Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Policosanol with Atorvastatin in Elderly Patients with Type II Hypercholesterolaemia
- 87 Downloads
Hypercholesterolaemia is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Clinical studies have shown that lowering elevated serum total cholesterol (TC) levels, and particularly low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, reduces the frequency of coronary morbidity and deaths, whereas high serum levels of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) protect against CHD. Policosanol is a cholesterol-lowering drug purified from sugar cane wax with a therapeutic dosage range from 5–20 mg/day. Atorvastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which across its dosage range (10–80 mg/day) has shown significantly greater lipid-lowering effects than all previously marketed statins.
This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of policosanol with atorvastatin in older patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia.
Patients and methods
This randomised, single-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in older patients (60–80 years) with type II hypercholesterolaemia. After 4 weeks on a cholesterol-lowering diet, 75 patients were randomised to policosanol or atorvastatin 10mg tablets taken once daily with the evening meal for 8 weeks. An interim and final check-up were performed at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after treatment was initiated.
At 4 (p < 0.0001) and 8 (p < 0.00001) weeks, policosanol 10 mg/day significantly lowered serum LDL-C levels by 17.5 and 23.1%, respectively compared with baseline; corresponding values for atorvastatin were 28.4 and 29.8%. At study completion, policosanol significantly (p < 0.0001) reduced serum TC (16.4%), LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (25.5%) and TC/HDL-C ratio (19.3%), as well as (p < 0.001) triglyceride levels (15.4%). Atorvastatin significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased serum TC (22.6%), LDL-C/HDL-C (26.2%) and TC/HDL-C (19.8%) ratios, as well as (p < 0.001) triglyceride levels (15.5%). Atorvastatin was significantly more effective than policosanol in reducing LDL-C and TC, but similar in reducing both atherogenic ratios and triglyceride levels. Policosanol, but not atorvastatin, significantly (p < 0.05) increased serum HDL-C levels by 5.3%. Both treatments were well tolerated. At study completion, atorvastatin mildly, but significantly (p < 0.05) increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and creati-nine, whereas policosanol significantly reduced AST and glucose (p < 0.01) and CPK (p < 0.05) levels. All individual values, however, remained within normal limits. Three atorvastatin but no policosanol patients withdrew from the study because of adverse events: muscle cramps (1 patient), gastritis (1 patient) and uncontrolled hypertension, abdominal pain and myalgia (1 patient). Overall, no policosanol and seven atorvastatin patients (18.9%) reported a total of nine mild or moderate adverse events during the study (p < 0.01).
This study shows that policosanol (10 mg/day) administered for 8 weeks was less effective than atorvastatin (10 mg/day) in reducing serum LDL-C and TC levels in older patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia. Policosanol, but not atorvastatin, however, significantly increased serum HDL-C levels, whereas both drugs similarly reduced atherogenic ratios and serum triglycerides. Policosanol was better tolerated than atorvastatin as revealed by patient withdrawal analysis and overall frequency of adverse events. Nevertheless, further studies must be conducted in larger sample sizes and using dose-titration methods to achieve target lipid levels in order to reach wider conclusions.
This study was supported by a research grant from the West Havana Scientific Pole. Most of the authors have been involved in the development of the policosanol scientific project. No additional payment or reward has been received for conducting this study.
- 4.Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994; 344: 1383–9Google Scholar
- 9.Expert Panel of Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA 1993; 269: 3015–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Expert Panel of Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285: 2486–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Gotto AM, Assman G, Carmena R, et al. The ILIB lipid handbook for clinical practice. Blood lipids and coronary heart disease. 2nd ed. New York: Internatinal Lipid Information Bureau (ILIB), 2000Google Scholar
- 16.Jones P, Kafanek S, Laurora I, CURVES investigators, et al. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (The CURVES study). Am J Car-diol 1998; 81: 582–7Google Scholar
- 18.Schuster H, Berger J, Luft F. Randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial of atorvastatin and fluvastatin on plasma lipid levels in patients with untreated hyperlipidaemia. Br J Cardiol 1998; 5: 597–602Google Scholar
- 21.Laguna A, Magraner J, Arruzazabala ML, et al. Patent Cooperation Treaty EP 937/00007. 1993 Jan 5Google Scholar
- 29.Castaño G, Más R, Arruzazabala ML, et al. Effects of policosanol, pravastatin on lipid profile, platelet aggregation, endothelemia in older hypercholesterolemic patients. Int J Clin Pharm Res 1999; 19: 105–16Google Scholar
- 31.Fernández JC, Más R, Castaño G, et al. Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of policosanol versus fluvastatin in elderly hypercholesterolemic women. Clin Invest 2001; 21: 103–13Google Scholar
- 34.Crespo N, Illnait J, Mas R, et al. Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of policosanol and lovastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia and non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 1999; 19: 105–16Google Scholar
- 41.Seigier L, Wu WT. Separation of serum high-density lipopro-tein for cholesterol determination: ultracentrifugation vs precipitation with sodium phosphotungstat and magnesium chloride. Clin Chem 1981; 27: 838–41Google Scholar
- 45.Castaás R, Fernño G, Nodarse M, Más R, Fernás R, et al. Estudio comparativo de la eficacia y tolerabilidad del policosanol, la simvastatina y su terapia combinada en el tratamiento de la hipercolesterole-mia tipo II. Rev CENIC Cien Biol 1998; 29: 9–15Google Scholar