Sports Medicine

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 409–425 | Cite as

Neural Influences on Sprint Running

Training Adaptations and Acute Responses
  • Angus Ross
  • Michael Leveritt
  • Stephan Riek
Review Article


Performance in sprint exercise is determined by the ability to accelerate, the magnitude of maximal velocity and the ability to maintain velocity against the onset of fatigue. These factors are strongly influenced by metabolic and anthropometric components. Improved temporal sequencing of muscle activation and/or improved fast twitch fibre recruitment may contribute to superior sprint performance. Speed of impulse transmission along the motor axon may also have implications on sprint performance. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) has been shown to increase in response to a period of sprint training. However, it is difficult to determine if increased NCV is likely to contribute to improved sprint performance.

An increase in motoneuron excitability, as measured by the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex), has been reported to produce a more powerful muscular contraction, hence maximising motoneuron excitability would be expected to benefit sprint performance. Motoneuron excitability can be raised acutely by an appropriate stimulus with obvious implications for sprint performance. However, at rest H-reflex has been reported to be lower in athletes trained for explosive events compared with endurance-trained athletes. This may be caused by the relatively high, fast twitch fibre percentage and the consequent high activation thresholds of such motor units in power-trained populations. In contrast, stretch reflexes appear to be enhanced in sprint athletes possibly because of increased muscle spindle sensitivity as a result of sprint training. With muscle in a contracted state, however, there is evidence to suggest greater reflex potentiation among both sprint and resistance-trained populations compared with controls. Again this may be indicative of the predominant types of motor units in these populations, but may also mean an enhanced reflex contribution to force production during running in sprint-trained athletes.

Fatigue of neural origin both during and following sprint exercise has implications with respect to optimising training frequency and volume. Research suggests athletes are unable to maintain maximal firing frequencies for the full duration of, for example, a 100m sprint. Fatigue after a single training session may also have a neural manifestation with some athletes unable to voluntarily fully activate muscle or experiencing stretch reflex inhibition after heavy training. This may occur in conjunction with muscle damage.

Research investigating the neural influences on sprint performance is limited. Further longitudinal research is necessary to improve our understanding of neural factors that contribute to training-induced improvements in sprint performance.


Motor Unit Muscle Spindle Eccentric Exercise Nerve Conduction Velocity Sprint Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Miller J. Burst of speed. South Bend (IN): Icarus Press, 1984Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mero A, Luhtanen P, Viitaslo JT, et al. Relationship between the maximal running velocity, muscle fibre characteristics, force production and force relaxation of sprinters. Scand J Sports Sci 1981; 3: 16–22Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacobs I, Esbjornsson M, Slyven C, et al. Sprint training effects on muscle myoglobin, enzymes, fibre types, and blood lactate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19 (4): 368–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allemeier CA, Fry AC, Johnson P, et al. Effects of sprint cycle training on human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77 (5): 2385–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hakkinen K, Komi PV. Electromyographic changes during strength training and detraining. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15 (6): 455–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hakkinen K, Komi PV, Alen M. Effect of explosive type strength training on isometric force and relaxation time, EMG and muscle fibre characteristics of leg extensor muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 1985; 125: 587–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hakkinen K, Komi PV. Effect of explosive type strength training on EMG and force pad characteristics of leg extensor muscles during concentric and various stretch shortening cycle exercises. Scand J Sports Sci 1985; 7: 65–76Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietz V, Schmidtbleicher D, Noth J. Neuronal mechanisms of human locomotion. J Neurophysiol 1979; 42 (5): 1212–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jönhagen S, Ericson MO, Németh G, et al. Amplitude and timing of electromyographic activity during sprinting. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1996; 6: 15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mero A, Komi PV. EMG, force and power analysis of sprint specific exercises. J Appl Biomech 1994; 10 (1): 1–13Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nummela A, Rusko H, Mero A. EMG activities and ground reaction forces during fatigued and non-fatigued sprinting. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26 (5): 605–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernardi M, Solomonow M, Nguyen G, et al. Motor unit recruitment strategy changes with skill acquisition. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996; 74: 52–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hakkinen K, Komi PV. Training-induced changes in neuromuscular performance under voluntary and reflex conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1986; 55: 147–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raglin JS, Koceja DM, Stager JM, et al. Mood, neuromuscular function, and performance during training in female swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1996; 28 (3): 372–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sleivert GG, Backus RD, Wenger HA. The influence of a strength sprint training sequence on multi joint power output. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27 (12): 1655–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Casabona A, Polizzi MC, Perciavalle V. Differences in H-Reflex between athletes trained for explosive contractions and nontrained subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1990; 61: 26–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamen G, Taylor P, Beehler PJ. Ulnar and posterior nerve conduction velocity in athletes. Int J Sports Med 1984; 5 (26): 26–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osternig LR, Hamill J, Lander J, et al. Co-activation of sprinter and distance runner muscles in isokinetic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986; 18: 431–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saplinskas JS, Chobatas MA, Yashchaninas II. The time of completed motor acts and impulse activity of single motor units according to the training level and sport specialisation of tested persons. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 20: 529–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mann R, Kotmel J, Herman J, et al. Kinematic trends in elite sprinters. In: Terauds J, editor. Sports biomechanics. Del Mar (CA): Academic Publishers, 1984Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ae M, Ito A, Suzuki M. The men’s 100metres. N Stud Athletics 1992; 7 (1): 47–52Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murase Y, Hoshikawa T, Yasuda N, et al. Analysis of the changes in progressive speed during 100-meter dash. In: Komi PV, editor. Biomechanics. V-B. Baltimore (MA): University Park Press, 1976: 200–207Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mero A, Komi PV. Effects of supramaximal velocity on biomechanical variables in sprinting. Int J Sport Biomech 1985; 1: 240–52Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mann R, Moran GT, Dougherty SE. Comparative electromyography of the lower extremity in jogging, running and sprinting. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14 (6): 501–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mero A, Komi PV. Electromyographic activity in sprinting at speeds ranging from sub maximal to supramaximal. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19 (3): 266–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carpentier A, Duchateau J, Hainaut K.Velocity dependent muscle strategy during plantarflexion in humans. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1996; 6: 225–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schneider K, Zernicke RF, Schmidt RA, et al. Changes in limb dynamics during the practice of rapid arm movements. J Biomech 1989; 22 (8/9): 805–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nardone A, Schieppati M. Shift of activity from slow to fast muscle during voluntary lengthening contractions of the triceps surae muscles in humans. J Physiol 1988; 395: 363–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nardone A, Romano C, Schieppati M. Selective recruitment of high threshold motor units during voluntary isotonic lengthening of active muscle. J Physiol 1989; 409: 451–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Fast motor units are not preferentially activated in rapid voluntary contractions in man. Nature 1977; 267 (5613): 717–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miyashita M, Matsui H, Miura M. The relationship between electrical activity in muscle and speed of walking and running. In: Vrendenbregt J, Wartenweiler JW, editors. Biomechanics. II. Baltimore (MA): University Park Press, 1971: 192–6Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kyröläinen H, Komi PV, Belli A. Changes in muscle activity patterns and kinetics with increasing running speed. J Strength Condition Res 1999; 13 (4): 400–6Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mero A, Komi PV. Force-, EMG-, and elasticity-velocity relationships at submaximal and supramaximal running speeds in sprinters. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1986; 55: 553–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Suter E, Herzog W, Huber A. Extent of motor unit activation in the quadriceps muscles of healthy subjects. Muscle Nerve 1996; 19: 1046–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lloyd AR, Gandevia SC, Hales JP. Muscle performance, voluntary activation, twitch properties and perceived effort in normal subjects and patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. Brain 1991; 114: 85–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Keen DA, Yue GH, Enoka RM. Training-related enhancement in the control of motor output in elderly humans. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77 (6): 2648–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hoyle RJ, Holt LE. Comparison of athletes and non-athletes on selected neuromuscular tests. Aust J Sport Sci 1983; 3 (1): 13–8Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lastovka M. The conduction velocity of the peripheral motor nerves and physical training. Act Nerv Super 1969; 11 (4): 308Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lehnert VK, Weber J. Untersuchen der motorische veneleitgeschwindigkeit (NLG) des nervus ulnaris an sport. Med Sport 1975; 15: 10–4Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sleivert GG, Backus RD, Wenger HA. Neuromuscular differences between volleyball players, middle distance runners and untrained controls. Int J Sports Med 1995; 16 (5): 390–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Upton ARM, Radford PF. Motoneurone excitability in elite sprinters. In: Komi PV, editor. Biomechanics. V-A. Baltimore (MA): University Park Press, 1975: 82–7Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Appelberg B, Émonet-Dénand F. Motor units of the first superficial lumbrical muscle of the cat. J Neurophysiol 1967; 30: 154–60Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kupa EJ, Roy SH, Kandarian SC, et al. Effects of muscle fibre type and size on EMG median frequency and conduction velocity. J Appl Physiol 1995; 79 (1): 23–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Borg J. Axonal refractory period of single short toe extensor motor units in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43 (10): 917–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Moyano HF, Molina JC. Axonal projections and conduction properties of olfactory peduncle neuron’s in the rat. Exp Brain Res 1980; 39 (3): 241–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arasaki K, Ijima M, Nakanishi T. Normal maximal and minimal motor nerve velocities in adults determined by a collision method. Muscle Nerve 1991; 14: 647–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kitai TA, Sale DG. Specificity of joint angle in isometric training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1989; 58: 744–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Esbjornsson M, Hellsten-Westing Y, Sjodin B, et al. Muscle fibre type changes with sprint training: effect of training pattern. Acta Physiol Scand 1993; 149: 245–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Andersson Y, Edstrom J. Motor hyper-activity resulting in diameter decrease of peripheral nerves. Acta Physiol Scand 1957; 39: 240–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roy RR, Gilliam TB, Taylor JF, et al. Activity-induced morphologic changes in rat soleus nerve. Exp Neurol 1983; 80: 622–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Edds MV Jr. Hypertrophy of nerve fibres to functionally overloaded muscles. J Comp Neurol 1950; 93: 259–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wedeles CHA. The effects of increasing the functional load of muscle on the composition of its motor nerve [abstract]. J Anat 1949; 83: 57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Okajima Y, Toikawa H, Hanayama K, et al. Relationship between nerve and muscle fiber conduction velocities of the same motor units in man. Neurosci Lett 1998; 253: 65–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Güllich A, Schmidtbleicher D. MVC-induced short-term potentiation of explosive force. N Stud Athletics 1996; 11 (4): 67–81Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dietz V. Human neuronal control of automatic functional movements: interaction between central programs and afferent input. Physiol Rev 1992; 72 (1): 33–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Voight M, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Simonsen EB. Modulation of short latency stretch reflexes during human hopping. Acta Physiol Scand, 1998; 163: 181–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Burke D. Mechanisms underlying the tendon jerk and H-reflex. In: Delwaide PJ, Young RR, editors. Clinical neurophysiology in spasticity. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1985: 55–62Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dietz V. Contribution of spinal stretch reflexes to the activity of leg muscles in running. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A, editors. Muscle receptors and movement. London: MacMillan, 1981: 339–46Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nichols TR, Houk JC. Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of the stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 1976; 39: 119–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rochcongar P, Dassonville J, Le Bars R. Modification of the Hoffman reflex in function of athletic training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1979; 40: 165–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Maffiuletti NA, Martin A, Babault N, et al. Electrical and mechanical Hmax-Mmax ratio in power- and endurance-trained athletes. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 3–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Buchthal F, Schmalbruch H. Contraction times of twitches evoked by H-reflexes. Acta Physiol Scand 1970; 80: 378–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Almeida-Silveira M, Pérot C, Goubel F. Neuromuscular adaptations in rats trained bymuscle stretch shortening. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996; 72: 261–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Carp JS, Wolpaw JR. Motoneuron plasticity underlying operantly conditioned decrease in primate H-reflex. J Neurophysiol 1994; 72 (1): 431–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rothwell JC. Control of human voluntary movement. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Goode DJ, Van Hoven J. Loss of patellar and achilles tendon reflexes in classical ballet dancers [letter]. Arch Neurol 1982; 39 (5): 323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nielsen J, Crone C, Hultborn H. H-reflexes are smaller in dancers from Royal Danish Ballet then in well-trained athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1993; 66: 116–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Nielsen J, Kagamihara Y. The regulation of presynaptic inhibition during co-contraction of antagonistic muscles in man. J Physiol 1993; 464: 575–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Seagrave L. Introduction to sprinting. N Stud Athletics 1996; 11 (2–3): 93–113Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Koceja DM, Kamen G. Conditioned patella tendon reflexes in sprint and endurance trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20 (2): 172–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kamen G, Kroll W, Zigon ST. Exercise effects upon reflex time components in weight lifters and distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1981; 13 (3): 198–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kyröläinen H, Komi PV. Neuromuscular performance of the lower limbs during voluntary and reflex activity in power and endurance trained athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1994; 69: 223–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Evatt ML, Wolf SL, Segal RL. Modification of human spinal stretch reflexes: preliminary studies. Neurosci Lett 1989; 105: 350–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wolf SL, Segal RL, Hetner ND, et al. Contralateral and long latency effects of human biceps brachii stretch reflex conditioning. Exp Brain Res 1995; 107: 96–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Butler AJ, Yue G, Darling WG. Variations in soleus H-reflexes as a function of plantar flexion torque in man. Brain Res 1993; 632: 95–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Verrier MC. Alterations in H-reflex by variations in baseline EMG excitability. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 60: 492–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Meunier S, Peirrot-Deseilligny E. Gating of the afferent reflex volley of the monosynaptic stretch reflex during movement in man. J Physiol 1989; 419: 753–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Stein RB, Hunter IW, LaFontaine SR, et al. Analysis of short latency reflexes in human elbow flexor muscles. J Neurophysiol 1995; 71 (5): 1900–11Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Gollhofer A, Schopp A, Rapp W, et al. Changes in reflex excitability following isometric contraction in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1998; 77 (1–2): 89–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Trimble MH, Harp SS. Postexercise potentiation of the H-reflex in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 (6): 933–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Hamada T, Sale DG, MacDougall JD. Postactivation potentiation in endurance trained male athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32 (3): 403–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Costill DL, Daniels J, Evans W, et al. Skeletal muscle enzymes and fiber composition in male and female track athletes. J Appl Physiol 1976; 40: 149–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Romano C, Scheippati M. Reflex excitability of human soleus motoneurons during voluntary or lengthening contractions. J Physiol 1987; 390: 271–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Funase K, Imanaka K, Nishihira Y, et al. Threshold of the soleus muscle H-reflex is less sensitive to the change in excitability of the motoneuron pool during plantarflexion or dorsiflexion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1994; 69: 21–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nakazawa K, Yano H, Satoh H, et al. Differences in stretch reflex responses of elbow flexor muscles during shortening, lengthening and isometric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1998; 77: 395–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Zehr EP, Stein RB. What functions do reflexes serve during human locomotion? Prog Neurobiol 1999; 58: 185–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC, Jaeger RJ. Response to sudden torques about the ankle in man. IV a functional role of α-γ linkage. J Neurophysiol 1981; 46 (1): 179–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Komi PV. Training of muscle strength and power: interaction of neuromotoric, hypertrophic and mechanical factors. Int J Sports Med, 1986; 7 Suppl.: 10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Komi PV. Stretch shortening cycle. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power and sport. London: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1992: 169–79Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Voight M, Chelli F, Frigo C. Changes in the excitability of soleus muscle short latency stretch reflexes during human hopping after 4 weeks of hopping training. Acta Physiol Scand 1988; 163: 181–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hoffer JA, Andreassen S. Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premamillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. J Neurophysiol 1981; 45: 267–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Locatelli E. The importance of anaerobic glycolysis and stiffness in the sprints (60, 100, 200 metres). N Stud Athletics 1996; 11 (2–3): 121–5Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Chelly SM, Denis C. Leg power and hopping stiffness: relationship with sprint running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33 (2): 326–333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Simonsen EB, Thomsen L, Klausen K. Activity of mono- and biarticular leg muscles during sprint running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1985; 54: 524–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Moritani T, Oddsson L, Thorstensson A. Differences in modulation of the gastrocnemius and soleus H-reflexes during hopping in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1990; 138: 575–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Capaday C, Stein RB. Difference in the amplitude of the human soleus H-reflex during walking and running. J Physiol 1987; 392: 513–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Edamura M, Yang JF, Stein RB. Factors that determine the magnitude and time course of human H-reflexes in locomotion. J Neurosci 1991; 11 (2): 420–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Gandevia SC, Allen GM, McKenzie DK. Central fatigue: critical issues, quantification and practical implications. In: Gandevia SC, Enoka RM, McComas AJ, et al., editors. Fatigue: neural and muscular mechanisms New York (NY): Plenum, 1995: 495–514Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Grimby L, Hannerz J, Borg J, et al. Firing properties of single human motor units on maintained maximal voluntary effort. In: Porter R, Whelan J, editors. Human muscle fatigue: physiological mechanisms. London: Pitman Medical, 1981: 157–77 (Ciba Foundation symposium 82)Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Gandevia SC, Allen GM, Butler JE, et al. Supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue: evidence for suboptimal output from the motor cortex. J Physiol 1996; 490 (2): 529–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Miller RG, Moussavi RS, Green AT, et al. The fatigue of rapid repetitive movements. Neurology 1993; 43 (4): 755–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Windhorst U, Boorman G. Overview: potential role of segmental motor circuitry in muscle fatigue. Adv Exp Med Biol 1995; 384: 241–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Schlicht W, Naretz W, Witt D, et al. Ammonia and lactate: differential information on monitoring training load in sprint events. Int J Sports Med 1990; 11 Suppl. 2: S85-S90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    McFarlane B. Speed... a basic and advanced technical model. Track Tech 1994 126: 4016–20Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Mero A, Peltola E. Neural activation fatigued and non-fatigued conditions of short and long sprint running. Biol Sport 1989; 6 (1): 43–58Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Horita T, Komi PV, Nicol C, et al. Stretch shortening cycle fatigue: interactions among joint stiffness, reflex and muscle mechanical performance in the drop jump. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996; 73: 393–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Avela J, Kyrolainen H, Komi PV, et al. Reduced reflex sensitivity persists several days after long lasting stretch shortening exercise. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86 (4): 1292–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Sinoway LI, Hill JM, Pickar JG, et al. Effects of contraction and lactic acid discharge on group III muscle afferents in cats. J Neurophysiol 1993; 69: 1053–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Mense S. Nervous outflow from skeletal muscle following chemical noxious stimuli. J Physiol 1977; 267: 75–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Francis C, Coplon J. Speed trap: inside the biggest scandal in Olympic history. London: Grafton Books, Collins, 1991Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Penfold L, Jenkins D. Training for speed. In: Reaburn P, Jenkins D, editors. Training speed and endurance. St Leonards (NSW): Allen and Unwin, 1996: 24–41Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Harridge SD, White MJ. A comparison of voluntary and electrically evoked isokinetic plantar flexion torque in males. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1993; 66: 343–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Gandevia SC, Herbet R, Leeper JB. Voluntary activation of human elbow flexor muscles during maximal concentric contractions. J Physiol 1998; 512: 595–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    James C, Sacco P, Jones DA. Loss of power during fatigue of human leg muscles. J Physiol 1995; 484: 237–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Kroon GW, Naeije M. Recovery following exhaustive dynamic exercise in the human biceps muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1988; 58: 228–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Kroon GW, Naeije M. Recovery of the human biceps electromyogram after heavy eccentric, concentric or isometric exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1991; 63: 444–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Friden J, Seger J, Ekblom B. Sublethal muscle fibre injuries after high-tension anaerobic exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1988; 57: 360–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Bigland-Ritchie BR, Dawson NJ, Johansson RS, et al. Reflex origin for the slowing of motoneuron rates in fatiguing human voluntary contractions. J Physiol 1986; 379: 451–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Saxton JM, Clarkson PM, James R, et al. Neuromuscular dysfunction following eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27 (8): 1185–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Buchthal F, Schmalbruch H. Contraction times and fiber types in intact muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1970; 79: 435–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Bottinelli R, Pellegrino MA, Canepari M, et al. Specific contributions of various muscle fibre types to human muscle performance: an in vitro study. J Electroencephalogr Kinesiol 1999; 9: 87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Movement StudiesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations