Advertisement

Drugs

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 71–100 | Cite as

Micronised Purified Flavonoid Fraction

A Review of its Use in Chronic Venous Insufficiency, Venous Ulcers and Haemorrhoids
  • Katherine A. Lyseng-WilliamsonEmail author
  • Caroline M. Perry
Adis Drug Evaluation

Summary

Abstract

Micronised purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) [Daflon® 500mg1], an oral phlebotropic drug consisting of 90% micronised diosmin and 10% flavonoids expressed as hesperidin, improves venous tone and lymphatic drainage, and reduces capillary hyperpermeability by protecting the microcirculation from inflammatory processes. The absorption of diosmin is improved by its micronisation to particles with a diameter <2μm.

Compared with placebo, MPFF 500mg twice daily significantly decreased ankle or calf circumference, and improved many symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and plethysmographic parameters in two randomised, double-blind, 2-month studies. Improvement in symptoms was parallelled by an improvement in health-related quality of life in a nonblind, 6-month trial.

Significantly more venous leg ulcers ≤10cm in diameter completely healed with MPFF 500mg twice daily plus standard management (compression and local treatment) for 2–6 months than with standard management alone or with placebo in a nonblind and a double-blind trial. The addition of MPFF to standard management was cost effective in a retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis of the 6-month trial.

Compared with placebo, the duration and/or intensity of individual symptoms of grade 1 or 2 acute internal haemorrhoids improved significantly with 3 tablets of MPFF 500mg twice daily for 4 days then 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg twice daily for 3 days. Two tablets of MPFF 500mg daily for 60 or 83 days reduced the frequency, duration and/or severity of acute haemorrhoidal symptoms and improved the overall signs and symptoms of chronic (recurrent) haemorrhoids compared with placebo. Compared with a control group, MPFF significantly reduced the risk of secondary bleeding after elective haemorrhoidectomy.

In clinical trials, MPFF had a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo; the most frequently reported adverse events were gastrointestinal and autonomic in nature.

In conclusion, MPFF is a well established and well tolerated treatment option in patients with CVI, venous ulcers, or acute or chronic internal haemorrhoids. MPFF is indicated as a first-line treatment of oedema and the symptoms of CVI in patients in any stage of the disease. In more advanced disease stages, MPFF may be used in conjunction with sclerotherapy, surgery and/or compression therapy, or as an alternative treatment when surgery is not indicated or is unfeasible. The healing of venous ulcers ≤10 cm in diameter is accelerated by the addition of MPFF to standard venous ulcer management. MPFF may reduce the frequency, duration and/or intensity of symptoms of grade 1 or 2 acute internal haemorrhoids, and also the severity of the signs and symptoms of chronic haemorrhoids.

Pharmacodynamic Properties

MPFF, an oral phlebotropic and vascular protective agent consisting of 90% micronised diosmin and 10% flavonoids expressed as hesperidin, increases venous tone, improves lymphatic drainage and reduces capillary hyperpermeability. By reducing the expression of some endothelial adhesion molecules, MPFF inhibits the activation, migration and adhesion of leukocytes, which leads to a reduction in the release of inflammatory mediators and thereby a reduction in capillary hyperpermeability.

Two tablets of MPFF 500mg daily reduced venous distensibility and capacitance, and improved venous tone in patients with various types of venous insufficiency.

Several indices of inflammation in the microcirculation are reduced by MPFF. Plasma levels of some markers of endothelial activation (intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule) and surface expression of some leukocyte adhesion molecules (monocyte or neutrophil CD62L) were significantly reduced from baseline with 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily for 60 days in patients with CVI. Capillary hyperpermeability decreased with 2 or 3 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily resulting in a decrease in oedema in patients in two trials.

Daily administration of 1–4 tablets of MPFF 500mg for 1–3 months had beneficial effects on venous oximetry measurements (e.g. increases from baseline in oxygen pressure, oxygen saturation or pH, and decreases from baseline in carbon dioxide pressure) in patients with mild to moderate CVI in two studies. In patients with CVI, 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily for 4 weeks increased red blood cell velocity in capillaries; however, relative capillary packed cell volume also increased.

In patients with severe CVI, 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily for 28 days decreased intralymphatic pressure and the diameter of lymphatic capillaries and increased the number of functional lymphatic capillaries compared with baseline.

Pharmacokinetic Properties

Most information on the pharmacokinetics of oral MPFF relates to the diosmin portion of the drug. Diosmin is rapidly transformed in the intestine by intestinal flora and absorbed as its aglycone, diosmetin; the unchanged form of diosmin does not appear to be absorbed. Approximately half of an oral 500mg dose of radiolabelled MPFF was absorbed within 48 hours of administration in healthy volunteers. Micronisation of diosmin increased oral absorption compared with nonmicronised diosmin (57.9 vs 32.7% of a radiolabelled dose was absorbed 0–168 hours postdose). Diosmetin has a rapid distribution period followed by a slower elimination period. Animal studies have demonstrated that radiolabelled diosmetin and/or its metabolites are widely distributed throughout the body.

Diosmetin is rapidly and extensively degraded to phenolic acids or their glycine conjugate derivatives, which are eliminated in the urine; unmetabolised diosmin and diosmetin are not excreted in the urine. The predominant metabolite, 3-hydroxy-phenylpropionic acid, is mainly eliminated in its conjugated form. Unidentified metabolites may be responsible for the pharmacological activity of diosmin.

Approximately half of a radiolabelled dose of diosmin was eliminated in the faeces as unchanged diosmin and diosmetin. Elimination of micronised diosmin is relatively rapid (≈34% of the dose excreted in the urine and faeces over the first 24 hours and ≈86% over the first 48 hours). There are no known drug interactions with MPFF.

Therapeutic Efficacy

In Patients with Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Compared with placebo, MPFF 500mg twice daily for 2 months significantly decreased ankle and calf circumferences from baseline in two double-blind trials in 36 and 150 patients; improvements were also seen in the symptoms of CVI (e.g. functional discomfort, nocturnal cramps and sensations of leg heaviness, swelling or heat) and plethysmographic parameters (e.g. venous capacitance, distensibility and emptying time).

The efficacy of 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily was maintained in the long-term nonblind treatment (6–12 months) of patients with symptoms of CVI. Patients with or without venous reflux in the large (n = 4527) 6-month Reflux Assessment and Quality of Life Improvement with Micronised Flavonoids study showed a significant improvement in CEAP (Clinical signs, Etiology, Anatomical distribution, and Pathophysiological dysfunction) classification. Moreover, both groups of patients also showed a significant improvement in their health-related quality of life, as measured by the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire global index scores.

In double-blind, 2-month trials in patients with CVI, 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily was more effective than the same nominal dosage of nonmicronised diosmin in improving most of the subjective symptoms and objective parameters of CVI; MPFF 500mg improved the signs and symptoms of CVI regardless of the daily administration schedule (2 tablets in either the morning or the evening, or 1 tablet twice daily).

Effects on Venous Ulcer Healing: MPFF 500mg twice daily plus standard management (compression and local therapy) for 2–6 months was more effective than standard management alone or with placebo in the complete healing of venous leg ulcers ≤10cm in diameter in a nonblind and a double-blind trial. Venous leg ulcers with a diameter ≤10cm were completely healed in 32 or 46.5% of patients receiving 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily for 2 or 6 months compared with 13% of patients receiving placebo for 2 months or 27.5% of patients in the control group in the 6-month trial. Ulcers >10cm in diameter did not completely heal in either the active-treatment or placebo group during the 2-month trial. Compared with the control group in the longer trial, MPFF reduced mean ulcer area (80 vs 65%) and discomfort related to ulcer (64.8 vs 38.3% of patients); this trial did not include ulcers >10cm in diameter.

In a retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis of the 6-month trial, 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily was cost-effective in the treatment of venous ulcers compared with the control group receiving standard venous ulcer treatment. Based on the cost per healed ulcer over 6 months, the cost-effectiveness ratio in the MPFF group was 1026 euros (EUR) compared with EUR1872 in the control group (year of costing 1998).

In Patients with Haemorrhoids: In two randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled trials, MPFF 500mg (3 tablets twice daily for 4 days then 2 tablets twice daily for 3 days) significantly reduced the duration and/or intensity of symptoms of acute internal haemorrhoids (e.g. bleeding, pain, and anal discharge) compared with placebo. After the first few days of treatment, systemic and topical anaesthetics were used less by patients receiving MPFF than patients receiving placebo.

In two double-blind trials, treatment with MPFF 500mg twice daily for 60 or 83 days reduced the frequency, duration and/or severity of acute haemorrhoidal symptoms in patients with chronic symptoms of haemorrhoids compared with placebo. Relapses of bleeding were prevented in 18 or 36% more patients receiving MPFF than those receiving placebo; MPFF also effectively treated the symptoms and signs of chronic haemorrhoids.

In a randomised, nonblind trial, MPFF 500mg (3 tablets twice daily for 5 days, then 2 tablets twice daily for 3 weeks) plus fibre (ispaghula husk) resolved bleeding from nonprolapsed internal haemorrhoids as effectively as with rubber band ligation plus fibre and more rapidly than with fibre alone.

In a noncomparative trial in pregnant women, MPFF 500mg (6 tablets daily for 4 days, then 4 tablets for 3 days) reduced median symptom scores for bleeding, pain, rectal discomfort and rectal exudation from baseline. Maintenance treatment with MPFF 500mg twice daily in the antenatal and 30-day postnatal periods reduced the duration of relapses of symptoms of acute haemorrhoids compared with the patient’s history.

The proportion of patients with secondary postoperative bleeding after open pedicular haemorrhoidectomy was less in patients receiving MPFF 500mg (2 tablets three times daily for 3 days then 1 tablet three times daily for 4 days) than in the control group (0.9 vs 6.1%).

Tolerability

In clinical trials, MPFF was well tolerated with most reported events being mild and transitory. The adverse events most commonly associated with MPFF are gastrointestinal (e.g. abdominal pain, gastric discomfort, nausea, dyspepsia, vomiting and diarrhoea) or autonomic (e.g. insomnia, drowsiness, vertigo, headache and tiredness) in nature. Combined data from clinical trials in patients with CVI or haemorrhoids indicated that the incidence of adverse events was similar in 2850 patients receiving 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily and 225 patients receiving placebo (10 vs 13.9% of patients). Gastrointestinal and autonomic events were reported by 6.9 and 1.7% of patients receiving MPFF. Adverse events were the reason for discontinuation in the trials of 1.1 % of MPFF recipients compared with 3.2% of placebo recipients.

The incidence or nature of adverse events was not changed by long-term treatment (1 year) with 2 tablets of MPFF 500mg daily, dosages of MPFF 500mg of up to 6 tablets daily for 7 days, age ≥70 years or the presence of concomitant diseases (i.e. hypertension, atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, neurological/psychiatric disease or alcoholism). Two tablets of MPFF 500mg daily for 1 year did not modify blood pressure or laboratory parameters.

Dosage and Administration

MPFF is available as 500mg tablets and is administered orally. Prescribing information for MPFF may differ between the more than 100 countries (including 9 countries in the EU and 20 other European countries) that have approved its use. In general, MPFF is indicated for the treatment of organic or idiopathic CVI of the lower limbs with symptoms of heavy legs, pain or nocturnal cramps, acute haemorrhoidal attacks or chronic haemorrhoids. In CVI, the recommended dosage is 2 tablets daily (as a single dose in the morning or evening or 1 tablet twice daily); in acute haemorrhoidal attacks, 2 tablets three times daily for 4 days followed by 2 tablets twice daily for 3 days; and in chronic haemorrhoids, 2 tablets daily. MPFF does not interact with any drugs. Caution is recommended when administering MPFF to patients who are breast feeding.

Keywords

Varicose Vein Venous Ulcer Calf Circumference Rubber Band Ligation Chronic Venous Insufficiency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Nicolaides AN. Investigation of chronic venous insufficiency; a consensus statement. Circulation 2000 Nov 14; 102: el26–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Italian College of Phlebology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Int Angiol 2001 Jun; 20 (2 Suppl. 2): 1–37Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Struckmann JR, Nicolaides AN. Flavonoids: a review of the pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy of Daflon 500 mg in patients with chronic venous insufficiency and related disorders. Angiology 1994 Jun; 45(6): 419–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Task Force. The management of chronic venous disorders of the leg: an evidence-based report. Phlebology 1999; 14 Suppl. 1: 1–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nicolaides AN, Geroulakos G. Objective evaluation of the pharmacoclinical properties of Daflon 500 mg. Drugs Today 1995; 31 Suppl. E: 37–40Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takase S, Schmid-Schönbein GW, Bergan JJ. Leukocyte activation in patients with venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 1999 Jul; 30(1): 148–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ono T, Bergan JJ, Schmid-Schönbein GW, et al. Monocyte infiltration into venous valves. J Vasc Surg 1998 Jan; 27(1): 158–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takase S, Bergan JJ, Schmid-Schönbein G. Expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines on saphenous veins in chronic venous insufficiency. Ann Vasc Surg 2000 Sep; 14(5): 427–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fowkes FGR, Evans CJ, Lee AJ. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic venous insufficiency. Angiology 2001; 52 Suppl. 1: S5–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evans CJ, Fowkes FGR, Ruckley CV, et al. Prevalance of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in mean and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53(3): 149–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nicolaides AN, Hussien MK, Szendro G, et al. The relation of venous ulceration with ambulatory venous pressure measurements. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17: 414–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, et al. Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44(3): 401–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wille-Jørgensen P, Jørgensen T, Andersen M, et al. Postphlebitic syndrome and general surgery: an epidemiologic investigation. Angiology 1991; 42(5): 397–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Porter J.M., Moneta GL. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International Consensus Committee on Chronic Venous Disease. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21(4): 635–45Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van den Oever R, Hepp B, Debbaut B, et al. Socio-economic impact of chronic venous insufficiency: an underestimated public health problem. Int Angiol 1998; 17(3): 161–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruckley CV. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcers. Angiology 1997 Jan; 48(1): 67–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Castro Silva M. Chronic venous insufficiency of the lower limbs and its socio-economic significance. Int Angiol 1991; 10(3): 152–7Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brand FN, Dannenberg AL, Abbott RD, et al. The epidemiology of varicose veins: the Framingham Study. Am J Prev Med 1988; 4(2): 96–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nelzén O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A, et al. Chronic leg ulcers: an underestimated problem in primary health care among elderly patients. J Epidemiol Community Health 1991;45: 184–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomson WHF. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 542–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, et al. Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 946–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pfenninger JL, Surreil J. Nonsurgical treatment options for internal hemorrhoids. Am Fam Physician 1995 Sep 1; 52(3): 821–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Godeberge P. Daflon 500 mg in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a demonstrated efficacy in comparison with placebo. Angiology 1994 Jun; 45 (6 Pt 2): 574–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abramowitz L, Godeberge P, Staumont G, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease [in French]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001; 25(6–7): 674–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hulme-Moir M, Bartolo DC. Hemorrhoids. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001 Mar; 30(1): 183–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation: an epidemiologic study. Gastroentrology 1990 Feb; 98: 380–6Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Les Laboratoires Servier. Daflon: product description [online]. Available from URL: http://www.servier.com/pro/phlebologie/daflon.asp [Accessed 2002 Sep 12]
  28. 28.
    Garner RC, Garner JV, Gregory S, et al. Comparison of the absorption of micronized (Daflon 500 mg) and non-micronized 14C-diosmin tablets after oral administration to healthy volunteers by accelerator mass spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting. J Pharm Sci 2002 Jan; 91(1): 32–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramelet AA. Clinical benefits of Daflon 500 mg in the most severe stages of chronic venous insufficiency. Angiology 2001 Aug; 52 Suppl. 1: S49–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ramelet AA. Pharmacologic aspects of a phlebotropic drug in CVI-associated edema. Angiology 2000 Jan; 51(1): 19–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coleridge Smith PD. Neutrophil activation and mediators of inflammation in chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Res 1999; 36 Suppl. 1: 24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Takase S, Lerond L, Bergan JJ, et al. The inflammatory reaction during venous hypertension in the rat. Microcirculation 2000; 7: 41–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Coleridge Smith PD. Update on chronic-venous-insufficiency-induced inflammatory processes. Angiology 2001; 52 (8 Suppl. 1): S35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Haas PA, Fox Jr TA, Haas GP. The pathogenesis of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27(7): 442–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Behar A, Lagrue G, Cohen-Boulakia F, et al. Study of capillary filtration by double labelling I131-albumin and Tc99mred cells. Application to the pharmacodynamic activity of Daflon 500 mg. Int Angiol 1988; 7 (2 Suppl.): 35–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shoab SS, Porter J, Scurr JH, et al. Endothelial activation response to oral micronised flavonoid therapy in patients with chronic venous disease-a prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999 Apr; 17(4): 313–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shoab SS, Scurr JH, Coleridge-Smith PD. Plasma VEGF as a marker of therapy in patients with chronic venous disease treated with oral micronised flavonoid fraction: a pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999 Oct; 18(4): 334–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shoab SS, Porter JB, Scurr JH, et al. Effect of oral micronized purified flavonoid fraction treatment on leukocyte adhesion molecule expression in patients with chronic venous disease-a pilot study. J Vasc Surg 2000 Mar; 31(3): 456–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Korthuis RJ, Gute DC. Adhesion molecule expression in postischemic microvascular dysfunction: activity of a micronized purified flavonoid fraction. J Vasc Res 1999; 36 Suppl. 1: 15–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Friesenecker B, Tsai AG, Allegra C, et al. Oral administration of purified micronized flavonoid fraction suppresses leukocyte adhesion in ischemia-reperfusion injury: in vivo observations in the hamster skin fold. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 1994; 14(1–2): 50–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bouskela E, Donyo KA. Effects of oral administration of purified micronized flavonoid fraction on increased microvascular permeability induced by various agents and on ischemia/ reperfusion in the hamster cheek pouch. Angiology 1997 May; 48(5): 391–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pickelmann S, Nolte D, Leiderer R, et al. Effects of the phlebotropic drug Daflon 500 mg on postischemic reperfusion injury in striated skin muscle: a histomorphologic study in the hamster. J Lab Clin Med 1999 Nov; 134(5): 536–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bouskela E, Cyrino FZGA, Lerond L. Leukocyte adhesion after oxidant challenge in the hamster cheek pouch microcirculation. J Vasc Res 1999; 36 Suppl. 1: 11–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Damon M, Flandre O, Michel F, et al. Effect of chronic treatment with a purified flavonoid fraction on inflammatory granuloma in the rat: study of prostaglandin E2 and F and thromboxane B2 release and histological changes. Arzneimittelforschung 1987 Oct; 37(10): 1149–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lonchampt M, Guardiola B, Sicot N, et al. Protective effect of a purified flavonoid fraction against reactive oxygen radicals: in vivo and in vitro study. Arzneimittelforschung 1989 Aug; 39(8): 882–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jean T, Bodinier MC. Mediators involved in inflammation: effects of Daflon 500 mg on their release. Angiology 1994 Jun; 45 (6 Pt 2): 554–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stacker O, Bonhomme E, Lenaers A, et al. Daflon 500 mg depresses bradykinin-ischemia-induced microvascular leakage of FITC Dextran in rat cremaster muscle. Int Angiol 1989; 8 (4 Suppl.): 39–43Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bouskela E, Svensjö E, Cyrino FZGA, et al. Oxidant-induced increase in vascular permeability is inhibited by oral administration of S-5682 (Daflon 500 mg) and alpha-tocopherol. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 1997; 17 Suppl. 1: 18–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cesarone MR, Laurora G, De Sanctis MT, et al. Capillary filtration and ankle edema in patients with venous hypertension: effects of Daflon. Angiology 1993; 44(1): 57–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Juteau J, Bakri F, Pomies P, et al. The human saphenous vein in pharmacology: effect of a new micronized flavonoidic fraction (Daflon 500 mg) on norepinephrine induced contraction. Int Angiol 1995; 14: 8–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gargouil YM, Perdrix L, Chapelain B, et al. Effects of Daflon 500 mg on bovine vessels contractility. Int Angiol 1989; 8 (4 Suppl.): 19–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Savineau J-P, Marthan R. Diosmin-induced increase in sensitivity to Ca2+ of the smooth muscle contractile apparatus in the rat isolated femoral vein. Br J Pharmacol 1994 Apr; 111(4): 978–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Delbarre B, Delbarre G, Pillion G, et al. Effects of Daflon 500 mg on haemoconcentration and alterations of white blood cell count elicited by the upright position in anaesthetized dogs. Int Angiol 1995 Sep; 14 (3 Suppl. 1): 23–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bouskela E, Cyrino FZGA, Lerond L. Effects of oral administration of different doses of purified micronized flavonoid fraction on microvascular reactivity after ischaemia/reperfusion in the hamster cheek pouch. Br J Pharmacol 1997 Dec; 122(8): 1611–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    McGregor L, Bellangeon M, Chignier E, et al. Effect of a micronized purified flavonoid fraction on in vivo platelet functions in the rat. Thromb Res 1999; 94: 235–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    McHale NG, Hollywood MA. Control of lymphatic pumping: interest of Daflon 500 mg. Phlebology 1994; 9 Suppl. 1: 23–5Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Labrid C. Pharmacologie properties of Daflon 500 mg. Angiology 1994 Jun; 45 (6 Pt 2): 524–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Barbe R, Amiel M. Pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy of Daflon 500 mg. Phlebology 1992; 7 Suppl. 2: 41–4Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ibegbuna V, Nicolaides AN, Sowade O, et al. Venous elasticity after treatment with Daflon 500 mg. Angiology 1997 Jan; 48(1): 45–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bergan JJ, Schmid-Schönbein GW, Takase S. Therapeutic approach to chronic venous insufficiency and its complications: place of Daflon 500 mg. Angiology 2001 Aug; 52 Suppl. 1: S43–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Galley P, Thiollet M. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a new veno-active flavonoid fraction (S 5682) in the treatment of symptomatic capillary fragility. Int Angiol 1993 Mar; 12(1): 69–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Belcaro G, Cesarone MR, De Sanctis MT, et al. Laser Doppler and transcutaneous oximetry: modern investigations to assess drug efficacy in chronic venous insufficiency. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 1995; 15 Suppl. 1: 45–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ener BK. Dorsal pedal venous oximetry for assessing treatment of chronic venous insufficiency: effects of Daflon 500 mg. Vasc Surg 2000; 34(1): 43–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Allegra C, Bartolo Jr M, Carioti B, et al. An original microhaemorheological approach to the pharmacological effects fects of Daflon 500 mg in severe chronic venous insufficiency. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 1995; 15 Suppl. 1: 50–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Struckmann JR. Clinical efficacy of micronized purified flavonoid fraction: an overview. J Vasc Res 1999; 36 Suppl. 1: 37–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cova D, De Angelis L, Giavarini F, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of oral diosmin in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1992 Jan; 30(1): 29–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Messmer K. Daflon 500 mg: expert report on the preclinical documentation. Courbevoie Cedex, France: Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, 1997 OctGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Les Laboratoires Servier. Daflon 500: summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.servier.com/pro/phlebologie/daflon_spc.asp [Accessed 2002 Sep 12]
  69. 69.
    Chassignolle J-F, Amiel M, Lanfranchi G, et al. Activité thérapeutique de Daflon 500 mg dans l’insuffisance veineuse fonctionnelle [in French]. J Int Med 1987; 99 (Suppl.): 32–7Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Gilly R, Pillion G, Frileux C. Evaluation of a new venoactive micronized flavonoid fraction (S 5682) in symptomatic disturbances of the venolymphatic circulation of the lower limb: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Phlebology 1994; 9(2): 67–70Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cospite M, Dominici A. Double blind study of the pharmacodynamic and clinical activities of 5682 SE in venous insufficiency. Advantages of the new micronized form. Int Angiol 1989; 8 (4 Suppl.): 61–5Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Tsouderos Y. Are the phlebotonic properties shown in clinical pharmacology predictive of a therapeutic benefit in chronic venous insufficiency?: our experience with Daflon 500 mg. Int Angiol 1989 Oct-1989 31; 8 (4 Suppl.): 53–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Menyhei G, Acsady G, Hetenyi A, et al. Chronobiology and clinical activity of Daflon 500 mg in chronic venous insufficiency. Phlebology 1994; 9 Suppl. 1: 15–8Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Jantet G. Chronic venous insufficiency: worldwide results of the RELIEF study. Reflux assEssment and quaLity of life improvEment with micronized Flavonoids. Angiology 2002; 53(3): 245–56Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Guillot B, Guilhou JJ, de Champvallins M, et al. A long term treatment with a venotropic drug: results on efficacy and safety of Daflon 500 mg in chronic venous insufficiency. Int Angiol 1989; 8 (4 Suppl.): 67–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Launois R, Reboul-Marty J, Henry B. Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ). Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 539–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Les Laboratoires Servier. Data on file. 2002Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Guilhou J-J, Février F, Debure C, et al. Benefit of a 2-month treatment with a micronized, purified flavonoidic fraction on venous ulcer healing: a randomized, double-blind, controlled versus placebo trial. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 1997; 17 Suppl. 1: 21–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Gliñski W, Chodynicka B, Roszkiewicz J, et al. The beneficial augmentative effect of micronised purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) on the healing of leg ulcers: an open, multicentre, controlled, randomised study. Phlebology 1999; 14(4): 151–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Cospite M. Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of clinical activity and safety of Daflon 500 mg in the treatment of acute hemorrhoids. Drugs Today 1995; 31 Suppl. E: 49–55Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Misra MC, Parshad R. Randomized clinical trial of micronized flavonoids in the early control of bleeding from acute internal haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2000; 87(7): 868–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ho Y-H, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Micronized purified flavonidic fraction compared favorably with rubber band ligation and fiber alone in the management of bleeding hemorrhoids: randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000 Jan; 43(1): 66–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Buckshee K, Takkar D, Aggarwal N. Micronized flavonoid therapy in internal hemorrhoids of pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997 May; 57(2): 145–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ho Y-H, Foo CL, Seow-Choen F, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of a micronized flavonidic fraction to reduce bleeding after haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1995 Aug; 82(8): 1034–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Meyer O. Safety of use of Daflon 500 mg confirmed by acquired experience and new research. Phlebology 1992; 7 Suppl. 2: 64–8Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tsouderos Y, Lecomte M. Dalfon 500 mg: review of clinical data. Neuilly-sur Seine, France: Les Laboratoires Servier, 2001 DecGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Les Laboratoires Servier. Daflon: questions and answers [online]. Available from URL: http://www.servier.com/pro/phlebologie/daflon_faq.asp [Accessed dy2001 Sep 12]
  88. 88.
    Ramelet A-A, Monti M. Drug Therapy. Phlebology: the guide. 4th ed. Paris, France: Elsevier, 1999: 303–18Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Frick RW. Three treatments for chronic venous insufficiency: escin, hydroxyethylrutoside, and Daflon. Angiology 2000 Mar; 51(3): 197–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Coleridge Smith PD. The drug treatment of chronic venous insufficiency and venous ulceration. In: Gloviczki P, Yao JST, editors. Handbook of venous disorders: guidelines of the American Venous Forum. 2nd ed. London: Arnold, 2001: 309–21Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Vanscheidt W, Jost V, Wolna P, et al. Efficacy and safety of a Butcher’s broom preparation (Ruscus aculeatus L. extract) compared to placebo in patients suffering from chronic venous insufficiency. Arzneimittelforschung 2002; 52(4): 243–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Widmer L, Biland L, Barras JP. Doxium 500 in chronic venous insufficiency: a double-blind placebo. Controlled multicentre study. Int Angiol 1990; 9(2): 105–10Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Pittler MH, Ernst E. Horse-chestnut seed extract for chronic venous insufficiency: a criteria-based systematic review. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134: 1356–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wadworth AV, Faulds D. Hydroxyethylrutosides: a review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic efficacy in venous insufficiency and related disorders. Drugs 1992 Dec; 44: 1013–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Travers JP, Makin GS. Reduction of varicose vein recurrence by use of postoperative compression stockings. Phlebology 1994; 9: 104–7Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Clement DL. Venous ulcer reappraisal: insights from an international task force. J Vasc Res 1999; 36 Suppl. 1: 42–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Nelzén O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. Long-term prognosis for patients with chronic leg ulcers: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997; 13: 500–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Dormandy JA. Pharmacologic treatment of venous leg ulcers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995; 25 Suppl. 2: S61–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Anonymous. Consensus paper on venous leg ulcer. Alexander House Group. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992 Jul; 18(7): 592–602Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Falanga V, Fujitani RM, Diaz C, et al. Systemic treatment of venous leg ulcers with high doses of pentoxifylline: efficacy in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Wound Rep Reg 1999; 7(4): 208–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Colgan M-P, Dormandy JA, Jones PW, et al. Oxpentifylline treatment of venous ulcers of the leg. BMJ 1990; 300: 972–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Rudofsky G. Intravenous prostaglandin E1 in the treatment of venous ulcers-a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. VASA 1989; 28 Suppl.: 39–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Fletcher A, Cullum N, Sheldon TA. A systematic review of compression treatment for venous leg ulcers. Br Med J 1997 Sep 6; 315: 576–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Mayberry JC, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, et al. Fifteen-year results of ambulatory compression therapy for chronic venous ulcers. Surgery 1991; 109(5): 575–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Moneta GL, Nicoloff AD, Porter JM. Compression treatment of chronic venous ulceration: a review. Phlebology 2000; 15: 162–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Allegra C, Sarcinella R, Bartolo Jr M. Morphologic and functional changes of the microlymphatic network in patients with advancing stages of primary lymphedema. Lymphology 2002 Sep; 35(3): 114–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Franks PJ, Oldroyd MI, Dickson D, et al. Risk factors for leg ulcer recurrence: a randomized trial of two types of compression stocking. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 490–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the treatment of hemorrhoids [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fascrs.org/ascrspp-toh.html [Accessed 2002 Sep 26]
  109. 109.
    Moesgaard F, Nielsen ML, Hansen JB, et al. High-fiber diet reduces bleeding and pain in patients with hemorrhoids: a double-blind trial of Vi-Siblin. Dis Colon Rectum 1982; 25(5): 454–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Perez-Miranda M, Gomez-Cedenilla A, León-Colombo T, et al. Effect of fiber supplements on internal bleeding hemorrhoids. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43(12): 1504–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Shafik A. Role of warm-water bath in anorectal conditions: the “thermosphincteric reflex”. J Clin Gastroenterol 1993 Jun; 16(4): 304–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine A. Lyseng-Williamson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Caroline M. Perry
    • 1
  1. 1.Adis International LimitedMairangi Bay, AucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations