Sports Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 376–392 | Cite as

Biomechanics of Sprint Running

A Review
  • A. Mero
  • P. V. Komi
  • R. J. Gregor
Review Article

Summary

Understanding of biomechanical factors in sprint running is useful because of their critical value to performance. Some variables measured in distance running are also important in sprint running. Significant factors include: reaction time, technique, electromyographic (EMG) activity, force production, neural factors and muscle structure. Although various methodologies have been used, results are clear and conclusions can be made.

The reaction time of good athletes is short, but it does not correlate with performance levels. Sprint technique has been well analysed during acceleration, constant velocity and deceleration of the velocity curve. At the beginning of the sprint run, it is important to produce great force/ power and generate high velocity in the block and acceleration phases. During the constant-speed phase, the events immediately before and during the braking phase are important in increasing explosive force/power and efficiency of movement in the propulsion phase. There are no research results available regarding force production in the sprint-deceleration phase. The EMG activity pattern of the main sprint muscles is described in the literature, but there is a need for research with highly skilled sprinters to better understand the simultaneous operation of many muscles. Skeletal muscle fibre characteristics are related to the selection of talent and the training-induced effects in sprint running.

Efficient sprint running requires an optimal combination between the examined biomechanical variables and external factors such as footwear, ground and air resistance. Further research work is needed especially in the area of nervous system, muscles and force and power production during sprint running. Combining these with the measurements of sprinting economy and efficiency more knowledge can be achieved in the near future.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aura O, Komi P. Mechanical efficiency of pure positive and pure negative work with special reference to the work intensity. International Journal of Sports Medicine 7 (1): 44–49, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amar J. The human motor, 1920. Cited in Dillman CJ. Kinematic analysis of running. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 3: 193–218, 1975Google Scholar
  3. Andersson Y, Edström J-E. Motor hyperactivity resulting in diameter decrease of peripheral nerves. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 39: 240–245, 1957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbuthnott ER, Boyd IA, Kalu KU. Ultrastructural dimensions of myelinated peripheral nerve fibers in the cat and their relation to conduction velocity. Journal of Physiology 308: 125–157, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Atwater AE. Cinematographic analyses of human movement. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 1: 217–228, 1973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates BT, Haven BH. Effects of fatigue on the mechanical characteristics of highly skilled female runners. In Nelson RC & Morehouse CA (Eds) Biomechanics IV, pp. 121–125, University Park Press, Baltimore, 1974Google Scholar
  7. Baumann W. Kinematic and dynamic characteristics of the sprint start. In Komi PV (Ed) Biomechanics V-B, University Park Press, Baltimore, 1976Google Scholar
  8. Baumann W. Sprint start characteristics of female sprinters. In Ayab A (Ed.) Proceedings of an international seminar biomechanics of sports games and sport activities, pp. 80–86, Wingate Institute for Physical Education and Sports, Netanya, Israel, 1979Google Scholar
  9. Bigland-Ritchie B, Woods JJ. Changes in muscle contractile properties and neutral control during human muscular fatigue. Muscle and Nerve 7: 691–699, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bigland-Ritchie B, Johansson R, Lippold OCJ, Woods JJ. Contractile speed and EMG changes during fatigue of sustained maximal voluntary contractions. Journal of Neurophysiology 50(1): 313–325, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosen KO. Experimental speed training. Track technique (Spring): 2382–2383, 1979Google Scholar
  12. Cavagna GA, Kaneko M. Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. Journal of Physiology 263: 467–481, 1977Google Scholar
  13. Cavagna GA, Komarek L, Mazzoleni S. The mechanics of sprint running. Journal of Physiology (London) 217: 709–721, 1971Google Scholar
  14. Cavanagh PR, LaFortune MA. Ground reaction forces in distance running. Journal of Biomechanics 15 (5): 397–406, 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cavanagh PR, Williams KR. The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise 14 (1): 30–35, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavanagh PR, Pollock ML, Landa J. A biomechanical comparison of elite and good distance runners. In Milvy P (Ed.) The marathon: physiological, medical, epidemiological and psychological studies, pp. 328–345, New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1977Google Scholar
  17. Coppenolle Van H, DeLecluse C, Goris M, Bohets W, Vanden Eynde E. Technology and development of speed. Evaluation of the start, sprint and body composition of Pavoni, Cooman and Desruelles. Athletics Coach 23 (1): 32–90 (1989)Google Scholar
  18. Costill DL, Daniels J, Evans W, Fink W, Krahenbuhl G, et al. Skeletal muscle enzymes and fiber composition in male and female track athletes. Journal of Applied Physiology 40 (2): 149–154, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Coyle EF, Feiring DC, Rotkis RC, Cote RW, Roby FB, et al. Specificity of power improvements through slow and fast isokinetic training. Journal of Applied Physiology 51: 1427–1442, 1981Google Scholar
  20. Davies CTM. Effects of wind assistance and resistance on the forward motion of a runner. Journal of Applied Physiology: Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology 48 (4): 702–709, 1980Google Scholar
  21. Deshon DE, Nelson RC. A cinematographic analysis of sprint running. Research Quarterly 35 (4): 451–455, 1964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dick FW. Developing and maintaining maximum speed in sprints over one year. Athletics Coach 23 (1): 3–8, 1989Google Scholar
  23. Dietz V, Schmidtbleicher D, Noth J. Neuronal mechanisms of human locomotion. Journal of Neurophysiology 42: 1212–1222, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dillman CJ. Kinematic analyses of running. Exercise and Sports Sciences Reviews 3: 193–218, 1975Google Scholar
  25. Dostal E. Analyse der Reaktionszeitin im Sprint bei den Euro-pameisterschaften in Prag 1978. In Augustin D & Muller N (Eds) Leichtathletik-training 5/6, pp. 327–331, 1981Google Scholar
  26. Eberstein A, Goodgold J. Slow and fast twitch fibers in human skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology 215: 535–541, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Edds Jr MV. Hypertrophy of nerve fibers to functionally overloaded muscles. Journal of Comparative Neurology 93: 259–275, 1950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fohrenbach R, Mader A, Thiele W, Hollman W. Testverfahren und metabolisch orientierte Intensitatssteuerung im Sprint-training mit submaximaler Belastungsstruktur. Leistungssport 16 (5): 15–24, 1986Google Scholar
  29. Frederick EC, Howley ET, Powers SK. Lower O2 cost while running in air cushion type shoes. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 12: 81–82, 1982Google Scholar
  30. Garnett RAF, O’Donovan MJ, Stephens JA, Taylor A. Motor unit organization of human medial gastrocnemius. Journal of Physiology 287: 33–34, 1978Google Scholar
  31. Glaspey S. Soviet sprint training. Track and Field Journal 4: 19–20, 1980Google Scholar
  32. Gollnick PD, Armstrong RB, Saubert IV CW, Piehl K, Saltin B. Enzyme activity and fiber composition in skeletal muscle of untrained and trained men. Journal of Applied Physiology 33: 312–319, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gregor RJ, Kirkendall D. Performance efficiency of world class female marathon runners. In Biomechanics VI-B, Asmussen E & Jorgensen K (Eds) pp. 40–45. University Park Press, Baltimore, 1978Google Scholar
  34. Grieve DW, Pheasant S, Cavanagh PR. Prediction of gastrocnemius length from knee and ankle joint posture. In Asmussen E & Jorgensen K (Eds) Biomechanics VI-A, pp. 405–412, University Park Press, Baltimore, 1978Google Scholar
  35. Gundlach H. Laufgestaltung und Schrittgestaltung im 100-m-Lauf. Theorie und Praxis der Körperkultur 3: 35, 1962Google Scholar
  36. Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Alén M. Effect of explosive type strength training on isometric force- and relaxation-time, electromyographic and muscle fibre characteristics of leg extensor muscles. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 125: 587–600, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill AV. Muscular movement in man, McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York, 1927Google Scholar
  38. Hoffmann K. Stature, leg length, and stride frequency. Kult Fiz 9, 1964 Translated in Track Technique 46: 1463–1469, 1971Google Scholar
  39. Hoffmann K. Stride length and frequency of female sprinters. Treatises, Texts Doc. WSWF Poznan Ser 17, 1967. Translated in Track Technique 48: 1522–1524, 1972Google Scholar
  40. Högberg P. Length of stride, stride frequency, flight period, and maximum distance between the feet during running with different speeds. Arbeitsphysiologie 14: 431–436, 1952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoshikawa T, Matsui H, Miyashita M. Analysis of running pattern in relation to speed. In Lerquitins et al. (Eds) Medicine and sport, Vol. 8, Biomechanics III, pp. 342–348, Karger Basel, 1973Google Scholar
  42. Hoster M. Weg-, Zeit- und Kraft-Parameter als Einflussgrössen beim Sprintstart in der Leichtathletik. Leistungssport 11 (2): 110–117, 1981Google Scholar
  43. Hoster M, May E. Überlegungen zur Biomechanik der Sprint-starts in der Leichtathletik. Leistungssport 8 (3): 267–273, 1978Google Scholar
  44. Ito A, Komi PV, Sjödin B, Bosco C, Karlsson J. Mechanical efficiency of positive work in running at different speeds. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise 15 (4): 299–308, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kamen G, Taylor P, Beehler PJ. Ulnar and posterior tibial nerve conduction velocity in athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine 5(1): 26–30, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaneko M, Ito A, Fuchimoto T, Shishikura Y, Toyooka J. Influence of running speed on the mechanical efficiency of sprinters and distance runners. In Winter DA et al. (Eds) Biomechanics IX-B, pp. 307–312, Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, Ill., 1985Google Scholar
  47. Knuttgen HG. Oxygen uptake and pulse rate while running with undetermined and determined stride lengths at different speeds. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 52: 366–371, 1961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Komi PV. Biomechanical features of running with special emphasis on load characteristics and mechanical efficiency. In Nigg B & Kerr B (Eds) Biomechanical aspects of sport shoes and playing surfaces, pp. 123–134, University of Calgary, Calgary, 1983Google Scholar
  49. Komi PV. Physiological and biomechanical correlates of muscle function: effects of muscle structure and stretch-shortening cycle on force and speed. In exercise and sport sciences reviews, Terjung RL (Ed.) pp. 81–121, The Collamore Press, Toronto, 1984Google Scholar
  50. Komi PV. The musculoskeletal system. In Dirix A (Ed.) The Olympic book of sports medicine, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1988Google Scholar
  51. Komi PV, Bosco C. Utilization of stored elastic energy in men and women. Medicine and Science in Sports 10: 261–265, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Komi PV, Salonen M, Järvinen M, Kokko O. In vivo registrations of achilles tendon forces in man. I. Methodological development. International Journal of Sports Medicine 8 (Suppl.): pp. 3–8, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Komi PV, Viitasalo JT, Havu M, Thorstensson A, Sjodin B, et al. Skeletal muscle fibers and muscle enzyme activities in monozygous and dizygous twins of both sexes. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 100: 385–392, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Kunz H, Kaufmann DA. Annotation biomechanical anlysis of sprinting: decathletes versus champions. British Journal of Sports Medicine 15 (3): 177–181, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lastovka M. The conduction velocity of the peripheral motor nerve fibres and physical training. Activitas Nervosa Superior 11: 308, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lehnert VK, Weber J. Untersuchungen des motorischen Nervenleitgeschwindigkeit (NLG) der Nervus ulnaris an Sportlern. Medizin und Sport 15: 10–14, 1975Google Scholar
  57. Leierer W. A guide for sprint training. Athletic Journal 59 (6): 105–106, 1979Google Scholar
  58. Luhtanen P, Komi PV. Mechanical factors influencing running speed. In Asmussen E & Jörgensen K (Eds) Biomechanics VI-B, pp. 23–29, University Park Press, Baltimore, 1978Google Scholar
  59. Luhtanen P, Komi PV. Force-, power-, and elasticity-velocity relationship in walking, running and jumping. European Journal of Applied Physiology 44 (3), 279–289, 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mann R, Herman J. Kinematic analysis of Olympic sprint performance: men’s 200 meters. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics 1: 151–162, 1985Google Scholar
  61. Melvill-Jones G, Watt DGD. Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in man. Journal of Physiology (London) 219: 709–727, 1971Google Scholar
  62. Menely CR, Rosemier AR. Effectiveness of four track starting positions on acceleration. Research Quarterly 39 (1): 161–165, 1969Google Scholar
  63. Mero A. Nopeus huippupikajuoksijoilla Helsingin MM-kisoissa. Valmennus ja Kuntoilu 5: 20–22, 1985Google Scholar
  64. Mero A. Electromyographic activity, force and anaerobic energy production in sprint running with special reference to different constant speeds ranging from submaximal to supramaximal. In studies in sport, physical education and health 24, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, 1987Google Scholar
  65. Mero A. Force-time characteristics and running velocity of male sprinters during the acceleration phase of sprinting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 59 (2): 94–98, 1988Google Scholar
  66. Mero A, Artman V. Reaktioajat Helsingin MM-kisojen pikaja aitajuoksuissa. SUL-tiedote 8: 3–16, 1984Google Scholar
  67. Mero A, Komi PV. Effects of supramaximal velocity on biomechanical variables in sprinting. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics 1: 240–252, 1985Google Scholar
  68. Mero A, Komi PV, Force-, EMG-, and elasticity-velocity relationships at submaximal, maximal and supramaximal running speeds in sprinters. European Journal of Applied Physiology 55: 553–561, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mero A, Komi PV. Electromyographic activity in sprinting at speeds ranging from submaximal to supramaximal. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise 19 (3): 266–274, 1987aGoogle Scholar
  70. Mero A, Komi PV. Effects of stimulated supramaximal sprinting on force production, neural activation and blood lactate. XI International Congress of Biomechanics, Amsterdam, 1987bGoogle Scholar
  71. Mero A, Komi PV. Reaction time and electromyographic activity during a sprint start. European Journal of Applied Physiology 61: 73–80, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mero A, Peltola E. Neural activation in fatigued and nonfatigued conditions of short and long sprint running. Biology of Sport 6(1): 43–57, 1989Google Scholar
  73. Mero A, Luhtanen P, Viitasalo JT, Komi PV. Relationships between the maximal running velocity, muscle fiber characteristics, force production and force relaxation of sprinters. Scandinavian Journal of Sports Sciences 3 (1): 16–22, 1981Google Scholar
  74. Mero A, Luhtanen P, Komi PV. Zum Einfluss von Kontaktph-asenmerkmalen auf die Schrittfrequenz beim Maximal-sprint. Leistungssport 12 (4): 308–313, 1982Google Scholar
  75. Mero A, Luhtanen P, Komi PV. A biomechanical study of the sprint start. Scandinavian Journal of Sports Sciences 5(1): 20–28, 1983Google Scholar
  76. Mero A, Komi PV, Rusko H, Hironen J. Neuromuscular and anaerobic performance of sprinters at maximal and supramaximal speed. International Journal of Sports Medicine 8 (Suppl.): 55–60, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mero A, Luhtanen P, Komi PV, Susanka P. Kinematics of top sprint (400m) running in fatigued conditions. Track and Field Quaterly Review 88 (1): 42–45, 1988Google Scholar
  78. Miller DI. Biomechanical considerations in lower extremity amputee running and sports performance. In Wood GA (Ed.) Collected papers on sports biomechanics, pp. 74–96, The University of Western Australia, 1983Google Scholar
  79. Moravec P, Ruzicka J, Susanka P, Dostal E, Kodejs M, Nosek M. The 1987 International Athletic Foundation/IAAF Scientific Project Report: time analysis of the 100 metres events at the II World Championships in Athletics. New Studies in Athletics 3: 61–96, 1988Google Scholar
  80. Morton RH. Mathematical representation of the velocity curve of sprint running. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences 10(4): 166–170, 1985Google Scholar
  81. Paintal AS. Conduction in mammalian nerve fibers. In Desmedt JE (Ed.) New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology pp. 19–41, Karger, Basel, 1973Google Scholar
  82. Payne AH. Foot to ground contact forces of elite runners. In Matsui H & Kobayashi K (Eds) Biomechanics VIII-B, pp. 746–753, Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, Ill., 1983Google Scholar
  83. Roy B. Caracteriques biomecaniques de la course d’endurance. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences 7 (2): 104–115, 1982Google Scholar
  84. Singh M, Irwin D, Gutoski FP. Effect of high speed treadmill and sprint training on stride length rate. Presented at the International Congress on Physical Activity Sciences, Quebec City, 1976Google Scholar
  85. Slocum DB, Bowerman W. The biomechanics of running. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 23: 39–45, 1962Google Scholar
  86. Sprague P, Mann RV. The effects of muscular fatigue on the kinetics of sprint running. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 54 (1): 60–66, 1983Google Scholar
  87. Tabatschnik B, Sultanow N, Rjaskin W. Ein Ansatz zur Spezialisierung des Trainings in Abhangigkeit von den individuellen Besonderheiten des Sportlers — am Beispiel des Sprints. Leistungssport 6: 491–494, 1978Google Scholar
  88. Tomanek RJ, Tipton CM. Influence of exercise and tenectomy on the morphology of a muscle nerve. Anatomical Record 159: 105–114, 1967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Volkov NI, Lapin VI. Analysis of the velocity curve in sprint running. Medicine and Science in Sports 11 (4): 332–337, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Waxman SG. Determinants of conduction velocity in myelinated nerve fibers. Muscle Nerve 3: 141–150, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wedeles CHA. The effects of increasing the functional load of muscle on the composition of its motor nerve. Journal of Anatomy 83: 57, 1949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Williams KR. A biomechanical evaluation of distance running efficiency. PhD dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1980Google Scholar
  93. Williams KR. Biomechanics of running. In Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews Terjung RL (Ed.) vol 3, pp. 389–442, 1985Google Scholar
  94. Williams KR, Cavanagh PR. A model for the calculation of mechanical power during distance running. Journal of Biomechanics 16(2): 115–128, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wood GA. Biomechanical limitations to sprint running. Medicine and Sport Sciences 25: 58–71, 1987Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Mero
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. V. Komi
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. J. Gregor
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology of Physical ActivityUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Department of KinesiologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations