Sports Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 258–272 | Cite as

Measurement of Physical Activity in Children with Particular Reference to the Use of Heart Rate and Pedometry

  • Ann V. Rowlands
  • Roger G. Eston
  • David K. Ingledew
Review Article


Understanding the progression of physical activity behaviour from childhood to adulthood requires a valid, reliable and practical method of assessing activity levels which is appropriate for use in large groups. The measurement of physical activity in large scale research projects requires a method which is low in cost, agreeable to the study volunteer and accurate. Self-report can be used to determine adult activity patterns, but children lack the cognitive ability to recall details about their activity patterns. Heart rate telemetry has been used to estimate daily activity in children as a sole criterion and to validate commercial accelerometers. However, heart rate is an indirect estimate of physical activity which makes assumptions based on the linear relationship between heart rate and oxygen uptake. It is sensitive to emotional stress and body position, and takes longer to reach resting levels after physical exertion compared with oxygen uptake. It also lags behind movement, particularly as children’s physical activity is spasmodic or intermittent in nature. One alternative is the pedometer. Many early studies reported that the pedometer is inaccurate and unreliable in measuring distance or counting steps. While reasonably accurate at mid range speeds, the accuracy of the pedometer decreases in very slow walking or very fast walking or running. However, more recent studies have examined the efficacy of using pedometers to assess daily or weekly activity patterns as a whole, and these have produced more promising results. In this regard, the pedometer has a number of advantages. It is very cheap, objective and does not interfere with daily activities and is therefore appropriate for use in population studies. Commercial accelerometers with a time-sampling mechanism offer further potential and could be used to provide a picture of the pattern of children’s activity. As it has been observed that prolonged activity periods are not typically associated with childhood behaviour patterns, the use of a threshold value for ‘aerobic’ training stimulus is not appropriate as a cut-off value for physical activity. Instead, there is evidence to suggest that the total activity data measured by pedometers over limited periods of time may be more appropriate to assess how active children are.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Rowland TW. ’The horse is dead; let’s dismount’. Pediatr Exerc Sei 1995; 7: 117–20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riddoch CJ, Boreham CAG. The health-related physical activity of children. Sports Med 1995; 19(2): 86–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cureton RJ. Commentary on children and fitness: a public health perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport 1987; 58: 315–20Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hardman AE. Exercise in the prevention of atherosclerotic metabolic and hypertensive diseases: a review. J Sports Sci 1996; 14: 201–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T, editors. Physical activity, fitness and health: international proceedings and consensus statement. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publications, 1994: 61–3Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saris WHM. Habitual activity in children: methodology and findings in health and disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986; 18: 253–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sallis JF, Patterson TL, Buono JJ, et al. Relationship of physical fitness and physical activity to cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adults. Am J Epidemiol 1988, 127: 933–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGill HC, Geer JC, Strong JP. Natural history of human atherosclerotic lesions. In: Sandier M, Bourne GH, editors. Atherosclerosis and its origins. New York: Academic Press, 1996: 39–66Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strong JP, McGill HC. The pediatric aspects of atherosclerosis. J Atherosclerosis Res 1969; 9: 251–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strong JP, Eggen DA, Oalmann MC. The natural history, geographic pathology and epidemiology of atherosclerosis. In: Wissler RW, Greer JC, editors. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1972: 20–40Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Must A, Jacques PF, Dallai GE, et al. Longterm morbidity and mortality of overweight adolescents. N Eng J Med 1992; 327: 95–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rowland TW. Influence of physical activity and fitness on coronary risk factors in children: how strong an argument? Pediatr Exerc Sci 1991; 3: 189–91Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Powell KE, Dysinger W. Childhood participation in organised school sports and physical education as precursors of adult physical education. Am J Prev Med 1987; 3: 276–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Activity and Health Research. Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey. London: Health Education Authority/Sports Council, 1992Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Montoye HJ, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, et al. Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1996Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bar-Or O. A commentary to children and fitness: a public health perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport 1987; 58: 304–7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baranowski T, Dworkin RJ, Cieslik CJ, et al. Reliability and validity of self-report of aerobic activity: family health project. Res Q Exerc Sport 1984; 55: 309–17Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wallace JP, McKenzie TL, Nader PR. Observed vs recall exercise behaviour: a validation of a seven day exercise recall for boys 11–13 year olds. Res Q Exerc Sport 1985; 56: 161–5Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bailey RC, Olson J, Pepper SL, et al. The level and tempo of children’s physical activities: an observational study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1033–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Welsman JR, Armstrong N. Daily physical activity and blood lactate indices of aerobic fitness in children. Br J Sports Med 1992; 26: 228–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klausen K, Rasmussen B, Glensgaard LK, et al. Work efficiency during submaximal bicycle exercise. In: Binkhorst RA, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM, editors. Children and exercise: XI. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1985: 210–7Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maas S, Kok MLJ, Westra HG, et al. The validity of the use of heart rate in estimating oxygen consumption in static and in combined static/dynamic exercise. Ergonomics 1989; 32: 141–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition and human performance. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1991: 169–70Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Armstrong N, Williams J, Balding J, et al. Cardiopulmonary fitness, physical activity patterns and selected coronary risk factors in 11–16 year olds. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1991; 3: 219–28Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Armstrong N, McManus A. Childrens’ fitness and physical activity. Physiother Sport 1994; 17: 6–10Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gilbey H, Gilbey M. The physical activity of Singapore primary school children as estimated by heart rate monitoring. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1995; 7: 26–35Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ministry of Communication and Information. Singapore facts and pictures: 1992. Singapore: National Printers, 1992Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rowland TW. Exercise and children’s health. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1990: 34–6Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dauncey MJ, James WPT. Assessment of the heart rate method for determining energy expenditure in man, using a whole body calorimeter. Br J Nutr 1979; 42: 1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bray MS, Wong WW, Morrow JR, et al. Caltrac versus calorimeter determination of 24-h energy expenditure in female children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 1524–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saris WHM, Binkhorst RA, Cramwinckel AB, et al. The relationship between working performance, daily physical activity, fatness, blood lipids and nutrition in schoolchildren. In: Berg K, Eriksson BO, editors. Children and exercise: IX. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980: 166–74Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Durant RH, Baranowski T, Davis H, et al. Reliability and variability of heart rate monitoring in 3-, 4-, or 5-year old children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 265–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Freedson PS. Field monitoring of physical activity in children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1989; 1: 8–18Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gilliam TB, Freedson PS, Geenan DL, et al. Physical activity patterns determined by heart rate monitoring in 6 to 7 year old children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1981; 13: 65–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Epstein LH, Valoski AM, Vara LS, et al. Effects of decreasing sedentary behaviour and increasing activity on weight changes in obese children. Health Psychol 1995; 14(12): 109–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    van den Berg-Emons RJG, Saris WHM, Westerterp KR, et al. Heart rate monitoring to assess energy expenditure in children with reduced physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28(4): 496–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep 1985; 100: 126–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gibbs-Smith C. The inventions of Leonardo da Vinci. London: Phaidon Press Ltd, 1978: 31–43Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saris WHM, Binkhorst RA. The use of pedometer and actometer in studying daily physical activity in man. Part I: reliability of pedometer and actometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 1977; 37: 219–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Montoye HJ, Taylor HL. Measurement of physical activity in population studieo: a review. Human Biol 1984; 56: 195–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Marsden JP, Montgomery SR. A general survey of the walking habits of individuals. Ergonomics 1972; 15: 439–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gayle R, Montoye HJ, Philpot J. Accuracy of pedometers for measuring distance walked. Res Q Exerc Sport 1977; 48: 632–6Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kemper HCG, Verschuur R. Validity and reliability of pedometers in habitual activity research. Eur J Appl Physiol 1977; 37: 71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Washburn R, Chin MK, Montoye HJ. Accuracy of pedometer in walking and running. Res Q Exerc Sport 1980; 51: 695–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gretebeck RJ, Montoye HJ. Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24(10): 1167–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bassett DR, Ainsworth BE, Leggett SR, et al. Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28(8): 1071–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Saris WHM, Binkhorst RA. The use of pedometer and actometer in studying daily physical activity in man. Part II: validity of pedometer and actometer measuring the daily physical activity. Eur J Appl Physiol 1977b; 37: 229–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zarrugh VM, Werner SL, Kamin MA. Basic kinematics of walking: step length and step frequency: a review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1974; 34(2): 109–34Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cooke CB. Maximal oxygen uptake, economy and efficiency. In: Eston RG, Reilly T, editors. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: tests, procedures and data. London: E & FN Spon, 1996: 197–220Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sequeira MM, Rickenbach M, Wietlisbach V, et al. Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142(9): 989–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kashiwazaki H, Inaoka T, Suzuki T, et al. Correlations of pedometer readings with energy expenditure in workers during free-living daily activities. Eur J Appl Physiol 1986; 54: 585–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nishikido N, Kashiwazaki H, Suzuki T. Preschool children’s daily activities: direct observations, pedometry or questionnaire. J Human Ergol 1982; 11: 214–8Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bassey EJ, Dallosso HM, Fentem PH, et al. Validation of a simple mechanical accelerometer (pedometer) for the estimation of walking activity. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 323–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Montoye HJ, Washburn R, Servais RS, et al. Estimation of energy expenditure by a portable accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 403–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Balogun JA, Martin DA, Clendenin MA. Calorimetric validation of the Caltrac accelerometer during level walking. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 501–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bailor DL, Burke LM, Knudson DV, et al. Comparison of three methods of estimating energy expenditure: caltrac, heart rate, and video analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 1989; 60: 362–8Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Miller DJ, Freedson PS, Kline GM. Comparison of activity levels using the Caltrac accelerometer and five questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26(3): 376–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bray MS, Morrow JR. Accuracy and reliability of the Caltrac accelerometer in a field setting. Res Q Exerc Sport 1993 Mar; Suppl.: A-69Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Matthews CE, Freedson PS. Field trial of a three dimensional activity monitor: comparison with self-report. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27(7): 1071–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Shulz S, Westerterp KR, Brack K. Comparison of energy expenditure by the doubly labeled water technique with energy intake, heart rate, and activity recording in man. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 49: 1146–54Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Melanson EL, Freedson PS. Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27(6): 934–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Janz KF. Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children’s physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26(3): 369–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Janz KF, Witt J, Mahoney LT. The stability of children’s physical activity as measured by accelerometry and self-report. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27(9): 1326–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Welk GJ, Corbin CB. The validity of the Tritrac-R3D activity monitor for the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 1995; 66(3): 202–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Eston RG, Rowlands AV, Ingledew DK. Validation of the Tritrac-R3D™ activity monitor during typical children’s activities. In: Armstrong N, Kirby B, Welsman J, editors. Children and exercise: XIX. Pediatric work physiology, vol. I. London: E & FN Spon, 1997: 132–38Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Meijer GA, Westerterp KR, Koper H, et al. Assessment of energy expenditure by recording heart rate and body acceleration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 221(3): 343–7Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Coleman KJ, et al. Determinants of physical activity in obese children assessed by accelerometer and self-report. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28(9): 1157–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bouten CV, Westerterp KR, Verduin M, et al. Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26(12): 1516–23PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann V. Rowlands
    • 1
  • Roger G. Eston
    • 1
  • David K. Ingledew
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Sport, Health and Physical Education SciencesUniversity of WalesBangor, Gwynedd, WalesUK

Personalised recommendations