When monitoring of the plasma concentrations of anticonvulsant drugs first came into use 25 years ago, it appeared to have a major impact on improving the effectiveness and safety of anticonvulsant therapy. However, as time has passed, prescribers have absorbed many of the lessons to be learned from the monitoring, and now apply this knowledge without necessarily monitoring plasma anticonvulsant concentrations as frequently as in the past. Therefore, the effect of the drug concentration monitoring on the cost effectiveness of anticonvulsant therapy is probably not as significant now as it originally was.
In theory, drug concentration monitoring is often unlikely to decrease the cost of contemporary anticonvulsant drug therapy, but it may enhance the efficacy of the therapy. Thus, monitoring may reveal unrecognised under- or overdosage, detect failure of compliance or drug-drug interactions, or indicate when there is little point in persisting with a particular anticonvulsant drug.
Despite a good deal of anecdotal testimony, surprisingly little has been published demonstrating the benefits of anticonvulsant therapeutic drug monitoring in epileptic populations. However, one study did show better rates of Scizure control rates in patients monitored in the first 6 months of their epileptic disorder; but not if the monitoring began later than this.
Under conditions of contemporary practice, monitoring appears to be most advantageous under the following conditions: (i) while Scizure control is being established in a patient; (ii) if Scizures are no longer being controlled by therapy; (iii) if adverse effects that are possibly treatment-related occur; (iv) if a concomitant illness develops; (v) if there is a change in a patient’s physiological state, e.g. pregnancy; and (vi) prior to the withdrawal of therapy.
Woo E, Chan YM, Yu YL, et al. If a well stabilized epileptic patient has a subtherapeutic antiepileptic drug level, should the dose be increased? A randomized prospective study. Epilepsia 1988; 29: 129–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambie DG, Nanda RN, Johnson RH, et al. Therapeutic and pharmacokinetic effects of increasing phenytoin in chronic epileptics of multiple drug therapy. Lancet 1976; 7: 486–9Google Scholar
Gannaway DJ, Mawer GE. Serum phenytoin concentration and clinical response in patients with epilepsy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1981; 12: 833–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaghan N, Kenny RA, O’Neill B, et al. A prospective study between carbamazepine, phenytoin and sodium valproate as monotherapy in previously untreated and recently diagnosed patients with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1985; 48: 639–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt D, Einicke I, Haenel F. The influence of Scizure type on the efficacy of plasma concentrations of phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine. Arch Neurol 1986; 43: 263–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troupin AS, Ojemann LM. Paradoxical intoxication — a complication of anticonvulsant intoxication. Epilepsia 1976; 16: 753–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockerell OC, Hart YM, Sander JWAS, et al. The cost of epilepsy in the United Kingdom: an estimation based on the results of two population-based studies. Epilepsy Res 1994; 18: 249–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lascelles PT, Kocen RS, Reynolds EH. The distribution of plasma phenytoin levels in epileptic patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1970; 33: 501–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeavons PM, Clark JE, Maheshwari MC. Treatment of generalised epilepsies of childhood and adolescence with sodium valproate (Epitom). Develop Med Child Neurol 1977; 19: 9–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley RS, Freeman JM, Appel FA. Anticonvulsant serum levels are useful only if the physician appropriately uses them: an assessment of the impact of providing serum level data to physicians. Epilepsia 1983; 24: 330–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson GM, McLean S, Millingen KS. A randomised trial of strategies to improve patient compliance with anticonvulsant therapy. Epilepsia 1984; 25: 412–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadie MJ. Plasma antiepileptic drug monitoring in a neurological practice: a 25-year experience. Ther Drug Monit 1994; 16: 458–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar