Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 184–204 | Cite as

Athletic Injury Reporting

Development of Universal Systems
  • Willem H. Meeuwisse
  • Edgar J. Love
Review Article

Summary

There are numerous athletic injury reporting systems currently in place. In order for our understanding of athletic injury epidemiology to advance, we must be able to compare data from divergent sources. This paper provides a review of existing athletic injury reporting systems in North America. The epidemiological designs employed in these systems are outlined, along with a description of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to reporting. The differences between the case-series and cohort methods are delineated and the importance of injury definition, sources of error, denominator data and exposure estimation are discussed within this context.

Four recommendations are then offered to assist in moving toward more universal systems for athletic injury reporting. First, comparability of data between systems should be maximised through clear indication of the reporting system design and the methods of data collection. Secondly, an exact definition should be given as to what constitutes a reportable event (‘injury’). Thirdly, whenever possible, outcome information should be collected on each reported event so that an injury definition may be applied at the time of data analysis. Lastly, any limitations or sources of error should be acknowledged.

Keywords

Adis International Limited Sport Injury Cohort Design National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control. Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1988; 37Suppl. 5: 1–18Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lindenfeld TN, Noyes FR, Marshall MT. Components of injury reporting systems. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraus JF, Burg FD. Injury reporting and recording: some essential elements in the collection and retrieval of sports injury information. JAMA 1970; 213: 438–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Powell JW. National High School Athletic Injury Registry. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S134–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levy IM. Formation and sense of the NAIRS athletic injury surveillance system. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S132–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellison LF, MacKenzie SG. Sports injuries in the database of the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program: an overview. Chron Dis Canada 1993; 14(3): 96–104Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke KS. Premises and pitfalls of athletic injury surveillance. J Sports Med 1975; 3(6): 292–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garrick JG, Requa RK. Injuries in high school sports. Pediatrics 1978; 61: 465–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murphy RJ, Turner HS, Olix ML. Five year football injury survey. Physician Sports Med 1978; 6: 95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olson OC. The Spokane study: high school football injuries. Physician Sports Med 1979; 7(12): 75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jackson DS, Furman WK, Berson BL. Patterns of injuries in college athletes: a retrospective study of injuries sustained in intercollegiate athletics in two colleges over a two-year period. Mt Sinai J Med 1980; 47(4): 423–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torg JS, Vegso JJ. The National Football Head and Neck Injury Registry: 14 year report on cervical quadriplegia (1971–1984). Clin Sports Med 1987; 6(1): 61–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldberg B, Rosenthal PP, Nicholas JA. Injuries in youth football. Physician Sports Med 1984; 12(8): 122–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Whiteside JA, Fleagle SB, Kalenak A. Manpower loss in football: a 12 year study at the Pennsylvania State University. Physician Sports Med 1985; 13: 103–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saal JA. Common American football injuries. Sports Med 1991; 12(2): 132–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A national guide to injury reporting systems. National Youth Sports Foundation for the Prevention of Athletic Injuries, Inc., 1990Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sports medicine groups 1992: injury statistics groups. Physician Sports Med 1992; 20(1): 160–2Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Last JM, editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldberg J, Gelfand HM, Levy PS. Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study. Epidemiol Rev 1980; 2: 210–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Torg JS, Vegso JJ, O’Neill MJ, et al. The epidemiologic, pathologic, biomechanical and cinematographic analysis of football-induced cervical spine trauma. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18(1): 50–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Torg JS, Truex R, Quedenfeld TC, et al. The National Football Head and Neck Injury Registry: report and conclusions 1978. JAMA 1979; 241(14): 1477–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Torg JS, Vegso JJ, Sennett B, et al. The National Football Head and Neck Injury Registry: 14 year report on cervical quadriplegia, 1971 through 1984. JAMA 1985; 254(24): 3439–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Go B. Spinal cord injury: facts and figures at a glance. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1992Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clayton P. 3-year injury report system data review [report]. Calgary (Alberta): International Hockey Centre of Excellence, 1992Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sicard C, Daigle B. Economic costs of injuries and fatalities resulting form the practice of sports and recreational activities in Québec. Trois-Rivières: Régie de la Sécurité dans les Sports du Québec, 1990Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bicycle-related injuries: data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. JAMA 1987; 257(24): 3334–7Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duvall DP. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System: a description of its role in the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Division of Hazard and Injury Data Systems, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1990Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pelletier R. Canadian Athletic Injury/Illness Reporting System: CAIRS I recorder’s handbook. Ottawa: University of Ottawa, 1992Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pelletier RL, Montelpare WJ, Stark RM. Intercollegiate ice hockey injuries: a case for uniform definitions and reports. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21(1): 78–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dick R. 1991–92 Injury Surveillance System Report. Overland Park (KS): National Collegiate Athletic Association, 1992Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Big Ten Sports Injury Reporting System. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 Suppl. l: S169–200Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yale Athletic Medicine Reporting System. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S167–8Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rice SG. Injury Data Analysis Fall 1979 — Spring 1992. Seattle: Athletic Health Care System, University of Washington, 1993Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meeuwisse WH. Athletic injury etiology: distinguishing between interaction and confounding. Clin J Sport Med 1994; 4(3): 171–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Meeuwisse WH. Assessing causation in sport injury: a multifactorial model. Clin J Sport Med 1994; 4(3): 166–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical Epidemiology: the essentials. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1982: 190Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meeuwisse WH, Fowler PJ. Frequency and predictability of sports injuries in intercollegiate athletes. Can J Sport Sci 1988; 13(1): 35–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Meeuwisse WH. Predictability of sports injuries: what is the epidemiological evidence? Sports Med 1991; 12(1): 8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Meeuwisse WH. Development, implementation and validation of the Canadian Intercollegiate Sport Injury Registry [dissertation]. The University of Calgary, 1994Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Babbie E. The practice of social research. 5th ed. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1989Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sport Medicine Centre, Faculty of KinesiologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of MedicineThe University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations