Aspects of different approaches to study design in the epidemiology of sports injuries are presented, identifying 4 major types: (i) the clinical case series; (ii) the community-based survey; (iii) studies on specific sports or diagnoses without exposure data; and (iv) studies on specific sports or diagnoses with exposure data. The advantages and disadvantages of these concepts are discussed.
It is concluded that to optimise preventive efforts and improve the comparability of studies in sports injury epidemiology, there is not only a need for consensus on definitional issues, but also for an agreement on the methodology. Attention to exposure issues is a crucial component of this.
KeywordsSoccer Player Sport Injury Exposure Data Specific Sport Definitional Issue
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 10.de Loës M. Epidemiology of sports injuries in the Swiss organization ‘Youth and Sports’ 1987–92. In: Proceedings of the Third IOC World Congress on Sports Sciences; 1995 Sep 16–22: Atlanta (GA). Atlanta (GA): IOC, 1995: 163–4Google Scholar
- 13.Kibler WB. Injuries in adolescent and preadolescent soccer players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 12: 1330–2Google Scholar
- 16.Ireland ML. Special concerns of the female athlete. In: Fu FH, Stone DA, editors. Sports injuries: mechanisms, prevention, treatment. Baltimore (MD): William & Wilkins, 1994Google Scholar
- 17.Sandelin J, Santavirta S, Kiviluoto O, et al. Sport injuries treated in a casualty board: a twelve-month survey. Scand J Sports Sci 1980; 1: 17–20Google Scholar
- 18.Lindenfeld TN, Noyes FR, Marshall MT. Components of injury reporting systems. Am J Sports Med 1988; Suppl.: 55–6Google Scholar