, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 167–180 | Cite as

Newer Drugs for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

  • Dudy G. Kuiper-Geertsma
  • Ronald H. W. M. DerksenEmail author
Review Article


This article first reviews the current treatment of lupus nephritis, with a focus on the most serious forms, that is, the proliferative subtypes. Current standards for treatment have been developed empirically. Corticosteroids form the basis of all regimens. Cyclophosphamide given intravenously for prolonged periods is the current gold standard. Azathioprine can be regarded as an effective drug for maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis. Studies on its efficacy in schedules for remission induction are in progress. It has been learned from studies on ‘conventional’ immunosuppression that randomised, clinical trials should comprise large numbers of patients and a follow-up of many years to elucidate differences between effective strategies. These requirements are not met by any of the ‘new’ treatments we discuss in this review.

There is only limited experience in patients with lupus nephritis with drugs that are currently used for immunosuppression in other autoimmune diseases, such as methotrexate, cyclosporin and high-dose intravenous gammaglobulins, nor with new immunosuppressive drugs that have been developed for immunosuppression in organ transplantation (mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, fludarabine and cladribine). Hormonal therapy with the weak androgen prasterone (dehydro-epiandrosterone; DHEA) has no role in treatment of active lupus nephritis.

There are interesting experiences with agents that have evolved from progress in immunobiology and in our understanding of immunological processes. These modalities enable more specific immunosuppression and include monoclonal antibodies directed at immune cells, cytokines and components of the complement system, constructs developed to induce tolerance in pathogenic B cells, and gene therapy. Finally, we review data on autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. We conclude that some strategies (like mycophenolate mofetil) are good candidates for further investigation in large-scale, prospective, randomised trials with prolonged follow-up (which are almost by definition hard to perform). Most new biological agents still are in a pre-clinical phase.


Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Tacrolimus Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patient Lupus Nephritis DHEA 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review and no sources of funding were used in the preparation of this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Ruiz-Irastorza G, Khamashta MA, Castellino G, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 2001; 357: 1027–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mills JA. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1871–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boumpas DT, Austin HA, Fessler BJ, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus: emerging concepts. Pt 1. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 940–50Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wofsy D, Daikh DI. Opportunities for future biologic therapy in SLE. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1998; 12: 529–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boumpas DT, Fessler BJ, Austin A, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus: emerging concepts. Pt 2. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 42–53Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamradt T, Mitchison NA. Tolerance and autoimmunity. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 655–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davidson A, Diamond B. Autoimmune diseases. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 340–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berden JHM. Systemic lupus erythematosus: disturbed apoptosis? [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997; 141: 1848–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klippel JH, Kimberly RP. Connective tissue disorders. In: Llippel JH, Dieppe P, eds. Rheumatology. London: Mosby, 1998: ch. 7.1.5-7.1.7Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whiting-O’Keefe Q, Henke JE, Shearn MA, et al. The information content from renal biopsy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96: 718–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Austin HA, Boumpas DT, Vaughan EM, et al. Predicting renal outcomes in severe lupus nephritis: contributions of clinical and histological data. Kidney Int 1994; 45: 544–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pollak VE, Pirani CL, Kark RM. The effect of large doses of prednisone on the renal lesions and life span of patients with lupus glomerulonephritis. J Lab Clin Med 1961; 57: 495–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balow JE, Austin HA, Tsokos GC, et al. NIH conferences: lupus nephritis. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106(1): 79–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felson DT, Anderson J. Evidence for the superiority of immunosuppressive drugs and prednisone over prednisone alone in lupus nephritis: results of a pooled analysis. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1528–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Austin HA, Klippel JH, Balow JE, et al. Therapy of lupus nephritis: controlled trial of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs. N EnglJ Med 1986; 314: 614–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balow JE, Austin HA, Muenz LR, et al. Effect of treatment on the evolution of renal abnormalities in lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 491–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boumpas DT, Austin HA, Vaughan EM, et al. Severe lupus nephritis: controled trial of pulse methylprednisolone versus two different regimens of pulse cyclophosphamide. Lancet 1992; 340: 741–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D’Cruz D, Cuadrado MJ, Mujic F, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1997; 15: 275–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin-Suarez I, D’Cruz D, Mansoor M, et al. Immunosupressive therapy in severe connective tissue diseases; effects of low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Ann Rheum Dis 1997; 56: 481–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D’Cruz D, et al. Efficacy and safety of a short-course intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide regimen in proliferative lupus nephritis: interim analysis of the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial [abstract]. Lupus 2001; 10 Suppl. 1:S94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mok CC, Wong RW, Lau CS. Ovarian failure and flares of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42(6): 1274–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boumpas DT, Austin III HA, Vaughan EM, et al. Risk for sustained amenorrhea in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving intermittent pulse cyclophosphamide therapy. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119(5): 366–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ciruelo E, Cruz J de la, Lopez I, et al. Cumulative rate of relapse of lupus nephritis after successful treatment with cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39: 2028–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mok CC, Ho CTK, Siu YP, et al. Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis: a comparison of two cyclophosphamide containing regimens. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: 256–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nossent HC, Koldingsnes W. Long-term efficacy of azathioprine treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 969–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ligtenberg G, Derksen RH, Berden JH. Treatment of nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1996; 140(39): 1941–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van der Veen MJ, Dinant HJ, Van Booma-Frankfort C, et al. Can methotrexate be used as a steroid sparing agent in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis? Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55: 218–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mastaglia FL, Phillips BA, Zilko P. Treatment of inflammatory myopathies. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20: 651–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Villalba L, Adams EM. Update on therapy for refractory dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1996; 8: 544–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sato EI. Methotrexate therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2001; 10: 162–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Galarza D, Esquivel J, Villareal M, et al. Methotrexate in lupus nephritis: an uncontrolled study, preliminary results [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 34: S107Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Griffiths B, Emery P. The treatment of lupus with cyclosporin A. Lupus 2001; 10: 165–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dostal C, Tesar V, Rychlik I, et al. Effect of cyclosporin A treatment on the activity and renal involvement of systemic lupus erythematosus: a pilot study. Lupus 1998; 7: 29–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miescher PA, Favre H, Mihatsch MJ, et al. The place of cyclosporin A in the treatment of connective tissue diseases. Transplant Proc 1988; 20 Suppl. 4: 224–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dalakas MC, Illa I, Dambrosin JM, et al. A controlled trial of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin infusions as treatment for dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1993–2000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV. Immunomodulation of autoimmune disease with normal polyspecific immunoglobulin G (Intravenous immunoglobulin). In: Shoenfeld Y, editor. The decade of autoimmunity. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 1999: 409–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rauova L, Lukac J, Levy Y, et al. High dose intravenous immunoglobulins for lupus nephritis: a salvage immunomodulation. Lupus 2001; 10: 209–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Boletis JN, Ioannidis JP, Boki KA, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin compared with cyclophosphamide for proliferative lupus nephritis. Lancet 1999; 354: 569–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Adu D, Cross J, Jayne DRRW. Treatment of SLE with mycophenolate mofetil. Lupus 2001; 10(3): 203–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. Lancet 1995; 345: 1321–5Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. A blinded randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 1996; 61: 1029–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sollinger HW. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. US Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Transplantation 1995; 60: 225–32Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Corna D, Morigi M, Facchinetti D, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil limits renal damage and prolongs life in murine lupus autoimmune disease. Kidney Int 1997; 51: 1583–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jonsson CA, Svensson L, Carlsten H. Beneficial effect of the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor mycophenolate mofetil on survival and severity of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) —prone MRLlpr/lpr mice. Clin Exp Immunol 1999; 116: 534–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dooley M, Cosio F, Nachman P, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy in lupus nephritis: clinical observations. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 833–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chan TM, Li FK, Tang CSO. Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1156–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Buratti S, Szer IS, Spencer CH, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil treatment of severe renal disease in pediatric onset systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 2103–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Duddridge M, Powell RJ. Treatment of severe and difficult cases of SLE with tacrolimus: a report of three cases. Ann Rheum Dis 1997; 56: 690–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Benito AI, Furlong T, Martin PJ, et al. Sirolimus (rapamycin) for the treatment of steroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation 2001; 72: 1924–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Klippel JH. Indications for and use of cytotoxic agents in systemic lupus erythematosus. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1998; 12: 511–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Boumpas DT, Tassiulas IO, Fleisher TA, et al. A pilot study of low-dose fludarabine in membranous nephropathy rafractory to therapy. Clin Nephrol 1999; 52: 67–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kuo GM, Boumpas DT, Illei GG, et al. Fludarabine pharmacokinetics after subcutaneous and intravenous administration in patients with lupus nephritis. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21: 528–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Davis JC, Austin HA, Boumpas DT, et al. A pilot study of 2-chloro-2’deoxyadenosine in the treatment of glomerulonephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 335–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lucas JA, Ahmed SA, Casey ML, et al. Prevention of autiantibody formation and prolonged survival in New Zealand black/New Zealand white F1 mice fed dehydroisoandrosterone. J Clin Invest 1985; 75: 2091–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Derksen RHWM. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1998; 27: 335–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    van Vollenhoven RF, Engleman EG, McGuire JL. An open study of DHEA in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 9: 1305–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    van Vollenhoven RF, Engleman EG, McGuire JL. DHEA in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1826–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    van Vollenhoven RF, Park JL, Genovese MC, et al. A doubleblind, placebo-controlled, clnical trial of DHEA in severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 1999; 8: 181–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Strand V. Monoclonal antibodies and other biologic therapies. Lupus 2001; 10: 216–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Llorente L, Richaud-Patin Y, Garcia-Padilla C, et al. Clinical and biologic effects of anti-interleukin-10 monoclonal antibody administration in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 1790–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jacob CO, McDevitt HO. Tumor necrosis factor-α in murine autoimmune ‘lupus’ nephritis. Nature 1988; 331: 356–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gordon C, Ranges GE, Greenspan JS, et al. Chronic therapy with recombinant tumor necrosis factor-α in autoimmune NZB/NZW F1 mice. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1989; 52: 421–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jacob CO, McDevitt HO. Interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor in autoimmune disease models: implications for immunoregulation and genetic susceptibility. In: Talal N, editor. Molecular autoimmunity. San Diego: Academic Press. 1991: 107–26Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Meijer C, Huysen V, Smeenk RTJ, et al. Profiles of cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) and acute phase proteins (CRP and α-1AG) related to the disease course in patients with SLE. Lupus 1993; 2: 359–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Studnicka-Benke A, Steiner G, Petera P, et al. Tumour necrosis factor alpha and its soluble receptors parallel clinical disease and autoimmune activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 35: 1067–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Charles PJ, Smeenk RJ, De Jong J, et al. Assessment of antibodies to double-stranded DNA induced in rheumatoid arthritis patients following treatment with infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha: findings in open-label and randomized placebo-controlled trials. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 2383–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Isaacs JD. From bench to bedside: discovering rules for antibody design and improving serotherapy with monoclonal antibodies. Rheumatology 2001; 40: 724–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hiepe D, Volk HD, Apostoloff E, et al. Treatment of severe systemic lupus erythematosus with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Lancet 1991; 338: 1529–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Davis JC, Totoritis MC, Sklenar TA, et al. Results of a phase 1 single dose escalating trial of a humanized antiCD40L monoclonal antibody (IDEC 131) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: s281Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kalunian K, Davis J, Merrill JT, et al. Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus by inhibition of T cell costimulation [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: S271Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Davidson A, Budha L, Reddy B, et al. The effect of antiCD40L on B cells in human systemic lupus erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: S271Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Daikh DI, Wofsy D. Reversal of advanced murine lupus nephritis with combined CTLA4Ig and cyclophosphamide [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: S140Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Chan OC, Kaufman E, Daikh DI. CTLA4Ig substantially prolongs benefits of cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: S94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Abrams JR, Lebwohl MG, Guzzo CA, et al. CTLA4Ig mediated blockade of T cell costimulation in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. J Clin Invest 1999; 103: 1243–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Nakajima A, Hirai H, Kayagaki N, et al. Treatment of lupus in NZB/W F1 mice with monoclonal antibody against Fas ligand. J Autoimmun 2000; 14: 151–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wang Y, Hu Q, Madre JA, et al. Amelioration of lupus-like autoimmune disease in NZB/W F1 mice after treatment with a blocking monoclonal antibody specific for complement component C 5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 8563–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Malis L. Innovative therapies in autoimmune diseases [presentation]. Sponsored by the American College of Rheumatology; 1997 Apr 4; Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Jones DS, Barstad PA, Field MJ, et al. Immunospecific reduction of antioligonucleotide antibody-forming cells with a tetrakis-oligonucleotide conjugate (LJP 394), a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of lupus nephritis. J Med Chem 1995; 38: 2138–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Coutts SM, Plunkett ML, Iverson GM, et al. Pharmacologic intervention in antibody mediated disease. Lupus 1996; 5: 158–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Furie RA, Cash JM, Cronin ME. Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with LJP 394. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 257–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Alarcon-Segovia D, Tumlin J, Furie RA, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus trial shows fewer renal flares in LJP 394 treated patients with high affinity antibodies to LJP 394: 90-05 trial results [abstract]. Arthitis Rheum 2000; 43: S272Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Wallace DJ. Clinical and pharmacological experience with LJP-394. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2001; 10: 111–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Raz E, Dudler J, Lotz M, et al. Modulation of disease activity in murine systemic lupus erythematosus by cytokine gene delivery. Lupus 1995; 4: 286–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Evans C, Whalen JD, Ghirizzani SC, et al. Gene therapy in autoimmune diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 125–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Chuzhin Y, Reddy B, Budhai L, et al. Prolonged survival in murine systemic lupus erythematosus by adenoviral mediated CTLA4-Ig gene transfer [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: S140Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tyndall A. Immunoablation and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe autoimmune diseases with special reference to systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2001; 10: 214–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tyndall A, Passweg J, Gratwohl A. Haemopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of severe autoimmune diseases 2000. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 702–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dudy G. Kuiper-Geertsma
    • 1
  • Ronald H. W. M. Derksen
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Rheumatology, Isalaklinieken, Zwolle, and IjsselmeerziekenhuizenEmmeloordThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology (F02.127)University Hospital UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations