, Volume 67, Issue 12, pp 1725–1747 | Cite as


A Review of its Use in the Management of Parkinson’s Disease
  • Vicki Oldfield
  • Gillian M. Keating
  • Caroline M. Perry
Adis Drug Evaluation



Rasagiline (Azilect®) is a novel, selective, irreversible second-generation inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B). It is administered orally once daily and is approved in the US, Canada, Mexico, Israel and the EU for use as monotherapy and as adjunct therapy in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease.

Results of well designed clinical studies indicate that rasagiline is effective as initial monotherapy and improves Parkinson’s symptomatology in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. In addition, when administered in conjunction with levodopa, in patients with moderate to advanced disease and motor fluctuations, rasagiline reduces mean daily ‘off’ time and increases daily ‘on’ time without troublesome dyskinesias, compared with controls. Rasagiline is generally well tolerated as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy and is administered once daily. Thus, rasagiline, administered as a simple and convenient dosage regimen, is a well tolerated and effective option for monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson’s disease and for adjunctive therapy in patients with moderate to advanced disease.

Pharmacological Properties

Rasagiline selectively and irreversibly inhibited MAO-B activity in a number of in vitro and in vivo studies. It was 5- to 10-fold more potent than selegiline at inhibiting MAO-B activity in rats. The inhibition of MAO-B activity by rasagiline is thought to lead to an increase in striatal extracellular dopamine levels and may account for the beneficial effect of rasagiline treatment on motor function observed in animal models of Parkinson’s disease.

Rasagiline has demonstrated neuroprotective activity in animal studies and in vitro. Its main metabolite, l-(R)-aminoindan has shown beneficial effects in vitro and in vivo and does not inhibit the anti-apoptotic activity of rasagiline and has no sympathomimetic effects, unlike the major selegiline metabolites, L-amphetamine (L-amfetamine) and L-methamphetamine (L-metamfetamine), which are neurotoxic and inhibit the neuroprotective activity of the parent drug.

In humans, oral rasagiline is rapidly absorbed, reaching a maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) in ≤0.7 hours. Log Cmax was significantly correlated with the percentage of platelet MAO-B inhibition in healthy volunteers. Rasagiline undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism, with less than 1% of the dose being eliminated in the urine unchanged. The main metabolites are l-(R)-aminoindan, 3-hydroxy-N-propargyl-1-aminoindan and 3-hydroxy-1-aminoindan. Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve increased by 2-fold and 7-fold, respectively, in patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 7–9) compared with healthy individuals, following repeat dose administration for 7 days. The pharmacokinetic parameters of rasagiline in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment are similar to those observed in healthy volunteers.

Therapeutic Efficacy

The therapeutic efficacy of oral once-daily rasagiline has been evaluated in three large well designed clinical trials. Patients with early Parkinson’s disease received rasagiline as early initial monotherapy in the TEMPO trial, which was designed to evaluate the efficacy of rasagiline prior to treatment with dopaminergic agents including levodopa. In the PRESTO and LARGO trials, patients with moderate to advanced disease and motor fluctuations received rasagiline as an adjunct to levodopa plus a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor.

In the TEMPO trial, the change from baseline in mean adjusted total Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores favoured rasagiline 1 or 2 mg/day versus placebo recipients at 26 weeks and early-start rasagiline 1 or 2 mg/day versus delayed-start (by 6 months) rasagiline 2 mg/day at 52 weeks. At 26 weeks, the change from baseline in UPDRS motor, activities of daily living (ADL), tremor and bradykinesia scores also significantly favoured rasagiline recipients, and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) remained stable with rasagiline. Significantly more rasagiline 1 and 2 mg/day than placebo recipients responded to treatment (experienced a <3-unit increase in total UPDRS score) at 26 weeks. To date, rasagiline therapy has been shown to adequately control Parkinson’s symptoms in the long term (6.5 years) and the beneficial effect of earlyversus delayedstart rasagiline was maintained during this period.

Rasagiline 0.5 and 1 mg/day together with levodopa and other antiparkinsonian therapy significantly decreased the amount of daily ’off time (primary endpoint) compared with placebo in the PRESTO (0.5 and 1 mg/day) and LARGO (1 mg/day) trials. Additionally, compared with placebo, rasagiline recipients had significantly improved Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores, UPDRS ADL scores during ‘off’ time and UPDRS motor scores during ‘on’ and ‘off time’. Levodopa-responsive symptoms, including tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia, improved with rasagiline, improving ‘on’ time without troublesome dyskinesias and the response to treatment (≥1 hour decrease in mean total daily ‘off’ time) was significantly greater with rasagiline than placebo in the LARGO trial. Rasagiline treatment had no effect on HR-QOL in the more advanced Parkinson’s disease patients in the PRESTO trial.


Rasagiline was generally well tolerated as monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. The most frequently occurring adverse events in rasagiline recipients during the first 26 weeks of the TEMPO trial were infection and headache. During the long-term TEMPO extension (up to 6.5 years) rasagiline was well tolerated with the most common adverse events reported being infection and accidental injury.

Rasagiline was also generally well tolerated when added to other antiparkinsonian medication in patients with moderate to advanced disease and motor fluctuations, with the most commonly occurring adverse events being dopaminergic related. The incidence of dopaminergic adverse events was similar with rasagiline and placebo in the LARGO trial, but in the PRESTO trial rasagiline recipients reported a significantly greater incidence of weight loss, vomiting, anorexia, balance difficulty and dyskinesias. Depression occurred significantly less frequently with rasagiline than with placebo in the PRESTO trial.

Serious adverse events with rasagiline were infrequent and rasagiline treatment had little or no effect on ECG recordings, blood pressure, heart rate or laboratory measurements. No increase in sensitivity to tyramine was observed following a tyramine challenge performed in subpopulations of patients at the end of the TEMPO and PRESTO trials. All three trials were without dietary tyramine restrictions and no cases of hypertensive crisis were reported. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were low.


  1. 1.
    Burn D. Parkinson’s disease: an overview. Pharm J 2000 Feb 26; 264(7085): 333–7Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Samii A, Nutt JG, Ransom BR. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2004; 363(9423): 1783–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Rijk MC, Launer LJ, Berger K, et al. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in Europe: a collaborative study of populationbased cohorts. Neurology 2000; 54 Suppl. 5: S21–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jain PharmaBiotech. Neuroprotection strategic report 2006. Basel, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mandel S, Grunblatt E, Riederer P, et al. Neuroprotective strategies in Parkinson’s disease: an update on progress. CNS Drugs 2003; 17(10): 729–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waldmeier PC. Prospects for antiapoptotic drug therapy of neurodegenerative diseases. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2003; 27(2): 303–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hristova AH, Koller WC. Early Parkinson’s disease: what is the best approach to treatment? Drugs Aging 2000; 17(3): 165–81Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schapira AHV, Obeso J. Timing of treatment initiation in Parkinson’s disease: a need for reappraisal? Ann Neurol 2006; 59(3): 559–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olanow CW, Watts RL, Koller WC. An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson’s disease (2001): treatment guidelines. Neurology 2001; 56 (11 Suppl. 5): S1–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hauser RA, Chen JJ, Berchou RB, et al. Treatment strategies for Parkinson disease. Formulary 2006 Aug 1; 41 Suppl.: 1–46Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teva Pharma GmbH. Rasagiline (Azilect®): summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emc.medicines.org.uk/emc/assets/c/html/DisplayDoc.asp?DocumentID=16273 [Accessed 2007 Jul 17]
  12. 12.
    Teva Neuroscience Inc. Azilect® (rasagiline) prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://www.azilect.com/ContentRoot/Prescribing_Information [Accessed 2007 June21]
  13. 13.
    Siddiqui MAA, Plosker GL. Rasagiline. Drugs Aging 2005; 22(1): 83–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Youdim MBH, Gross A, Finberg JPM. Rasagiline [N-propargyl-1R (+)-aminoindan], a selective and potent inhibitor of mitochondrial monoamine oxidase B. Br J Pharmacol 2001; 132(2): 500–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freedman NM, Mishani E, Krausz Y, et al. In vivo measurement of brain monoamine oxidase B occupancy by rasagiline, using 11C-L-deprenyl and PET. J Nucl Med 2005 Oct; 46(10): 1618–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rabey JM, Sagi I, Huberman M, et al. Rasagiline mesylate, a new MAO-B inhibitorfor the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind study as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Clin Neuropharmacol 2000; 23(6): 324–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thebault JJ, Guillaume M, Levy R. Tolerability, safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of rasagiline: a potent, selective, and irreversible monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor. Pharmacotherapy 2004 Oct; 24(10): 1295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kupsch A, Sautter J, Gotz ME, et al. Monoamine oxidase-inhibition and MPTP-induced neurotoxicity in the non-human primate: comparison of rasagiline (TVP 1012) with selegiline. J Neural Transm 2001; 108(8-9): 985–1009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Finberg JPM, Wang J, Bankiewicz K, et al. Increased striatal dopamine production from L-DOPA following selective inhibition of monoamine oxidase B by R(+)-N-propargyl-l-aminoindan (rasagiline) in the monkey. J Neural Transm 1998; 52 Suppl.: 279–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finberg JP, Youdim MB. Modification of blood pressure and nictitating membrane response to sympathetic amines by selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors, types A and B, in the cat. Br J Pharmacol 1985 Jun; 85(2): 541–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Speiser Z, Levy R, Cohen S. Effects of N-propargyl-l-(R)aminoindan (rasagiline) in models of motor and cognition disorders. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1998; 52: 287–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lamensdorf I, Youdim MB, Finberg JP. Effect of long-term treatment with selective monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors on dopamine release from rat striatum in vivo. J Neurochem 1996 Oct; 67(4): 1532–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Youdim MBH, Tipton KF. Rat striatal monoamine oxidase-B inhibition by 1-deprenyl and rasagiline: its relationship to 2-phenylethylamine-induced stereotypy and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Rel Disord 2002; 8: 247–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Finberg JP, Youdim MB. Pharmacological properties of the anti-Parkinson drug rasagiline; modification of endogenous brain amines, reserpine reversal, serotonergic and dopaminergic behaviours. Neuropharmacology 2002 Dec; 43(7): 1110–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heikkila RE, Duvoisin RC, Finberg JP, et al. Prevention of MPTP-induced neurotoxicity by AGN-1133 and AGN-1135, selective inhibitors of monoamine oxidase-B. Eur J Pharmacol 1985 Oct 22; 116(3): 313–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Finberg JP, Takeshima T, Johnston JM, et al. Increased survival of dopaminergic neurons by rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor. Neuroreport 1998 Mar 9; 9(4): 703–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goggi J, Theofilopoulos S, Riaz SS, et al. The neuronal survival effects of rasagiline and deprenyl on fetal human and rat ventral mesencephalic neurones in culture. Neuroreport 2000 Dec 18; 11(18): 3937–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blandini F, Armentero MT, Fancellu R, et al. Neuroprotective effect of rasagiline in a rodent model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 2004 Jun; 187(2): 455–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huang W, Chen Y, Shohami E, et al. Neuroprotective effect of rasagiline, a selective monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor, against closed head injury in the mouse. Eur J Pharmacol 1999 Feb 5; 366(2-3): 127–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abu-Raya S, Tabakman R, Blaugrund E, et al. Neuroprotective and neurotoxic effects of monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors and derived metabolites under ischemia in PC12 cells. Eur J Pharmacol 2002 Jan 11; 434(3): 109–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abu-Raya S, Blaugrund E, Trembovler V, et al. Rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor, protects NGF-differentiated PC12 cells against oxygen-glucose deprivation. J Neurosci Res 1999 Nov 1; 58(3): 456–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weinreb O, Bar-Am O, Amit T, et al. Neuroprotection via prosurvival protein kinase C isoforms associated with Bcl-2 family members. FASEB J 2004 Sep 18; 12: 1471–3Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bar Am O, Amit T, Youdim MB. Contrasting neuroprotective and neurotoxic actions of respective metabolites of anti-Parkinson drugs rasagiline and selegiline. Neurosci Lett 2004 Jan 30; 355(3): 169–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Youdim MB, Wadia A, Tatton W, et al. The anti-Parkinson drug rasagiline and its cholinesterase inhibitor derivatives exert neuroprotection unrelated to MAO inhibition in cell culture and in vivo. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001 Jun; 939: 450–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Maruyama W, Youdim MB, Naoi M. Antiapoptotic properties of rasagiline, N-propargylamine-1(R)-aminoindan, and its optical (S)-isomer, TV1022. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001 Jun; 939: 320–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Naoi M, Maruyama W, Youdim MB, et al. Anti-apoptotic function of propargylamine inhibitors of type-B monoamine oxidase. Inflammopharmacology 2003; 11(2): 175–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Akao Y, Maruyama W, Shimizu S, et al. Mitochondrial permeability transition mediates apoptosis induced by N-methyl(R)-salsolinol, an endogenous neurotoxin, and is inhibited by Bcl-2 and rasagiline, N-propargyl-1(R)-aminoindan. J Neurochem 2002; 82: 913–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Finberg JP, Lamensdorf I, Weinstock M, et al. Pharmacology of rasagiline (N-propargyl-1R-aminoindan). Adv Neurol 1999; 80: 495–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bonneh-Barkay D, Ziv N, Finberg JP. Characterization of the neuroprotective activity of rasagiline in cerebellar granule cells. Neuropharmacology 2005 Mar; 48(3): 406–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eliash S, Shteter N, Eilam R. Neuroprotective effect of rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor, on spontaneous cell degeneration in a rat model. J Neural Transm 2005 Mar 15; 112 (991-1003)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Waibel S, Reuter A, Malessa S, et al. Rasagiline alone and in combination with riluzole prolongs survival in an ALS mouse model. J Neurol 2004 Sep; 251(9): 1080–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Speiser Z, Mayk A, Eliash S, et al. Studies with rasagiline, a MAO-B inhibitor, in experimental focal ischemia in the rat. J Neural Transm 1999; 106(7-8): 593–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maruyama W, Akao Y, Youdim MB, et al. Neurotoxins induce apoptosis in dopamine neurons: protection by N-propargylamine-1(R)- and (S)-aminoindan, rasagiline and TV1022. J Neural Transm Suppl 2000; 60 Suppl.: 171–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Carrillo MC, Minami C, Kitani K, et al. Enhancing effect of rasagiline on Superoxide dismutase and catalase activities in the dopaminergic system in the rat. Life Sci 2000 Jun 23; 67(5): 577–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bar-Am O, Yogev-Falach M, Amit T, et al. Regulation of protein kinase C by the anti-Parkinson drug, MAO-B inhibitor, rasagiline and its derivatives, in vivo. J Neurochem 2004 Jun; 89(5): 1119–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Logan J, et al. Slow recovery of human brain MAO B after L-deprenyl (selegiline) withdrawal. Synapse 1994 Oct; 18(2): 86–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Finberg J, Lamensdorf I, Commissiong J, et al. Pharmacology and neuroprotective properties of rasagiline. J Neural Transm Suppl 1996; 48: 95–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Youdim MB, Edmondson D, Tipton KF. The therapeutic potential of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Nat Rev Neuro Sci 2006 Apr; 7(4): 295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bar Am O, Amit T, Youdim M. Contrasting neuroprotective and neurotoxic actions of respective metabolites of anti-Parkinson drugs rasagiline and selegiline. Neurosci Lett 2004 Jan 30; 355(3): 169–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Maruyama W, Akao Y, Youdim M, et al. Transfection-enforced Bcl-2 overexpression and an anti-Parkinson drug, rasagiline, prevent nuclear accumulation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase induced by an endogenous dopaminergic neurotoxin N-methyl(R)salsolinol. J Neurochem 2001; 78: 727–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Maruyama W, Takahashi T, Youdim M, et al. The anti-Parkinson drug, rasagiline, prevents apoptotic DNA damage induced by peroxynitrite in human dopaminergic neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. J Neural Transm 2002 Apr; 109(4): 467–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Data on file. 2007 JunGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Eliash S, Speiser Z, Cohen S. Rasagiline and its (S) enantiomer increase survival and prevent stroke in salt-loaded stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Neural Trans 2001; 108(8–9): 909–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Maruyama W, Naoi M. Neuroprotection by deprenyl and related compounds. Mech Ageing Dev 1999 Nov; 111(2-3): 189–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Abassi ZA, Binah O, Youdim MB. Cardiovascular activity of rasagiline, a selective and potent inhibitor of mitochondrial monoamine oxidase B: comparison with selegiline. Br J Pharmacol 2004 Oct; 143(3): 371–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stern MB, Marek KL, Friedman J, et al. Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of rasagiline as monotherapy in early Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord 2004 Aug; 19(8): 916–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Orion Corporation. Eldepryl® (Selegiline): summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emc.medicines.org.uk/emc/assets/c/html/displaydoc.asp?DocumentID=11239 [Accessed 2007 June 21]
  58. 58.
    Parkinson Study Group. A controlled trial of rasagiline in early Parkinson disease: the TEMPO Study. Arch Neurol 2002 Dec; 59(12): 1937–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Melamed E, et al. Rasagiline as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations (LARGO, Lasting effect in Adjunct therapy with Rasagiline Given Once daily, study): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Lancet 2005 Mar 12; 365: 947–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Parkinson Study Group. A randomised placebo-controlled trial with rasagiline in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson disease and motor fluctuations. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 241–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Parkinson Study Group. A controlled, randomized, delayed-start study of rasagiline in early Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 561–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lew MF, Hauser RA, Hurtig HI, et al. Long-term efficacy of rasagiline in Parkinson’s disease [abstract]. Neurology 2005; 64 (Suppl 1): A396. Plus poster presented at the 9th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders; 2005 Mar 5–8; New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hauser RA, Lew MF, Hurtig HI, et al. Early treatment with rasagiline is more beneficial than delayed treatment start in the long-term management of Parkinson’s disease: analysis of the TEMPO ITT cohort [abstract no. 10 plus poster]. 16th International Congress on Parkinson’s Disease and Related Disorders; 2005 June 5–9; BerlinGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Rasagiline mesylate. Protocol 232 TEMPO. Analysis of the 6-month placebo-controlled phase (Data on file). 2001 Jun 19Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Prisco U, Fitzer-Attas C, Oren S. Efficacy of rasagiline monotherapy for Parkinson’s disease [poster]. American Neurological Association, 130th Annual Meeting; 2005 Sep 25–28; San Diego (CA)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hauser R, Fitzer-Attas J. Magnitude of effect of rasagiline in relation to Parkinson’s disease severity at baseline: a post-hoc analysis of the TEMPO study [poster P05.138]. 58th American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting; 2006 April 1–8; San Diego (CA)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Welsh M, McDermott MP, Holloway RG, et al. Development and testing of the Parkinson’s disease quality of life scale. Mov Disord 2003; 18(6): 637–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Biglan KM, Schwid S, Eberly S, et al. Rasagiline improves quality of life in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2006 May; 21(5): 616–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Fitzer-Attas C, Weiss S, Oren S. The effect of rasagiline on quality of life by age in patients with early Parkinson’s disease [poster no. P2153]. 10th Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Societies; 2006 Sept 2–5; GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Giladi N, Rascol O, Brooks DJ, et al. Rasagiline treatment can improve freezing of gait in advanced Parkinson’s disease: a prospective randomized, double blind, placebo and entacapone controlled study [abstract no. P04.137]. Neurology 2004 Apr 28; 62 Suppl. 5: 329–330. Plus poster presented at the 8th Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Sciences; 2004 Sep 4–7; ParisGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Stocchi F, LARGO Study Group. Effect of rasagiline on severity of OFF in Parkinson’s disease [abstract no. P585]. Mov Disord 2004 Jun 14; 19 Suppl. 9: 208–9. Plus poster presented at The Movement Disorder Society’s 8th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders; 2004 Jun 13–7; RomeGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. TVP-1012/Rasagiline mesylate. Protocol 122 LARGO. Analysis of the 18 weeks placebo-controlled phase (Data on file). 2003 Jun 9Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. TVP-1012/Rasagiline mesylate. Protocol 133 PRESTO. Analysis of the 6 months placebo-controlled phase (Data on file). 2003 Jun 9Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Elmer L, Schwid D, Eberly C, et al. Rasagiline-associated motor improvement in PD occurs without worsening of cognitive and behavioral symptoms. J Neurol Sci 2006 Oct 25; 248(1–2): 78–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Schwid S, for the PRESTO and LARGO Investigators. PRESTO and LARGO: once-daily rasagiline produces consistent treatment benefits in US and European studies of Parkinson’s disease [poster no. P1201]. 10th Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Societies; 2006 Sep 2–5; GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stocchi F. Rasagiline: defining the role of a novel therapy in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Int J Clin Pract 2006 Feb; 60(2): 215–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Melamed E, et al. Rasagiline is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of moderate to advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients receiving concomitant dopamine agonist therapy [poster no. P18]. 16th International Congress on Parkinson’s Disease and Related Disorders; 2005 Jun 5–9; BerlinGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Elmer L. Rasagiline is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with levodopa-related motor fluctuations receiving other adjunctive therapy [abstract no. P468]. Mov Disord 2005; 20 Suppl. 10: S138. Plus poster presented at the 9th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders; 2005 Mar 5; New Orleans (LA)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Tolosa E, for PRESTO and LARGO Investigators. Rasagiline is efficacious and safe in the treatment of elderly patients (≥70 years) with Parkinson’s disease (PD): pooled data analysis [poster no. P916]. 10th International Congress of the Movement Disorder Society; 2006 Oct 28–Nov 2; KyotoGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Fernandez H, for the PRESTO and LARGO Investigators. Rasagiline adjunct therapy produces marked levels of response across all Parkinson’s disease severities: pooled data analysis from the PRESTO and LARGO studies [poster no. P613]. 10th International Congress of the Movement Disorder Society; 2006 Oct 28–Nov 2; KyotoGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Poewe W, for the PRESTO and LARGO Investigators. Rasagiline provides significant benefits as adjunct therapy in patients with moderate Parkinson’s disease: subgroup analyses [poster no. P1193]. 10th Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Societies; 2006 Sep 2–5; GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Goetz CG, Schwid SR, Eberly SW, et al. Safety of rasagiline in elderly patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology 2006; 66: 1427–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Integrated summary of safety: regulatory submission, 2003. (Data on file)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Stern M, White W, de Marcaida J, et al. Rasagiline does not affect blood pressure in Parkinsons’s disease patients following meals unrestricted in tyramine content. Mov Disord 2006 2006; 21 (Suppl. 15): s487Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Guillaume M, Thebault J, Cohen S. Assessment of the potential for pharmacodynamic interaction between rasagiline and oral tyramine in healthy subjects [poster no. P963]. 10th International Congress of the Movement Disorder Society; 2006 Oct 28–Nov 2; KyotoGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Blindauer K, for the Parkinson Study Group. Tyramine challenge to assess the safety of rasagiline monotherapy in a placebo-controlled multicenter trial for early Parkinson’s disease (the TEMPO Study) [abstract no. P05.077]. Neurology 2001; 56 Suppl. 3: 345Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    deMarcaida JA, Schwid SR, White WB, et al. Effects of tyramine administration in Parkinson’s disease patients treated with selective MAO-B inhibitor rasagiline. Mov Disord 2006; 21(10): 1716–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    de Marcaida JA. Rasagiline does not promote tyramine pressor responses [abstract no. P451]. Mov Disord 2005; 20 Suppl. 10: S133. Plus poster presented at the 9th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders; 2005 Mar 5–8; New Orleans (LA)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Panisset M, Schwid S, Ondo W, et al. Safety of concomitant therapy with rasagiline and antidepressants in Parkinson’s Disease [poster no. 340]. 11th Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders; 2007 Jun 3–7; IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Schwid RS, Parkinson Study Group. Safety of rasagiline in combination with serotonin reuptake inhibitors [poster]. Ann Neurol 2005; 58 Suppl. 9: S56Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Azilect, INN-Rasagiline: scientific discussion [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.eu.int/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/Azilect/5289705en6.pdf [Accessed 2005 May 4]
  92. 92.
    Rigel DS. Evaluation of association of Parkinson’s disease in patients with history of malignant melanoma [abstract]. 10th World Congress on Cancers of the Skin; 2005 May 13–16; ViennaGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Olsen JH, Friis S, Frederiksen K, et al. Atypical cancer pattern in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 201–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Jansson B, Jankovic J. Low cancer rates among patients with Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1985; 17(5): 505–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Moller H, Mellemkjaer L, McLaughlin JK, et al. Occurrence of different cancers in patients with Parkinson’s disease. BMJ 1995 Jun 10; 310: 1500–1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Driver J, Logroscino G, Buring J, et al. A prospective cohort study of cancer incidence following the diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16(6): 1260–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bertoni J, Arlette J, Fernandez H, et al. Parkinson’s disease and melanoma: an epidemiologic evaluation [poster]. American Neurological Association, 131st Annual Meeting; 2006 Oct 8–11; Chicago (IL)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Rascol O, Goetz C, Koller W, et al. Treatment interventions for Parkinson’s disease: an evidence based assessment. Lancet 2002 May 4; 359: 1589–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease therapy: tailoring choices for early and late disease, young old patients. Clin Neuropharmacol 2000; 23(5): 252–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Riederer P, Lachenmayer L, Laux G. Clinical applications of MAO-inhibitors. Curr Med Chem 2004 Aug; 11(15): 2033–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Goetz CG, Koller WC, Poewe W, et al. MAO-B inhibitors for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2002; 17 Suppl. 4: S38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, et al. Evidence-based medical review update: pharmacological and surgical treatments of Parkinson’s disease: 2001 to 2004. Mov Disord 2005 Apr 7; 20(5): 523–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Pahwa R, Factor S, Lyons K, et al. Practice parameter: treatment of Parkinson disease with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommitee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2006 Apr 11; 66(7): 983–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Parkinson’s disease: diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care. Issued June 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/CG035 [Accessed 2006 Aug 28]
  105. 105.
    Rascol O, Olanow W. ADAGIO: a prospective double blind delayed-start study to examine potential disease-modifying effect of rasagiline in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2006; 21 Suppl. 15: S570Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Parkinson Study Group. Rasagiline improves symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD) without worsening cognitive and behavioural symptoms (Data on file). Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and H Lundbeck A/S, 2004Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Juncos JL. Management of psychotic aspects of Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60 Suppl. 8: 42–53PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicki Oldfield
    • 1
  • Gillian M. Keating
    • 1
  • Caroline M. Perry
    • 1
  1. 1.Wolters Kluwer Health ¦ AdisMairangi Bay, North Shore, AucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations