, Volume 63, Issue 9, pp 855–867 | Cite as

Optimising Postoperative Pain Management in the Ambulatory Patient

Therapy In Practice


Over 60% of surgery is now performed in an ambulatory setting. Despite improved analgesics and sophisticated drug delivery systems, surveys indicate that over 80% of patients experience moderate to severe pain postoperatively. Inadequate postoperative pain relief can prolong recovery, precipitate or increase the duration of hospital stay, increase healthcare costs, and reduce patient satisfaction.

Effective postoperative pain management involves a multimodal approach and the use of various drugs with different mechanisms of action. Local anaesthetics are widely administered in the ambulatory setting using techniques such as local injection, field block, regional nerve block or neuraxial block. Continuous wound infusion pumps may have great potential in an ambulatory setting. Regional anaesthesia (involving anaesthetising regional areas of the body, including single extremities, multiple extremities, the torso, and the face or jaw) allows surgery to be performed in a specific location, usually an extremity, without the use of general anaesthesia, and potentially with little or no sedation.

Opioids remain an important component of any analgesic regimen in treating moderate to severe acute postoperative pain. However, the incorporation of non-opioids, local anaesthetics and regional techniques will enhance current postoperative analgesic regimens. The development of new modalities of treatment, such as patient controlled analgesia, and newer drugs, such as cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, provide additional choices for the practitioner.

While there are different routes of administration for analgesics (e.g. oral, parenteral, intramuscular, transmucosal, transdermal and sublingual), oral delivery of medications has remained the mainstay for postoperative pain control. The oral route is effective, the simplest to use and typically the least expensive. The intravenous route has the advantages of a rapid onset of action and easier titratibility, and so is recommended for the treatment of acute pain.

Non-pharmacological methods for the management of postoperative pain include acupuncture, electromagnetic millimetre waves, hypnosis and the use of music during surgery. However, further research of these techniques is warranted to elucidate their effectiveness in this indication.

Pain is a multifactorial experience, not just a sensation. Emotion, perception and past experience all affect an individual's response to noxious stimuli. Improved postoperative pain control through innovation and creativity may improve compliance, ease of delivery, reduce length of hospital stay and improve patient satisfaction. Patient education, early diagnosis of symptoms and aggressive treatment of pain using an integrative approach, combining pharmacotherapy as well as complementary technique, should serve us well in dealing with this complex problem.


  1. 1.
    Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Acute pain management in adults: operative or medical procedures and trauma: clinical practice guideline. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1992Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Center for Disease Control. Vital & health statistics, ambulatory & inpatient procedures in the US. Atlanta (GA): Center for Disease Control, 1996Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tong D, Chung F. Postoperative pain control in ambulatory surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79: 401–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oates JD, Snowdown SL, Jayson DW. Failure of pain relief after surgery: attitudes of ward staff and patients to postoperative analgesia. Anesthesia 1994; 49: 755–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warfield CA, Kahn CH. Acute pain management: programs in US hospitals and experiences and attitudes among US adults. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 1090–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yentis SM, Vlassakov KV. Vassily von Anrep, forgotten pioneer of regional anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 890–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curley J, Castillo J, Hotz J. Prolonged regional nerve block: injectable biodegradable bupivicaine/polyester microspheres. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 1400–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leander P, Hoglund P, Borseth A, et al. A new liposomal liver-specific contrast agent for CT: first human phase I clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 698–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitajiri S, Tabuchi K, Hiraumi H, et al. Relief of post-tonsillectomy pain by release of lidocaine from fibrin glue. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 642–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kyrmizakis DE, Papadakis CE, Bizakis JG, et al. Sucralfate alleviating post-laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty pain. Am J Otolaryngol 2001; 22: 55–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eisenach JC, De Kock M, Klimscha W. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists for regional anesthesia: a clinical review of clonidine (1984–1995). Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 655–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dempsey GA, Barrett PJ, Kirby IJ. Hyaluronidase and peribulbar block. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 671–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dougherty PM, Staats PS. Intrathecal drug therapy for chronic pain: from basic science to clinical practice. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 891–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Devers A, Galer BS. Topical lidocaine patch relieves a variety of neuropathic pain conditions: an open-label study. Clin J Pain 2000; 16: 205–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liguori GA, Chimento GF, Borow L, et al. Possible bupivacaine toxicity after intraarticular injection for postarthroscopic analgesia of the knee: implications of the surgical procedure. Anesth Analg 2002; 94(4): 1010–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reuben SS, Sklar J, El-Mansouri M. The preemptive analgesic effect of intraarticular bupivacaine and morphine after ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92(4): 923–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joshi W, Reuben SS, Kilaru PR, et al. Postoperative analgesia for outpatient arthroscopic knee surgery with intraarticular clonidine and/or morphine. Anesth Analg 2000; 90(5): 1102–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Felson DT, Anderson JJ. Hyaluronate sodium injections for osteoarthritis: hope, hype, and hard truths. Arch Int Med 2002: 162(3): 245–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cook TM, Tuckey JP, Nolan JP. Analgesia after day-case knee arthroscopy: double-blind study of intra-articular tenoxicam, intra-articular bupivacaine, and placebo. Br J Anaesth 1997: 78: 163–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Joshi GP, McCarroll SM, Brady OH, et al. Intra-articular morphine for pain relief after anterior cruciate ligament repair. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 87–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Joshi GP, McCarroll SM, O'Brien TM, et al. Intra-articular analgesia following knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 333–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reuben SS, Steinberg RB, Cohen MA, et al. Intra-articular morphine in the multimodal analgesic management of postoperative pain after ambulatory anterior cruciate ligament repair. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 374–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peng PW, Chan VW. Local and regional block in postoperative pain control. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79: 345–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fredman B, Zohar E, Tarabykin A. Bupivacaine wound instillation via an electronic patient-controlled analgesia device and a double-catheter system does not decrease postoperative pain or opioid requirements after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 189–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klein SM, Greengrass RA, Gleason DH, et al. Major ambulatory surgery with continuous regional anesthesia and a disposable infusion pump. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 563–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheong WK, Seow-Choen F, Eu KW. Randomized clinical trial of local bupivacaine perfusion versus parenteral morphine infusion for pain relief after lapraotomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 357–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cousins MJ. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): JB Lippincott Company, 1988Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R. Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 496–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weltz CR, Greengrass RA, Lyerly HK. Ambulatory surgical management of breast carcinoma using paravertebral block. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 19–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McNamee DA, Convery PN, Milligan KR. Total knee replacement: a comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combined femoral and sciatic block. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 477–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bolotin G, Lazarovici H, Uretzky G. The efficacy of intraoperative internal intercostal nerve block during video-assisted thoracic surgery on postoperative pain. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1872–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borgeat A, Schappi B, Biasca N. Patient-controlled analgesia after major shoulder surgery: patient-controlled interscalene analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1343–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Corda DM, Enneking FK. A unique approach to postoperative analgesia for ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 595–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Claxton AR, McGuire G, Chung F. Evaluation of morphine versus fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after ambulatory surgical procedures. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 509–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, March RJ, et al. Effects of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on coagulation and outcome after major vascular surgery. Anesth Analg 1991; 73: 696–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beattie WS, Buckley DN, Forrest JB. Epidural morphine reduces the risk of post-operative myocardial ischaemia in patients with cardiac risk factors. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 532–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Watcha MF, White PF. Economics of anesthetic practice. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1170–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chumbley GM, Hall GM. Recovery after major surgery: does the anaesthetic make any difference [editorial]? Br J Anaesth 1997; 76: 347–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hardy JF, Belisle S, Tremblay N. Cardiac anesthesia: a perspective for the 1990's. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 1115–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia: their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1474–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gupta SK, Bernstein KJ, Noorduin H, et al. Fentanyl delivery from an electrotransport system: delivery is a function of total current, not duration of current. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38(10): 951–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kotani N, Hashimoto H, Sato Y, et al. Preoperative intradermal acupuncture reduces postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, analgesic requirement, and sympathoadrenal responses. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 349–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang B, Tang J, White PF, et al. Effect of the intensity of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation on the postoperative analgesic requirement. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 406–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen L, Tang J, White PF. The effect of location of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative opioid analgesic requirement: acupoint versus nonacupoint stimulation. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 1129–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ueda W, Katatoka Y, Sagara Y. Effect of gentle massage on regression of sensory anesthesia during epidural block. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 783–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Parks TJ, Kinsella SM. The effect of abdominal massage on the onset of epidural blockade in laboring women [letter]. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 887Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Koch ME, Kain ZN, Ayoub C, et al. The sedative and analgesic sparing effects of music. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 300–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Radzievsky AA, Rojavin MA, Cowan A, et al. Suppression of pain sensation caused by millimeter waves: a double-blinded, cross-over, prospective human volunteer study. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 836–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Montgomery GH, David D, Winkel G, et al. The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1639–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Physicians' Desk Reference. Vol.53. Montvale (NJ): Medical Economics Company, 1999: 1685Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    DiGregorio JG, Barbieri EJ, Sterling GH. Handbook of pain management. 3rd ed. Westchester (PA): Medical Surveillance Inc, 1991Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Etches RC, Warriner BC, Badner N, et al. Continuous intravenous administration of ketorolac reduces pain and morphine consumption after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 1175–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Alexander R, El-Moalem H, Gan TJ. Comparison of the morphine-sparing effects of diclofenac sodium and ketorolac tromethamine after major orthopedic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 187–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Green CR, Pandit SK, Levy L, et al. Intraoperative ketorolac has an opioid-sparing effect in women after diagnostic laparoscopy but not after laparoscopic tubal ligation. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 732–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Splinter WM, Rhine EJ, Roberts DW, et al. Preoperative ketorolac increases bleeding after tonsillectomy in children. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 560–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Myles PS, Power I. Does ketorolac cause postoperative renal failure: how do we assess the evidence? Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 420–1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cheer SM, Goa KL. Parecoxib (parecoxib sodium). Drugs 2001; 61: 1133–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Noveck RJ, Laurent A, Kuss M, et al. Parecoxib sodium does not impair platelet function in healthy elderly and non-elderly individuals two randomized, controlled trials. Clin Drug Invest 2001; 21: 465–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Barton SF, Langeland FF, Snabes MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib sodium in relieving acute postoperative pain following gynecologic laparotomy surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 306–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Camu F, Beecher T, Recker DP, et al. Valdecoxib, a COX-2-specific inhibitor, is an efficacious, opioid-sparing analgesic in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Am J Ther 2002; 9: 43–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Daniels SE, Desjardins PJ, Talwalker S, et al. The analgesic efficacy of valdecoxib vs oxycodone/acetaminophen after oral surgery. J Am Dental Assoc 2002; 133: 611–21Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schmid RL, Sandier AN, Katz J. Use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain: a review of current techniques and outcomes. Pain 1999; 82: 111–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Weinbroum AA, Weisenberg M, Rudick V, et al. Flumazenil potentiation of postoperative morphine analgesia. Clin J Pain 2000; 16: 193–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Groudine SB, Fisher HAG, Kaufman RPJ, et al. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retroublic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 235–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gan TJ, Ginsberg B, Glass PS, et al. Opioid-sparing effects of a low-dose infusion of naloxone in patient-administered morphine sulfate. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1075–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Joshi GP, Duffy L, Chehade J, et al. Effects of prophylactic nalmefene on the incidence of morphine-related side effects in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1007–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chapman CR. Psychological aspects of postoperative pain control. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1992; 43: 41–52PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.The Pratt School of Engineering, The Fitzpatrick Center for Photonics and Communication SystemsDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations