Advertisement

Clinical Pharmacokinetics

, Volume 41, Issue 15, pp 1229–1245 | Cite as

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tenecteplase in Fibrinolytic Therapy of Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Paul Tanswell
  • Nishit Modi
  • Dan Combs
  • Thierry Danays
Review Article Drug Disposition

Abstract

Tenecteplase is a novel fibrinolytic protein bioengineered from human tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase) for the therapy of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Specific mutations at three sites in the alteplase molecule result in 15-fold higher fibrin specificity, 80-fold reduced binding affinity to the physiological plasminogen activator inhibitor PAI-1 and 6-fold prolonged plasma half-life (22 vs 3.5 minutes). Consequently, tenecteplase can be administered as a single intravenous bolus of 30–50mg (0.53 mg/kg bodyweight) over 5–10 seconds, in contrast to the 90-minute accelerated infusion regimen of alteplase.

Tenecteplase plasma concentration-time profiles have been obtained from a total of 179 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Tenecteplase exhibited biphasic disposition; the initial disposition phase was predominant with a mean half-life of 17–24 minutes, and the mean terminal half-life was 65–132 min. Over the clinically relevant dose range of 30–50mg, mean clearance (CL) was 105 ml/min. The mean initial volume of distribution V1 was 4.2–6.3L, approximating plasma volume, and volume of distribution at steady state was 6.1–9.9L, suggesting limited extravascular distribution or binding. Bodyweight and age were found to influence significantly both CL and V1. Total bodyweight explained 19% of the variability in CL and 11% of the variability in V1, and a 10kg increase in total bodyweight resulted in a 9.6 ml/min increase in CL. This relationship aided the development of a rationale for the weight-adjusted dose regimen for tenecteplase. Age explained only a further 11% of the variability in CL.

The percentage of patients who achieved normal coronary blood flow was clearly related to AUC. More than 75% of patients achieved normal flow at 90 minutes after administration when their partial AUC2–90 exceeded 320 μg · min/ml, corresponding to an average plasma concentration of 3.6 μg/ml. Systemic exposure to tenecteplase at all times after bolus administration of 30–50mg was higher than for alteplase 100mg.

Tenecteplase has demonstrated equivalent efficacy and improved safety compared with the current gold standard alteplase in a large mortality trial (ASSENT-2). This suggests that the reduced clearance, greater fibrin specificity and higher PAI-1 resistance of tenecteplase allow higher plasma concentrations and thus a more rapid restoration of coronary patency to be attained, while providing a reduction in major non-cerebral bleeding events.

Keywords

Acute Myocardial Infarction Alteplase Reteplase Tenecteplase Fibrinolytic Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Drs K. Schleenhain and G. Heusel for expert help in the preparation of the manuscript. The authors are or were employed by Boehringer Ingelheim or Genetech, Inc. These companies sponsored the clinical trials described in the review and also manufacture and market tenecteplase.

References

  1. 1.
    Tanswell P, Tebbe U, Neuhaus KL, et al. Pharmacokinetics and fibrin specificity of alteplase during accelerated infusions in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1071–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Topol E. An international, randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sobel BE. Fibrin specificity of plasminogen activators, rebound generation of thrombin, and their therapeutic implications. Coron Artery Dis 2001; 12: 232–332Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collen D, De Bono DP, Lijnen HR, et al. Development of novel thrombolytic agents: mini-symposium on the role of the fibrinolytic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of thrombosis; 1993 Oct; Leuven. J Intern Med 1994; 236: 433–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huber K. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-I (part two): role for failure of thrombolytic therapy. PAI-1 resistance as a potential benefit for new fibrinolytic agents. J Thrombosis Thrombolysis 2001; 11: 195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keyt B, Paoni N, Refino C, et al. A faster-acting and more potent form of tissue plasminogen activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91(1): 3670–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Modi NB, Fox NL, Fong WC, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tenecteplase: results from a phase II study in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 40: 508–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stewart RJ, Fredenburgh JC, Leslie BA, et al. Identification of the mechanism responsible for the increased fibrin specificity of TNK-tissue plasminogen activator relative to tissue plasminogen activator. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 10112–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van de Werf F, Adgey J, Ardissino D, et al. Single bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT 2 double-blind randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354(9180): 716–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin U, Kaufmann B, Neugebauer G. Current clinical use of reteplase for thrombolysis: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic perspective. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 36: 265–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kohnert U, Rudolph R, Verheijen JH, et al. Biochemical properties of the kringle-2 and protease domains are maintained in the refolded t-PA deletion variant BM 06.022. Protein Eng 1992; 5: 95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    GUSTO III Investigators. A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1118–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Tenecteplase: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2001; 1: 51–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van de Werf F, Barron HV, Armstrong PW, et al. Incidence and predictors of bleeding events after fibrinolytic therapy with fibrin-specific agents. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 2253–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang-Clow F, Fox NL, Cannon CP, et al. Determination of a weight adjusted dose of TNK-tissue plasminogen activator. Am Heart J 2001; 141: 33–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gibson CM, Marble SJ. Issues in the assessment of the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK-tPA). Clin Cardiol 2001; 24: 577–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Angeja BG, Alexander JH, Chin R, et al. Safety of the weightadjusted dosing regimen of tenecteplase in the ASSENT trial. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 1240–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collen D, Lijnen HR. Molecular basis of fibrinolysis, as relevant for thrombolytic therapy. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74: 167–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lijnen H, Collen D. Strategies for the improvement of thrombolytic agents. Thromb Haemost 1991; 66: 88–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bennett WF, Paoni NF, Keyt BA, et al. High resolution analysis of functional determinants on human tissue-type plasminogen activator. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 5191–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parekh RB, Dwek RA, Thomas JR, et al. Cell-type-specific and site-specific N-glycosylation of type I and type II human tissue plasminogen activator. Biochemistry 1989; 28: 7644–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noorman F, Rijken DC. Regulation of tissue-type plasminogen activator concentrations by clearance via the mannose receptor and other receptors. Fibrinolysis Proteolysis 1997; 11: 173–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCluskey ER, Keyt BA, Refino CJ, et al. Biochemistry, pharmacology and initial clinical experience with TNK-tPA. In: Sasahara AA, Loscalzo J, editors. New therapeutic agents in thrombosis and thrombolysis. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1997: 475–93Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benedict CR, Refino CJ, Keyt BA, et al. New variant of human tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) with enhanced efficacy and lower incidence of bleeding compared with recombinant human TPA. Circulation 1995; 92: 3032–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eppler S, Senn T, Gilkerson E, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator following intravenous administration in rabbits; comparison of three dosing regimens. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1998; 19: 31–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Modi NB, Eppler S, Breed J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a slower clearing tissue plasminogen activator variant, TNK-tPA, in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost 1998; 79: 134–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mohler MA, Refino CJ, Chen SA, et al. D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone: its potential use in inhibiting the formation of in vitro artifacts in blood collected during tissue-type plasminogen activator thrombolytic therapy. Thromb Haemost 1986; 56: 160–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Seifried E, Tanswell P. Comparison of specific antibody, D-Phe-Pro-Arg-CH2C1 and aprotinin for prevention of in vitro effects of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator on haemostasis parameters. Thromb Haemost 1987; 58: 921–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reed BR, Chen AB, Tanswell P, et al. Low incidence of antibodies to recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator in treated patients. Thromb Haemost 1990; 64: 276–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gibaldi M, Perrier D, editors. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ette EL, Ludden TM. Population pharmacokinetic modeling: the importance of informative graphics. Pharm Res 1995; 12: 1845–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    DeGuzman G, Richarson L, Berleau L, et al. Hepatic uptake and processing of TNK-tPA [abstract]. Pharm Res 1995; 123: 332Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tanswell P, Stassen JM, Platz S. Regulatory submission to EMEA. Metalyse® (tenecteplase): expert report on the toxico-pharmacological documentation. Biberach: Boehringer Ingelheim, 1999. (Data on file)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Keyt BA, Berleau LT, Nguyen HV, et al. Radioiodination of the active site of tissue plasminogen activator: a method for radiolabeling serine proteases with tyrosylprolyarginyl chloromethyl ketone. Anal Biochem 1992; 206: 73–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bakhit C, Lewis D, Busch U, et al. Biodisposition and catabolism of tissue-type plasminogen activator in rats and rabbits. Fibrinolysis 1988; 2: 31–6Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lucore CL, Sobel BE. Interactions of tissue-type plasminogen activator with plasma inhibitors and their pharmacologic implications. Circulation 1988; 77: 660–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tanswell P, Seifried E, Stang E, et al. Pharmacokinetics and hepatic catabolism of tissue-type plasminogen activator. Arzneimittel Forschung 1991; 41: 1310–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krause J. Hepatic catabolism of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), its variants, mutants and hybrids. Fibrinolysis 1988; 2: 133–42Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bu G, Williams S, Strickland DK, et al. Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/alpha(2)-macroglobulin receptor is an hepatic receptor for tissue-type plasminogen activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 7427–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smedsrod B, Einarsson M. Clearance of tissue plasminogen activator by mannose and galactose receptors in the liver. Thromb Haemost 1990; 63: 60–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tanswell P, Heinzel G, Greischel A, et al. Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of tissue-type plasminogen activator in three animal species and isolated perfused rat liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990; 255: 318–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cannon CP, Gibson CM, McCabe CH, et al. TIMI 10B Investigators. TNK tissue plasminogen activator compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI 10B trial. Circulation 1998; 98: 2805–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van de Werf F, Cannon CP, Luyten A, et al. Safety assessment of single-bolus administration of TNK tissue-plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-1 trial. The ASSENT-1 Investigators. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 786–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tanswell P, Seifried E, Su CAPF, et al. Pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of tissue-type plasminogen activator in normal subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46: 155–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Gibson CM, et al. TNK-tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 10A doseranging trial. Circulation 1997; 95: 351–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van de Werf F, ASSENT-3 investigators. Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT—3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001; 358: 605–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sulikowski T, Patson PA. The inhibition of TNK-tPA by C1inhibitor. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2001; 12: 75–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Van Griensven JMT, Koster RW, Burggraaf J, et al. Effects of liver blood flow on the pharmacokinetics of tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase) during thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 63: 39–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sobel BE, Gross RW, Robison AK. Thrombolysis, clot selectivity, and kinetics. Circulation 1984; 70: 160–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Thomaseth K, Boniollo B. Simulation of plasmatic enzymatic reactions during thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator: from in vitro knowledge to new assumptions in vivo. Simulation 1996; 66: 219–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sharma A, Jusko WJ. Characteristics of indirect pharmacodynamic models and application to clinical drug responses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 48: 229–39Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hoylaerts M, Rijken DC, Lijnen HR, et al. Kinetics of the activation of plasminogen by human plasminogen activator: role of fibrin. J Biol Chem 1982; 257: 2912–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lee LV, Ewald GA, McKenzie CR, et al. The relationship of soluble fibrin and cross-linked fibrin degradation products to the clinical course of myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17: 628–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Seifried E, Tanswell P, Rijken DC, et al. Fibrin degradation products are not specific markers for thrombolysis in myocardial infarction. Lancet 1987; II: 333–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Walker JB, Nesheim ME. The molecular weights, mass distribution, chain composition, and structure of soluble fibrin degradation products released from a fibrin clot perfused with plasmin. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 5201–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Binbrek A, Rao N, Absher M, et al. The relative rapidity of recanalization induced by recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) and TNK-tPA, assessed with enzymatic methods. Coron Artery Dis 2000; 11(5): 429–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ohman EM, Armstrong PW, White HD, et al. GUSTO-III Investigators. Risk stratification with a point-of-care cardiac troponin T test in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1281–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, et al. Cardiac specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1342–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    The TIMI study group. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 932–6Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI Frame Count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996; 93: 879–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mehta SR, Eikeboom JW, Yusuf S. Risk of intracranial haemorrhage with bolus vs infusion thrombolytic therapy: a metaanalysis. Lancet 2000; 356: 449–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Liao WC, Beierle FA, Stouffer BC, et al. Single bolus regimen of lanoteplase (nPA) in acute myocardial infarction: pharmacokinetic evaluation from the InTIME-1 study. Circulation 1997; 96 Suppl. I: 1260–1Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Weight-adjusted dosing of TNK-tissue plasminogen activator and its relation to angiographic outcomes in the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 10 B trial. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 976–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hammann GF, Okada Y, del Zoppo GJ. Hemorrhagic transformation and microvascular integrity during focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16: 1373–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Tanswell
    • 1
  • Nishit Modi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dan Combs
    • 2
  • Thierry Danays
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacokinetics and MetabolismBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma KGBiberachGermany
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacokinetics and MetabolismGenentech IncSouth San FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.ALZA CorporationMountain ViewUSA
  4. 4.Department of Medical and Regulatory AffairsBoehringer IngelheimReimsFrance

Personalised recommendations