Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 181–183 | Cite as

Sports Injury Surveillance and Protective Equipment

  • Con Hrysomallis
  • William E. Morrison
Injury Surveillance Leading Article

Summary

Protective equipment is adopted in the hope of reducing the incidence and severity of injuries. To objectively assess the effectiveness of such equipment, injury data is required prior to and after the introduction of this countermeasure. In many cases, there has been no appropriate evaluation of the countermeasure. Pre- and postintervention data is vital to the protective equipment developer. Such information may be obtained from injury surveillance systems. Other information which is just as vital but not obtainable from such a system is injury tolerance levels. Additional information from injury surveillance such as the type of protective equipment worn, its condition prior to and after impact, and a description of the event leading to injury would be most valuable.

Keywords

Injury Surveillance Elite Level Athletic Injury Injury Surveillance System Sport Shoe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashford B, Biddle S, Goudas M. Participation in community sports centres: motives and predictors of enjoyment. J Sport Sci 1993; 11(3): 249–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Battista RR. Personal meaning: attraction to sports participation. Percept Mot Skills 1990; 70(3): 1003–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dowling PA. Prospective study of injuries in United States Ski Association freestyle skiing. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10(5): 268–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lowy CB, Leveau BF. Retrospective study of gymnastics injuries to competitors and noncompetitors in private clubs. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10(4): 237–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zemper E. Injury rates in a national sample of college football teams: a 2-year prospective study. Physician Sportsmed 1989; 17(11): 100–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stricevic MV, Patel MR, Okazaki T, et al. Karate: historical perspective and injuries sustained in national and international tournament competitions. Am J Sports Med 1983; 11: 320–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seward H, Orchard J, Hazard H, et al. Football injuries in Australia at the elite level. Med J Aust 1993; 159(6): 298–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pettersson M, Lorentzon R. Ice hockey injuries: a 4-year prospective study of a Swedish elite ice hockey team. Br J Sports Med 1993; 27(4): 251–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacIntosh DL, Skrien T, Shephard RJ. Athletic injuries at the University of Toronto. Med Sci Sport 1971; 3(4): 195–9Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shawdon A, Brukner P. Injury profile of amateur Australian rules footballers. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1994; 26(3/4): 59–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seward HG, Patrick J. A three year survey of Victorian Football League injuries. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1992; 24: 51–4Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clarke KS. An epidemiologic view. In: Torg JS, editor. Athletic injuries to the head, neck and face. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Year Book, 1991: 15–27Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McLatchie GR, Commandre FA, Zakarian H, et al. Injuries in the martial arts. In: Renström PAFH, editor. Clinical practice of sports injury prevention and care. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994: 609–23Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lau IV, Viano DC. The viscous criterion bases and applications of an injury severity index for soft tissues. Proceedings of Thirtieth Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1986 Oct 27–29: San Diego (CA). Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1986: 123–42Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Standards Association of Australia. Australian Standard 2063.1 Lightweight protective helmets (for use in pedal cycling, horse riding and other activities requiring similar protection), 1986Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Backaitis S, Mertz H J, editors. Hybrid III: the first human-like crash test dummy. Warrendale: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1993Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    British Standard Institution. Protective equipment for cricketers. BS 6183: Part 1, 1981Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Canadian Standards Association: National Standard of Canada (P400-M). Racket sports eye protection preliminary standard, 1982Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobs SJ, Berson BL. Injuries to runners: a study of entrants to a 10,000 meter race. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14(2): 151–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Segesser B, Nigg BM. Sport shoe construction: orthopaedic and biomechanical concepts. In: Renström PAFH, editor. Basic principles of prevention and care. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993: 398–416Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robbins SE, Gouw GJ. Athletic footwear: unsafe due to perceptual illusions. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1991; 23(2): 217–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Con Hrysomallis
    • 1
  • William E. Morrison
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sport ScienceVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations