Sports Medicine

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 385–394 | Cite as

A Proposed Model for Examining the Interference Phenomenon between Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training

Leading Article

Abstract

A review of the current research on the interference phenomenon between concurrent aerobic and strength training indicates modest support for the model proposed in this article. However, it is clear that without a systematic approach to the investigation of the phenomenon there is lack of control and manipulation of the independent variables, which makes it difficult to test the validity of the model. To enhance the understanding of the interference phenomenon, it is important that researchers are precise and deliberate in their choice of training protocols.

Clear definition of the specific training objectives for strength (muscle hypertrophy or neural adaptation) and aerobic power (maximal aerobic power or anaerobic threshold) are required. In addition, researchers should equate training volumes as much as possible for all groups. Care needs to be exercised to avoid overtraining individuals. There should be adequate recovery and regeneration between the concurrent training sessions as well as during the training cycle. The model should be initially tested by maintaining the same protocols throughout the duration of the study. However, it is becoming common practice to use a periodised approach in a training mesocycle in which there is a shift from high volume and moderate intensity training to lower volume and higher intensity. The model should be evaluated in the context of a periodised mesocycle provided the investigators are sensitive to the potential impact of the loading parameters on the interference phenomenon. It may be that the periodised approach is one way of maintaining the training stimulus and minimising the amount of interference.

The effects of gender, training status, duration and frequency of training, and the mode of training need to be regarded as potential factors effecting the training response when investigating the interference phenomenon. Other experimental design factors such as unilateral limb training or training the upper body for one attribute and the lower body for another attribute, may help establish the validity of the model.

References

  1. 1.
    Fry R, Morton A, Keast D. Periodization of training stress: a review. Can J Sport Sci 1992; 17 (3): 234–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bell G, Syrotuik D, Socha T, et al. Effects of strength training or concurrent strength and endurance training on strength, testosterone, and cortisol. J Strength Cond Res 1997; 11 (1): 57–64Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chromiak J, Mulvaney D. A review: the effects of combined strength and endurance training on strength development. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1990; 4 (2): 55–60Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kraemer W, Patton J, Gordon S, et al. Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol 1995; 78 (3): 976–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leveritt M, Abernethy P, Barry B, et al. Concurrent strength and endurance training: a review. Sports Med 1999; 28 (6): 413–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kraemer W, Nindl B. Factors involved with overtraining for strength and power. In: Kreider R, Fry A, O’Toole M, editors. Overtraining in sport. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1998: 69–86Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hickson R. Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol 1980; 45: 255–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nelson A, Arnall D, Loy S, et al. Consequences of combining strength and endurance training regimens. Phys Ther 1990; 70 (5): 287–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hennessey L, Watson A. The interference effects of training for strength and endurance simultaneously. J Strength Cond Res 1994; 8 (1): 12–9Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hunter G, Demment R, Miller D. Development of strength and maximum oxygen uptake during simultaneous training for strength and endurance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1987; 27 (3): 269–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCarthy J, Agre J, Graf B, et al. Compatibility of adaptive responses with combining strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27 (3): 429–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abernethy P, Quigley B. Concurrent strength and endurance training of the elbow flexors. J Strength Cond Res 1993; 7 (4): 234–40Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dudley G, Djamil R. Incompatibility of endurance and strength training modes of exercise. J Appl Physiol 1985; 59 (4): 1446–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sale D, MacDougall J, Jacobs I, et al. Interaction between concurrent strength and endurance training. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68 (1): 260–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bell G, Pedersen SR, Wessel J, et al. Physiological adaptations to concurrent endurance training and low velocity resistance training. Int J Sports Med 1991; 12 (4): 384–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sale D. Neural adaptation to strength training. In: Komi P, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992: 249–65Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleck S, Kraemer W. Designing resistance training programs. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1997Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thoden J. Testing aerobic power. In: MacDougall J, Wenger H, Green H, editors. Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1991: 107–73Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    MacDougall D, Sale D. Continuous vs interval training: a review for the athlete and the coach. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1981; 6 (2): 93–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sutton J. V̇O2max: new concepts on an old theme. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24 (1): 26–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holloszy J, Coyle E. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences. J Appl Physiol 1984; 56 (4): 831–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brodal P, Ingjer F, Hermansen L. Capillary supply of skeletal muscle fibers in untrained and endurance-trained men. Am J Physiol 1977; 232 (6): H705–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hoppeler H, Howald H, Conely K, et al. Endurance training in humans: aerobic capacity and structure of skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 1985; 59 (2): 320–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoffman R. Effects of training at the ventilatory threshold and performance in trained distance runners. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13 (2): 118–23Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fox E, Bartels R, Billings C, et al. Frequency and duration of interval training programs and changes in aerobic power. J Appl Physiol 1975; 38 (3): 481–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eddy D, Sparks K, Adelizi D. The effects of continuous and interval training in women and men. Eur J Appl Physiol 1977; 37: 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wenger H, Bell G. The interactions of intensity, frequency and duration of exercise training in altering cardiorespiratory fitness. Sports Med 1986; 3: 346–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Craig B, Lucas J, Pohlman R, et al. The effects of running, weightlifting and a combination of both on growth hormone release. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1991; 5 (4): 198–203Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cunningham D, McCrimmon D, Vlach L. Cardiovascular response to interval and continuous training in women. Eur J Appl Physiol 1979; 41: 187–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology: physiological bases of exercise. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Terrados N. Altitude training and muscle metabolism. Int J Sports Med 1992; 13 (Suppl. 1): S206–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bhambhani Y, Buckley S, Susaki T. Detection of ventilatory threshold using near infrared spectroscopy in men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29 (3): 402–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Belardinelli R, Varstow TJ, Porszasz J, et al. Changes in skeletal muscle oxygenation during incremental exercise measured with near infrared spectroscopy. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 70: 487–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bhambhani Y, Buckley S, Susaki T. Muscle oxygenation trends during constant work rate cycle exercise in men and women. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1999; 31 (1): 90–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dudley G, Abraham W, Terjung R. Influence of exercise intensity and duration on biochemical adaptations in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 1982; 53 (4): 844–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lehninger A, Nelson D, Cox M. Principles of biochemistry. 2nd ed. New York: Worth, 1982Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goldspink G. Cellular and molecular aspects of adaptation in skeletal muscle. In: Komi P, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992: 249–65Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wilson G. Disinhibition of the neural system: uses in programming, training, and competition. Strength Cond Coach 1995; 3 (3): 3–5Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Houston M. Gaining weight: the scientific basis of increasing skeletal muscle mass. Can J Appl Physiol 1999; 24 (4): 305–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schott J, McCully K, Rutherford O. The role of metabolites in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 71: 337–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Davies J, Parker P, Rutherford O, et al. Changes in strength and CSA of the elbow flexors as a result of isometric strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1988; 57: 667–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Narici M, Keyser B. Hypertrophic response of human skeletal muscle to strength training in hypoxia and normoxia. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 70: 213–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Narici M, Roi G, Landoni L, et al. Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur J Appl Physiol 1989; 59: 310–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    McCall G, Byrnes W, Dickinson A, et al. Muscle fiber hypertrophy, hyperplasia, and capillary density in college men after resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81 (5): 2004–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kawakami Y, Abe T, Kune S, et al. Training-induced changes inmuscle architecture and specific tension. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 72: 37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jackson C, Dickenson A, Rinel S. Skeletal muscle fiber area alterations in two opposing modes resistance exercise training in the same individual. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990; 61: 37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sale D, MacDougall J. Specificity in strength training: a review for coaches. Can J Appl Sports Sci 1991; 6 (2): 87–92Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Arnett M. A review of concurrent strength and endurance training. Sports Sci Periodical Res Technol Sport 1993; 13 (2): 1–6Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Poliquin C. Training for improving relative strength. Sci Period Res Technol Sport (SPORTS) 1991; 11 (7): 1–9Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schmidtbleicher D. Strength training. Part 1: classification of methods. Sci Period Res Technol Sport (SPORTS) 1985 Aug: 1–12Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Baker D, Wilson G, Carolyn R. Periodization: the effect on strength of manipulating volume and intensity. J Strength Cond Res 1994; 8 (4): 235–42Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kraemer W, Marchitelli J, Gordon L, et al. Hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise protocols. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69: 1442–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schmidtbleicher D, Buerle M. Neuronal adaptations and increases of cross-sectional area studying different strength training methods. Biomechanics 1987; 6B: 615–20Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kraemer W, Fleck S, Evans W. Strength and power training: physiological mechanisms of adaptation. In: Holloszy J, editor. Exercise and sports science reviews. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkens, 1996: 363–93Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hakkinen K, Komi P, Alen M, et al. EMG, muscle fiber and force production characteristics during a 1 year period in elite weight-lifters. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 556: 419–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gravelle B, Blessing D. Physiological adaptation in women concurrently training for strength and endurance. J Strength Cond Res 2000; 14 (1): 5–13Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bell G, Syrotuik D, Martin T, et al. Effect of concurrent strength and endurance training on skeletal muscle properties and hormone concentrations in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 81 (5): 418–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physical EducationUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations