Sports Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 320–336

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

An Overview and its Application in the Treatment of Sports Injuries
  • David A. Lake
Review Article

Summary

In sports medicine, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used for muscle strengthening, maintenance of muscle mass and strength during prolonged periods of immobilisation, selective muscle retraining, and the control of oedema. A wide variety of stimulators, including the burst-modulated alternating current (‘Russian stimulator’), twin-spiked monophasic pulsed current and biphasic pulsed current stimulators, have been used to produce these effects.

Several investigators have reported increased isometric muscle strength in both NMES-stimulated and exercise-trained healthy, young adults when compared to unexercised controls, and also no significant differences between the NMES and voluntary exercise groups. It appears that when NMES and voluntary exercise are combined there is no significant difference in muscle strength after training when compared to either NMES or voluntary exercise alone. There is also evidence that NMES can improve functional performance in a variety of strength tasks. Two mechanisms have been suggested to explain the training effects seen with NMES. The first mechanism proposes that augmentation of muscle strength with NMES occurs in a similar manner to augmentation of muscle strength with voluntary exercise. This mechanism would require NMES strengthening protocols to follow standard strengthening protocols which call for a low number of repetitions with high external loads and a high intensity of muscle contraction. The second mechanism proposes that the muscle strengthening seen following NMES training results from a reversal of voluntary recruitment order with a selective augmentation of type II muscle fibres. Because type II fibres have a higher specific force than type I fibres, selective augmentation of type II muscle fibres will increase the overall strength of the muscle.

The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to prevent muscle atrophy associated with prolonged knee immobilisation following ligament reconstruction surgery or injury has been extensively studied. NMES has been shown to be effective in preventing the decreases in muscle strength, muscle mass and the oxidative capacity of thigh muscles following knee immobilisation. In all but one of the studies, NMES was shown to be superior in preventing the atrophic changes of knee immobilisation when compared to no exercise, isometric exercise of the quadriceps femoris muscle group, isometric co-contraction of both the hamstrings and quadriceps femoris muscle groups, and combined NMES-isometric exercise. It has also been reported that NMES applied to the thigh musculature during knee immobilisation improves the performance on functional tasks.

There is some evidence to suggest that NMES is effective in selective strengthening of individual muscles within muscle groups or parts of muscles. Evidence for selective strengthening of the abdominal muscles, back muscles, triceps brachii and the vastus medialis obliquus has been presented. It is unclear whether this selective strengthening is due to local changes in the muscle or muscle area stimulated or to a change in the relative magnitude of recruitment of the different muscles within a muscle group or of the different portions of a muscle.

NMES has been suggested to be a useful adjunctive treatment in oedema. Several investigators have shown some effect of monophasic pulsed stimulation in the treatment of acute oedema when applied to produce muscle pumping. One investigator has demonstrated an effect of monophasic pulsed stimulation on acute oedema but only when applied at amplitude levels below those needed to produce muscle contraction.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alon G. High voltage stimulation: effects of electrode size on basic excitatory responses. Physical Therapy 65: 890–895, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alon G. Principles of electrical stimulation. In Nelson RM & Currier DP (Eds) Clinical electrotherapy, pp. 35–103, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1991Google Scholar
  3. Alon G, McCombe SA, Koutsantonis S, Stumphauzer LJ, Burgwin KC, et al. Comparison of the effects of electrical stimulation and exercise on abdominal musculature. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 8: 567–573, 1987Google Scholar
  4. Anderson P, Sjogaard G. Selective glycogen depletion in the subgroups of type II muscle fibers during intense submaximal exercise in man. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 96: 627–628, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atha J. Strengthening muscles. In Hutton RS & Miller DI (Eds) Exercise and sport sciences review, Vol. 8, pp. 1–73, The Franklin Institute, Philadelphia, 1981Google Scholar
  6. Bettany JA, Fish DR, Mendel FC. Influence of high voltage pulsed direct current on edema formation following impact injury. Physical Therapy 70: 219–224, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Binder-Macleod SA, Guerin T. Preservation of force output through progressive reduction of stimulation frequency in human quadriceps femoris muscle. Physical Therapy 70: 619–625, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolter CP, Critz, JB. Changes in thoracic and right duct lymph flow and enzyme content during skeletal muscle stimulation. Archives Internationales de Physiologie et de Biochimie 84: 115–128, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman BR, Baker LL. Effects of waveform parameters on comfort during transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 13: 59–74, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks ME, Smith EM, Currier DP. Effect of longitudinal versus transverse electrode placement on torque production by the quadriceps femoris muscle during neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 11: 530–534, 1990Google Scholar
  11. Burke RE. Motor units: anatomy, physiology, and functional organization. In Brooks VB (Ed.) Handbook of physiology, Sect. 1, Vol. 2, Part 1, pp. 345–422, American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, 1981Google Scholar
  12. Clemente RF, Matulionis DH, Barron KW, Currier DP. Effect of motor neuromuscular electrical stimulation on microvascular perfusion of stimulated rat skeletal muscle. Physical Therapy 71: 397–406, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cosgrove KS, Bell SF, Fisher SR, Fowler NR, Jones TL, et al. The electrical effect of two commonly used clinical stimulators on traumatic edema. Abstract no. R289. Physical Therapy 71 (Suppl.): S117, 1991Google Scholar
  14. Currier DP. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for improving strength and blood flow, and influencing changes. In Nelson RM et al. & Currier DP (Eds) Clinical electrotherapy, pp. 35–103, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1991Google Scholar
  15. Currier DP, Lehman J, Lightfoot P. Electrical stimulation in exercise of the quadriceps femoris muscle. Physical Therapy 59: 1508–1512, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Currier DP, Mann R. Muscular strength development by electrical stimulation in normal subjects. Physical Therapy 63: 915–921, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Currier DP, Mann R. Pain complaint: comparison of electrical stimulation with conventional isometric exercise. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 5: 318–323, 1984Google Scholar
  18. Delitto A, Brown M, Strube MJ, Rose SJ, Lehman RC. Electrical stimulation of quadriceps femoris in an elite weight lifter: a single subject experiment. International Journal of Sports Medicine 10: 187–191, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delitto A, Robinson AJ. Electrical stimulation of muscle: techniques and applications. Snyder-Mackler L & Robinson AJ (Eds) Clinical electrophysiology: electrophysiology and electrophysiological testing, pp. 95–138, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1989Google Scholar
  20. Delitto A, Rose SJ. Comparative comfort of three waveforms used in electrically eliciting quadriceps femoris muscle contractions. Physical Therapy 66: 1704–1707, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Delitto A, Rose SJ, McKowen JM, Lehman RC, Thomas JA, et al. Electrical stimulation versus voluntary exercise in strengthening thigh musculature after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Physical Therapy 68: 660–663, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Delitto A, Snyder-Mackler L. Two theories of muscle strength augmentation using percutaneous electrical stimulation. Physical Therapy 70: 158–164, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Duchateau F, Hainaut K. Training effects of submaximal electrostimulation in a human skeletal muscle. Medicine and Science and Sports and Exercise 20: 99–104, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eriksson E, Haggmark T. Comparison of isometric muscle training and electrical stimulation supplementing isometric muscle training in the recovery after major knee ligament surgery. American Journal of Sports Medicine 17: 169–171, 1979Google Scholar
  25. Eriksson E, Haggmark T, Kiessling KH, Karisson J. Effects of electrical stimulation on human skeletal muscle. International Journal of Sports Medicine 2: 18–22, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferguson JP, Blackley MW, Knight RD, Sutlive TG, Underwood FB, et al. Effects of varying electrode site placements on the torque output of an electrically stimulated involuntary quadriceps femoris muscle contraction. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 11: 24–29, 1989Google Scholar
  27. Fish DR, Mendel FC, Schultz AM, Gottstein-Yerke LM. Effectiveness of anodal high voltage pulsed current on edema formation. Abstract R289. Physical Therapy 71 (Suppl.): S117, 1991Google Scholar
  28. Fleury M, Lagasse P. Influence of functional electrical stimulation training on premotor and motor reaction time. Perceptual and Motor Skills 48: 387–393, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garnett R, Stephens J A. Changes in recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man. Journal of Physiology 311: 463–473, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Godfrey CM, Jayawardena H, Quance TA, Welch P. Comparison of electro-stimulation and isometric exercise in strengthening the quadriceps muscle. Physiotherapy Canada 31: 265–267, 1979Google Scholar
  31. Gould N, Donnermeyer D, Gammon GG, Pope M, Ashikaga T. Transcutaneous muscle stimulation to retard disuse atrophy after open menisectomy. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 178: 190–197, 1983Google Scholar
  32. Griffin JW, Newsome LS, Stralka SW, Wright PE. Reduction of chronic postraumatic hand edema: a comparison of high voltage pulsed current, intermittent pneumatic compression, and placebo treatments. Physical Therapy 70: 279–286, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Grimby G, Wigerstad-Lossing I. Comparison of high- and low-frequency muscle stimulators. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 70: 835–838, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Grove-Lainey C, Walmsley RP, Andrew GM. Effectiveness of exercise alone versus exercise plus electrical stimulation in strengthening the quadriceps muscle. Physiotherapy Canada 35: 5–11, 1983Google Scholar
  35. Halbach JW, Straus D. Comparison of electro-myo stimulation to isokinetic power of the knee extensor mechanism. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 2: 20–24, 1980Google Scholar
  36. Howson DC. Peripheral nerve excitability: implications for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Physical Therapy 58: 1467–1473, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones DA, Bigland-Ritchie B, Edwards RHT. Excitation frequency and muscle fatigue: mechanical responses during voluntary and stimulated contractions. Experimental Neurology 64: 401–413, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahanovitz N, Nordin M, Verderame R, Yabut S, Parnianpour M, et al. Normal trunk muscle strength and endurance in women and the effect of exercises and electrical stimulation, part 2: comparative analysis of electrical stimulation and exercises to increase trunk muscle strength and endurance. Spine 12: 112–118, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kloth L. Interference current. In Nelson RM & Currier DP (Eds) Clinical electrotherapy, pp. 221–260, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1991Google Scholar
  40. Kloth LC, Cummings JP (co-chairs). Electrotherapeutic terminology in physical therapy, Section on Clinical Electrophysiology of the American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, VA, 1991Google Scholar
  41. Kramer JF, Semple JE. Comparison of selected strengthening techniques for normal quadriceps. Physiotherapy Canada 35: 300–304, 1983Google Scholar
  42. Kramer J, Lindsay D, Magee D, Mendryk S, Wall T. Comparison of voluntary and electrical stimulation contraction torques. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 5: 324–331, 1984Google Scholar
  43. Kubiak RJ, Whitman KM, Johnston RM. Changes in quadriceps femoris muscle strength using isometric exercise versus electrical stimulation. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 8: 537–541, 1987Google Scholar
  44. Lai DH, DeDomenico G, Strauss GR. The effect of different electro-motor stimulation training intensities on strength improvement. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 34: 151–164, 1988Google Scholar
  45. Lake DA. The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation as applied by ‘toning salons’ on muscle strength and body shape. Abstract RO77. Physical Therapy 68: 789, 1988Google Scholar
  46. Lake DA. Increases in range of motion of the edematous hand with the use of electromesh glove. Physical Therapy Forum 8: 6, 1989Google Scholar
  47. Lake DA, Gillepsie WJ. Electrical stimulation (NMES) does not decrease body fat. Abstract 131. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20 (Suppl.): S22, 1988Google Scholar
  48. Laughman RK, Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Chao EYS. Strength changes in the normal quadriceps femoris muscle as a result of electrical stimulation. Physical Therapy 63: 494–499, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. LeDoux J, Quinones MA. An investigation of the use of percutaneous electrical stimulation in muscle reeducation. Abstract R183. Physical Therapy 61: 737, 1981Google Scholar
  50. Lindstrom B, Korsan-Bengtsen K, Petruson B, Pettersson S, Wikstrand J. Electrically induced short-lasting tetanus of the calf muscles for prevention of deep vein thrombosis. British Journal of Surgery 69: 203–206, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McMiken DF, Todd-Smith M, Thompson C. Strengthening of human quadriceps muscles by cutaneous electrical stimulation. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 15: 25–28, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Michlovitz SL, Smith W, Watkins M. Ice and high voltage pulsed stimulation in treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 9: 301–304, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller CR, Webers RL. The effects of ice massage on an individual’s pain tolerance level to electrical stimulation. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 12: 105–110, 1990Google Scholar
  54. Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB, Yemm R. The orderly recruitment of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions. Journal of Physiology 230: 359–370, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Mohr TM, Carlson B, Sulentic C, Landry R. Comparison of isometric exercise and high volt galvanic stimulation on quadriceps femoris muscle strength. Physical Therapy 65: 606–612, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Mohr TM, Akers TK, Landry RG. Effect of high voltage stimulation on edema reduction in the rat hind limb. Physical Therapy 67: 1703–1707, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Morrissey MC, Brewster CE, Shields CL, Brown M. The effects of electrical stimulation on the quadriceps during postoperative knee immobilization. American Journal of Sports Medicine 13: 40–45, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Newton RA, Karselis TC. Skin pH following high voltage galvanic stimulation. Physical Therapy 63: 1593–1596, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Nitz AJ, Dobner JJ. High intensity electrical stimulation effect on thigh musculature during immobilization for knee sprain: a case report. Physical Therapy 67: 219–222, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Owens J, Malone T. Treatment parameters of high frequency electrical stimulation as established on the electro-stim 180. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 4: 162–168, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Packman-Braun, R. Relationship between functional electrical stimulation duty cycle and fatigue in wrist extensor muscles of patients with hemiparesis. Physical Therapy 68: 51–56, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Reed BV. Effect of high voltage pulsed electrical stimulation on microvascular permeability to plasma proteins: a possible mechanism in minimizing edema. Physical Therapy 68: 491–495, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Robinson AJ. Basic concepts and terminology in electrotherapy. In Snyder-Mackler L & Robinson AJ (Eds) Clinical electrophysiology: electrophysiology and electrophysiological testing, pp. 1–19, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1989Google Scholar
  64. Selkowitz DM. Improvement in isometric strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle after training with electrical stimulation. Physical Therapy 65: 186–196, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sinacore DR, Delitto A, King DS, Rose SJ. Type II fiber activation with electrical stimulation: a preliminary report. Physical Therapy 70: 416–422, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sisk TD, Stralka SW, Deering MB, Griffin JW. Effect of electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength after reconstructive surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament. American Journal of Sports Medicine 15: 215–221, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Snyder-Mackler L. Electrically-elicited cocontraction of the quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscles: effects on gait and thigh muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1990Google Scholar
  68. ai]Snyder-Mackler L, Campbell L, Gardiner D, Kenney MB, et al. Effects of duty cycle of portable neuromuscular electrical stimulation on fatigue of the non-dominant triceps brachii. Abstract no. R283. Physical Therapy 68: 833, 1988a Snyder-Mackler L, Celluci MB, Lyons J, Magno J, et al. Effects of duty cycle of portable nueromuscular electrical stimulation on strength of the non-dominant triceps brachii. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy 68: 833–839, 1988bGoogle Scholar
  69. Snyder-Mackler L, Garrett M, Roberts M. A comparison of torque-generating capabilities of three different electrical stimulation currents. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 11: 297–301, 1989Google Scholar
  70. Soo C-L, Currier DP, Threlkeld, AJ. Augmenting voluntary torque of healthy muscle by optimization of electrical stimulation. Physical Therapy 68: 333–337, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Steadman JR. Nonoperative measures for patellofemoral problems. American Journal of Sports Medicine 7: 374–375, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taylor K, Fish DR, Mendel FC, Burton HW. Effect of a single 30 minute treatment of high voltage pulsed direct current on edema formation. Abstract R291. Physical Therapy 71 (Suppl.): S117, 1991aGoogle Scholar
  73. Taylor K, Fish DR, Mendel FC, Burton HW. Effects of electrically induced muscle contractions on postraumatic edema formation. Abstract R292. Physical Therapy 71 (Suppl.): S118, 1991bGoogle Scholar
  74. Underwood FB, Kremser GL, Finstuen K, Greathouse DG. Increasing involuntary torque production by using TENS. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 12: 101–104, 1990Google Scholar
  75. Walmsley RP, Letts G, Vooys J. A comparison of torque generated by knee extension with a maximal voluntary muscle contraction vis-a-vis electrical stimulation. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 6: 10–17, 1984Google Scholar
  76. Wigerstad-Lossing I, Grimby G, Jonsson T, Morelli B, Peterson L, et al. Effects of electrical stimulation combined with voluntary contractions after knee ligament surgery. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20: 93–98, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wolf SL, Ariel GB, Saar D, Penny MA, Railey P. The effect of muscle stimulation during resistive training on performance parameters. American Journal of Sports Medicine 14: 18–23, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wong RA. High voltage versus low voltage electrical stimulation: force of induced muscle contraction and perceived discomfort in healthy subjects. Physical Therapy 66: 1209–1214, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Lake
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical TherapyNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations