical activity with special reference to motion sensors and accelerometers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991; 38: 221–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Chen KY, Sun M. Improving energy expenditure estimation by using triaxial accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83: 2112–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Jakicic JM, Winters C, Lagally K, et al. The accuracy of the TriTrac-R3D accelerometer to estimate energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 747–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Sarkin JA, et al. Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 908–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sherman WM, Morris DM, Kirby TE, et al. Evaluation of the commercial accelerometer (Tritrac-R3D) to measure energy expenditure during ambulation. Int J Sports Med 1998; 19: 43–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Welk GJ, Corbin CB. The validity of the Tritrac-R3D activity monitor for the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 1995; 66: 202–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Aminian K, Robert P, Jequier E, et al. Estimation of speed and incline of walking speed using Neural Network. IEEE Trans Instr Meas 1995; 44: 743–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Herren R, Sparti A, Aminian K, et al. The prediction of speed and incline in outdoor running in humans using accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 25: 1365–9Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Terrier P, Ladetto Q, Merminod B, et al. Measurement of the mechanical power of walking by satellite positioning system (GPS). Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1912–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Perrin O, Terrier P, Ladetto Q, et al. Improvement of walking speed prediction by accelerometry and altimetry, validated by DGPS. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000; 38: 164–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Meijer G, Westerterp K, Koper H, et al. Assessment of energy expenditure by recording heart rate and body acceleration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: 343–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Haskell WL, Yee MC, Evans A, et al. Simultaneous measurements of heart rate and body motion to quantify physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 109–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Moon JK, Butte NF. Combined heart rate and activity improve estimates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production rates. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81: 1754–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Strath SJ, Bassett DR, Thompson DL, et al. Validity of the simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique for measuring energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 888–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip N. Ainslie
    • 1
  • Thomas Reilly
    • 2
  • Klass R. Westerterp
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Research Institute for Sport and Exercise SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  3. 3.Department of Human BiologyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations