Clinical Pharmacokinetics

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 493–504 | Cite as

Induction of Drug Metabolising Enzymes

Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Consequences in Humans
  • Uwe FuhrEmail author
Review Article Concepts


Currently, 5 different main mechanisms of induction are distinguished for drug-metabolising enzymes. The ethanol type of induction is mediated by ligand stabilisation of the enzyme, but the others appear to be mediated by intracellular ‘receptors’. These are the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor, the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR), the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR, phenobarbital induction) and the pregnane X receptor [PXR, rifampicin (rifampin) induction].

Enzyme induction has the net effect of increasing protein levels. However, many inducers are also inhibitors of the enzymes they induce, and the inductive effects of a single drug may be mediated by more than one mechanism. Therefore, it appears that every inducer has its own pattern of induction; knowledge of the main mechanism is often not sufficient to predict the extent and time course of induction, but may serve to make the clinician aware of potential dangers.

The possible pharmacokinetic consequences of enzyme induction depend on the localisation of the enzyme. They include decreased or absent bioavailability for orally administered drugs, increased hepatic clearance or accelerated formation of reactive metabolites, which is usually related to local toxicity. Although some severe drug-drug interactions are caused by enzyme induction, most of the effects of inducers are not detected in the background of nonspecific variation. For any potent inducer, however, its addition to, or withdrawal from, an existing drug regimen may cause pronounced concentration changes and should be done gradually and with appropriate monitoring of therapeutic efficacy and adverse events.

The toxicological consequences of enzyme induction in humans are rare, and appear to be mainly limited to hepatoxicity in ethanol-type induction.


Verapamil Isoniazid Phenobarbital Tacrine Enzyme Induction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The data were presented in part at the 7th European ISSX Meeting in Budapest, August 1999. The ISSX also printed a manuscript of this presentation as a ‘Short Course Manual’ (ISBN 9-634-20610-7) which was made available at the meeting.


  1. 1.
    Whitlock JP, Denison MS. Induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes that metabolize xenobiotics. In: Ortiz de Montellano P, editor. Cytochrome P450: structure, mechanism, and biochemistry, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press, 1995: 367–90.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dogra SC, Whitelaw ML, May BK. Transcriptional activation of cytochrome P450 genes by different classes of chemical inducers. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998; 25: 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greiner B, Eichelbaum M, Fritz P, et al. The role of intestinal P-glycoprotein in the interaction of digoxin and rifampin. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104: 147–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fromm MF, Busse D, Kroemer HK, et al. Differential induction of prehepatic and hepatic metabolism of verapamil by rifam picin. Hepatology. 1996; 24: 796–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tantcheva-Poor I, Zaigler M, Rietbrock S, et al. Estimation of cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 activity in 863 healthy Caucasians using a saliva-based caffeine test. Pharmacogenetics. 1999; 9: 131–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klotz U, Ammon E. Clinical and toxicological consequences of the inductive potential of ethanol. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 54: 7–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breckenridge A, Orme M. Clinical implications of enzyme induction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1971; 179: 421–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lehmann JM, McKee DD, Watson MA, et al. The human orphan nuclear receptor PXR is activated by compounds that regulate CYP3A4 gene expression and cause drug interactions. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 1016–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sueyoshi T, Kawamoto T, Zelko I, et al. The repressed nuclear receptor CAR responds to phenobarbital in activating the human CYP2B6 gene. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 6043–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang TK, Yu L, Maurel P, et al. Enhanced cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide activation in primary human hepatocyte cultures: response to cytochrome P-450 inducers and autoinduction by oxazaphosphorines. Cancer Res. 1997; 57: 1946–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moore LB, Parks DJ, Jones S A, et al. Orphan nuclear receptors CAR and PXR share xenobiotic and steroid ligands. J Biol Chem 2000. In press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waxman DJ. P450 gene induction by structurally diverse xenochemicals: central role of nuclear receptors CAR, PXR, andPPAR. Arch Biochem Biophys 1999 Sep 1; 369(1): 11–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Safe S, Krishnan V. Cellular and molecular biology of aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor-mediated gene expression. Arch Toxicol 1995; Suppl. 17: 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayes JD, Pulford DJ. The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoen-zymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1995; 30: 445–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bock KW, Gschaidmeier H, Heel H, et al. AH receptor-controlled transcriptional regulation and function of rat and human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1998; 38: 207–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shet MS, McPhaul M, Fisher CW, et al. Metabolism of the antiandrogenic drug (flutamide) by human CYP1A2. Drug Metab Dispos. 1997; 25: 1298–303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schein JR. Cigarette smoking and clinically significant drug interactions. Ann Pharmacother. 1995; 29: 1139–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Otero MJ, Buelga DS, Vazquez MA, et al. Application of population pharmacokinetics to the optimization of theophylline therapy. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1996; 21: 113–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perry PJ, Bever KA, Arndt S, et al. Relationship between patient variables and plasma clozapine concentrations: a dosing no-mogram. Biol Psychiatry. 1998; 44: 733–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fuhr U, Harder S, Lopez-Rojas P, et al. Increase of verapamil concentrations in steady state by coadministration of grapefruit juice [abstract]. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1994; 349 Suppl.: R134.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fontana RJ, Lown KS, Paine MF, et al. Effects of a chargrilled meat diet on expression of CYP3A, CYP1A, and P-glycoprotein levels in healthy volunteers. Gastroenterology. 1999; 117: 89–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Probst-Hensch NM, Tannenbaum SR, Chan KK, et al. Absence of the glutathione S-transferase Ml gene increases cytochrome P4501A2 activity among frequent consumers of cruciferous vegetables in a Caucasian population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998; 7: 635–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vistisen K, Poulsen HE, Loft S. Foreign compound metabolism capacity in man measured from metabolites of dietary caffeine. Carcinogenesis. 1992; 13: 1561–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jorritsma U, Schrader E, Klaunick G, et al. Monitoring of cytochrome P-450 1A activity by determination of the urinary pattern of caffeine metabolites in Wistar and hyperbilirubinemic Gunn rats. Toxicology. 2000; 144: 229–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Diaz D, Fabre I, Daujat M, et al. Omeprazole is an aryl hydrocarbon-like inducer of human hepatic cytochrome P450. Gastroenterology. 1990; 99: 737–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rost KL, Brosicke H, Heinemeyer G, et al. Specific and dose-dependent enzyme induction by omeprazole in human beings. Hepatology. 1994; 20: 1204–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rendic S, Di Carlo FJ. Human cytochrome P450 enzymes: a status report summarizing their reactions, substrates, inducers, and inhibitors. Drug Metab Rev. 1997; 29: 413–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Anttila S, Vainio H, Hietanen E, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of pulmonary cytochrome P450IA and metabolic activities associated with P450IA1 and P450IA2 isozymes in lung cancer patients. Environ Health Perspect. 1992; 98: 179–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lang NP, Butler MA, Massengill J, et al. Rapid metabolic phenotypes for acetyltransferase and cytochrome P4501A2 and putative exposure to food-borne heterocyclic amines increase the risk for colorectal cancer or polyps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994; 3: 675–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee SW, Jang IJ, Shin SG, et al. CYP1A2 activity as a risk factor for bladder cancer. J Korean Med Sci. 1994; 9: 482–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rannug A, Alexandrie AK, Persson I, et al. Genetic polymorphism of cytochromes P450 1A1, 2D6 and 2E1: regulation and toxicological significance. J Occup Environ Med. 1995; 37: 25–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gonzalez FJ, Ueno T, Umeno M, et al. Microsomal ethanol oxidizing system: transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of cytochrome P450, CYP2E1. Alcohol Alcohol 1991; Suppl. 1:97–101.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chien JY, Thummel KE, Slattery JT. Pharmacokinetic consequences of induction of CYP2E1 by ligand stabilization. Drug Metab Dispos. 1997; 25: 1165–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhukov A, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Relationship between cytochrome P450 catalytic cycling and stability: fast degradation of ethanol-inducible cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) in hepatoma cells is abolished by inactivation of its electron donor NADPH-cytochrome P450reductase. Biochem J. 1999; 340: 453–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kharasch ED, Hankins D, Mautz D, et al. Identification of the enzyme responsible for oxidative halothane metabolism: implications for prevention of halothane hepatitis. Lancet. 1996; 347: 1367–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Raucy JL, Lasker JM, Lieber CS, et al. Acetaminophen activation by human liver cytochromes P450IIE1 and P450IA2. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1989; 271: 270–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lucas D, Farez C, Bardou LG, et al. Cytochrome P450 2E1 activity in diabetic and obese patients as assessed by chlorzo-zaxone hydroxylation. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 12: 553–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Staels B, Dallongeville J, Auwerx J, et al. Mechanism of action of fibrates on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Circulation. 1998; 98: 2088–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, Mueller E, et al. Induction of solid tumor differentiation by the peroxisome proliferator-acti-vated receptor-gamma ligand troglitazone in patients with liposarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 3951–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Winocour PH, Durrington PN, Bhatnagar D, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of bezafibrate on blood lipids, lipoproteins, and fibrinogen in hyperlipidaemic type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1990; 7: 736–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Durrington PN, Mackness MI, Bhatnagar D, et al. Effects of two different fibric acid derivatives on lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor and paraoxonase activity in type IIb hyperlipoproteinaemia. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 138: 217–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Conney AH, Jacobson M, Schneidman K, et al. Induction of liver microsomal Cortisol 6beta-hydroxylase by diphenylhy-dantoin or phenobarbital: an explanation for the increased excretion of 6-hydroxycortisol in humans treated with these drugs. Life Sci. 1965; 4: 1091–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Remmer H, Estabrook RW, Schenkman J, et al. Reaction of drugs with microsomal liver hydroxylase: its influence on drug action. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmacol. 1968; 259: 98–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Frueh FW, Zanger UM, Meyer UA. Extent and character of phenobarbital-mediated changes in gene expression in the liver. Mol Pharmacol 1997 Mar; 51(3): 363–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Meyer UA, Hoffmann K. Phenobarbital-mediated changes in gene expression in the liver. Drug Metab Rev. 1999; 31: 365–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Forman BM, Tzameli I, Choi HS, et al. Androstane metabolites bind to and deactivate the nuclear receptor CAR-beta. Nature. 1998; 395: 612–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schellens JH, van der Wart JH, Brugman M, et al. Influence of enzyme induction and inhibition on the oxidation of nifedipine, sparteine, mephenytoin and antipyrine in humans as assessed by a ‘cocktail’ study design. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989; 249: 638–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sutherland L, Ebner T, Burchell B. The expression of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases of the UGT1 family in human liver and kidney and in response to drugs. Biochem Pharmacol. 1993; 45: 295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Anderson GD. A mechanistic approach to antiepileptic drug interactions. Ann Pharmacother. 1998; 32: 554–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Patsalos PN, Duncan JS. Antiepileptic drugs: a review of clinically significant drug interactions. Drug Saf. 1993; 9: 156–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pisani F, Fazio A, Artesi C, et al. An epidemiological study of the clinical impact of pharmacokinetic anticonvulsant drug interactions based on serum drug level analysis. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1987; 8: 135–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yukawa E, Aoyama T. Detection of carbamazepine drag interaction by multiple peak approach screening using routine clinical pharmacokinetic data. J Clin Pharmacol. 1996; 36: 752–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liu H, Delgado MR. Interactions of phenobarbital and phenytoin with carbamazepine and its metabolites’ concentrations, concentration ratios, and level/dose ratios in epileptic children. Epilepsia. 1995; 36: 249–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nation RL, Evans AM, Milne RW. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with phenytoin: part I. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990; 18: 37–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nation RL, Evans AM, Milne RW. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with phenytoin: part II. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990; 18: 131–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Spina E, Pisani F, Perucca E. Clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with carbamazepine: an update. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996; 31: 198–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rutledge DR, Pieper JA, Mirvis DM. Effects of chronic phenobarbital on verapamil disposition in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988; 246: 7–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rao-Schymanski RA, Fuhr U. Pharmacokinetic interactions of antineoplastic agents. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 35: 84–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Busse D, Busch FW, Schweizer E, et al. Fractionated administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide: influence on dose-dependent changes in pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999; 43: 263–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Maezawa S, Ohira S, Sakuma M, et al. Effects of inducer of liver drug-metabolizing enzyme on blood level of active metabolites of cyclophosphamide in rats and in cancer patients. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1981; 134: 45–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Whysner J, Ross PM, Williams GM. Phenobarbital mechanistic data and risk assessment: enzyme induction, enhanced cell proliferation, and tumor promotion. Pharmacol Ther. 1996; 71: 153–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Watanabe M, Tateishi T, Asoh M, et al. Effects of glucocorti-coids on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mid-azolam in rats. Life Sci. 1998; 63: 1685–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    LeBel M, Masson E, Guilbert E, et al. Effects of rifabutin and rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998; 38: 1042–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fuhr U. Drag interactions with grapefruit juice: extent, probable mechanism and clinical relevance. Drug Saf. 1998; 18: 251–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Pharmacology, Clinical PharmacologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations